<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For Tea Parties, Bigger Is Not Better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biggovernment.com/smcqueen/2010/01/04/for-tea-parties-bigger-is-not-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biggovernment.com/smcqueen/2010/01/04/for-tea-parties-bigger-is-not-better/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:00:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Meluso wieght loss</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/smcqueen/2010/01/04/for-tea-parties-bigger-is-not-better/comment-page-2/#comment-2708974</link>
		<dc:creator>Meluso wieght loss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 02:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=55214#comment-2708974</guid>
		<description>If you mention it, they turn out to be defensive, then abusive, aggressive, and finally, resort to hypocrisy, by doing what they claim they would never do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you mention it, they turn out to be defensive, then abusive, aggressive, and finally, resort to hypocrisy, by doing what they claim they would never do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Focus on Freedom</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/smcqueen/2010/01/04/for-tea-parties-bigger-is-not-better/comment-page-2/#comment-1953738</link>
		<dc:creator>Focus on Freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=55214#comment-1953738</guid>
		<description>Remain leaderless.  We don&#039;t need leaders.  Look at the success of the Tea Party Movement so far--without leaders.  The important immediate goal of the movement is to gain millions more patriots.  When we reach forty or fifty million Congress, the President, the Supreme Court and the bureaucrats will take notice.  Joining into the GOP or creating another party will add more baggage and destroy the focus of the Movement.  The weight of individuals will have much more impact on Washington, D.C. especially if the focus of the movement is on Freedom, a universal dream. Keep growing Tea Partiers.  This can be the opportunity to force the government back into the Constitution. Focus on Freedom.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remain leaderless.  We don&#039;t need leaders.  Look at the success of the Tea Party Movement so far&#8211;without leaders.  The important immediate goal of the movement is to gain millions more patriots.  When we reach forty or fifty million Congress, the President, the Supreme Court and the bureaucrats will take notice.  Joining into the GOP or creating another party will add more baggage and destroy the focus of the Movement.  The weight of individuals will have much more impact on Washington, D.C. especially if the focus of the movement is on Freedom, a universal dream. Keep growing Tea Partiers.  This can be the opportunity to force the government back into the Constitution. Focus on Freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shackled by Deeds in My Jail Made of Choices</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/smcqueen/2010/01/04/for-tea-parties-bigger-is-not-better/comment-page-2/#comment-1865170</link>
		<dc:creator>Shackled by Deeds in My Jail Made of Choices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=55214#comment-1865170</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syntax_Game</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/smcqueen/2010/01/04/for-tea-parties-bigger-is-not-better/comment-page-2/#comment-1668206</link>
		<dc:creator>Syntax_Game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=55214#comment-1668206</guid>
		<description>  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeaC</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/smcqueen/2010/01/04/for-tea-parties-bigger-is-not-better/comment-page-2/#comment-1669486</link>
		<dc:creator>TeaC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=55214#comment-1669486</guid>
		<description>Believe me we will be watching Scott Brown also and personally expressed have told him so.  
As Mr. McQueen states clearly, we are NOT wanting to form a 3rd Party - but we do hope that those in office and the GOP listen to what &#039;we the people&#039; have to say and expect representation.  
We will not be ignored any longer as they do work for us and I am fed up with RINO&#039;S, the out of control spending, the manufacturing of debt now far beyond what any of us can truly comprehend, bribes and back room deals!  
In states where there are primaries, KNOW who you are voting for and don&#039;t listen to the ads on the TV&#039;s which they paint a rosey picture of themselves. Do your homework and majority of those who are running may have been part of the same old - same old: part of the problem so study and see who is the REAL person for the office and the good of your state, city or our Nation! TEAC 
 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe me we will be watching Scott Brown also and personally expressed have told him so.<br />
As Mr. McQueen states clearly, we are NOT wanting to form a 3rd Party &#8211; but we do hope that those in office and the GOP listen to what &#039;we the people&#039; have to say and expect representation.<br />
We will not be ignored any longer as they do work for us and I am fed up with RINO&#039;S, the out of control spending, the manufacturing of debt now far beyond what any of us can truly comprehend, bribes and back room deals!<br />
In states where there are primaries, KNOW who you are voting for and don&#039;t listen to the ads on the TV&#039;s which they paint a rosey picture of themselves. Do your homework and majority of those who are running may have been part of the same old &#8211; same old: part of the problem so study and see who is the REAL person for the office and the good of your state, city or our Nation! TEAC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Eldridge</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/smcqueen/2010/01/04/for-tea-parties-bigger-is-not-better/comment-page-2/#comment-1628470</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Eldridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=55214#comment-1628470</guid>
		<description>I have been a Republican, from a family of Massachusetts Democrats, for 45 years however,I am not a rock ribbed conservative. There are things Republican with which I disagree. Now I&#039;m being told by the  Limbaughs, Becks and Hanitys that if I don&#039;t follow the conservative agenda, I&#039;m liberal?? Sorry boys, I don&#039;t drink anyone&#039;s Kool-Aid!  
 
The worst thing we can do right now is to split the party. I have heard it said that Scott Browns  election is a vote for conservatism. Scott Brown is not exactly the &quot;Poster Child&quot; for the conservative movement. We have something good going with the Tea Parties, lets not mess it up by splitting the party. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been a Republican, from a family of Massachusetts Democrats, for 45 years however,I am not a rock ribbed conservative. There are things Republican with which I disagree. Now I&#039;m being told by the  Limbaughs, Becks and Hanitys that if I don&#039;t follow the conservative agenda, I&#039;m liberal?? Sorry boys, I don&#039;t drink anyone&#039;s Kool-Aid!  </p>
<p>The worst thing we can do right now is to split the party. I have heard it said that Scott Browns  election is a vote for conservatism. Scott Brown is not exactly the &quot;Poster Child&quot; for the conservative movement. We have something good going with the Tea Parties, lets not mess it up by splitting the party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyKnoxs</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/smcqueen/2010/01/04/for-tea-parties-bigger-is-not-better/comment-page-1/#comment-1576766</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyKnoxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=55214#comment-1576766</guid>
		<description>That is misdirected anger, the government forced most of those troops to go to Nam.  If citizens believe enough of a threat exists, they will bear arms on their own, rather than being forced. 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is misdirected anger, the government forced most of those troops to go to Nam.  If citizens believe enough of a threat exists, they will bear arms on their own, rather than being forced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

