Lessons of ‘66 and ‘94 Loom Over Democrats: Part I
by Thomas Del BeccaroMidterm elections can present a considerable risk for a new President. Often viewed as a referendum on a President’s policies, the last 45 years featured such huge party losses as 54 House seats under Clinton, 48 seats under Ford, and 47 seats under Johnson. While Ford’s fate was not entirely his own, the fates of Johnson and Clinton present foreboding scenarios for Democrats in 2010.
Johnson and Clinton: Unpopular Policies Lead to Midterm Losses.
In 1964, the Democrats were sitting atop the political world. They held 68 Senate seats and gained 36 House seats for an overwhelming margin of 295 to 140 – not to mention winning the White House. Just two years later, however, they lost 48 seats. Why? A series of policies that were unpopular including a “credibility gap” on the Vietnam War and what one Democrat Governor said was “Frustration over Vietnam; too much federal spending and… taxation; no great public support for your Great Society programs; and … public disenchantment with the civil rights programs.” Despite the economy growing 6% because of the Kennedy/Johnson tax cuts, the divide between Johnson’s policies and public opinion produced a 49% approval rating for Johnson and resulted in historic losses for the President and his party in 1966.
In 1994, the Democrats lost a stunning 54 seats and control of the House for the first time in over 40 years. Bill Clinton was elected because Bush 41 broke his “no new tax” pledge, the economy was weak, the deficit was high and Ross Perot siphoned votes – all of which gave the young Clinton, promising middle class tax cuts, a plurality victory. Clinton then overestimated his victory, got off to a rocky start and raised taxes instead of cutting them. The divide between Clinton and voters over policy played out in his first midterm election when Republicans picked up 54 seats amidst an approval rating of 46% for Clinton – despite a recovering economy.
Obama’s Growing Divide.
Barack Obama won the Presidency in large part because of a weak economy. Although he gave the voters only a vague sense of what Change would really mean, the damage Republicans did to themselves between 2005 and 2008, along with the economy, was enough for Obama to win – along with Media help and the dynamic of an historic first chance to elect a black President. It is important to note that Obama won only 52.9% of the vote – a victory but not an overwhelming victory.
Today, Obama’s approval rating is in the mid to high 40s – an historic drop for a first year President. Democrats rightly point out that the economy Obama inherited hurts his ratings. It is his policies, however, that are increasingly more at odds with Americans and are truly the cause for his plummeting ratings.
Keep in mind that Obama approval rating in April was in the 60% range despite the bad economy. Yes the continuing bad economy has a corrosive effect on Obama’s popularity; his divisive policies, however, have had a worse effect.
The so-called “stimulus” spending and resultant higher deficits are unpopular and hardly working. The Health Care bill is strongly opposed; the cap and trade/global warming policies are unpopular as are the coming tax hikes. Those divisive policies have played a central role in quickly driving down Obama’s ratings.
2010 – No Room for a Turnaround.
Given lagging job growth and high deficits, and policies that many know will hurt, not help, the economy, the economic situation will not be the Democrats friend in 2010. The unpopular Health Care bill will dominate the 1st quarter of 2010 as the reconciliation process takes center stage – along with cap and trade, a record federal deficit, along with tax hikes, and an immigration battle that may scare and anger many voters.
Obama’s mounting policy divide with Americans, combined with a weak economy should leave Obama’s approval ratings in the low 40s by the summer and through the fall.
All of that is bad news for Democrats House candidates next fall. Over the last 40 years, the average loss, in House seats, for the Presidents party when his approval rating is below 50% was 41 seats. Recalling that even in a recovering economy that Clinton lost 54 seats and Johnson 47, unless Obama can bridge the growing policy divide he has with Americans or the economy roars back, unlikely scenarios both, Obama may well suffer the same fate as Johnson and Clinton with losses that exceed 40 seats – enough for the Republicans to retake the House.
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
127 Comments
To retake the House and cripple Reid in the Senate – PRICELESS.
The thing I love about this article is the fact that America was weary of the social programs that Kennedy/Johnson put in place in spite of the economy growing. I find it amazing that TAX CUTS were used to help spur the economy as well. This shows no matter what era in time we live in Americans don't like to go to war unless it is to win & we hate our money being taxed & redistributed by the Government. BO should be able to take lessons from this article & the history of the party he claims to be a proud member of.
SEND THEM HOME
Every time I hear news like this I get a tingle up my leg.
Obummer is too arrogant to learn from history, after all, he is rewriting it.
Did anyone here ever think that you'd prefer Bill Clinton to the current alternative in the WH?
Strange times, these.
democrat power comes from redistribution of wealth, they wont stop. win or lose government money is all democrats care about.
he never really studied American History…his formative years were not American…
Newsflash – Obama cancels FoxNews on the Armed Forces TV Network in Europe.
to the democrats these losses are the price of doing business. they got the power and are going to line there pockets wile it lasts.
Tax cuts help the economy?? What a novel idea.
As someone said before Bill Clinton would even be a welcome relief to the inept, incompetent, egotistical, lying narcissist that is now president.
To retake the House and DEFEAT Reid in the Senate – REAL "hope and change"
So, unlike Michael Steele, you think we can win?
The GOP will mop up both houses in a year that will rival '94 and even '66. At this point, Obama would be a lame duck faster than you can say, "hope and change". It's going to be a good year for the elephant.
From what I see, it's going to be a tsunami.
Part 2 of my article is called "the 4 Things Congressional Republicans Must Do in 2010." – Stay Tuned!
It's the peoples seat – Go Scott Brown !!!! Amazing agian that the clown leading the debate throws in CRAP about Kennedy and says that "your willing to block this for the next 15 yrs"
WTF and I reapeat WTF???? The clown does not get it … My God if it's this bad let's pass CRAP and then think about it later ??? The mindset of people is amazing ….. I guess this clown is for Kevin Jennings too!!!! I mean he must be the best we can have at the moment..
Go Scott Brown !!!! Watch the video and pass it around …
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJEEQHOnI2Q
Obama setting a new record of 55 or more House seat losses would be some change I could believe in.
Keep your eyes on Massachusetts. If this race is even close, imagine how dramatic a turn that is in one year since Mr. Hope and Change was elected. All signs are pointing to an upset of historic proportions. Brown is taking the game to his opponent, the sterile and boring Ms. Coakley.
To retake the House and cripple Reid in the Senate–REAL "hope and change you can count on"
There is a cautionary tale, here, giddy conservatives:
LBJ suffered a debacle in 1966, sure. But did that mean that the damage was undone? Not at all. The hydrophobic Great Society was not gently euthanised; it's still with us, grown to a ravening monster ripping the entrails out of the American economy.
Entitlements are forever.
From the beginning of his campaign…Barack Obama has never seemed authentically 'American' to me. I've never heard him acknowledge, gratefully, how glad he is to live here. I'm grateful every day that my parents decided to move from Canada and settle here..
Rather, from the Obama camp there's more whining ,complaining and apologizing than a heart felt…' am I ever lucky to have been born HERE ! '
Anything bordering on a positive remark about what this country (from him and Michelle) offers us seems forced and contrived.
Hmmmm, just when you think (like in Clinton's tenure) that it can't get WORSE…it does (Obama as POTUS)!
Welcome to 2010, the year of 'Obama Who?'. It's going to be a hoot hearing all of the incumbents distancing excuses for not inviting ' da one' to stump for them back in the old home town.
Once they ram an entitlement through, no matter who controls the Congress it won't go away. If we actually had that hope, we would no longer have Social Security, MediCare and MediCaid. We might have much better mechanisms in place.
I can't really agree with you. I think y'all will lose interest before summer and Acorn will win in November. You need a backup plan to defeat apathy.
I spent the New Years weekend listening to various conservative stations and I was only hearing hopes and dreams but no real backbone. Prove me wrong guys.
Take the house and send Reid home.
You beat me to it!
I know that politician and dishonesty are one in the same but even for dishonest pols this health care bill is a big ball faced lie! They know what's in in it and yet they will go on TV and say it's a good bill and that it will bend the cost curve downward. Do you all know that there will be a "Floor" mandate on ALL insurance policies that you must buy? No more just catastrophic coverage for young people. No! Single men will have to pay for mammograms and single women will have to pay for prostate exams. And most of the uninsured will be either on Medicaid or Medicare both of which pay much less to the hospitals and doctors that will be required to treat them. Doctors in my area are already turning away new Medicare/Medicaid patients. Guess Who is backing this abomination? That's right, big PHARMA and the health insurance companies! Why? The have both met behind closed doors with the most transparent admin in history to work out kickback deals that guarantee a big profit for all of them.
And finally my last rant. STOP THE F**KING SPENDING!
True, but …
“The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.” ~ Margaret Thatcher (attributed)
Hard place, meet rock …
Barry and his fellow Maoist have completely misread the mood of the electorate, and there’s gonna be hell to pay in November. “66 and ’94 are good analogies except for one thing, The Tea Party movement.
Unfortunately knew this before Obama was elected.
He canceled Fox on AFTV? This should be broadcasted. Do you have more information?
2009 has hereby been renamed to year 0.
History began with the inauguration of Obama.
Well, a new chapter in history…the retaking of America by Americans.
I miss Dubya.
I haven't heard these conservative stations. I also do not see how you could possibly think conservatives are going to lose interest in the only thing they are interested in.
By the way…ever heard of the American dream? You dream it, then you make it happen.
We have nothing to prove to you.
Yes, Republicans have been toothless for decades. What's your point?
That's why we need to take back the Republican party and get all these limpwristed douchbags O_U_T!!!
Remember all the Un-spent stimulus $$$$ waiting in the wings for just prior to the 2010 elections. The Obamatons have a plan. They release a pile of $$$$ into the economy around mid-year and the economy will jump a bit, but enough for the Obamatons to claim that their policies are working. It might save some of the Dem's up for reelection especially if we are not paying attention. They are going to try to ram through as much of their PROGRESSIVE agenda as possible even if they sacrifice their majority. If they keep the majority America as we know it is through!
Stimulus funds to stimulate their chances of reelection.
Of course it was planned.
The extra monies are probably residing in a bank account labeled "Election Grease."
Yes, and the worst part is that WE THE PEOPLE will still suffer from their policies long after they've gone. Who cares what is coming in 2010 since the damage will have already been done. No skin of their teeth. They are on the exempt of all exempt Cadillac plan.
"…so we will never elect thugs like him again." USArmyMom
Every single one of us needs to make it our mission that our voting system is made more secure. We need to hammer our officials with that message. The fact that our voting system is NOT secure from fraud was made extremely evident with Obama’s and Franken’s elections.
It takes a while for something that big to get “repaired.” We can’t wake up and demand it when we remember the danger from the next round of “purchased” and fraudulent votes.
Per the article, "It is important to note that Obama won only 52.9% of the vote."
As I read that, my first thought was, “I’ll bet at least 3% of those votes were fraudulent,” and that would place him at 49.9%.
We also need to be preparing for the sure-to-come amnesty bill, whereby the Dems/Progressives/Libs seek to purchase millions of votes outright, as well as making their revolving payment to SEIU, who desperately needs those new members in order to fund their “Cadillac” benefits.
In an interview during his campaign, Obama was asked about the impact of increasing taxes on the "rich". The interviewer pointed out that it has been proven that lower taxes on the rich spurs job growth and actually increases tax revenues. Obama's responsed that he will increase taxes on the rich because "it is about being fair". Meaning, higher taxes on the rich and redistrbuting this money to the "poor" is the just and fair way to handle it.
News flash Obama, your job as President is not the "Great Equalizer", the "Redistributor of Wealth", or in essence "God". Learn your role you idiot!!!
LBJ in 1968:
“I shall not seek and I will not accept the nomination of my party for another term as your president,”
Lyndon Johnson quote
If were really lucky Obama in 2012
“I shall not seek and I will not accept the nomination of my party for another term as your president,”
Barak Hussein Obama – quote
Is anyone surprised Tommy doesn't mention that President Reagan's party lost 26 seats in the midterm election? Not to mention John F. Kennedy's party only lost four…
"Barack Obama won the Presidency in large part because of a weak economy."
Not true. He won because he was not Bush. Eight years of Bush hating by the media which lied about everything Bush did.
The reason Europe and the Democrats hate Bush is he shut the checkbook on Europeans who were constantly blocking our efforts in foreign affairs. The Dems said he was a cowboy and wanted to go it alone. Instead they wanted to buy Europes support, which they never got.
Obama and Clinton opened the checkbook again and look what it got him.
I disagreed with much of what Bush one and Two did, but they did not hurt this country as much in 12 years as Obama has in 11 months.
The record is not 55, it is 125 House seats the Democrats lost in 1894 following the financial panic of 1893. The Dems won the 2008 congressional vote by 9% which gave then a 40 seat margin. According to Rasmussen, Republicans lead the generic balllot by 9% which should be good for a 40 seat victory (a swing of 80 seats). This 18 point swing has occurred over a 14 month period. If the trend continues and Republicans win by a 20 point margin, the Democrats would lose 125 seats.
Republicans lost 26 seats instead of the 50 predicted because of the deep depression at the time. Reagan was not popular until his tax cuts began to work and two years later … well we all know what happened then.
Why did the Democrats lose any that year??????????????????
A power-change in the House will have a dramatic impact not only on the agenda in Washington, but also accountability, whether it be in Washington D.C. or across the country. We are still waiting on ACORN investigations.
As powerful of a player as the House will be, I am more interested in the Senate. The Senate is where the president's appointments can be reviewed adequately and where true accountability can take place.
His ego would never allow it. Sadly.
Giving the keys of government to radical statists like Pelosi, Barney Frank, Henry Waxman, and Charles Rangel is like giving a mound of crack to Amy Winehouse.
My son, stationed in Germany told me, and he said they were told that Chris Mathews and Keith Olberman have taken Oreilly's place. Oreilly and Fox news cancelled. The soldiers are pissed. They were told that Chris Mathews and Keith Olberman are more popular here in the states and that's why they changed the programming. I've emailed fox news manager, but got no response. I wish someone would find out and get this on the news. I've emailed everyone at Fox, but I think they get thousands of emails and probably don't read mine.
The pendulum swings. Obama will go down in history as a joke, a bad joke. The only thing good about him is that he shows us what bad character looks like, so we will never elect thugs like him again.
"I believe myself that the secretary of state, secretary of defense and – you have to make your own decisions as to what the president knows – (know) this war is lost and the surge is not accomplishing anything as indicated by the extreme violence in Iraq yesterday," said Reid, D-Nev, [2007].
I believe myself that the senate majority leader, speaker of the house and – you have to make your own decisions as to what the president knows – (know) the war in the house is lost and the senate is not accomplishing anything as indicated by the extreme violence at the town hall meetings," said Reid, D-Nev, [2010].
If Health care passes,It will be forever-impossible to
overturn and Our Country will be toast.
If we can just dodge enough bullets
from the libs and hang on long enough
to cripple Obama in nov 2010
we just may survive–GO Mr.Brown
you can win in Massachusetts….
It is possible–Now THAT is hope and change we need..
2010 is a referendum on Mr. Redistribution of Wealth and his radical marxist agenda (read:governement is the source of all wisdom–the little people– aka ordinary citizens– are too dumb to plot their own paths.
I can't wait unbtil this turkey we have for a president–one who blatantly lied when he swore allegiance to the Consitution–has to deal with a Republican house and senate after the2010 elections. That's change I can believe in –the RIGHT (as in being correct and in being conservative) change.
Oh, dear! You just ruined my tingle!
Maybe we should rewrite the opening of Genesis.
So many of you are just giddy over the prospect of the GOP making huge electoral gains and possibly even winning a majority in the House. Personally, I would rather see the GOP win the Senate and only narrow the gap in the house – think judges. What is lost in all of this premature jubilation is that the White House and the Leftist media will pull the triangulation bit and try to create a public perception that it is all the fault of the Republicans. Also, if the Republicans succeed in altering the agenda of King Numb-nuts, things may improve to the point where the average moron voter returns this disaster to power in 2012. Raise your hand if a Republican politician you USED to admire has caved to leftist/media pressure instead of defending themselves.
We need a new breed (or maybe a really old one?) that believes in Constitutionally limited government, the sanctity of the vote and the primacy of individual rights and liberties.
Rather than reply to a bunch of posts, I say those who complain that Obama "needs to learn" "doesn't get it" or "misread". No. WRONG! He just doesn't care.
Another thought to brighten your day: We all know what a disaster Carter was while in office. We all know what a disastrous meddling ass he became after being unequivocally rejected by the electorate. Obama is young and seemingly quite healthy. He is probably less able to cope with rejection than Carter was. The "media" loves him. How compelling (at least to idiots) will the "He was never given a chance" narrative be? What will he choose to meddle in? How much worse will he be once he is a FORMER president? Ugh…
I think you are right! They obviously don't appreciate what we have because all they want to do is change it.
Your parents were wise.
Great point! Apparently he never had to really work for anything either.
I'm on the verge of becoming nostalgic for **Carter** !
These Dems will be long gone in Nov. The gravity of what they have tried to do, and are doing, will not be lost for a very long time.
You are all on something. You don't realize that reps or dems are one and the same. THEY ARE ALL THUGS. The system is corrupt and it is collapsing. We need SOMEBODY to dismantle it from within and set Constitutional brakes so that the FED be put in the box and locked up. Nowhere does it say that the Government is responsible for economic growth. Just do away with the interstate commerce clause and that would solve a lot of problems.
These comments are offensvie to the Democratic Supremecist.
I may be old fashioned, but while reading this article, the every changing twitter scroll on the screen is a very annoying distraction. I am interested in Del Beccaro's views, not a bunch of twitters.
Sounds like something similar to 5 years ago when I was in Korea. The Dems complained that AFN radio broadcast all 3 hours of Rush Limbaugh. AFN was forced to reduce that to only the 1st hour of his program. Can assure you that the troops will scream bloody murder if this has actually happened.
FWIW, most AFN programming is provided free to AFN. Perhaps FOX withdrew their free programming.
I'd be interested to know more details.
Mary,
You, too, noticed that Michael Steele isn't exactly giving the talking points that one would expect an RNC chairman to be expressing at this juncture.
Only a know-nothing Democrat believes that you can "stimulate" the shallow end of the pool by taking water out of the deep end. Only, in this case, we've leveraged TRILLIONS in doing something that an 8-year-old can understand is pointless.
This is by design. This is calculated, planned and being executed – even at the cost of the political careers of its proponents.
Ask yourself this: Who would do something that they KNEW was going to cost them DIRECTLY if there wasn't another agenda at play? Only the most sold-out socialist could POSSIBLY believe that the likes of Reid and "fancy Nancy" are thinking about THEM. Nancy hasn't done her own laundry in more than 40 years, but she has our best interest at heart….? Could it be even fathomable that even the most entrenched Democrat is this delusional? This is the societal equivalent to saying "Mussolini made the trains run on time". It's abhorrent, sinful, and abominable.
None of this will matter – win-or-lose – in November, unless the GDP (generally dumb public) [sorry - it's accurate] decides to throw out the bums at the most LOCAL level of politics while they are at it. If you vote NATIONALLY, and refuse to think LOCALLY, you are only enabling the NEXT generation of thugs and crooks. I don't CARE if you think your councilman (or woman) is a "good person"… remind them, by example, that their jobs are YOURS. Throw every single incumbent out, without question, and then we'll see something. Otherwise, it's a Band-Aid on a bullet-wound. Nothing more. The pendulum will continue to slice us in half as it does what pendulums do. Don't just THINK IT… DEMAND IT. Make it happen. Your vote is NEVER more powerful than in your LOCAL elections.
Nope.
"except for one thing" — No leadership and not one single tea-bagger smarter than Obama's dog.
Dr. Paul's Tea Party movement doesn't like any of you and more than they like the current Democrats. People you supported religiously and obediently caused this mess and are more than willing to cause it again with a complete doofus like Sarah "GW III" Palin.
Yeah. Make ut secure like it was in Florida in 2000. You sleaze should not be allowed anywhere near our voting sytem thank you very much. We've seen your style of "protection". It was just used in Iran a few months ago.
Bill Clinton was a smart politician. Obama is not. Bill ended up claiming credit for Repub bills by Newt. O has the misfortune of Harry who should have a talk with the novice pres. A lot of Dems are going to bite the dust. I look forward to it
Please lets stop knocking industries where so many good Americans honestly work. It is easy to say these industries are bad just like the government. They are not. The government in many cases strong arms these companies. I have many friends who work in insurance and the medical field. All very good honest people.
They create a crisis, blow it out of proportion, then take advantage of the situation with new taxes and regulation. This sums up the modern day Democrats. It all creates a climate of uncertainty that discourages hiring and investing.
http://theillinoisguy.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/un...
"They were told that Chris Mathews and Keith Olberman are more popular here in the states and that's why they changed the programming."
Are you kidding me? Our armed forces were told that? That is blatant propaganda. The WH lies continue…this is pathetic.
Are you talking about the hanging chad scandal?
Newsflash: whatever the Dems accuse someone else of doing is EXACTLY what they are doing. We have all seen it time and time again. The Dems were so worried about the "rigged" election of Bush because they have been rigging elections for years and the best they could come up with was "hanging chads"?
Mickey Mouse voted in 2008 for goodness sake! Give me a break.
What a loser. "gwlll"??? Nobody refers to bush as gwll. Your tea-bagger comment shows what a little man you are. PATHETIC.
Dude – nobody has to be any less sleazy or less of a bunch of losers or anything other than above room temperature. Just like when the Dems won the last 2 elections. In case you haven't noticed people are pissed.
"In 1964, the Democrats were sitting atop the political world."
Damn brah! Am I glad in '64 I had no connection to the world for a few years yet. The wisdom beset strenuous hails the future.
Can we get on with it? For better or worse.
I guess the lessons of 2010 do not loom high over Republicans – and that's a good thing for America.
Republicans just got their ass handed to them AGAIN yesterday – In Virginia's special election for the vacant 8th state Senate District:
"Marsden, 61, a two-term delegate from Burke who switched political parties earlier this decade while serving as the head of the state Department of Juvenile Justice under both Republican and Democratic governors, won the 37th state Senate seat vacated by Attorney General-elect Cuccinelli (R) by rallying a voter base reeling from big losses in November's statewide and House races.
Marsden's victory over Republican Stephen M. "Steve" Hunt, a former Fairfax County School Board member, also expands the control of Virginia Democrats in the Senate chamber and makes compromise less likely heading into redistricting next year."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/arti...
I guess the lessons of 2010 do not loom high over Republicans – and that's a good thing for America.
Republicans just got their ass handed to them AGAIN yesterday – In Virginia's special election for the vacant 8th state Senate District:
"Marsden, 61, a two-term delegate from Burke who switched political parties earlier this decade while serving as the head of the state Department of Juvenile Justice under both Republican and Democratic governors, won the 37th state Senate seat vacated by Attorney General-elect Cuccinelli (R) by rallying a voter base reeling from big losses in November's statewide and House races.
Marsden's victory over Republican Stephen M. "Steve" Hunt, a former Fairfax County School Board member, also expands the control of Virginia Democrats in the Senate chamber and makes compromise less likely heading into redistricting next year."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/arti...
I guess the lessons of 2010 do not loom high over Republicans – and that's a good thing for America.
Republicans just got their ass handed to them AGAIN yesterday – In Virginia's special election for the vacant 8th state Senate District:
"Marsden, 61, a two-term delegate from Burke who switched political parties earlier this decade while serving as the head of the state Department of Juvenile Justice under both Republican and Democratic governors, won the 37th state Senate seat vacated by Attorney General-elect Cuccinelli (R) by rallying a voter base reeling from big losses in November's statewide and House races.
Marsden's victory over Republican Stephen M. "Steve" Hunt, a former Fairfax County School Board member, also expands the control of Virginia Democrats in the Senate chamber and makes compromise less likely heading into redistricting next year."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/arti...
Sounds cute. Have any candidates with approval ratings higher then the Dems? Even higher than the 30's? Have any candidates that aren't looked upon right now as a bigger bunch of sleazy losers than the Dems? No? Any leadership? Anybody with a message? A solution? An answer? No? Good luck with that.
The real agenda of the Democrats started long ago when Adam Weishaupt (Jew turned Catholic) in Rome, the Vatican invented the Illuminati ("New World Order under LUCIFER"). One of it's first members was his best friend Karl Marx! If you can not see the picture, this was the beginnings of the FASCIST/MARXIST MOVEMENT embraced by the Democratic Party. Another secret society called the FreeMasons joined this movement, including George Washington, T. Jefferson, J. Adams, etc.). Note: Ben Franklin, who made our government get off the ground was a Illuminati member, which become this "New World Order concept in America! Weishaupt also invented the "Seeing-Eve" emblem saying "Announcing the New World Order" that another Mason, FDR put on the dollar bill! The Democratic Party, including any Republican Skull and Crossbones i.e.,(Daddy G. Bush, G.W., etc.) members believe in this Illuminati movement! They are leading America into accepting Lucifer as our Savior, or DIE!!!
I happen to know that you, Syntax_game, are one of the original trolls who have lurked around this site nearly since its inception. I don't waste my time on trolls.
Great job, wonder_all.
Did I feed a troll?
I believe so, wonder_all, but you fed it Truth, and I was appreciative of your riding to the rescue.
I was advised of Syntax_game's status by one of the early commenters some time back. A couple of others are Scott and PTeknology. (May have gotten the names less than correct, but you probably already recognize them. There are others, of course, and it is futile to joust with them. They know no reason. Sometimes it is extremely satisfying to win the match though. All it takes is facts.
Oh hey Syntax what’s up in the 57th state. As a salad tosser you’d know a teabagger. You really love your Barry, kinda weird to love a Washington politician as an American, you are an American, being from the 57th state and all? Any how – Syntax, you get yourself out of bed around noon, and even as a salad tosser who resides in the 57th state might find yourself a three letter word “jobs,” and remember Barry loves you!
"I don't waste my time on trolls" — Well that explains your lack of a reply to my comment. Thanks for the intelligent explanation.
"Are you talking about the hanging chad scandal? " — No.
"Your tea-bagger comment shows what a little man you are. PATHETIC. " — Pretty typical and predictable Tea-bagger response. Schematics over a "I" is the best defense of ex-governor Doofus? Please, define "PATHETIC" without using your comment as an example. Good luck with that.
I didn’t realize a salad tosser cared about reasoned thought.
You seem obsessed over my alleged salad tossing. Stop hitting on me.
I’m just responding in kind. You can play with yourself if you like.
Stan, you're a trip.
The pool was a good analogy. Well-said.
However, I do plan to vote for the re-election of Lamar Smith. He has always tried to stay in touch with his constituency and their opinions, and he stands firm in our fight against the tide of illegal aliens.
..and your intelligent point is hiding where?
"Mickey Mouse voted in 2008 for goodness sake!" — Can you please provide a credible link for this big-honkin' lie as well? I Googled it and I couldn't find this BS lie anywhere. Happen in your Imaginationland did it? If not, please enlighten us as to when and where Mickey Mouse or someone disguised as Mickey Mouse actually showed up to vote somewhere.
"but you fed it Truth" — Yes…Mickey Mouse votes! TRUTH lmao.
How many seat did Bush lose in the mid-term election of 2006 not to mention Governor seats as well? I think it broke some sort of record didn't it?
You must be logged in to post a comment.