Former Spanish Prime Minister Aznar Speaks On Radical Islam
by Washington News ObserverLast week, Washington News Observer in collaboration with Big Government attended a speech by former Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar. Prime Minister Aznar illustrated the fact that while “not all Muslims are Jihadists, all Jihadists are Muslims.” Prime Minister Aznar’s party lost the 2004 election, only 3 days after the tragic events of the Madrid train bombing. His successor has since withdrawn all Spanish troops from Iraq.
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
19 Comments
Radical Islam?
There is no such thing. Don't you all know that? It is a figment of your imagination. Barrack Hussein Obama and Janet Napilatano are reassuring the Muslim world there will be no American backlash on the Muslim world, as a result of the MILITANT MUSLIM MASSACRE at Ft. Hood, Texas.
Ok.
Spain used to be a part of the Muslim empire maybe the leftist over there are getting a little nostalgic, capitulation rarely wins you anything but a collar, which this man seems to understand quite well.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Smoky Mountain 912 -, Big Government. Big Government said: Former Spanish Prime Minister Aznar Speaks On Radical Islam: Last week, Washington News Obs.. http://digg.com/u1G6w9 #tcot #tlot #BigGov [...]
If jihadists are so tough and courageous why do they routinely kill innocent people, bunch a cowards in my book
For real, Liberty. Why don't they attack a military base during training, while the troops are armed and ready to fight back? Why kill a bunch of sick, unarmed people instead? Do they really think that God is so hateful?
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by PatriotActivist: Former Spanish Prime Minister Aznar Speaks On Radical Islam: Last week, Washington News Observer in collaborati.. http://bit.ly/1YtEYE…
Speaking of radical islam and jihad johnnies, I see they are going to execute the DC sniper tonight. I hope they do it very slowly…………..
Because they are subhuman idiots.
I'll say one thing for him, Aznar has some pelotas!
To such nut jobs, as Osama bin Laden, Spain is but one piece of the world that should still be part of some huge Muslim Caliphate, because they once, very long ago, ruled there. Except that Muslims only owned/ruled one part of Spain; not all of it.
If the world keeps on either ignoring this problem, or being wishy washy about it, the crazy extremist Muslims just might win this war, without many real battles.
Sadly, it's by lethal injection, so it won't be long, nor lingering.
timothy mc veigh, ronald reagan, tony blair, hugo chavez and chairman mao were all behind killings of innocent civilians in the name of an ideology, but i don´t remember them talking about the koran.
i think it´s good that the wise spanyards kicked out this religious retard.
[...] Big Government » Blog Archive » Former Spanish Prime Minister … addthis_url = [...]
He is also from a nation that has not quite knuckled as far under to political correctness as has the US.
Pres Thomas Jefferson built our 1st US Navy because our shipping industry was getting hi-jaacked all of the time in the Tripoli, Muslim area. He read their Koran, in order to understand the enemy, and decided that the Muslim believers can only be dealt with by force. We were intended to be a Christian Republic, not a Diversified Democracy.
“not all Muslims are Jihadists, all Jihadists are Muslims.”
"Not all crooks are democrates, all democrats are crooks" Quote myself…
Well, actually our first navy was built either during the Seven Years War (under British command) or during the Revolution to try and harass enemy shipping and support drives North on the Great Lakes.
Slight issue.
"Radical Islam"?!?
*sigh*
_Normative_ Islam = Lies, oath-breaking, savage barbarity, mass murder, enslavement, oppression, hate, sexual perversion and oppression of half the human race (whether "believers" or not) as simple, honest and direct discipleship of Mohamed, the Butcher of Medina, who taught all these things with his first 'great victory" over the ban Quraysa Jews of Yathrib (now called Medina) by means of massacre of ~900 men facilitated by a false-flag "truce" and followed by the pillage, rape and enslavement of their families that remained. That Mohamed's further life example and teachings only complete this tutoring in savage brutality toward "unbelievers" (and women) is just more evidence that Islamic terrorists are the NORMATIVE faithful Muslim. So-called "moderate Muslims" (like, for example, Nidal Hasan) may live lives of "holy lies" when surrounded by the dar al harb, but this doesn't mean they are any less likely to commit normative faithful Muslim acts of mass murder whenever opportunity may present.
Excellent observations by the former Prime Minister. It's a shame he was replaced by that gelded weakling, Zapatero. Spain truly shamed itself in that election.
My one problem with his address is with his distinction between "moderate Muslims" and "radicalized Muslims." Not that I think moderate Muslims are an impossibility – far from it. But often, when people hear that distinction, they think that "radical" must somehow mean "heretical" and that, somewhere, there is some moderate Islam that we can all get along with.
Far from it. The distinction has to be made between Muslims and Islam, between the people and the doctrines. I've no doubt that there are many moderate Muslims, men and women who wish to live at peace with their neighbours. There are, however, also many radicalized Muslims, who seek to impose sharia and confront the infidel, until he either converts, submits, or is killed in battle.
What we must realize is that there is no moderate Islam, nor no radical Islam. There is only Islam and, in its development after the flight to Medina, it is violent, supremacist, aggressive, and antisemitic. It rests on totalitarian pillars of jihad, sharia, misogyny, and hatred of the outsider, especially Jews. Both the moderates and the radicals are followers of this same Islam; the difference between them is the radical chooses to act on those principles, as Major Hasan did at Fort Hood, while the moderate does not. (And between them is a whole spectrum from peaceful to violent Muslim.) Indeed, given the prevalence of violent jihadist exhortations in the Qur'an, given the seemingly endless expressions of hatred toward "unbelievers," I have to think it's the moderate who's more likely the heretic.
That cavat aside, at least Aznar has the mental clarity to see the religious nature of the conflict and the courage to speak honestly about it. We need more leaders like him.