[...]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[...]……

[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……

[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……

My one problem with his address is with his distinction between "moderate Muslims" and "radicalized Muslims." Not that I think moderate Muslims are an impossibility – far from it. But often, when people hear that distinction, they think that "radical" must somehow mean "heretical" and that, somewhere, there is some moderate Islam that we can all get along with.

Far from it. The distinction has to be made between Muslims and Islam, between the people and the doctrines. I've no doubt that there are many moderate Muslims, men and women who wish to live at peace with their neighbours. There are, however, also many radicalized Muslims, who seek to impose sharia and confront the infidel, until he either converts, submits, or is killed in battle.

What we must realize is that there is no moderate Islam, nor no radical Islam. There is only Islam and, in its development after the flight to Medina, it is violent, supremacist, aggressive, and antisemitic. It rests on totalitarian pillars of jihad, sharia, misogyny, and hatred of the outsider, especially Jews. Both the moderates and the radicals are followers of this same Islam; the difference between them is the radical chooses to act on those principles, as Major Hasan did at Fort Hood, while the moderate does not. (And between them is a whole spectrum from peaceful to violent Muslim.) Indeed, given the prevalence of violent jihadist exhortations in the Qur'an, given the seemingly endless expressions of hatred toward "unbelievers," I have to think it's the moderate who's more likely the heretic.

That cavat aside, at least Aznar has the mental clarity to see the religious nature of the conflict and the courage to speak honestly about it. We need more leaders like him.

*sigh*

_Normative_ Islam = Lies, oath-breaking, savage barbarity, mass murder, enslavement, oppression, hate, sexual perversion and oppression of half the human race (whether "believers" or not) as simple, honest and direct discipleship of Mohamed, the Butcher of Medina, who taught all these things with his first 'great victory" over the ban Quraysa Jews of Yathrib (now called Medina) by means of massacre of ~900 men facilitated by a false-flag "truce" and followed by the pillage, rape and enslavement of their families that remained. That Mohamed's further life example and teachings only complete this tutoring in savage brutality toward "unbelievers" (and women) is just more evidence that Islamic terrorists are the NORMATIVE faithful Muslim. So-called "moderate Muslims" (like, for example, Nidal Hasan) may live lives of "holy lies" when surrounded by the dar al harb, but this doesn't mean they are any less likely to commit normative faithful Muslim acts of mass murder whenever opportunity may present.

"Not all crooks are democrates, all democrats are crooks" Quote myself…