<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big Government &#187; Political Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biggovernment.com/tag/political-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biggovernment.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:34:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Politics Grip Us</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/jbradley/2011/06/03/politics-grip-us/</link>
		<comments>http://biggovernment.com/jbradley/2011/06/03/politics-grip-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harold Dwight Lasswell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political thought]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=277552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To the men and women who inspired this post. May your victories be triumphant and your defeats devastating.

The established academic definition of the word Politics was  put forth by Harold Dwight Lasswell. Laswell was a 20th Century  political scientist and he defined politics as a struggle for power that  ultimately decided “Who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>To the men and women who inspired this post. May your victories be triumphant and your defeats devastating.</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://biggovernment.com/files/2011/06/10231137AFreedom-Of-Speech-Posters.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-278720" title="10231137A~Freedom-Of-Speech-Posters" src="http://biggovernment.com/files/2011/06/10231137AFreedom-Of-Speech-Posters.jpg" alt="" width="361" height="450" /></a></strong></p>
<p>The established academic definition of the word <em>Politics</em> was  put forth by Harold Dwight Lasswell. Laswell was a 20th Century  political scientist and he defined politics as a struggle for power that  ultimately decided “Who Gets What, When, How.&#8221; That is a serviceable  meaning that gives understanding to the word in its academic form. Yet,  somehow I doubt that is what turns people on to politics. In fact, if it  were so, if that were the story, many would fail to pay attention. “Who  Gets What, When, How” is decided in chambers and behind doors. Politics  is a spectator’s sport made for the open field. Power to decide is only  the final ends to a much bigger and fascinating story that is routinely  played out. Mr. Lasswell’s and those like him missed it altogether.  Scientifically sterile, they rushed for a diagnosis and never even  glanced at the patient. Lasswell’s dictum severs the story from its true  source.</p>
<p>Politics it is just that: A story. Politics is a human story. It is  about people — their ambitions, desires, visions, personalities,  strengths, weaknesses, triumphs and vulnerabilities. Since it is a  contest of the strong willed and the dynamic kind, naturally only the  ambitious enter this arena. It is not made for the timid and even its  most accomplished contestants will emerge with scars. That is why some  unlikely friendships have emerged from inside politics. They see their  lot as a fraternity. They hold a sort of boxer’s respect for one  another. And rightly so, it takes a person with a unique constitution to  compete in such a personal fashion. They are gladiators for our  amusement and entertainment. They live to enter that arena, not  government. Government is a job. Politics is a behavior. Government is  boring. Politics is anything but boring.</p>
<p><span id="more-277552"></span></p>
<p>Indeed, politics in action is, in itself, an intricate and unfolding  plot loaded with a cast of characters. A whirlwind of personalities,  strategies, and machinations grip us during campaign season. It is to no  one’s doubt that politics has gotten professional. Million dollar  staffs comprised of policy wonks and personal handlers’ create campaigns  that are tightly wound cocoons. It is a scientific system of damage  control. These hired guns advise candidates from everything on what to  wear, what to eat while in public, and what opinion to give on certain  questions. Consider, if you will, a highly centralized system of  preventive maintenance. This has in time turned many people off as it  seems to render candidates as phonies. Much like, I suspect, boxing fans  reacted when padded gloves were introduced. On the other hand, it  thickens the plot for spectators to enjoy. We stay gripped and watch as  each tiny layer is peeled off one by one. We wait. Then the facade  crashes down exposing a frail and empty individual. They fail the test  and in many cases lose our respect. Or the wonderful implosion happens.  Sometimes it is so terrifically catastrophic they vanish into thin air.  We love these parts of the plot almost as much as we enjoy seeing “our”  guy win. Politics has always been a reality show long before there was  ever such a genre.</p>
<p>As I said, it is a story about people. We cheer on our candidates as  much as we do our favorite athletes. National polls become our pennant  races. Election night becomes our super bowl. We give them more of our  money than we do to charities and churches. We put our trusts and pin  our hopes upon a single, solitary person. And sometimes we get it right.  When we do, we create an image and an idea of how this person really  and truly is or was. So much to the point that individual is hardly that  at all, an individual; he or she lives on as an immortal who will  define a particular time in history for us. We do this with having never  met them. In fact, rarely are we ever within fewer of a hundred miles  of them. In other cases, a hundred years may separate us. So to keep  them close to us, we ensure they live on in new form of existence as a  doctrine, a holiday, a noun, an airport or an aircraft carrier.</p>
<p>Politics is much more than a method to power. It has several parts to  its whole. Politics is a grand stage, an open cathedral, used to  observe humanity. It is the microscope that reveals who we are. Politics  is celebrity. Politics is civilized brutality. Politics is a contest.  That is why it never fails to bring out an element of primal existence  deep, yet, always simmering, within us. It has the power to both unite  and separate. It will never be settled, nor tamed. It is a story about  humanity.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://biggovernment.com/jbradley/2011/06/03/politics-grip-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pork Report October 20, 2009: Are Political Scientists Relevant?</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/porkreport/2009/10/20/pork-report-october-20-2009-are-political-scientists-relevant/</link>
		<comments>http://biggovernment.com/porkreport/2009/10/20/pork-report-october-20-2009-are-political-scientists-relevant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Pork Report</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pork Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS assistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC Davis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=18406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today’s edition identifies at least $333 million in wasteful Washington spending.

-$300 million stimulus program to promote energy efficiency may not be energy efficient after all, audit finds
-Quid Pro Pork: Department of Justice investigates link between the exchange of congressional earmarks and campaign donations
-Washington, DC, city government steered $4.5 million in federal funds to an AIDS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s edition identifies at least $333 million in wasteful Washington spending.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.pennywellfarm.co.uk/download/pigs_at_pennywell_S.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="407" height="305" /></p>
<p>-$300 million stimulus program to promote energy efficiency <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/19/business/energy-environment/19star.html">may not be energy efficient after all</a>, audit finds</p>
<p>-Quid Pro Pork: Department of Justice investigates link between the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/16/AR2009101603461.html?hpid=topnews">exchange of congressional earmarks and campaign donations</a></p>
<p>-Washington, DC, city government steered $4.5 million in federal funds to an AIDS housing group that <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/18/AR2009101802571.html?hpid=dynamiclead">never filed federal tax returns</a> and has been plagued with service and cost complaints</p>
<p>-DC mayor launches investigation of groups that <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/19/AR2009101903621.html">misspent more than $25 million of public AIDS assistance</a></p>
<p>-<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/20/books/20poli.html?hpw">Political scientists debate the relevancy of the research they conduct with federal funds</a>; “We’re kidding ourselves if we think this research typically has the obvious public benefit we claim for it.”</p>
<p>-National Science Foundation<a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/CMF/OnlineTownHall/prweb3077144.htm"> funds political science study of online town hall meetings</a> held by Members of Congress<span id="more-18406"></span></p>
<p>-UC Davis <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/topstories/story/2264964.html">grossly inflated the number of campus-related sexual assaults</a> to reap more than $1 million in grants for violence prevention</p>
<p>-Delaware receives $2.3 million in <a href="http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20091020/NEWS02/910200359">federal funds to enhance and expand its sandy beaches</a></p>
<p>-Feds investigating the <a href="http://newsok.com/feds-scrutinize-oklahoma-citys-weed-and-seed/article/3410256?custom_click=lead_story_title">possible misuse of crime prevention funds </a>by Oklahoma City</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://biggovernment.com/porkreport/2009/10/20/pork-report-october-20-2009-are-political-scientists-relevant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>267</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

