The Obama-Pelosi-Reid regime marched into office pledging to provide the most transparent federal government in American history. I was looking forward to that.
The way to make government responsible is to hold it accountable. And the way to make government accountable is make it transparent so that the American people can know exactly what decisions are being made, how they’re being made, and whether their interests are being well served.
Mr. President, live up to your statement and ask Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to simply show us the bill.
Tags: government transparency, ObamaCare, Pelosicare, public option, Reid Health care Posted Dec 19th 2009 at 6:40 am in Congress, Politics |
49242347 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2Fkolson%2F2009%2F12%2F19%2Ftransparency-is-first-rationing-victim-of-reids-obamacare%2FTransparency+Is+First+Rationing+Victim+of+Reid%E2%80%99s+ObamaCare2009-12-19+14%3A40%3A01Kyle+Olsonhttp%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2F%3Fp%3D49242
Tags: Clement Moore, fillibuster, government health care, Harry Reid, Reid Health care Posted Dec 18th 2009 at 5:46 pm in Congress, Culture, Politics |
4947442 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2Fkbond%2F2009%2F12%2F18%2Ftwas-the-congress-before-christmas%2FTwas+the+Congress+Before+Christmas2009-12-19+01%3A46%3A42Sen.+Kit+Bond+%28R-MO%29http%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2F%3Fp%3D49474
When the AARP began its full-throated support for the President’s Health Care Scheme many wondered why this venerable organization would support a plan which would cut hundreds of billions of dollars from Medicare, mostly by putting strict price controls on the very popular Medicare Advantage program.
By putting enormous price controls (cuts) in the Medicare Advantage program, many seniors will be forced to look to the other Medicare supplemental offer, MediGap. It just so happens that AARP sells MediGap coverage to its members. The income generated from those sales accounts for 60.3% of AARP’s revenues, ten years ago, this income only accounted for 10% of their budget.
So, in short, the Obama Health Care Scheme puts hundreds of millions of dollars in AARP’s coffers by forcing seniors off of Medicare Advantage and into MediGap programs. You would think that this was enough of a payback to the AARP for their support. But Big Government now reveals another little prize that has been awarded to AARP in time for their recent official endorsement of the Senate Bill.
Tags: AARP, Big Hollywood, federal grants, Medicaid, Medicare Posted Dec 18th 2009 at 9:29 am in Healthcare, Politics, Uncategorized |
4911867 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2Fsright%2F2009%2F12%2F18%2Fbehind-the-curtain-why-aarp-supports-obamacare%2FBehind+the+Curtain%3A+Why+AARP+Supports+ObamaCare2009-12-18+17%3A29%3A08Larry+O%27Connorhttp%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2F%3Fp%3D49118
In a blow to the bill grinding through the Senate, Howard Dean bluntly called for the bill to be killed in a pre-recorded interview set to air later this afternoon, denouncing it as “the collapse of health care reform in the United States Senate,” the reporter who conducted the interview tells me.
Dean said the removal of the Medicare buy-in made the bill not worth supporting, and urged Dem leaders to start over with the process of reconciliation in the interview, which is set to air at 5:50 PM today on Vermont Public Radio, political reporter Bob Kinzel confirms to me. (more…)
On October 12, 2008, then Presidential candidate Barack Obama made a campaign stop in a quiet suburban neighborhood in Toledo, Ohio. What was supposed to be an uneventful run of the mill “Grip and Grin,” turned into something quite the contrary. Our future President and the world were introduced to Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher: a proud American who unwittingly became the symbol of the “every man” trying to escape the far reaching arm of Big Government.
Joe the Plumber….a great American….A great bald American. I do not come from a critical place when I mention the state of Joe’s hair, or the lack thereof. In fact, despite the flowing mane of the anonymous avatar under which I post here today, I too, am a follicly challenged American….but not for long.
And this is where the press and the world missed the real story behind that fateful exchange in October of 2008.
As are most Americans, I am closely monitoring the status of S.1796 – America’s Healthy Future Act of 2009. When it comes to Healthcare everybody has a different horse in the race. For example, we have all heard the concerns that a government run healthcare system would potentially “Kill Grandma.” Now this is a legitimate beef, but being that my grandmothers are currently not alive, this is not at the forefront of my concerns. However, what did occur to me was that in the growing chorus of objections to the bill, nobody seemed to be concerned about “Grandpa.” Why? Why was Grandpa never mentioned? How come nobody was talking about killing him? Why does he get to live?
I’ll be the first to admit that anti-trust law is not my strong suit. The myriad implications of cable giant Comcast’s proposed acquisition of NBC are complexities beyond the grasp of most mortals. Legions of attorneys will put legions of children through college with the fees that this transaction will generate. This is the kind of stimulus that will inject much-needed capital into the private country club sector of the economy.
But beyond the regulatory and legal minutia that technically govern this proposed deal, one obscenely crass, downright offensive action by Comcast’s CEO warrants the application of withering scrutiny to the merger.
A day, one single day, after the two media giants announced their deal, Comcast CEO Brian Roberts proudly weighed in to strongly support the Senate Democrats’ health care reform bill.
Tags: anti-trust, Brian Roberts, Comcast, Comcast merger, employer health care Posted Dec 4th 2009 at 9:46 am in Economics, Healthcare, Justice/Legal, News, Obama, Politics |
41222537 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2Fcapitolconfidential%2F2009%2F12%2F04%2Fcomcast-nbc-deal-does-the-mergers-approval-rest-on-health-care%2FComcast-NBC+Deal%3A+Does+the+Merger%27s+Approval+Rest+on+Health+Care%3F+2009-12-04+16%3A46%3A55Capitol+Confidentialhttp%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2F%3Fp%3D41222
Last weekend Democrats in the U.S. Senate took another step toward passing their government run healthcare legislation. The more we have come to learn about this legislation, the more we all have cause to be concerned about this plan. It fundamentally does not focus on patients or on quality care. In fact, it is a fiscal albatross for our already ballooning federal budget deficit.
This proposal will cost taxpayers up to $2.5 trillion, create a massive new entitlement, raise taxes, add to the federal deficit and fail to solve our nation’s health care crisis. It is the kind of big government answer that we have come to expect from Democrats, particularly my opponent, Barbara Boxer. It is the same answer that has proven to fail this country time and time again.
Among the many problems with this legislation, of significant concern is the impact it will have on the ability of doctors and individuals to make decisions about care, particularly for women. Last week a government appointed panel issued a set of recommendations regarding mammograms and self-exams for women in their 40s and 50s. Specifically, this panel discouraged women from self-exams, said women in their 40s should not get annual mammograms as is currently advised, and recommended women in their 50s get mammograms just every two years. As a breast cancer survivor who found my own cancer through a self-exam just two weeks after a routine mammogram, I was alarmed. To be honest, if I had followed these recommendations I am not sure what my own prognosis would have been.
Tags: breast cancer, government health care, mammograms, ObamaCare, Pelosicare Posted Nov 24th 2009 at 8:20 pm in Healthcare, News, Politics |
3672668 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2Fcfiorina%2F2009%2F11%2F24%2Fbig-government-the-wrong-answer-on-health-care%2FBig+Government+the+Wrong+Answer+on+Health+Care2009-11-25+03%3A20%3A51Carly+Fiorinahttp%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2F%3Fp%3D36726
Nobody outside the inner halls of Congress really knows what’s going on in the negotiations on health care “reform. Every now and then, someone emerges from the formerly smoke-filled rooms and throws another 2,000 or so page “bill” out into the public and then disappears to continue talks to carve up one-sixth of the nation’s economy.
But we do know some of the critical unforgiving numbers. And we have strong reason to suspect that radical changes to Medicare Part E (as in Medicare for Everybody) is the real endgame, whatever the interim steps are called: public option, cooperatives, or mandated Insurance Exchanges.
We have the unmentionable truth that Medicare is insolvent. And the common dogma that Medicare is efficient, popular, and impregnable. Is it a Hegelian thesis and antithesis? With the synthesis being to throw the whole rest of the system, which is also allegedly bankrupting the country, into Medicare?
Are our leaders stark, raving mad? Or diabolically clever?
Tags: bernie madoff, complete lives system, cooperatives, david walker, ezekiel emanuel Posted Nov 22nd 2009 at 8:31 am in Congress, Healthcare, Politics |
3487091 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2Fjorient%2F2009%2F11%2F22%2Fis-medicare-the-real-target-of-health-care-reform%2FIs+Medicare+the+Real+Target+of+%27Health+Care+Reform%3F%272009-11-22+15%3A31%3A46Dr.+Jane+Orienthttp%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2F%3Fp%3D34870
There simply is no other way to explain the statements of White House Chief of Staff Jacob Lew this morning on CNN's State of the Union. Lew was asked by Candy Crawley about a recent statement by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid indicating he would not be bringing a...