Myth of a ‘Recovery’: What the Numbers Really Say
by Charles C. JohnsonLast night, at the State of the Union address, President Obama spoke of a recovery, but the evidence for such a recovery doesn’t really exist.
The national unemployment is now 8.5% (December’s), its lowest level since January 2009, but while some saw this welcome news as something to celebrate, it hides a much darker economic picture: the jobs report vastly undercounts the unemployment rate. Moreover, as of this writing, we don’t know if December’s jobs report is a trend, or if, as some economists predict, economic growth will slow in the first quarter of 2012, forestalling some of the gains made. In November, the unemployment rate fell from 9% to 8.6%, but this was not due to an increase in jobs, but due to a decrease in the numbers of people “actively seeking” them. “The 315,000 who dropped out of the labor market exceeded the 120,000 new jobs,” notes Edward Luce, former speechwriter to then Treasury Secretary and Obama economic advisor Larry Summers in The Financial Times. “If the same number of people were looking for work today as in 2007, the jobless rate would be 11%.” In December 2007, the U.S. economy employed 146 million; today, four years later, it employs 140 million. The population has grown; the number of jobs has declined.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?