And I live in Canada.

The reason I’m here is that I saw such American arrogance being born in the Clinton Administration with Janet Reno’s assaults upon violence on television.

They were as ominously totalitarian as her assaults upon Waco.

When I knew I was losing my battle with the Clinton Administration, I went North.

Now I watch with equal helplessness as Fox News, Sarah Palin, Paul Ryan and the Tea Partiers raise a similar hue and cry against Obama.

All will be for naught as long as Roe v Wade still stands on the books.

While film clips of 1984,

are rattling all of our cages, the long-shot photo – in a Hot Air web site – of Obama bowing to the President of Red China makes the reality of Big Brother grotesquely comic in light of the diminutive CEO of … yes … World Communism.

A second glimpse of the clip is beyond chilling when you consider that this is President Obama’s only consistent humility.

Homage before dictators and tyrants.

Our new Big Brother, President Barack Obama, pays tribute to his role models within the growing nightmare of Red Islam.

How did we get here?

When did America begin to put on her own prison clothes?

1973, with the passing of the Roe v Wade Decision legalizing murder.

It was inevitably a suicidal blow to our freedom.

To fully close our chapter, Abraham Lincoln said, “If America is destroyed, it will not be by a foreign power. If it dies, it will be by suicide.”

However, it was ultimately Roe v Wade that has become America’s suicide note.

Loathing of gestating infants to the point of murder is, indeed, the clear metaphor for our ultimate self-loathing and America’s inevitable suicide, a consummation devoutly to be wished for by the entire Obama Nation.

Planned Parenthood as a nationalized Murder, Inc. is the united declaration that death is the best solution to most of our major problems.

Roe v Wade was beyond a bipartisan agreement. Republicans actually dominated the Supreme Court in 1973.

Meanwhile our best and brightest, such as Glenn Beck and Paul Ryan, are rallying our forces to defeat this 100 year-old nightmare of American Progressivism.

They don’t mention Roe v Wade though.

Despite all that “Faith, Hope and Charity”, our commanders have yet to designate the real moment the United States gave up its soul to the homicidal likes of Lenin, Stalin, Mao and the equally murderous Jihads.

It was in the Nixon/Kissinger era, when we were giving up South Vietnam, that we also gave up our Judeo-Christian heritage by legalizing murder.

Lincoln’s own Party, the Nixon/Kissinger Republicans, ushered in the very suicide that our 16th President had prophesied.

Republicans like Reagan and the Bushes did not attend to their Party’s greatest cardinal sin when they talked “Pro-Life” and did actually nothing about it.

A Constitutional Amendment should have been passed under their 20 year-long Presidencies, banning forever not only decisions like Roe v. Wade but similarly life and freedom threatening Supreme Court commandments like the Dred Scott Decision legalizing slavery and the Buck v Bell Decision legalizing the State’s right to sterilize the so-called “unfit”.

Even if one is too lazy to memorize the Ten Commandments, or, like myself, to suspicious of a religious brand of tyranny, the Golden Rule of the New Testament can be understood by a three-year old and not easily forgotten.

The Golden Rule is the moral and spiritual equivalent of Einstein’s theory of relativity.

However, with Roe v Wade, we do unto gestating infants what we would not want done unto our own gestating infancy.

Defilements of our last bastions of sanity and individual freedom, the Golden Rule and our Declaration of Independence, our Founding Fathers’ assurance that all men are “created”, not gestated, with the “inalienable right to life”, treason can go no deeper than the Supreme Court’s repeated and profoundly Obama-like arrogance.

The insolent face of Obama, Mussolini-like, is beyond elitism.

It’s beyond even the megalomania oozing out of every pore.

Beyond insanity.

It is just plain evil.

However, we are the original and soporifically evil ones.

Our acceptance of Roe v Wade for 37 years?!

We fought a Civil War to overturn Dred Scott.

How many lives must be lost to do the same with Roe v Wade?

There are still illegal forms of slavery and there would still be illegal forms of abortion, but the entire meaning of the Judeo-Christian Civilization would be saved by the overturning of the Roe v Wade Decision.

With murder again forbidden, not only would we return home but the Progressive, Red Islamic, New World Order enemies of Western Civilization would be put on probation if not actually ostracized like neo-Nazis.

Unless that is done, however, nothing that our Glenn Becks, Paul Ryans and Sarah Palins can do to cut Progressivism and the Obama Nation down to size will survive long enough to make any major difference.

Until Roe v Wade is ended, there won’t be any discernible drop in the tempo of our fall into the complete fulfillment of 1984 … and its inevitable aftermath, which is worldwide suicide.

Legalizing murder ultimately means legalizing your own assassination.

But Eric Holder’s plan to transfer Khalid Sheikh Mohammed from Guantánamo Bay to Manhattan for a civilian trial is perhaps liberals’ worst idea in years. KSM and his cohorts had agreed to plead guilty before a military tribunal, accept a sentence of death, and speedily rendezvous with their 72 ladies-in-waiting.

This offer of an efficient way out for the administration was not good enough for Attorney General Eric Holder. He insists on trying the terrorists before a civilian jury in federal court, just a few hundred yards from Ground Zero. Next to martyrdom and a free trip to paradise, this has to be the terrorists’ wildest dream.

No turbaned genie ever appeared out of Aladdin’s lamp to grant three greater wishes than these. KSM to Genie: One, I want to exploit my status as mass-murdering terrorist; Two, I want to inflict even greater pain and suffering on the families of those thousands whom I’ve murdered; Three, I want to make my trial a magnet for my brother jihadists throughout the world.

Of course, it’s always possible that this whole transfer could go without incident. But why in the world would anyone take such an utterly reckless risk, going from swift and sure justice on a military base in a foreign country, to an unpredictable gamble on our own shores, surrounded by civilians in our largest city?

Eric Holder’s decision to try the terrorists in Manhattan may not be simply the worst decision of this administration, it bids fair to stand with Dred Scott and Roe v. Wade as being among the worst decisions in American history.

Congress has the power to prevent this farce from going forward. Congress must spare us this travesty. Phyllis Schlafly has reminded us—serious student of the Constitution that that she is—that Congress has the power to restrict the appellate jurisdiction of the federal judiciary. Very true. But Congress has a power that would provide even more immediate relief: That power is the power of the purse.

We need to move quickly to deny Mr. Holder’s Justice Department any federal funds to transfer or try any of the Guantánamo detainees apart from military tribunals. President Obama is on record as approving those military tribunals. As a senator in 2006, he even voted for the measure that established those tribunals. Of course, he is now on record backing up his besieged attorney general.

We would actually be doing Mr. Obama a favor by having Congress override his hasty and reckless attorney general. I think the president would secretly heave a sigh of relief if Congress would prevent this gross error from going forward.

It’s vitally important that the people’s representatives speak on this point. It’s why we have checks and balances.

It’s ironic. The president—as commander-in-chief of the military—would have enormous discretion to handle this situation as he saw fit if the Defense Department retained custody of these terrorists. But by transferring them to the Justice Department, this becomes a domestic issue outside President Obama’s commander-in-chief power, giving Congress the upper hand in deciding how to proceed.

We should have a good chance of prevailing on a cutoff of federal funds for civilian trials of terrorists. How many members of Congress would relish the prospect of having to explain on the campaign trail next year why they voted to spend a minimum of $75 million a year on security for the New York show trials? Voters will especially object when they realize that Guantánamo Bay was built with taxpayer funds for precisely such trials. We’d have good prospects of winning on such a proposition. But even if we don’t carry this amendment, we would certainly have a vote that would be of intense interest to American voters as they approach the 2010 elections next fall

The ins and outs of the health care debate, cap-and-trade, and the stimulus require voters to pay the strictest attention as lawmakers wade through numerous 2,000+-page legislative behemoths. But an up-or-down vote on Holder’s Manhattan Transfer has a marvelous clarity. Let’s get clear.