Posts Tagged ‘regulatory costs’

Wayne Crews

Runaway Spending and Deficits–Plus Runaway Regulation

by Wayne Crews
Today, the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law will conduct a hearing on “Cost-Justifying Regulations: Protecting Jobs and the Economy by Presidential and Judicial Review of Costs and Benefits.”

These hearings are long overdue. Runaway regulation is now nipping at the the heels of runaway spending and deficits. The Dodd-Frank financial legislation alone has already, as of April, generated 3.3 million words of regulation in 3,500 Federal Register pages, according to the Wall Street Journal, and the translation of law-to-rules there has barely begun.

A much-cited evaluation of the United States federal regulatory enterprise for the Small Business Administration finds annual regulatory compliance costs hit $1.75 trillion. (Criticisms of this report have emerged; but for starters let’s recognize that estimated costs of Sarbanes-Oxley alone–the post-Enron but pre-Dodd Frank financial law–top $1 trillion.)

The expanding scope of federal regulations is newly explored in the 2011 edition of the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Ten Thousand Commandments: An Annual Snapshot of the Federal Regulatory State. (The report also has been circulated this week as a Dear Colleague letter by Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY)).

Of note:

(more…)

Thomas Del Beccaro

California’s Revenue Problem – Educators Should Demand Economic Growth Not Tax Increases

by Thomas Del Beccaro

In what is becoming a perennial affair, the California budget deficit is projected to be over $21 billion in the coming year – including a $6 billion hangover from this year.  With the same degree of regularity, in pursuit of stable education funding (a good idea), educators in California are calling for tax rate increases (a bad idea) and blaming Republican legislators for blocking those increases (an unproductive idea).   Rather than call for more tax rate increases – one of the causes of our current problems –educators should call for policies that will increase private sector jobs so we have more people paying taxes – not less.

Road_Sign_Welcome_to_Nevada

At first blush, it may be hard to believe that we have another deficit.  After all, in 2008, expenditures were far in excess of $100 billion.   Expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year were just over $90 billion.  With all that cutting, shouldn’t we have a balanced budget?  The answer is no – because budgets are a two-part equation: deficit/surplus = spending – revenues.  In California’s case, revenues have plummeted faster than expenditures – and continue to do so at a perilous rate.  Worse yet, California’s Legislative Analysts Office projects huge deficits for years to come.

Nevertheless, Democrats and many educators are calling for ever more tax rate increases in a dangerous game of economic roulette with California jobs.  Keep in mind that California already has the 6th highest tax rate in the Country.  Why not shoot for number #1?  Three reasons:

(more…)