Why ‘Stimulus’ Doesn’t Stimulate
by Robert HiggsPresident Obama has asked Congress for an additional $50 billion in “stimulus” money to finance infrastructure projects. The theory is that the additional spending will cause businesses to boost production to meet this demand. Producers will add jobs, triggering increases in consumer spending that will ripple through the economy and fuel a stronger overall recovery.

Unfortunately, however, such government pump-priming hasn’t worked in the past, and there’s no reason to believe it will work now.
Sure, consumer spending accounts for approximately 70 percent of America’s gross domestic product, and increases in consumer spending would provide the economy with an immediate boost. But a drop in consumer spending is not what ails the economy. In fact, as a percentage of GDP, consumer spending actually increased during the downturn, the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Economic Analysis reports—from approximately 69.2 percent of GDP in the fourth quarter (October-December) of 2007 to approximately 71 percent of GDP in the April-June quarter of 2009.
So the conventional wisdom—that a sharp decline in consumer spending caused the economy’s downturn—is wrong.
What did cause the downturn? The answer is: a sharp decline in private investment.
In fact, the ups and downs of the business cycle are always driven by investment spending, not by consumption spending.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?