Inspector General Report Details ACORN Fraud
by PubliusBig Government has obtained an advance copy of Homeland Security’s Inspector General report detailing ACORN’s misuse of a federal grant from FEMA. The report will be released to the public on December 8th. We’ve included it below.
EMBARGOED 12-8-10 DHS IG Report – ACORN Grants
Contacted by Big Government about the report, incoming Chair of the House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, Rep. Darrell Issa, had this comment:
It is really unthinkable that anyone would use the guise of public safety and helping victims of a tragedy like Hurricane Katrina as a calculating way to inappropriately obtain taxpayer dollars. As the discussion over how to reign in government’s growth and spending moves forward, there couldn’t be a more important time to ensure that the grants awarded with taxpayer dollars meet rigorous criteria and are subject to vigilant oversight to ensure that grant recipients are not given access to taxpayer dollars under false pretenses.”
The key things in the DHS IG’s report were:
- “We concluded that the ACORN Institute should not have received these funds, did not fully implement and evaluate the program as approved, and could not substantiate all its grant expenditures.
- “The FEMA did not have sufficient oversight processes to prevent the award or to fully evaluate the use of the grant money.”
- The Technical Evaluation Panel that reviewed ACORN’s grant request recommended it not be funded but “FEMA overrode the panels’ recommendation and awarded the grant without documenting how it addressed the Technical Evaluation Panel’s concerns.”
- ACORN described an Urban Fire Initiative that did not actually exist until they requested the funding: “the Urban Fire Initiative did not exist prior to the grant application, but was created specifically for activities funded by the FY 2007 Fire Prevention and Safety Grant. Neither ACORN Institute nor the Urban Fire Initiative was involved in any of the above activities and events.”
- ACORN claimed partnerships with local fire departments but “there was no evidence of these partnerships were in place…”
- FEMA relied on “self certification” and “has no requirement or standard procedure in the evaluation process of the Fire Prevention and Safety grant applications to validate the legitimacy of significant claims and assertions used to qualify an applicant for the grant…”







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?