<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big Government &#187; Delaware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biggovernment.com/tag/delaware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biggovernment.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:34:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Donnell Wins in Delaware, Is The Senate Lost For Republicans? No, No, No, and NO!</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/jdunetz/2010/09/15/odonnell-wins-in-delaware-is-the-senate-lost-for-republicans-no-no-no-and-no/</link>
		<comments>http://biggovernment.com/jdunetz/2010/09/15/odonnell-wins-in-delaware-is-the-senate-lost-for-republicans-no-no-no-and-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Dunetz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midterm Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 GOP Primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Republican Senate Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RINO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=167889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were three major surprises in the sometimes nasty Republican  Senate primary results last night.  The first is the most obvious,  Christine O&#8217;Donnell pulled off a stunning upset over nine-term Congress  Mike Castle.


O&#8217;Donnell must have surged late and big which leads us to the second  surprise, everyone expected a very close [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><span style="font-weight: normal;font-size: 13.3333px">There were three major surprises in the sometimes nasty Republican  Senate primary results last night.  The first is the most obvious,  Christine O&#8217;Donnell pulled off a stunning upset over nine-term Congress  Mike Castle.</span></h3>
<h3><span style="font-weight: normal;font-size: 13.3333px"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-167953" title="marklevinoncastle_std.original" src="http://biggovernment.com/files/2010/09/marklevinoncastle_std.original1.jpg" alt="marklevinoncastle_std.original" width="400" height="300" /></span></h3>
<div>
<p>O&#8217;Donnell must have surged late and big which leads us to the second  surprise, everyone expected a very close election but based on the  latest results O&#8217; Donnell won by a fairly comfortable 53-47% margin.  This was no squeaker, it was a statement by the Delaware Republicans  that they did not want a Senator who supported issues that ran contrary  to the Republican Platform. Calling his defeat a victory for the party  extremists is simply disingenuous. Mike Castle is one of the biggest  supporters of Cap and Trade, he voted for TARP, against the surge, for  the auto bailout and cash for clunkers, these are among the programs  that have turned the people against Obama, voting against Castle is not  &#8220;extreme&#8221; in fact it goes hand in hand with the prevailing mood of the  country.</p>
<p>There are those who say that despite Castle&#8217;s positions Republicans  should have voted for him anyway because he was a &#8220;lock&#8221; to win the  general election.Others say that especially in the primary, O&#8217;Donnell  was the way to go, because the primary is the time to vote based on  ideology. Both are valid arguments, but the overriding factor is that  primaries <strong>are</strong> the time for ideology, party leaders would tell you  that after the primary season we are supposed to unite behind the  party&#8217;s candidates and get that person elected. Heck, that&#8217;s exactly  what we were told to do when John McCain was nominated for as the  party&#8217;s candidate for President.  For conservatives McCain was a bitter   pill to swallow because many of his positions were similar to Barack  Obama&#8217;s, without the pizzaz.</p>
<p><span id="more-167889"></span></p>
<p>Unite behind the candidate is the rule, except in the case of Christine  O&#8217;Donnell, because while she was making her victory speech, the National  Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) made what can only be described  as a divisive, juvenile , and frankly stupid announcement, that  O&#8217;Donnell could not win so they were not going to lend her any support.   It is the equivalent of a seven-year-old picking up the ball and going  home.</p>
<p>Thankfully the NRSC reversed themselves this morning, maybe the felt the grass roots anger after last night&#8217;s angry statement. <span style="font-size: 13.3333px"> National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman John Cornyn put  out a <a title="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0910/Cornyn_embraces_ODonnell.html" href="http://">statement of support</a> for Christine O&#8217;Donnell </span></p>
<blockquote><p>Let there be no mistake: The National Republican Senatorial Committee  – and I personally as the committee’s chairman – strongly stand by all  of our Republican nominees, including Christine O’Donnell in Delaware.</p>
<p>I reached out to Christine this morning, and as I have conveyed to  all of our nominees, I offered her my personal congratulations and let  her know that she has our support. This support includes a check for  $42,000 – the maximum allowable donation that we have provided to all of  our nominees – which the NRSC will send to her campaign today.</p></blockquote>
<p>The NRSC was obviously looking at polls showing Castle  leading the  Democratic nominee Coons in November but O&#8217;Donnell trailing. They were  hoping to pick up the ten seats they needed for the GOP to win control  of the Senate, and felt the O&#8217;Donnell victory destroyed that chance. The  GOP leadership was upset by the O&#8217;Donnell victory and even though they reversed themselves, they still have to make up for the bad will created by their political tantrum.</p>
<p>Republican leadership has not exactly had their fingers on the pulse of  the people when it comes to Senate candidates. Th<span style="font-size: 13.3333px">e  NRSC came out and endorsed Charlie Crist for the Florida Senate  nomination as soon as he announced he was running, branding eventual nominee Marco Rubio as too conservative for Florida. </span><span style="font-size: 13.3333px">The GOP also said nice things about Arlen Specter, and branded  Pat Toomy as extremist. and had  similar feelings about Ken Buck, Rand Paul, Sharron Angle, and Joe  Miller. With the exception of Sharron Angle who is in a dead heat with  Senate majority leader Harry Reid, all of those candidates the  Republican leadership once said could never win, are ahead in the general election polls. </span></p>
<p>The most recent Delaware polls (September 2nd) show  Democrat Chris Coons has  with an eleven point lead in over O&#8217; Donnell.  A month and  a half ago <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/delaware/delaware_senate_castle_r_47_coons_d_36">O&#8217;Donnell had a two point l</a>ead.   The negative campaigning by Castle pushed O&#8217;Donnell&#8217;s favorables down  and moved Coons into the lead. Keep in mind that the same poll  gave Castle had an eleven point lead over O&#8217;Donnell.</p>
<p>The National GOP&#8217;s logic about their new nominee is flawed.  Yes she is at a disadvantage, and yes it will be difficult, but Coons does not have an insurmountable lead. Remember there was a seventeen point  swing between O&#8217;Donnell and Castle in the six and a half weeks between  July 15 and Sept. 2. and an eleven point swing between Coons and O&#8217;  Donnell during the same time period.</p>
<p>Did the O&#8217;Donnell victory ruin the Republican chances to win the Senate?  <strong>No, no, no and no</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>No</strong>, because, the head to head general election campaign has not  started yet.  Coons is a relatively unknown, that is good for the  Democrats because he has a relatively clean slate, for the same reason  it is good for the GOP because if O&#8217;Donnell wages an intelligent  campaign she could fill in Coons&#8217; slate.</p>
<p><strong>No</strong>, because Castle was not guaranteed a victory over Coons.  If a  poorly funded O&#8217;Donnell campaign could generate a seventeen point swing  against Castle in forty-seven days, just imagine what a well funded  Coons could do in the same period.  Castle was an example of &#8220;same old,  same old&#8221; in a year when voters want to throw all of &#8220;the bums&#8221; out of  office.  Chances are he would have had a very hard time winning in the  general election.</p>
<p><strong>No</strong>, because two races earlier thought to slam dunks for the Democrats, Connecticut and West Virginia are now competitive.</p>
<p><strong>And no</strong>, because  because all pundits and political hacks thought  that the chances of the  Republicans re-taking the Senate were a long  shot at best.  You can&#8217;t  lose what you don&#8217;t have.</p>
<p>Christine O&#8217;Donnell&#8217;s surprising win last night did not cause the GOP  their chance at winning the Senate, unless of course the Republican leadership  continues its &#8220;hissy fit&#8221; over Mike Castle&#8217;s loss and doesn&#8217;t follow through with its new-found friendship.</p>
<p>Yesterday in his <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/njonline/offtotheraces.php">National Journal column</a>, prognosticator Charlie Cook said:</p>
<blockquote><p><span>&#8230;.. unless a large number  of Republican  officeholders and candidates begin taking stupid pills  every morning,  the odds of Republicans picking up more than the 39  seats needed to win a  majority in the House is very high, and in the  Senate, a net gain of  between eight and 10 seats looks probable.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>Last  night it was the Republican Party leadership, not the GOP voters in  Delaware that took some &#8220;stupid pills.&#8221; Today they heard the voice of the people and returned to the fold. Now they must throw those pills  away permanently and remember Ronald Reagan&#8217;s 11th Commandment  <em>&#8220;Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican</em>.</div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://biggovernment.com/jdunetz/2010/09/15/odonnell-wins-in-delaware-is-the-senate-lost-for-republicans-no-no-no-and-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>268</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey GOP: Lead. Follow. Or Get Out of the Way</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/kbyrne/2010/09/15/hey-gop-lead-follow-or-get-out-of-the-way/</link>
		<comments>http://biggovernment.com/kbyrne/2010/09/15/hey-gop-lead-follow-or-get-out-of-the-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kerry J. Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midterm Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike castle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=167725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GOP leadership wants to cling to its old, tired image. GOP rank &#38; file, in primary after primary, is very clear in what it wants: young, new, vibrant … and conservative!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tea Party conservative Christine O’Donnell knocked off longtime Republican insider milquetoast Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican primary Tuesday for the Senate seat once held in a lockbox by Vice President Joe Biden.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-167825" title="386-77Delaware_Primary.sff.embedded.prod_affiliate.74" src="http://biggovernment.com/files/2010/09/386-77Delaware_Primary.sff.embedded.prod_affiliate.74.jpg" alt="386-77Delaware_Primary.sff.embedded.prod_affiliate.74" width="300" height="402" /></p>
<p>It’s another victory for the GOP rank and file, whose party leadership has abandoned them in recent years on its great detour into the wilderness of big-government leftism.</p>
<p>One of the lessons that leaped out at me in recent days, as O&#8217;Donnell stormed from out of nowhere to win, was the symbolic difference in the two candidates:</p>
<p>O’Donnell: pretty, young (41), wide-eyed, smiling and bright, marching off confidently from appearance to appearance with a strong conservative message. The very image of the girl next door.</p>
<p>Castle: old (71), weathered, worn, dour and gray, walking lamely and slowly. The very image of the tired old white-guy GOP that has turned off young voters at least since the days of Reagan, and maybe longer, pitching leftist policies from his RINO perch.</p>
<p>GOP leadership wants to cling to its tired, old, go-along-to-get-along image. The GOP rank and file, in primary after primary, is very clear in what it wants: young, new, vibrant, and conservative! They don&#8217;t want to go along to get along with big-government statism. They want to fight. They want to take back their country.</p>
<p><span id="more-167725"></span></p>
<p>But GOP leadership is not on board. And it&#8217;s going to kill itself in the process. A moment after the Delaware result came in, Karl Rove was on Fox submarining his own party’s candidate before the general election campaign even got underway.</p>
<p>Said Rove: <em>“I’m for the Republican. But I gotta tell ya: We were looking at eight to nine seats in the Senate [of the 10 needed for the majority]. We’re now looking at seven to eight, in my opinion. This is not a race we’re gonna be able to win.”</em></p>
<p>The fact of the matter is that candidates like O’Donnell can win in states like Delaware, especially with hefty party resources behind them. But it seems the GOP has given up before the race has even started. It&#8217;s infuriating.</p>
<p>After all, Democrats never give up or apologize when their candidates are tax cheats (take your pick), adulterers (John Edwards, Bill Clinton), ethically challenged (Charlie Rangel), carpetbaggers (Hillary Clinton), scions of segregationists (Al Gore), members of the KKK (the late Robert Byrd), or well out of the American political mainstream (Barack Obama).</p>
<p>Dems don’t submarine their own candidates, however corrupt or out of the mainstream. Instead, they rally behind them. And O’Donnell is hardly corrupt, hardly out of the American mainstream.</p>
<p>I was so incensed by the GOP behavior relative to O’Donnell that I whipped off this letter this morning to party leadership.</p>
<p><strong>Dear Michael Steele:</strong><br />
Registered Republican here for 22 years, since the day I turned 18 – right here in the heart of Moonbat Central in Massachusetts. That’s not easy. State GOP delegate here in Massachusetts this year. On your mailing list nationally.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m excited to support <a href="http://jeffperryforcongress.com/">Jeff Perry in the 10th Massachusetts</a>. A conservative Repub here in coastal Mass. He can win. We can flip a Dem seat to Repub in my district, just like we did statewide with Scott Brown. Very exciting.</p>
<p>But I’m not sure you guys at the national level are on board the train here. So here’s my advice:</p>
<p>Get your act together on Christine O’Donnell in Delaware. Today. Right now. Get behind her. Get behind her strong and fast. You’re really (upsetting) a lot of people with your milquetoast candidates and policies and your refusal to stand proudly behind your party’s history or behind conservative policies.</p>
<p>I know Karl Rove doesn’t speak for the national GOP, but his appearance on Fox last night was disgusting. In the eyes of much of the public, Rove is GOP elite. And the first thing he did was rip his party’s candidate after a thrilling victory.</p>
<p>So get your little ducks in a row, and do it fast. The GOP rank and file are going one way, as recent election results prove, and you guys are going another. You know the saying:</p>
<p>Lead. Follow. Or get out of the way.</p>
<p>Otherwise you’ll be a party leadership without a party.</p>
<p>Reagan/Tea Party Conservatism can win in this country. O’Donnell can win in Delaware. Hell, Reagan won 93 states in two elections … including here in Massachusetts in ’84!! Including Delaware in both ‘80 and ‘84!!!</p>
<p>Since then, you, the GOP, has failed to give us strong, conservative candidates … candidates that can win big around the country, and even here in small northeastern states like Massachusetts or Delaware. Your voters are screaming from the top of their lungs, demanding a new course. A winning course.</p>
<p>The left fears this conservative message, that&#8217;s why they&#8217;re throwing water on the O&#8217;Donnell victory, trying to snuff out the fire. But most people dig this message; independents and moderate &#8220;Reagan Democrats&#8221; are quickly swayed by this message; the rank and file GOP are desperate for this message  … and you guys are the ones standing in the way. So snap shi*t.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://biggovernment.com/kbyrne/2010/09/15/hey-gop-lead-follow-or-get-out-of-the-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>260</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACORN Still Owes $2.3 Million in Overdue Taxes</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2009/11/16/acorn-still-owes-2-3-million-in-overdue-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2009/11/16/acorn-still-owes-2-3-million-in-overdue-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Vadum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buddy Caldwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pelican Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=31606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ACORN and its affiliates are content to impose crippling big-government laws, regulations, and taxes on Americans, but when called upon to obey those same rules, ACORN&#8217;s network of scofflaws and deadbeats simply refuses to comply.
ACORN and its affiliates currently owe more than $2.3 million in long overdue back taxes to all levels of government.
As of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ACORN and its affiliates are content to impose crippling big-government laws, regulations, and taxes on Americans, but when called upon to obey those same rules, ACORN&#8217;s network of scofflaws and deadbeats simply refuses to comply.</p>
<p>ACORN and its affiliates currently owe more than $2.3 million in long overdue back taxes to all levels of government.</p>
<div id="attachment_12026" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><img class="size-full wp-image-12026" src="http://biggovernment.com/files/2009/10/ACORN-For-Sale1.JPG" alt="ACORN For Sale" width="480" height="360" /><p class="wp-caption-text">It&#39;s deathly quiet at the former funeral home at 1024 Elysian Fields Avenue, New Orleans. (photo: Kevin Kane)</p></div>
<p>As of Nov. 11 the exact figure was $2,328,596.95.</p>
<p>ACORN owes money to the IRS, Arkansas, California, Delaware, District of Columbia, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, New Mexico, New York, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Washington, Wisconsin, and to the cities of New York and Philadelphia.</p>
<p><span id="more-31606"></span></p>
<p>I first uncovered ACORN&#8217;s massive tax debts <a href="http://spectator.org/archives/2008/10/28/lien-on-me">last year.</a></p>
<p>A detailed list of the tax liens is <a href="http://www.capitalresearch.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/copy-of-acorntaxliens_masterlist_nov2009.xls">available here</a> as an Excel spreadsheet. Data was obtained from Nexis and the Pelican Institute.</p>
<p>The liens are grouped according to the addresses against which they were filed. In New Orleans 2609 Canal St. is functioning as ACORN&#8217;s headquarters in that city. That office was raided a few days ago by Louisiana Attorney Buddy Caldwell, whose investigators seized computers and documents.</p>
<p>Elsewhere in New Orleans, the old headquarters at 1024 Elysian Fields Avenue reportedly stands empty. The property, which was previously a funeral home, has been on the market for months.</p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.fqr.com/index/listings/multi-family/details/795504" target="_blank">French Quarter Realty</a> is asking $835,000 for the property, which is now encumbered by $1,278,862 in tax liens, </span><span>$619,271 of which is owed to the IRS. It&#8217;s unclear why the Obama administration&#8217;s tax enforcers haven&#8217;t seized the property yet. Perhaps the president is extending a courtesy to his former ally and client.</span></p>
<p>Liens were also filed against ACORN offices at 16 W. 25th St. in Baltimore, 209 W. Jackson Blvd. in Chicago, and 846 N. Broad St. in Philadelphia.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2009/11/16/acorn-still-owes-2-3-million-in-overdue-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

