Posts Tagged ‘Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’

Media Trackers

PolitiFact Knocks Conservative Group, Ignores Identical Claim by Liberal ACLU

by Media Trackers

Last December, Wisconsin-based conservative watchdog Media Trackers earned a special evaluation from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s PolitiFact team for an article detailing privacy and security concerns over information contained on public recall petitions. PolitiFact chose to evaluate the truthfulness of this Media Trackers statement from November 17, 2011:

With the signature gathering phase of the Recall Walker effort only three days old, a flaw in the security of the system has been discovered. Under Wisconsin law there are no privacy protections for those who sign a recall petition.

PolitiFact, a creation of the Tampa Bay Times, is a “fact-checking” column found in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel and eight other newspapers around the country. The writers pick and choose statements made by elected officials, candidates, organizations, and advertisements in an effort to sort through the rhetoric and present only the facts. They make no bones about it, they intend to “call balls and strikes” utilizing their arbitrary ranking system that ranges from “True” to “Pants on Fire.”

On December 1, 2011 PolitiFact published it’s determination that Media Trackers’ statement was “Mostly False” citing the following conclusion:

(more…)

Jeff Dunetz

Cain’s Missteps Doomed His Campaign

by Jeff Dunetz

The self-control displayed by Herman Cain’s closest staff was Amazing.  As the candidate approached the podium on Saturday afternoon half of the pundits were predicting he would drop out, while remainder said he was staying .  As for me, I was hoping that with the media  and all the political wonks watching, Cain (who has a very quick wit) would get up and say, “I just saved 15% on my car insurance….”  It would have been the  perfect addition to what has been a very weird primary season.

On Saturday however, the former head of Godfather’s Pizza played it straight,   Cain announced the suspension of his campaign and formation of a political action committee, Cain solutions.com. The now-former candidate blamed his exit on the mainstream media and the “bimbo eruption” which began with reports sexual harassment during his tenure at the National Restaurant Association.  His rhetoric ignored that whether Herman Cain had the affair or harassed those women or whether he didn’t, Cain has only himself to blame for the failure of his campaign.

Before Politico broke the sexual harassment story they spent 10 days repeatedly trying to get the Cain campaign to respond directly about whether he ever faced allegations of sexual harassment when he was at the Restaurant Association. The campaign was  also asked about specific reports confirming there were financial settlements in two cases in which women leveled complaints.

Not only did the campaign refuse to answer the questions, but even more disastrous is they had a ten-day-lead to figure out a strategy to address the charges and did absolutely nothing. When the charges were made public, Cain bungled his answers and evaded the questions.

Cain said he has “had thousands of people working for me” at different businesses over the years and could not comment “until I see some facts or some concrete evidence.” His campaign staff was given the name of one woman who complained last week, and it was repeated to Cain on Sunday. He responded, “I am not going to comment on that.”

He was then asked, “Have you ever been accused, sir, in your life of harassment by a woman?”

He breathed audibly, glared at the reporter and stayed silent for several seconds. After the question was repeated three times, he responded by asking the reporter, “Have you ever been accused of sexual harassment?”

(more…)

Media Trackers

The Left’s Hypocrisy On ‘Fake Candidates’ In Wisconsin

by Media Trackers

In the wake of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s “expose” that Wisconsin Republicans were actively recruiting “fake candidates” to run against Democrat challengers in summer primaries to the advantage of incumbent Republicans, the hysteria of those in the media and on Left shows a glaring hypocrisy.

Last summer, a candidate named Andrew Wisniewski ran as a Republican in Assembly District 25 against conservative Independent Bob Ziegelbaur. Ziegelbaur, a Democrat assemblyman since 1992, defected from the party in the summer of 2010 because he felt “they became more enthusiastic about big government and big tax increases and farther away from pro-life issues.”

But instead of running an honest campaign against Ziegelbauer, AFSCME union organizer Jason Sidener recruited Andrew Wisniewski to run as a Republican in an attempt to siphon votes away from Ziegelbauer in the conservative district. Wisniewski initially did not receive enough valid signatures to get on the ballot, but a GAB error revealed he had enough signatures to be placed on the ballot despite objections by the Republican Party.

On Wisniewski’s recruitment and candidacy, Ziegelbauer said:

“It’s pretty obvious to everyone that the Madison Democratic machinery put up a fake candidate to put a name on the ballot because they think it will screw up our election in the 25th Assembly District. From my perspective it points out how bad things have gotten in Wisconsin.”

(more…)

Media Trackers

Wisconsin AFL-CIO Lies About Boycotts

by Media Trackers

In light of a recent plot to put stickers on the products of targeted companies in grocery stores, Wisconsin AFL-CIO President Phil Nuenfeldt issued a statement on Thursday claiming “no knowledge” of the plot. His statement reads:

“We have no knowledge beyond unevidenced assertions made to the media by the Wisconsin Grocers Association of any such campaign, but let’s be crystal clear – there are not, nor have there ever been, any boycotts encouraged by our organizations.”

While Nuenfeldt is right that the “Sticker Campaign” plot has yet to materialize (according to reports it is supposed to occur on May 1), his statement is profound in its gross disregard for the truth about events in the past two months. Nuenfeldt says that “there are not, nor have there ever been, any boycotts encouraged by our organizations.” This is a lie.

On March 30, it was first reported in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that the Wisconsin State Employees Union (AFSCME Council 24) was circulating a letter among businesses in southeast Wisconsin that demanded the placement of a window sign declaring support for “worker’s rights.” The letter went on to threaten “failure to do so will leave us no choice but (to) do a public boycott of your business. And sorry, neutral means ‘no’ to those who work for the largest employer in the area and are union members.” Field Representative for AFSCME Council 24 Jim Parrett “confirmed the contents of the letter, which carries his signature.”

Of course, when the boycott letters backfired and public outrage swelled against the tactics, Marty Beil of AFSCME blamed the it on “some overzealousness in the field.”

(more…)

Media Trackers

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel and Daily Kos Buy Into Conspiracy Despite The Facts

by Media Trackers

The national liberal blog Daily Kos – aided by a report in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel – is raising misleading questions regarding the April 5 Supreme Court election because election results on the website of the Waukesha County clerk for past elections showed more votes than ballots cast.

However, the blog and the newspaper that reported on its propaganda failed to tell readers that the reason for the gap was widely known at the time it occurred – and had nothing to do with failings by Kathy Nickolas or nefariousness that would call the races into question.

Indeed, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel itself reported on the reasoning back in 2006 (two communities’ decisions to use new voting machines that year caused them to not electronically report all votes, although they were counted). Although some were unhappy with slow returns as a result, the election results weren’t questioned, and did get completely reported to the state, meaning the Daily Kos’ “big gap” is a complete non-story, and the Journal Sentinel, missed basic journalism 101 (looking up its own archives) by covering it as such.

Although several elections were part of the criticism, the Journal Sentinel and Daily Kos are focusing on the 2006 fall election, when Republican Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen defeated Democrat Kathleen Falk by less than 10,000 votes statewide.

In a story in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel posted Tuesday, Nickolaus explained that the reporting gap on the website between ballots cast and votes resulted because not all votes were electronically sent to her by municipalities. The results for ballots cast did not include votes not electronically sent (although all votes were included in final tallies given to the state). After being asked about the situation, Nickolaus added asterisks to the ballots cast results for several past races to indicate they did not include the ballots that were not electronically sent.

However, those ballots WERE counted in the final tallies sent to state elections officials.

(more…)

James M. Simpson

Woman Accused of E-mail Death Threats Charged, Not Arrested, Media Silent

by James M. Simpson

Photo taken 2004; Credit WKOW.com

26 year-old Katherine R. Windels has been charged for sending emails containing bomb threats and death threats to Wisconsin state senators during the budget battles last month.

According to the Milwauakee Journal Sentinel:

Windels was charged with two felony counts “bomb scare” and two misdemeanor counts of “computer message-threatening injury/bodily harm.” If convicted, each felony count carries a maximum penalty of three years and six months in prison and a $10,000 fine, and each misdemeanor count carries a maximum penalty of 90 days in prison and a $1,000 fine.

Windels was never arrested, but released on her own recognizance. This is surprising, since it now comes to light that she was investigated last year for similar activity. It is not known what she wrote exactly, as police redacted all content of the emails, but an acquaintance, Lisa Patterson, who received the e-mails, felt compelled to take them to the police. The police  merely told Windels to cease contact with Patterson.

In this latest caper meanwhile, Windels used the alias “Lisa Patterson.” Vindictiveness perhaps?

Liberty Chick reported at BigGovernment Friday that the Mackinaw Center recently received similar threats from a female caller. Could this be the same person again?

Windels’ e-mails got a lot of play when they first appeared. They were particularly vicious. Here is the complete text of one:

From: XXXX
Sent: Wed 3/9/2011 9:18 PM
To: Sen.Kapanke; Sen.Darling; Sen.Cowles; Sen.Ellis; Sen.Fitzgerald; Sen.Galloway; Sen.Grothman; Sen.Harsdorf; Sen.Hopper; Sen.Kedzie; Sen.Lasee; Sen.Lazich; Sen.Leibham; Sen.Moulton; Sen.Olsen
Subject: Atten: Death threat!!!! Bomb!!!!

Please put your things in order because you will be killed and your familes will also be killed due to your actions in the last 8 weeks. Please explain to them that this is because if we get rid of you and your families then it will save the rights of 300,000 people and also be able to close the deficit that you have created. I hope you have a good time in hell. Read below for more information on possible scenarios in which you will die.

(more…)

Mary Grabar

The Tangled Web of Green: Manufacturing a Public Scare

by Mary Grabar

On November 30th, the same day the Food and Drug Administration was scheduled to issue a statement regarding the long-used plastics additive Bisphenol A (BPA), the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel editors urged the agency with the headline “Get on with it!”  They charged that “the agency blew its own self-imposed deadline for issuing a ruling on the safety of the ubiquitous chemical,” and went on to complain that “The FDA is taking more time to have its scientists analyze studies of the chemical’s effects.”

media-scare-stories2

The Milwaukee newspaper, along with the Los Angeles Times health blog, called on Congress to ban the product.  Then, on December 14, the examiner.com reported that Democrat Senators Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand had proposed a bill outlawing the use of BPA in food container linings for infant and toddler food.  Washington, with its Senate vote on Friday, is the latest among several states that are not waiting for federal bans.

But as reported here, in the fall, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) had announced the award of $30 million in research grants, $14 million of which represents Obama administration stimulus money, to study BPA further.

What might account for such odd behavior?  There are enough peculiarities and strange connections to suggest that the media, the academy, and liberal political forces are working together to pursue an ideological agenda—with the help of stimulus funds.

(more…)

Ken Blackwell

The Left Goes to War Against Science, Surrenders on Terror

by Ken Blackwell

Two ongoing trends I chronicled during 2009 highlight an ironic situation: Leftists remain tough on their domestic political opponents, while lax when it comes to our real common enemies.

As we recently saw with the Christmas airplane-bombing attempt, leftists seem bent on treating terrorists with kid gloves, insisting they receive rights normally reserved for U.S. citizens (even when this means failing to extract timely information that might save lives).

global-warming-junk-science

Conversely, leftists play “hardball” when their opponents are not terrorists or criminals, but instead, American businesses and industries.   One such example is the left’s battle against Bisphenol A (BPA), a chemical used for more than a half century to make plastics more durable.

Though clearly less consequential than the war on terror, the Left’s war on BPA serves as a microcosm of the larger attempt to use “junk science” and litigation to redistribute wealth from job-producing American industries into the hands of trial lawyers and liberal special interest groups.

In this regard, the Left’s attempts are reminiscent of their past battle against the insecticide DDT. In the 1960s, many developing nation’s had nearly wiped out malaria, but it came back after DDT was banned.  It did not matter that DDT was harmless to humans – and actually saved lives — the Left attacked it, ultimately causing 50 million preventable deaths.

(more…)