Godwin’s Law II: ‘Racism’ Charge Loses Debate
by Tim SlagleWe owe a great favor to Mike Godwin. Those of us who have spent any amount of time arguing nonsense on the Internet are familiar with Godwins Law. Briefly, Godwins Law states: “As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches … given enough time, all discussions —regardless of topic or scope —inevitably wind up being about Hitler and the Nazis.”
The most wonderful aspect of Godwin is that “there is a tradition in many newsgroups, and other Internet discussion forums that once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically ‘lost’ whatever debate was in progress.”
Now there are exceptions to Godwin, for instance when discussing Jesse James affair with Bombshell McGee, it would be quite difficult to not bring up Nazi references. As a student of Hayek, a personal beef I have, is that sometimes a political argument requires a comparison.
Friedrich A. Hayek believed, the infringements on Liberty caused by programs like National Health Care, or any other central planning, will inevitably lead to a totalitarian government that is indistinguishable from National Socialism, save for the logo on the armbands. However being held to Godwin is a rigorous discipline that forces me to plum the depths of my intellect, for an alternate metaphor when discussing issues with liberals.
I believe that Godwin also applied during the years of the Bush Administration. Their argument was lost when Code Pink and MoveOn started with the BusHitler remarks, and I think images of the current President sporting a Charlie Chaplin moustache should probably be discouraged as well.
But I think we should add another corollary to Godwins Law. I think that if you call your opponent a Racist, you have also lost the argument.
It certainly seems that way. The latest attack on the Tea Parties by the NAACP, seems like a last resort. It reminds me of the old Superman movies where the criminals, having fired all their bullets at the man in steel, resort to throwing their guns. It certainly seems like a desperation move, but in this case it might actually work.
We are not Supermen. Nor are we professional politicians. We’re just a bunch of hard working stiffs trying to make a buck or two, under the worst economy in close to a century. We want a little change in our pockets. and a lot of Change in Washington. Heck we’re not even very good at the White Supremacist stuff.
For all the talk about bigots in the Tea Party, we make a pretty pathetic racist mob. It seems to me that competent racists would be able to reach a racial purity level much closer to 100%, an anti-diversity factor somewhat comparable to the NAACP.
But we’re doing exactly what they expected us to do: stumbling all over, making apologies, and trying to defend ourselves. We look like the person at the party, who accidently makes a borderline remark, then spends the next hour explaining that he really does like black people, and proudly counts several among his friends.
Instead, we all would be much happier if we just ignore the NAACP resolution, declare victory and move on.
Thank you again Mike Godwin.
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
299 Comments
Thanks for the article. Progressivism as envisioned by "our" modern Democ-rat Party is neccessarily comparative to radical forms of socialism like policies set forth by the National Socialist German Workers Party.
Now in short order the trolls will decend here and reject the OBVIOUS TRUTH that links modern liberalism/progressivism from Sanger to Alinsky and general 20th century socialist-facism. The Alinsky playbook has dictated PAINTING the OTHER guy with one's own failings.
I say let Shirlee talk as much and as often as she likes. Her mouth can dig a hole faster than a caterpillar backhoe.
Hitler was a RACIST! There, I killed 2 birds with one stone.
*sorry*
George Bush ignored the left's constant barrage on his character and where did that get him? You cannot ignore an accusation. It will grow legs and run!
People are so tired of being called racist just for disagreeing with the leftist agenda that the constant accusations are going to backfire. Witness the rise of Sarah Palin and Nikki Haley, both became more popular and well-known after being savagely attacked and maligned in the media.
People, don't waste time saying "I'm not a racist", simply state your case and say.."Now can you refute anything I said or are you just going to call me a racist?"
What a racist!
/sarc off
"In case anyone still doubts the fact that there was no difference in princple between the fascists and the socialists, consider the following revealing quotations from various infamous Nazis and other fascists:
We ask that the government undertake the obligation above all of providing citizens with adequate opportunities for employment and earning a living.
The activities of the individual must not be allowed to clash with the interests of the community, but must take place within its confines and for the good of all. Therefore, we demand:…an end to the power of the financial interests.
We demand profit sharing in big business.
We demand a broad extension of care for the aged.
We demand…the greatest possible consideration of small business in the purchases of the national, state and municipal governments.
http://www.lawrence.edu/sorg/objectivism/socfasc….
"In order to make possible to every capable and industrious [citizen] the attainment of higher education and thus the achievement of a post of leadership, the government must provide an all-around enlargement of our entire system of public education…We demand the education at government expense of gifted children of poor parents…
The government must undertake the improvement of public health — by the greatest possible support for all clubs concerned with the physical education of youth.
[We] combat the…materialistic spirit withn[sic] and without us, and are convinced that a permanent recovery of our people can only proceed from within on the foundation of The Common Good Before the Individual Good ."
(Nazi party platform adopted at Munich, February 24, 1920;Der Nationalsozialismus Dokumente 1933-1945, edited by Walther Hofer, Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Bucherei, 1957, pp. 29-31)."
http://www.lawrence.edu/sorg/objectivism/socfasc….
I agree with the article – sometimes comparisons are necessary. And saying something is like Nazism, to me, is just another way of saying something is fascist or statist.
Also, the racism thing is getting old and I don't think the libs know how old just yet.
Hopefully in November they will know.
TeaPartiers are racist like Nazis are tolerant ( of minorities)
Most leftists are just trained parrots that squawk a few words they've been given by their owners. Polly wanna cracker? Oh wait…
You better believe it grew legs and after that,………..
everything that was thrown at Bush stuck to him like white on rice,……….
Hence,…..don't you dare say anything about the BOY,……………
don't even start.
Unfortunately, Bush's lousy speaking abilities and penchant for mangling the language put him at a real disadvantage when it came to verbal combat.
OH come on! You spoiled the ending for me.
This is precious, it's at big journalism, it's Howard Dean calling Fox racist. Um, ah, ah, ah, um, huh, duh, wha.., eh? RACIST. http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/07/25/chris-w...
Do you do this just to confuse me?
Of course they don't know it yet, that's why they keep trying to use it. And every time they do, they lose a little more of their support – because more people can see right through it.
So I hope they KEEP using it!!!
"……….I think that if you call your opponent a Racist, you have also lost the argument………"
Who is this person,………???
Is there really a ref out there that determines who wins and who loses the argument,…..??????
and he makes his decisions objectively,………..???????
WIN the Senate and the House,………and,…..
the arguments will no longer matter.
What Breitbart has done is set a hair trigger at the White House, sheer hysterics ensued, it was…amazing! When you stop and think about this whole affair for a minute, a blog (the BIGs) have essentially altered the, day to day, for a White House…any White House, for that matter…awesome. It makes me happy to think, that the assholes in the White House, and Washington in general, pay attention when something comes from a conservative blog. Let us remember, the administration had this bigoted woman fired before Glenn Beck at 5:00 PM ET, of which, no one demanded her firing, that’s on Barry! Though this whole event was a mess, that’s undeniable, but! …it was also quite instructive, actions tell you many things that the mouth will not…the BIGs, and the rest of the conservative blogosphere are relevant, Rock-N-Roll! That’s what it’s all about.
The reason liberals (really Modern Liberals/Progressives) go down to racism is because they have nothing else to add.
Since their belief system is based on making everything "equal" rather than how normal people base their lives (making things better), they literally have no where else to go. Normal people (more Conservative) are working to make things better. Making things better and success are hate crimes to these liberals.
If EVERYONE in America is a known racist, than it's the pot calling the kettle black…or
I'm rubber and you're glue….sticks and stones …something like that…
If the fool saying it is ridiculed and laughed at, the effect is minimized…
But didn't Bush greatly expand the Medicare Entitlement program (Big Pharma benefit program AKA the Senior Drug Benefit program) paving the way to national healthcare? Strange how selective you are. What if Obama had apologized to China after China forced down one of our planes – ooops, that was Bush, too. Funny how rarely that gets mentioned.
I known for a long time that when someone calls me a racist or some other name, it's because they're losing the argument. Verbal combat is a skill that for most of us has to be practiced. One of the most effective ways I've found to wage it is to ask pointed questions in front of a group and let them answer. It's like handing them a shovel.
A great victory of mine came recently at a social gathering where the topic of man caused global warming came up. My opponent gave the usual blather of of how 99% of scientists agree, etc. Knowing something of the background of some of the so called scientists in on the scam, I simply asked him what makes a scientist a scientist? "Do you get a license from the DMV proving you're a scientist? Do you go to scientist school? Do you have to be born of at least one scientist parent? What defines a scientist? Why am I not a scientist? After that last one his head exploded for all to see and the name calling (troglodyte) began. His wife was very embarrassed and chewed him out for his bad manners.
I believe the true winner in any debate is the one who changed the most minds or at least opens up the most folks to thinking differently about a topic. It isn't just about changing the mind of those you are debating, it's what the audience comes away thinking about the exchange that they witnessed. Sometimes winning is just getting the other side to show how contemptible, arrogant, mean, vitriolic, and downright nasty they really are.
Footnote: Probably a bit sinister but after that I've always enjoyed being extra nice to his wife any time I thought he might witness me doing so.
So you're defense is "Bush did it too." I guess that makes it ok.
Barack Obama is George Bush's fault.
Cool but, "Godwin's Law" doesn't apply to Lie-berals/Progressives/Socialists/Marxists, and the vast left wing race baiting NAACP/Journolists!
I think the China incident was handled poorly but I don't remember him apologizing. Can you site the verbiage for me please? Thank you.
The trolls just came back from a Convention in Vegas, where they kissed Harry Reid's feet. So they're ready to spew their Fascist Lies.
still blond or fully awake,,,,,,,,,,,dang I was dozing while reading till I had to wake up to think about that 1.
Now I'm just aggravated,
Certainly, lacking any concrete evidence to present, the instinct to introduce race into an argument is symptomatic of intellectual bankruptcy.
Racism is a serious offense. It ends careers. It creates social outcasts. It ruins relationships. It destroys trust and credibility.
So, naturally, accusing someone of racism is a serious charge. It must be accompanied by more than insinuation. It must contain legitimate context. It must include factual and incontrovertible evidence.
Lacking these requirements, it can not be reasonably, honestly or legitimately introduced into an argument. If one fails to properly vet its introduction; one has chosen to assume a stance of intellectual fraud, emptiness and….bankruptcy.
.
If an argument is intellectually bankrupt, by definition, the individual(s) who introduced the empty point into the argument have no intellectual currency.
The best analogy I can think of is:
Normal Thinker : "An idiot says what?"
NAACP: "what?"
You sir are correct in your assessment, geee what dweeb in a cubicle is reading this as I type? he he he
That doesn't mean its right. Also the jump Bush made isn't even close to the massive jump Obama made.
Yes there is an old saying "If liberals push us toward socialism at 100% conservatism pushes us at 50%."
It's racist to allow Sanctuary Citie's Governors and Mayors to keep aiding and abetting Illegal Criminals to stay in America.
Excellent tactic. I employed something similar a number of years ago at a company picnic. I ingratiated myself with a fellow employee's wife by discussing plants and organic gardening and such. We talked about natural medicine and recycling, composting, alternatives to pesticides and weed killers -you get the idea. I was careful to be just a little contentious, while at the same time being honest, and then the 'debate' happened a few hours later. She knew I had set him up, but she also knew I had been honest. He was a little rankled for a few days, but we are all still friends. They are still 'true believers', but will not engage me in any political or policy debates to this day. It is sometimes beneficial to the party that loses, if they learn the lesson that they certainly don't know it all, and that intelligent, reasonable and well informed people are out there, and will take their egotism down a notch from time to time.
Do as I say, not as I do. That's the Progressive way! I've been called racist because I did not agree with President Obama's agenda. Here's how that one went:
Guy: You're a racist because you haven't liked one single thing Obama has done!!! You don't want a black man in the White House do you?!?!?!
Me: NO, he just plain sucks! Black, white, whatever; he sucks! He can't do the job. End of story.
I walked away after that because what else can you say? To be called something I am not and to have no discernible way to prove it otherwise placed a really bad taste in my mouth. No matter how much we use the facts to prove the points, the left uses race as the ultimate "smart bomb." (for all you Defender fans out there)
Your words are right out of the mouth of that anti-Semite Alex Jones.
Paulie-wog.
Yes, but have you stopped beating your wife? (sarcasm) And good analogy on Defender.
Remember, Remember the 9th of November, Progressive Treason and Plot. I can think of no reason Progressive Treason should ever be forgot.
Yay! America gets it's own November "Guy Fawkes" day!
Call it what it is, Class Warfare from the communist manifesto, and implemented by the NSDAP, the tensions between members or groups of different social classes, how many times has Obama, Democrats these liberal/progressives, the NAACP played the race card, played the middle class ploy, and this is the worse type of racisms because it is for political gain. The racist left, in exchange for whips and chains, they now abuse a socialist allotment and bastardized the meaning of freedom, and groups are now very dependent on their socialist allotment. Those of us on the right believe in inalienable god given rights for everyone, the more the government controls these rights, they will become subverted and perverted which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government. The time to end the racism and hatred from the left is now and time to stop the bastardization of our Constitution is now. Such a comparison is fact and must never be lost, if you do not know and understand history you are doomed to repeat it. We must not stumble all over, making apologies, and trying to defend ourselves, we must state these facts more clearly and loudly then ever before.
Hey, maybe you finally get it….. Why do you think the TEA Party came about. It's big government expansionist like Bush and now (on hyper drive) obama that pissed everyone off. We all realize that incrementally, we have been electing presidents that more than eager in solving our problems with an expansion of government.
The argument that because Bush did something similar is not an argument, it's your excuse.
You should probably look it up yourself – it would be arduous to post here due to posting limits.
What did he do about them stealing our technology? Maybe they already had it thanks to Israel selling it to them, though…..
Alex Jones an anti-Semite? Most people I know say he is too pro-Zionist. His wife's a Jew, you know?
I'm not apologizing about nonexistent racism, I'm throwing the charge right back at them, and the difference is in their case it's true. Don't waste any time apologizing. If O'Reilly goes out and apologizes "for us" it only remins us he is actually a tool of the left. Anyone else who apologizes on our behalf either is also a tool or is not clear in his or her head about what racism is and where it's found – in the Left, where it has always been.
Don't we already have a term for what Slagle is saying?
Its called jump the shark right?
Libs are 100% – RINO's are 50%
Fixt that for ya.
On "your" scale – REAL Conservatives would be about -125 to -200%.
Godwin's Law is a variant of Confuscius' adage: He who throws the first punch has lost the argument.
It began with the Ron Paul campaign – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvGS12EoZUE
I thought "jump the shark" referred to an idea so badly mangled that it's humorous. (From "Happy Days" Fonzie water skiing and jumping a shark…was near the end of the series' run…)
Hannity will be having one of his "raicsts" reports on tonight @9:00 …. /smirk/…. – I guess I will have to tune in to see it … I'm sure everyone from the left will also to see the hatred from FOX
maybe it's because words do not have meaning anymore,………
so how are we to properly interpret the actions of our "government",………
much less be critical of it,…………..
Me thinks it all started to unravel when we were told,…..
we did not know the meaning of what is,……is.
sorry Jamesb,…… now you are asking us to recognize an entire ideology,…….
give us a break,………#134,…we ain't that smart.
Note to 'shouldbethinkinalot' – George Bush is not a conservative. We didn't agree with everything he did, either. What is it with you and your ilk? Bush spends like a drunken sailor – something your side is obviously on board with – and he gets condemned. Put a D behind the drunken sailor's name and big spending is hunky dory OK again. Please – explain yourself.
Eh, a distant variant.
Actually this is the father of the Tea Party: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp-Jw-5Kx8k
The best response to racism charges from the NAACP and the relic media is to laugh.
Racism had been technically dead since the blacks won their right to vote and use the same bathrooms and that WAS NOT because of the Dimocrats. They were the true racists and still are. Byrd comes to mind.
I don't disagree with your post ( the first common sense one I've read thus far) but the NAACP and a lot of others will milk the race card till it looks like an antiquity relic. It's old and tired but this administration wants to use it for political leverage and they know exactly what will ensue.
Therefore, they/we have a huge target on our backs!
The truth has been revealed: "A Republican-appointed member of the panel probing why voter intimidation charges were dropped against the New Black Panther Party said Sunday that the case was flimsy and stood by an earlier claim that some of her colleagues are hammering the issue to bring down Attorney General Eric Holder. "
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/25/commis...
Do you realize December 2007 comes before early 2009? LOL!!!!!!! Then again, you are wrong about so much it wouldn't surprise me if you didn't.
It's strange how you commented on an article you apparently didn't read.
No Jump the shark means a series (or argument) has seen its better days lost all purpose as Fonzie "Jumped the shark" as a last death breath of the series.
You seem to mistake him for a Democrat. That's being mean to Democrats.
"……….Medicare Entitlement program (Big Pharma benefit program AKA the Senior Drug Benefit program) paving the way to national healthcare?,……."
Big Pharma was indeed big,………..
but you if feel it paved the way for Obamacare,………..
well than I suppose it is pretty easy to pin this jackass,…..
on Bush's butt.
You should actually read the ENTIRE story. It's the "it's too small of group" to be a "danger" argument. That was proved wrong with 19 people on 9/11. Actually way back with ONE Jim Jones.
And if she was appointed by the CURRENT Republicans – then she's a RINO like them. Don't lump her in with us here.
The case wasn't flimsy – and I'll type if REAL big and REAL slow for you
THE
CASE
HAD
ALREADY
BEEN
WON.
Did you get that???
When the TEA Party began is mutually exclusive to the discussion. You made a statement, "didn't Bush greatly expand the Medicare" and that prompted my statement that you might finally get it. I take it back.
How did Harry Reid's feet taste, talkzy? Surely your enlightened ass got to kiss them at that pitiful convention.
REMEMBER NOVEMBER.
http://remembernovember.com/
http://remembernovember.com/
One of the Tea Party cries was that the Health Plan was for Black REPARATIONS!! Cant get more racist than that. They had signs of Obama as a witch doctor with a bone through his nose and people carried around stuffed monkeys labelled Obamacare.
Racists love to deny the Holocaust as much as they deny their Tea Party racism.
And Fascism is a government run by big business. Like the Big Health insurance companies and BP and Wall Street banks. Companies the Right wing always defends.
Or we have the target on them, 11/2 is coming…my brothers…and the real change is at hand…hahahaha…statist Washington has our complete attention, never a good thing for politicians or parasites.
Let me make this really simple for you. You cannot convict someone for murder if NOBODY IS DEAD!!!! Simalarly, you cannot convict someone of voter intimidation, if NO VOTERS WERE INTIMIDATED!!! Not ONE single voter has come forward to say they were intimidated, even AFTER Fox has been running the story every single day like it is the crime of the century! Can you wrap your mind around that?
It is pure tried and true Alinsky ~ nothing more, nothing less.
Hell! …it wouldn’t surprise me one little bit that the White House has a dweeb corps, fighting with the ugly Americans on conservative blogs, you know…the ones that pay for everything.
I wonder if we should drop the use of Nazi and fascist and totally stick to statist ~ Levin uses it all the time. He may be onto something if we would incorporate it on a daily basis, it will stick them with a new stench, like liberal has become in their nostrils.
My side? My side would round up the illegals and shoot them (they are, after all, an invading and occupying force), end all immigration, raise tariffs, bring home the troops from the TWO Vietnam-type police actions (no declaration to make it a war) and end aid to Israel and other countries. Which party is mine? Certainly not the GOP nor the Democrats. We need a new party that puts Americans first because neither party comes close.
Well, sometimes that has to take a back seat to trolling.
LOL!
That was "Loral Space" under Clinton, that sold the technology to China, guidance systems for ICBMs. Remember the ’96 campaign Charlie Tree, OwlGore at the Buddhist Temple, and his iced tea alibi etc.
There's a danger in this particular line of thinking.
Perhaps accusations of Nazism should automatically cost the accusor the argument — unless their opponent is ACTUALLY a Nazi. Perhaps accusations of Racism should automatically cost the accusor the argument — unless their opponent is ACTUALLY a racist.
This is the greatest danger that weaponized racism poses: it breeds cynicism on the topic of racism. Very soon, genuine racists may be able to shield themselves behind weaponized racism — if they cannot already.
Of course, it's the Spencer Ackermans and Janeane Garofalos of the world who are to blame for this. Shame on them — if only they were capable of shame.
"…if you call your opponent a Racist, you have also lost the argument."
Funny how the liberals never bother making an initial argument, they just go straight for the race card as soon as the debate is started.
The Prescription Drug Benefit for Seniors was a dumbass statist piece of legislation, that should have never seen the light of day.
I don't understand how this comment could have gotten voted down so often.
That's nothing. I once had an individual tell me I was racist because I wouldn't accept Emanuel Cleaver's claims that he had the N-word screamed at him without any evidence.
Alright! …whoever it is that has Joseph hostage, let him go now!
You Racist!!! You called the new Rosa Parks "black hoe". After all she's done to promote civil rights in America! Bastard. LOL
I think there may be more there. They reacted way, way too fast. This may have something to do with the huge lawsuit she just won and the circumstances under which she won it. I think they reacted to distract us from something else. This would be consistent with liberal-progressive doctrine. Then again, my underwear may be too tight, but remember you heard it here first.
Do wear a helmet when you go outside!
"………..milk the race card till……….." and they are doing so via Piggy-back Pigford suits against USDA,
and next will go after banking institutions that have discriminated against anyone who even THOUGHT
about trying to get a loan in the last 50 years, I guaran-damn-tee it.
Mr of Steele has a history of being rather antagonistic to the commenters here on BG, recently his
body has been occupied by aliens or medication, we're not sure which.
I think aliens from Uranus have occupied his body.
I like Statist as well because it's hard for them to argue against it or try to say "No, fascism is a right wing philosophy."
And it helps undecided and otherwise apathetic people focus on the real issue – Liberty v. Tyranny.
Machiavelli would be so proud. It looks like amateur hour to me, these creeps are over their heads.
Amen, man. As soon as people start spouting off about race, then I no longer respect their credibility. I drives me absolutely insane when I hear individuals cry "racist" just because they have no other ground to stand on.
I know! …he really has a line on this race issue.
Earth to agent 77……..concentrate now, I'll t y p e r e a l s l o w , the guilt/innocence phase was
fini', during the GWB Adm……….the defendants were a no show. They were convicted.
oRegime only needed to prepare the sentencing phase, I believe.
What part of this are you unable to understand.
You have the RIGHT to remain silent…………………….
And I advise that you do cutie pie!
Most conservatives have allowed themselves to be cowed by the mere threat of being labeled a racist. It's time we take a new approach. Rather than retreating or falling back into denials, we should respond by saying "If you need me to be your racist, then fine… I'll be your racist." When they realize that their threats no longer intimidate, liberals may be forced to actually confront the issues instead of taking cheap shots.
Wrong, wrong and wrong. There was voter intimidation you ignorant troll. Wrap your head around this:
"Bartle Bull, a longtime Democratic activist and civil-rights lawyer – and a prominent figure in the presidential campaigns of Bobby Kennedy and Jimmy Carter – was on the scene in Philadelphia that day. He relied on his eyes and ears. Moreover, he filed an affidavit elaborately describing the Panthers' menacing, and concluded that it, "qualified as the most blatant form of voter intimidation I have encountered in my life in political campaigns in many states, even going back to the work I did in Mississippi in the 1960's."
http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/michellemalkin...
Also, this comes from the career attorney from the DOJ who was prosecuting the case and who resigned his position because Holder is a unethical, racist POS:
I have never, ever heard of the Division refusing to take a default judgment, especially in a situation where the defendants are basically admitting they violated the law.” I would go further. In my nearly 20 years as a federal prosecutor, there were innumerable times when the Justice Department opted not to bring charges, despite convincing evidence of guilt. But the usual prerequisite for deferring or dismissing prosecution is an exhibition of contrition. Never have I seen a case in which the government, having gone to the trouble of filing charges and litigating to the threshold of victory, decided to forfeit for the benefit of defendants who had treated both the case and the judicial process with utter contempt.
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDJjZmYw...
Daum, I'm sick and tired of trying to educate you morons !!!
It was WRONG to convict someone of voter intimidation if NO VOTER WAS INTIMIDATED!! AG Holder did the right thing to drop the charges, just like Ms. Thernstrom, a Republican member, said! Hello genius, people have been convicted of crimes they didn't commit before. It doesn't make it right. Justice was done in this matter.
Joseph
We are all very proud of your political maturity and apparent escape from the "PodPeople".
Everything in the post was great until the analogy at the end…
Call me dense but are you calling the NAACP idiots? Racists is more like it…Put "Racist" in place of "Idiot" and it makes more sense, to me anyway…
"It reminds me of the old Superman movies where the criminals, having fired all their bullets at the man in steel, resort to throwing their guns."
And just like George Reeves' Superman, we stand strong against the initial attack but the thrown gun forces us to duck out of the way.
Anyone seen the EXHORCIST? Thats his problem but today his head has stopped spinnin in circles.
No, what you just admitted to is the epitome of trolling. NICE.
You must be logged in to post a comment.