<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big Government &#187; TSA screeners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biggovernment.com/tag/tsa-screeners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biggovernment.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:34:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A Simple Question For TSA</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/bparks/2011/06/04/a-simple-question-for-tsa/</link>
		<comments>http://biggovernment.com/bparks/2011/06/04/a-simple-question-for-tsa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 20:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Parks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Security Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA screeners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=279336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
According to www.tsa.gov, it makes no mention of not being able to choose the gender of your screener.
If you must go through additional screening, the screener will direct you from the metal detector to a screening station where he or she will brief you on the next steps.

Except in extraordinary circumstances, a screener of your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="349" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FppRHmtGT8M?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FppRHmtGT8M?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.tsa.gov/travelers/airtravel/assistant/editorial_1049.shtm" target="_blank">www.tsa.gov</a>, it makes no mention of not being able to choose the gender of your screener.</p>
<blockquote><p>If you must go through additional screening, the screener will direct you from the metal detector to a screening station where he or she will brief you on the next steps.</p>
<ul>
<li>Except in extraordinary circumstances, a screener of your gender will conduct your additional screening. You may request that your search be conducted in private.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>I dunno. There seems to be some gray area here but I&#8217;d personally prefer to be felt up by someone of the opposite sex. If there&#8217;s a <em>reaction</em>, consider it a compliment.</p>
<p><span id="more-279336"></span></p>
<p>Obviously, TSA doesn&#8217;t want to put their employees in an uncomfortable position, but it&#8217;s okay for them to do so to the taxpaying public. See how that works?</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://biggovernment.com/bparks/2011/06/04/a-simple-question-for-tsa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Look For the Label.</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/cmuir/2010/11/19/look-for-the-label/</link>
		<comments>http://biggovernment.com/cmuir/2010/11/19/look-for-the-label/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 20:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Muir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA screeners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=197881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biggovernment.com/files/2010/11/111910BG.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-197885" title="111910BG" src="http://biggovernment.com/files/2010/11/111910BG.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="200" /></a></p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://biggovernment.com/cmuir/2010/11/19/look-for-the-label/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Con Air 2010 (TSA Remix)</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2010/11/18/con-air-2010-tsa-remix/</link>
		<comments>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2010/11/18/con-air-2010-tsa-remix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reason TV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Tyner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reason Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reason magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reason TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reason.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Balaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation security administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA screeners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war on terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=197533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Cameron Poe is back, and he&#8217;s getting an enhanced pat down (just like you).
This holiday travel season, we&#8217;re all convicts.

Approximately 30 seconds.
&#8220;Con Air 2010 (TSA Remix)&#8221; is written and produced by Ted Balaker.
Related video: Coming Soon to an Airport Near You: Prison-style strip searches? 
Visit Reason.tv for HD, iPod, and audio versions of this and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="340" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/A8n432p8kP4?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/A8n432p8kP4?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Cameron Poe is back, and he&#8217;s getting an enhanced pat down (just like you).</p>
<p>This holiday travel season, we&#8217;re all convicts.</p>
<p><span id="more-197533"></span></p>
<p>Approximately 30 seconds.</p>
<p>&#8220;Con Air 2010 (TSA Remix)&#8221; is written and produced by Ted Balaker.</p>
<p>Related video: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLZq2iaMpXY">Coming Soon to an Airport Near You: Prison-style strip searches? </a></p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://reason.tv/">Reason.tv</a> for HD, iPod, and audio versions of this and all our videos, and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/ReasonTV">subscribe to Reason.tv&#8217;s YouTube channel</a> to receive automatic notification when new content is posted.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2010/11/18/con-air-2010-tsa-remix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Get The Security We Deserve</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/11/18/we-get-the-security-we-deserve/</link>
		<comments>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/11/18/we-get-the-security-we-deserve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew  Marcus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jihad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorsts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA groping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA screeners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=197573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are upset about the Orwellian TSA screening procedures in effect in our nation&#8217;s airports, too bad.


Our country has gone back to sleep, reverting to a 9/10 military posture vis-à-vis the Jihad being waged against us infidels. How can you tell? Once again, Progressive Americans are treating terrorists as though they are simply criminals [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are upset about the <a href="http://biggovernment.com/jhoft/2010/11/18/it-beginsohio-woman-with-baby-describes-sexual-assault-by-tsa-agent-video/" target="_blank">Orwellian</a> TSA <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/nov/15/tsa-probe-scan-resistor/" target="_blank">screening</a> procedures in effect in our nation&#8217;s airports, too bad.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://biggovernment.com/files/2010/11/article-1166157-0433AC7F000005DC-43_634x3571.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-197641" title="article-1166157-0433AC7F000005DC-43_634x357" src="http://biggovernment.com/files/2010/11/article-1166157-0433AC7F000005DC-43_634x3571.jpg" alt="" width="444" height="250" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p>Our country has gone back to sleep, reverting to a 9/10 military posture vis-à-vis the Jihad being waged against us infidels. How can you tell? Once again, Progressive Americans are treating terrorists as though they are simply criminals who should face justice in a civilian-criminal court of law. When Yemen sends crotch and printer bombs, we send in the FBI. This was the 9/10 (or) Progressive response to the Jihad, which made possible the events of 9/11.</p>
<p>Another example of our return to a 9/10 mindset can be found in our reactions to Islamists declaring Jihad against us. <a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/fatwa_1996.html" target="_blank">When Osama did it in 1996</a> (FROM YEMEN), the West yawned. Who was this sandman to declare war on us, we thought. Only <em>we</em> declare war &#8211; nobody else has that power or capacity, right? Once again, Jihad has been declared against us, <a href="http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_multimedia/English/eng_n/html/ipc_e134.htm" target="_blank">now by the Muslim Brotherhood directly.</a> The West is yawning once more.</p>
<p>When we briefly adopted a 9/12 posture against our Islamist enemies, they were too busy running and hiding and dying, to be planning and launching multiple attempts to blow us out of the sky. Our enemies seem to have all the time and breathing room in the world now though, inspiring the question: What ever could have changed over the past couple of years, leading to this new &#8220;normal&#8221; of repeated Yemeni-Jihad bomb plots? Oh well, we could wonder for hours and probably never put our finger on it.</p>
<p><span id="more-197573"></span></p>
<p>If we will not directly attack our enemies with at least the same determination that they bring to bear against us, we can only be defensive and reactive. That means we have no choice but to put up with this, and undoubtedly other, intrusions on our privates.</p>
<p>Again, if people do not like the invasive pat downs and full body imaging, too bad. We get the security we deserve. If we are not willing to fight the fight on offense, then we deserve the humiliations of our defensive posture, and all the cavity probings that come with it.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/11/18/we-get-the-security-we-deserve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>137</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming Soon to an Airport Near You: Prison-style Strip Searches?</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2010/11/15/coming-soon-to-an-airport-near-youprison-style-strip-searches/</link>
		<comments>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2010/11/15/coming-soon-to-an-airport-near-youprison-style-strip-searches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 02:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reason TV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reason Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reason magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reason TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reason.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reason.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strip search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation security administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA screeners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war on terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=196269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
You&#8217;ve heard about the passenger who opted out of a full-body scan (a.k.a. &#8220;a virtual strip search&#8221;)  and was subjected to an intrusive and humiliating pat down. &#8220;If you  touch my junk, I&#8217;ll have you arrested,&#8221; passenger John Tyner told  Transportation Security Administration workers in San Diego.
Well, rest easy, John—and other passengers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="340" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SLZq2iaMpXY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SLZq2iaMpXY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>You&#8217;ve heard about the <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/68539.">passenger</a> who opted out of a full-body scan (a.k.a. &#8220;a virtual strip search&#8221;)  and was subjected to an intrusive and humiliating pat down. &#8220;If you  touch my junk, I&#8217;ll have you arrested,&#8221; passenger John Tyner told  Transportation Security Administration workers in San Diego.</p>
<p>Well, rest easy, John—and other passengers offended by both full-body scans and hands-on searches.</p>
<p>TSA  won&#8217;t touch your junk—or your breasts or buttocks. If they begin to  strip search passengers as if they&#8217;re prison inmates, they&#8217;ll do just  what correctional officers do: They&#8217;ll make <em>you</em> do all the nasty work.</p>
<p>What follows is an excerpt from a training video for prison guards on how to make sure that inmates aren&#8217;t hiding contraband.</p>
<p>The  video makes for extremely uncomfortable watching and viewer  discretion—and outrage—is advised. After all, this may well be the next  step in how the TSA, one of the <a href="http://blogs.forbes.com/artcarden/2010/11/14/full-frontal-nudity-doesnt-make-us-safer-abolish-the-tsa/">least effective and efficient government agencies of all time</a>, goes about its daily business.</p>
<p><span id="more-196269"></span></p>
<p>Approximately 2.43 minutes.</p>
<p>Written and produced by Ted Balaker and Nick Gillespie.</p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://reason.tv/">Reason.tv</a> for HD, iPod, and audio versions of this and all our videos and subscribe to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/ReasonTV">Reason.tv&#8217;s YouTube channel</a> to receive automatic notification when new content is posted.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2010/11/15/coming-soon-to-an-airport-near-youprison-style-strip-searches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>122</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pork Report November 30, 2009: Stimulus Snafus Edition</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/porkreport/2009/11/30/pork-report-november-30-2009-stimulus-snafus-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://biggovernment.com/porkreport/2009/11/30/pork-report-november-30-2009-stimulus-snafus-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Pork Report</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pork Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bike paths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eminent domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Services Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA screeners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weatherization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=38770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tens of thousands of TSA screeners to receive government bonuses, including millions of dollars paid to more than 10,000 who have been rated poorly
Government bailout watch:  Despite receiving $5.5 billion in stimulus funds, Government Services Administration’s backlog of deferred maintenance projects now totals $8.8 billion and the agency is proposing billions of dollars in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tens of thousands of TSA screeners <a href="http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20091123/BENEFITS01/911230301/1041/BENEFITS">to receive government bonuses</a>, including millions of dollars paid to more than 10,000 who have been rated poorly</p>
<p>Government bailout watch:  Despite receiving $5.5 billion in stimulus funds, Government Services Administration’s <a href="http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20091130/FACILITIES02/911300303/1001">backlog of deferred maintenance projects now totals $8.8 billion</a> and the agency is proposing billions of dollars in new projects</p>
<p>As stimulus money doubles Wisconsin’s weatherization budget, a review finds weatherization work done on hundreds of low-income homes <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/watchdogreports/77925427.html">failed to meet federal standards</a>; Inspectors found projects done in a way that could threaten the safety of residents or  did not save enough energy</p>
<p>Stimulus funds pay to <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/community/gilbert/articles/2009/11/26/20091126stim-odd1126.html">replace “unattractive” streetlights;</a> The new lights “aren’t especially energy-efficient, and the old ones work”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-fed-ads26-2009nov26,0,2775391.story">Federal Reserve tries theater ads</a> to improve its image</p>
<p>Las Vegas’ $4.1 million housing plan built on federal stimulus money <a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/nov/30/squabbles-hold-help/">stalled over squabbles</a> about how to hand out the money and to whom</p>
<p><span id="more-38770"></span></p>
<p>Illinois using <a href="http://www.sj-r.com/homepage/x441559875/Heirs-to-land-needed-for-bike-path-sought-in-eminent-domain-suit">eminent domain to obtain private property to build a bike path</a> intended to be funded with federal stimulus dollars</p>
<p>IRS employees bought unauthorized <a href="http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20091115/TRAVEL02/911150306/1002/TRAVEL">first-class plane tickets</a></p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://biggovernment.com/porkreport/2009/11/30/pork-report-november-30-2009-stimulus-snafus-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

