Vermont’s Three Members of Congress Give Staffers $236,830 in Taxpayer-Funded Bonuses
by Wynton HallWith only one congressman and two senators, Vermont’s congressional delegation may be small. But that isn’t stopping Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), and Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT) from doling out big dollars–$236,830, to be exact–to members of their staffs.
As the Burlington Free Press reports:
Of the three lawmakers, Sen. Patrick Leahy, a Democrat, gave the most in bonuses. Twenty-nine of his personal office staffers received bonuses ranging from $1,500 to $5,000 last year, totaling $138,830. Leahy, who heads the Senate Judiciary Committee, also gave bonuses to 25 committee staffers, totaling $112,048.
Leahy’s spokesman, David Carle, said many other lawmakers use Leahy’s office salary structure “because it is flexible and fair and rewards good work.”
Sanders gave $2,000 bonuses to 32 people on his personal staff, totaling $64,000. He also gave $2,000 bonuses to two staffers on the Senate health subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging, which he chairs.
Rep. Peter Welch, a Democrat, gave each of his 17 staffers a $2,000 bonus, totaling $34,000. House office budgets are authorized by calendar year and Senate office budgets are authorized by fiscal year.
News of the taxpayer-funded big bonuses comes at a time when state budgets are being slashed, the nation’s unemployment is still above eight percent, and the U.S. government is $15 trillion in debt.
Still, say members of the Vermont delegation, their staff members deserve the bonuses because they did a good job:
The Vermont lawmakers saw the bonuses as a way to reward hard-working staffers, many of whom earn much less than they would in the private sector.
Michael Briggs, a spokesman for independent Sen. Bernie Sanders said, “We have an extremely hard-working and aggressive staff that puts in long hours and (Sanders) could hire more people but does not. That’s how he’s able to give back to the taxpayers the amount that he does at the end of the fiscal year.”
Indeed, the Burlington Free Press notes that Sen. Sanders will return 10.9 percent of his office’s $3 million annual budget. Sen. Leahy, who also has a $3 million office budget will give back 11.7 percent.
But Bradford Fitch, the CEO of a nonprofit group called the Congressional Management Foundation that advises members of Congress on procedures, says giving staffers bonuses is a good idea:
“It still is extremely helpful to managing an office,” he said. “Especially when you take into consideration that, in general, congressional staff get anywhere from 20 to 30 percent less pay than counterparts with similar experience and education in the private sector. Bonuses are one of the ways that they can compensate for that.”
While relatively few working Americans may receive year-end bonuses, according to a 2010 House Compensation Study, handing out bonuses to congressional staff members is a rather common practice:
Lawmakers have the discretion to decide whether to give bonuses, and most do. A 2010 House Compensation Study by ICF International found that 77 percent of 133 offices surveyed gave bonuses that year. That’s down from 89 percent in 2009 and 92.3 percent in 2006, according to the study, produced for the House Chief Administrative Office.
Perhaps Sen. Sanders, who is himself a self-described socialist, and the rest of Congress would do well to remember Lady Margaret Thatcher’s dictum that the trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
26 Comments
I'm surprised the bonuses weren't $4,000 plus each because that is what is need to give President Obama his maximum donations for reelection.
Walter Hanson
Minneapolis, MN
Without exception, all Leftists in positions of power are absolutely corrupt.
Anyone who still votes for Democrats is an abject fool, or a seditious Marxist.
I get it….I'm getting smarter all the time. (let me think so anyway)
First we vote ourselves outrageous office budgets. (3 million bucks)
Second, we hand out nice bonuses to our underworked and overpaid staffs.
Third, we return a little to the treasury.
Then we tell everyone we are financially conservative.
Slick trick
Ahh, other people's money: It's the Mother's Milk of Socialism.
As you ponder all this, please recall that Abraham Lincoln and Franklin D. Roosevelt ran the Civil War and World War II with secretaries of war and personal secretaries, plus extremely small handfuls of support staffers, and that's about it. Today, Congressional hacks from an irrelevant "workers' paradise" of a state need dozens of staffers just to get by.
Yup, you've come a long way, baby. It's just too bad it was in completely the wrong direction…
whats your problem mr administrator, im not politically correct?? or you have investment in the same crooked chit as our political theives??
Why do These jerks give bonuses to members of their staffs? They make more money & benefits than the Tax Payer! We need to stop this kind of crap!! The voters need to fire these Jerks!
The Beatles said it best.
Let me tell you how it will be
There's one for you, nineteen for me
'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah, I'm the taxman
Should five per cent appear too small
Be thankful I don't take it all
'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah I'm the taxman
If you drive a car, I'll tax the street,
If you try to sit, I'll tax your seat.
If you get too cold I'll tax the heat,
If you take a walk, I'll tax your feet.
Don't ask me what I want it for
If you don't want to pay some more
'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah, I'm the taxman
Now my advice for those who die
Declare the pennies on your eyes
'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah, I'm the taxman
And you're working for no one but me.
Thier IS no private sector position to have a comparasion to,this logic only exists in Washington D.C.These thieves insulate themselves and have no idea of the actual cost of not only surviving but running a business.To brag about the 10-11% returned is absurd,the rates of pay for any federal employee is usually affixed and bonuses are illegal.BUT even as aide they are LEGALLY allowed to trade stock with information obtained from legislation that they know will affect whichever business is being regulated.This is OUR money NOT the senators to throw around freely and it certainly is not a cost of maintaning any of the legitimate (hahahaha) functions of thier office.
“The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money”
-Margaret Thatcher
VT is likely the smallest state. Each Senate office is given a budget based on the size (population) of their state. So, $3 mil is the smallest senate office budget. I can only imagine what the senate offices for large states get: $20 mil? more?
At least these guys gave 10% back. I wonder how much the BIG offices gave back?
Left viewpoint: They are sacrificing to serve us is (Even though the evidence shows no sacrifice). Funny how some have the idea you go about rewarding "good" work by giving away someone else's money. Theft is OK when government is the middleman.
Well then. I guarantee that people in the Private Sector (including myself) worked equally as hard, if not harder, and my business lost money last year. Why doesn't my portion of taxpayer money deserve to come back to me since I worked hard and it was mine to begin with.
This country with it's spending is sickening and someone needs their heads knocked until their sense comes back to them.
The bonuses are bad enough – but the fact that a United States Senator has a "personal" staff of 30 people (plus an additional 25 or so on their committee staff) is outrageous! This position was never intended to be emperor for life like these people are making it out to be!
You want to cut some fat in the Federal budget? Start right here, folks!
The 1% of the 1%
Here's another solution. If we want smaller goverment then we have to have smaller congressional districts. In fact, districts so small that the common American citizen will be the only ones able to be elected. That would mean us. Simply, put since 1913 the House of Representatives is the same 435 fixed elite membership. There is nothing preventing the House from increasing its size say to 1000 members. Why is it that Rhode Island has a population of 1 million and they get 2 members in the House of Reps, yet Montana has nearly the same number and they have only 1 member in the House of Reps? Further James Wilson signer of the Declaration of Independence and ratifier of the US Constitution said in 1787 "in a single century we will have a House of Reprsentatives consisting of more than 600 members." Even more puzzling 11 of the 12 Bills of Rights have been ratifed except for Article the First declaring a congressional district consiting of no less than 50,000 per 1 Representative. It is our government not theirs.
Nope, rulers make the rules, and it is just a thief robbing our Treasury. In fact, the US Senate was never designed to have direct elections. That was changed by progressives in 1913. 17th Amendment. Further, in the time of our founders none of them had a staff. They simple traveled to the House of Reps and voted or wrote the laws themselves. The House of Reps has also been the same size 435 since 1913. According to Jefferson and Madison Republicans with our population of 310 million the House of Reps is to be 6000, and according to Adams and the Federalists the House of Reps is to be 1,656 clearly more than the 435. Remember every 10 years with a census our rulers get to pick their districts, so they cannot lose. Determined5, you've got to get active and educated if you want to change it to the original intent. Not to mention it costs about 8 million to win a seat in the House of Reps, if districts were about 50,000 as proclaimed in Article the First it would cost a few hundred bucks to win and no need for lobbyists, but you'd have to have dinner with your constituents every night…hmmm that's what the founders used to do.
Give them a break. These staffers are working hard at bankrupting the country.
Bonuses in the private sector are generally tied to performance in increasing profits. How does this work in the world of staffers? Bonuses for warming chairs is kinda stupid.
"in general, congressional staff get anywhere from 20 to 30 percent less pay than counterparts with similar experience and education in the private sector. Bonuses are one of the ways that they can compensate for that."
Actually, the job on their resume is their bonus. Duh.
Does the money for the bonuses come from the current staff budget? Or, does this require a new influx of taxpayer money, on top of what is already budgeted?
Outrageous in any case!
Isn't that what SOCIALISTS/COMMUNISTS/MARXISTS do? Generosity with OTHER PEOPLE's MONEY! Remember how sanders had a fit when he claimed after George Steinbrenner died that his $500 MILLION dollars was "our money". Hey Vermont, WAKE UP AND DUMP THE FOOLS YOU CALL YOUR SENATORS!
Congrsional budgets should come straight from the states to THEIR delegation. If VT wants to spend $X on their delegations, let it come from their bank accounts.
This is chump change. Check out the bonus/performance awards handed out by the federal government.Start with the small agencies alphabetically. $5,000 is chump change to what SES and GS-15s get.
Each member of Congress gets what's called an MRA (Member's Representational Allowance). This is their operational budget. The bonuses come out of what's left in that budget after they pay wages and other expenses. So this isn't new money.
IT AVERAGES OUT TO $4786.00 EA. FOR THAT POS LEAHEY.
MOST EXCELLENT
But who will read the 2,000-page bills they refuse to look at before voting on them? [sarcasm]
You must be logged in to post a comment.