Between Barack and A Hard Place – The Lesson of ’68 Looms for Democrats
by Thomas Del BeccaroThese may well be the times that try the souls of Democrat politicians.
In the year since Obama took the oath of office, the fortunes of the Democrat Party have changed substantially. Voters, especially Independent voters, now favor Republicans on many issues and in Rasmussen’s Generic Congressional Ballot by 9%. Entrenched Senate Democrats like Christopher Dodd and Byron Dorgan are retiring and now – in no small irony – in the election heard ‘round the world, Scott Brown, campaigning against ObamaCare was elected to “Kennedy’s seat.”

It has been a remarkable turnaround – yet the worse is yet to come for Democrats in office.
Keep in mind that voters turned out the Republicans in 2006 and 2008 in large part because they spent too much, reformed too little and ran up the deficit into the $400 billion range. By the end of the Bush Presidency, economic troubles were mounting and the Republicans had no clear plan for a national recovery.
Today, the incidence of buyer’s remorse for voters over Barack is mounting for all the same reasons and more. Unemployment is at double digits, government reform has been abandoned in favor of unprecedented government spending and the deficit is in the $1.5 trillion range. All of that, with no meaningful recovery in site.
Beyond that, the President has his Party in the stickiest of wickets known to you as the Health Care debate. By allowing Pelosi and Company to write the bill, Obama lost control of the process and now public opposition to the bill is at an all time high. Even so, the Democrat leadership still promises to push it – whether we like it or not.
That is, at least until Scott Brown came around – which begs the questions:
So what’s a Coercive Utopian to do? And what is a sensible Democrat to do? And of the two, who will prevail?
In the months ahead, the coercive utopian Democrats, who control government, i.e. Pelosi & Reid et. al., now know they may be out of power in 10 months – but not because of the Scott Brown election or The Lessons of ’66 and ’94 that Loom Over the Democrats. They have been repeatedly told, by Bill Clinton and others, that the failure to pass HillaryCare in the ‘90s was the reason they lost in ‘90s, because their base became discouraged. Beyond that, they will have to provide an answer to the country for solving the deficit. Given their reflexive answer to that enduring question, i.e. raising tax rates, the Obama, Reid and Pelosi may well force their Democrats supporters in Congress to vote for higher taxes. If anyone thinks that’s a good idea, (besides the coercive utopians), ask the 54 House seats that went from Democrat to Republican in ’94 how that worked for them.
So what’s a sensible Democrat in Congress to do? As a Shakespearean politician may have said: To Be Re-Elected or not to Be Re-elected, that is the question. Of course, that would require them to break company with Barack and the hard place in which he is forcing them – thereby splitting the Democrat Party.
Who will win that battle? Perhaps the Lessons of ’68 are relevant here. During that election year, the Vietnam War badly split the Democrats between the pro-war Johnson/Humphrey faction and the anti-war faction led by Senator McCarthy. A split of that magnitude simply could not be mended within a single election year. Their political civil war was so bad that even the Republican Presidential nominee, who once declared that we would no longer have him to kick around just 8 years before, Richard Nixon, was able to make the ultimate comeback and win the Presidency.
In other words, for the Democrats, there probably will be no victor in this inter-party war – all of which amounts to one gigantic opportunity for the Republicans – if they would just do these 4 things . . . The Top 4 Things Congressional Republicans Must Do In 2010.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
68 Comments
We have our boots on their throats and should continue to choke off their agendas.
A November to remember = A Congress to dismember.
It's going to be a well deserved and long over due slaughter!
And yet Obama still blames the 'anger' of the American people on "the last 8 years" he is so clueless!!
It all depends on the quality of the candidate. It's not whether they are Democrat or Republican but whether they adhere to the Constitution of the United States of America. It will likely take several federal election cycles to turn out the bums and replace them with responsible legislators. A politician will lie to get elected. Enormous amounts of money will be spent by the parties to figure out what the voter wants to hear. We won't be fully able to tell the good from the bad until they have served. Judge them by their actions, not their words.
Never forget, Republicans were handed the keys to the nation, and they ran it into the ground, just as the democrats are doing.
Patriot Act, FISA, Dept. of Homeland Security, warrantless wiretaps, TSA bureaucracy, Secret Courts…
All in the name of Safety. To be fair, Democrats helped as well. Do not be so quick to hand the keys back to someone with a (R) behind their name.
Smaller, less intrusive government. Let US run our lives and let us be. The Constitutional role of the Federal Government is simple, provide for the external safety of our nation, nothing more. The States can handle the other "Non Enumerated" functions of governing.
It really isn't that hard, or complicated.
Granted, we can have top four lists, we can even have top ten lists, and talking points. At the end of the day though, it all boils down to honour, integrity, and values. Every RINO will be under the microscope. America is fundamentally a conservative country. Her people are good, just, and generous; just look south to Haiti to witness that. We haven't yet rebuilt the World Trade Center, or New Orleans, and yet we are off again helping those in need, when we haven't fully taken care of our own.
People have awoken from a generational slumber. We don't need CON-sultants, pundits, talking heads or the chattering class telling US what we need to do. WE know that in our hearts. It is bred and born into US.
There is a sea change sweeping across America, those in power had best face that fact, or face unemployment.
The Democrats respond to the Mass election by proposing to raise the debt limit by a record $1.9 trillion dollars. What do you think they want to do that for? Spend, spend, spend.
The economy is going to have a faux "economic recovery" sometime this year, and then it will crash harder in 2011. You can take that to the bank, but don't cash it, please.
The key to a successful future does not belong to a party, it belongs to the people. If from the people leaders can emerge that will communicate an inspired vision of a positive future for the country, a vast majority of the population will coalesce around that message. Then together, we will prove once again that a free and inspired people can accomplish anything. And we'll do this not by putting our faith in the parties, but by placing our faith in the people.
Please don't use "begs the question" when you mean "raises the question." (pet peeve)
I think the idea of churning the Congress, both houses, is a good one. Let's turn out the arrogant Old Guard and replace them with new blood who will follow the Constitution, stop spending money we don't have and will LISTEN TO THE PEOPLE. Doesn't matter which party they're from, as long as they are fiscally conservative and will not take us off the edge of the cliff as a true Republic.
Dangerously clueless…..
these clowns are beginning to look like the biggest circus that ever came to town.
Andrew, you are correct.
When it comes to our elected officials, here is a novel idea.
Make them play by the same rules they enact to make US play by.
How's this one for a starter: MANDATORY RETIREMENT at age 65.
That will eliminate the Strom Thurmonds, Robert Byrds, Teddy Kennedy's and the rest of the senile old bastardz legislating to US from wheelchairs, with their arms velcroed to the arm rests, drooling on themselves and eating jello at the Congressional cafeteria.
Make them pass a physical. If they can't run a mile, or do 100 sit ups, bounce them out………
How about any politician that doesn't meet specific health requirements has to retire. (Overweight – smoking – risky sexual behavior – drinking – mental health.) Also if they keep moving their hands like claws when they talk, they must be recalled. (Nannie is starting to look like an unwrapped mummy!!)
You know what needs to "loom" as a lesson for the current Democrats in power? The last pictures of Benito Mussolini.
Peter: I have the same pet peeves. And the peeves are getting a workout lately, on all of my favorite political sites. I can stomach the misspellings, bad usage, bad grammar, bad sentence structure, etc., in the comments, but the authors of essays and columns and articles should really take the time to re-read before posting. It seems to be getting worse, and getting worse faster, as a general trend.
I would hope that someone who wants to write online columns on a regular basis would have the foresight to let someone read their works before they post them, as well, so that misused common phrases like the one you found can be pointed out. No spellchecker can fix that. Don't authors of books let people, usually more than one, read their work before they commit to publishing and printing it?
Given that most conservatives haven't spent most of their lives in classrooms at colleges and universities, it would be a good, humble idea to let someone proofread your work. This means EVERYONE. Not just this author. I bet every single post today at BG and the other sites contains numerous, elementary errors. Hell, I make plenty of writing errors myself – and if I were writing articles, I would bounce them off a few readers before posting, even if only to keep conservative thought from looking sloppy and undereducated, even if only to reflect well on the site which is gracious enough to host your thoughts.
" These may well be the times that try the souls of Democrat politicians. "____It's about time. Our (citizens) souls have been tried for more than a year on an ever escalating basis. And it had better be not just democrats, but every elected official that that feels hot breath on the back of their neck as they sit in that office – we are watching. Walk the talk or walk the plank.
don't forget to tax them with the new tax on the banks…..Congress was complicit in banking crisis, and they should pay an additional 10% tax from all their income to pay back the taxpayers. Obama must be fair to the banks, Fannie and Freddie……
also, Congress should drop their benefits and retirement progams. It should be a priviledge to serve, not a right to perks, fat pensions and insurance benefits….. ad infinitum……..
Repudiation of leftist-statist is in high gear, if you’re in the political “business” don’t make long term plans. Healthcare or the “suicide pact” will finally be the millstone that sinks many Washington politicians in perpetuity…most especially Democrats/RINOs. Our government has challenged the boss, it’s people – - challenge accepted – - now comes the voter, and it’ll soon be your ass! Get right, or get gone!
Your exactly right, I can almost feel the Reps sitting back with a smile on their faces thinking, " I knew we would get the ball back". The large majority in our capital seem to think it is some sort of ball game and they're superstars.
But they still hold power, so we have to be careful. We can't stop until ALL of them are out of office.
You speak more truth in a few short sentences than Obama in a year of speeches.
The booming part of the economy incomes from unintended consequences.
Fox News, Rush, Gleen Beck, Hannity are exploding in revenue.
Money. As of this week, it is hard to raise money for a Dem because it may be wasted. People really can't get kickbacks and paybacks when a Dem loses the election. Would a "rational" Dem if there is one pump a million into Murtha and see him sent to the politicians elephant graveyard?
Arrogance arrogance arrogance. The left never learns
After reading this article and the many comments, it is clear that the Republican party had better wake up. From the comments I'm hearing from the right it's obvious that they haven't really digested what really happened in Mass. If they don't come to realize that people are more interested in fiscal resposibility, less intusion into our lives and smaller Gov't the old guard is going to pay the piper in '10 as well. Career politicians (on both sides) beware the people are speaking and your not listening. It's not just about Heath Care.
Agreed.
CL~
Hear! Hear! Got a call from John Boehner's PAC and then later from a telephone town hall for Pete Sessions and asking for ways to help Republicans…and money. I told both the message that would resonate well with voters was that they themselves will have to live with the laws they pass and until I heard them out there preaching that, "No money for you!"
Yes, you are absolutely correct. And to those who think Bush 43 was a hero…You better get over it or you will just be part of the problem heading into the future. It's easy to compare one year of Obama, to 8 years of Bush 43, but one need only look at the deficit/spending charts over the last 100 years to SEE who actually is/was running this country into the ground! It's obvious that where we are now is a worse place then we were with Bush 43 in office, but that just because we have a 2 term limit…Obama is a new kind of Progressive/Liberal/Socialist. The true natures of the parties have been exposing themselves for years. And besides, would you rather be called a Progressive, or a Socialist, or a Communist, or a Fascist? Because we have every single one of those ideologies being represented today in our Congress, and White House, they just prefer to the term Progressive…For now anyhow…!?
Perhaps some of you who excoriated me for calling a Bush 43 a fascist should take a little time and look up the American Liberty League. Check out Prescott Bush, the father of Bush 41, and the grand-father of Bush 43. Look up Maj.-Gen. Smedley Butler, and see what he endured. Take a close look at who supported the American Liberty League, and who founded it. Look at the numbers, see who has spent and borrowed us up to our eyeballs already. It doesn't take a genius to see what has happened in the past. Hell, in all honesty, Reagan wasn't as "fiscally conservative" as most people think. And little did Reagan know (or perhaps he did know?) that his vice-pres. was a Nazi sympathizer, just like his father. Wake up people…Global Fascism has been working it's way into this country since FDR, and it hasn't subsided one bit. We have to be careful to not let Patriotism turn into misguided admiration for the state!
PLEASE…Don't believe what I tell you, go do the research for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. I would LOVE to be wrong on all this, I truly would…!
[...] Coakley … Pot Committed Obama Continues to Defy the People Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats Paul A. Rahe, Big Government: George W. Bush Revisited Critical Political Thinking: ~ Massachusetts [...]
[...] Around The Sphere: NBC In-Fighting Never Ends, It Only Spreads Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats The Raw Story: Scarborough slams Olbermann’s rant against ‘homophobic, racist’ [...]
You hit the nail on the head.
It really is quite simple. MONEY is the lifeblood of politics. Shut off the money, and they all wither and die on the vine. It doesn't matter if it is a duplicitous politician, or rebuilding the World Trade Center, rebuilding New Orleans, or rebuilding Haiti, shut off the money, and it all stops.
It is time for US, to collectively STOP THE INSANITY………..!
Robert,
You are right.
Bless their little ol' hearts. They still "don't get it". But they will, when they reach the unemployment line.
I couldn't agree more…But I think it's also important to remember how many lawyers we have in office now. We don't need lawyers running this country, we need business persons running this country. Lawyers do not know how to produce anything, they don't know how to run a business (the working end anyway), they don't know how to be compassionate, they don't know how to do much of anything but, how to legally break laws. These are the kind of people that have been ruining this country, in both parties. We need to get the lawyers out and get some good, honest, and hard working business minded, free market capitalist to re-establish our country. And it's my personal opinion that if a politician comes from an Ivy League school, they don't deserve to be anywhere near the capital building! We already have enough elitist pigs in office now, we don't need any more.
VOTE ONLY FOR "TEA PARTY" ENDORSED CANDIDATES!!!!
Hopefully your keen INSIGHT will help "TEA PARTY" candidates in the 2010 elections!
I know that the economy will turn around in February of 2012 from a good source, which does suggest that this MARXIST AGENDA will lose in the long run!
Funny.
Back last summer, when this first started (about the time of Nancy Pelosi's :astroturf" comments), I was at several tea party functions. In Billings, Rapid City, and Oklahoma City respectively. Folks laughed at US, and we were the butt of many jokes.
We weren't laughing then, and we aren't laughing now. This is far too serious a matter to laugh over. WE want our country back. We will take it back, one way or the other. Hopefully, it can be done at the ballot box. Perhaps the old adage does apply: "He who laughs last, gets the last laugh". I would like nothing better than to see that laugh get wiped off Madame Pelosi's ignorant, botoxed face……….
Check out the version of "Mmm Mmm Mmm Barack Hussein Obama" at; http://www.myspace.com/rogerweber
You'll get a laugh!
" What do you think they want to do that for? Spend, spend, spend. "
Floyd, it's worse than that. They have put us in a position of needing to borrow money just to keep up payments on our debt.
2010 the year we can/will spay or neuter the progressives!!
I think Pelosi's fake boobs might be a contributing factor to early ostioporosis?
Anybody else notice that more often than not she takes on a Quasimodo-like posture?
TVB
I disagree completely…he knows very well what he is doing…it is media spin…that progressive piece of $hit is playing a gigantic game with this country and it's peoples future…
O'bumma will be remembered as the most corrupt and inept President ever….he gets his place in the history books….just not the way he wanted!
Pelosi and Harry "Rat Face" Reid can start a brothel in NV this Fall…..they won't succeed at that either
I think it's important to remember we need to vote in CONSERVATIVES, rather than just Republicans! Moderate Republicans helped create all of this debt – they all need to go away.
I called my Republican Congressman and both Senators and told them……
"Please Republicans…………a message from Conservative Americans…..
We have given you a seat at the table after Massachuetts……..
DON'T SCREW THIS UP………..
MAKE IT MANDATORY TO PUT HEALTHCARE AND ANY OTHER LEGISLATION
ON C-SPAN………….ALLOW THE AMERICAN CITIZENS TO SEE AND HEAR THE DEBATE…….
that would really make the Obama to put up or shut up."
Term limits………
No special retirement……….same as us……..401 or Social Security
No special healthcare…….same as us…..buy your own or Medicare
Pay raises………..same as us……your bosses decide if you get a raise.
NEVER FORGET WHOM YOUR BOSSES ARE……..WE THE PEOPLE.
"These may well be the times that try the souls of Democrat politicians."
Oh, don't be ridiculous — Democrat politicians don't have souls.
Coercive Utopian
Beeyootee-full. Is that a fancy way of saying "Facist"?
Not surprising since Barak is the Kenyan word for excrement and Obama is the orifice it comes from. We have to thank the Dems for putting that flaming bag of crap on our doorstep.
No, he is not clueless. His ego is so big though that he thinks that WE are clueless and are buying his pap.
[...] Coakley … Pot Committed Obama Continues to Defy the People Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats Paul A. Rahe, Big Government: George W. Bush Revisited Critical Political Thinking: ~ Massachusetts [...]
[...] Coakley … Pot Committed Obama Continues to Defy the People Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats Paul A. Rahe, Big Government: George W. Bush Revisited Critical Political Thinking: ~ Massachusetts [...]
[...] Coakley … Pot Committed Obama Continues to Defy the People Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats Paul A. Rahe, Big Government: George W. Bush Revisited Critical Political Thinking: ~ Massachusetts [...]
The Republicans shouldn't be going around partying just because Brown got elected. They're forgetting that they've got RINOs in there that we want out.
[...] Victory: “The Most Significant Non-Presidential Election”? Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats Gateway Pundit: He’s Got That Midas Touch… Obama Makes It 0 and 3 With Coakley (Video) and Oh [...]
[...] Victory: “The Most Significant Non-Presidential Election”? Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats Pronk Palisades: President Barack Obama: The Delusional Narcissist–Needs Time In The Naughty Blue [...]
[...] Big Hollywood: Daily Gut: ‘Teabaggers’ Tuesday Triumph Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats Firedoglake: Classy: DNC Throws Martha Coakley Under the Bus Hot Air Green Room: The liberal [...]
[...] Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: California Democrats Ignore Brown Win: Vote For Bankruptcy and Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats Critical Political Thinking: ~ Massachusetts Voters Demonstrate To Forty-Nine Other States: IT CAN [...]
[...] Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: California Democrats Ignore Brown Win: Vote For Bankruptcy and Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats Pronk Palisades: President Barack Obama: The Delusional Narcissist–Needs Time In The Naughty Blue [...]
[...] Around The Sphere: NBC In-Fighting Never Ends, It Only Spreads Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats The Raw Story: Scarborough slams Olbermann’s rant against ‘homophobic, racist’ [...]
[...] “Characteristic Condescension” Caused Their Collapse Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats Gateway Pundit: Oh Dear. Even Hardcore Obama Supporter McCaskill Says Dems Moved “Too Far, Too [...]
[...] “Characteristic Condescension” Caused Their Collapse Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats On My Watch – The Writings of SamHenry: A Vengeful Return to Obama the Enforcer and Barack; Leave [...]
[...] “Characteristic Condescension” Caused Their Collapse Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats On My Watch – The Writings of SamHenry: A Vengeful Return to Obama the Enforcer and Barack; Leave [...]
[...] “Characteristic Condescension” Caused Their Collapse Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats On My Watch – The Writings of SamHenry: A Vengeful Return to Obama the Enforcer and Barack; Leave [...]
[...] In the wake of Brown Victory, Obama Returns to Campaign Mode Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats On My Watch – The Writings of SamHenry: A Vengeful Return to Obama the Enforcer and Barack; Leave [...]
[...] Congressional Actions in Year of 10 Percent Unemployment Thomas Del Beccaro, Big Government: Between Barack and A Hard Place — The Lesson of ‘68 Looms for Democrats Eric Dondero, Big Government: Scott Brown Win Is a Victory For Bush Foreign Policy, Defeat for Ron [...]
[...] to fight amongst themselves – an acceptable exercise in an off year but not in an election year (as in 1968 for the Democrats). Obama is talking about election year tax increases and using executive powers and a legislative [...]
Websites worth visiting…
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……
You must be logged in to post a comment.