Reagan Was Noble, But Obama Got the Prize
by Thomas Del BeccaroIn an age where style trumps substance in so many ways, few can be surprised that a fledging President would receive a Nobel Peace Prize. It bears repeating that Obama was President for just a matter of days before the nomination process was closed. Nevertheless, and without any substantive accomplishment, Obama was awarded the Prize – unanimously – apparently for things to come. No wonder 58% of Americans believe that politics was behind the choice.

By contrast, consider the accomplishment of Ronald Reagan who, last I checked, did not receive the Nobel Peace Prize. According to Margaret Thatcher, Reagan won the Cold War “without firing a shot.” In the words of Henry Kissinger, it was “the most stunning diplomatic feat of the modern era.” In the wake of that victory, millions upon millions of people were set free – and, as history has shown, a free people are far more likely to be a peaceful people.
So why didn’t Reagan get the Prize? The answer is simple, the political Left, including the Nobel committee, didn’t like the way Reagan went about setting people free. Reagan, we well remember, installed missiles in Europe. He did so because he believed what Thomas Jefferson told us long ago: “Whatever enables us to go to war, secures our peace.” Reagan, in time, would modernize Jefferson’s wisdom by advocating “peace through strength.”






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?