<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big Government &#187; Health care poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biggovernment.com/tag/health-care-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biggovernment.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:34:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>FDA Delays Rationing Decision on Avastin</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/09/20/fda-delays-rationing-decision-on-avastin/</link>
		<comments>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/09/20/fda-delays-rationing-decision-on-avastin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capitol Confidential</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60 Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avastin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost rationing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug rationing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off label drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stage 4 cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=169801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Washington, DC, if you want to release news so it doesn&#8217;t get much coverage, do it Friday afternoon.  If you want to really stick it to the American people, do it after Election Day.  Apparently, the Food and Drug Administration is following the playbook.

Late Friday, the FDA announced it had postponed for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Washington, DC, if you want to release news so it doesn&#8217;t get much coverage, do it Friday afternoon.  If you want to really stick it to the American people, do it after Election Day.  Apparently, the Food and Drug Administration is following the playbook.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-169809" title="avastin" src="http://biggovernment.com/files/2010/09/avastin1.jpg" alt="avastin" width="450" height="347" /></p>
<p>Late Friday, the FDA announced it had postponed for 90 days &#8212; and until after the Election &#8212; a decision whether to ration the later stage cancer drug Avastin based on cost.  With poll numbers that 60 Plus rolled out earlier in the week this is not a shock.</p>
<p>For the first time, an FDA sub-panel used cost as a factor in consideration of drug approval &#8212; opening the door to rationing for Avastin and other cutting edge drugs.  The American people reject rationing. They do not want doctor&#8217;s choices limited by cost &#8212; undermining the basic premise of ObamaCare and when drugs are rejected because of their price tag, that is rationing.<span id="more-169801"></span></p>
<p>Senior citizens, women and breast cancer patients were given a short term reprive.  We must ensure that the FDA doesn&#8217;t enact it&#8217;s own version of a lame duck session in December.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/09/20/fda-delays-rationing-decision-on-avastin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rasmussen: Fear of Losing Private Insurance Trumps Hope of Public Option</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/10/04/rasmussen-fear-of-losing-private-insurance-trumps-hope-of-public-option/</link>
		<comments>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/10/04/rasmussen-fear-of-losing-private-insurance-trumps-hope-of-public-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 12:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Publius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government-sponsored non-profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmusse Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasumusse Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=12062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking over the wires now:
Sixty-three percent (63%) of voters nationwide say guaranteeing that no one is forced to change their health insurance coverage is a higher priority than giving people the choice of a public option. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that just 29% take the opposite view. They say it’s more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.breitbart.com/index.php?category=3">Breaking over the wires </a>now:</p>
<blockquote><p>Sixty-three percent (63%) of voters nationwide say guaranteeing that no one is forced to change their health insurance coverage is a higher priority than giving people the choice of a public option. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that just 29% take the opposite view. They say it’s more important to give people the choice between private insurance and a government-sponsored non-profit health insurance option.</p>
<p>Most liberal voters say giving people the choice of a public option is more important. But, most moderates take the opposite view and Republicans overwhelmingly agree with them.</p></blockquote>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/10/04/rasmussen-fear-of-losing-private-insurance-trumps-hope-of-public-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

