Tax Day is Here Again!
by Rep. Steve King (R-IA)Tax day is often marked by many political events objecting to our nation’s tax policies. This year will be no different, as tea party groups and advocates for tax reform will be out in full force across the country.
Americans are upset with Washington, and it is easy to see why. Government dependency and spending is up, while nearly half the households in America (47%) will pay no federal income taxes this year. Meanwhile, Gallup reported this week that 63 percent of Americans believe their taxes will increase in the next 12 months. Private sector jobs are increasingly difficult to obtain, and special interest groups control the agenda on Capitol Hill.
Many wrongly claim that only the “rich” are affected by high tax rates. In reality, the average American worker surrenders 27 percent of his earnings to federal, state and local governments, meaning the average American gives three months of his annual earnings to government.
Despite this high percentage, liberals in Congress want to take even more money out of the pockets of American workers by pursuing an agenda that increases taxes to pay for the policies being handed down by Nancy Pelosi and signed by Barack Obama. Liberals in Washington are spending the federal government into a record deficit of $1.5 trillion dollars this year alone.
America cannot continue down the current path because our spending levels are unsustainable. Spending needs to be cut and our method of taxation needs to be changed.
To reign in government spending, I introduced H.Res.323, the Cut the Unnecessary Tab (CUT) Resolution. This resolution requires that rescission bills be brought to the House floor at the beginning of every fiscal quarter to give Congress the opportunity to cut and cancel unnecessary, wasteful government spending.
At the rate Congress is going right now, our grandchildren will never climb the mountain of debt America is accumulating. The CUT Act will change the way the federal government spends taxpayer dollars by allowing any Member of Congress to offer an amendment to cut wasteful federal spending and require a recorded vote so every Member is held accountable. The CUT Act will be an important step toward Congress finally balancing the budget and reducing the waste of taxpayer dollars.
But controlling spending alone is not enough to put our government on a fiscally sustainable path. We need to fundamentally reform the American tax system by abolishing the IRS and replacing our system with a national sales tax.
The FairTax – a national consumption tax – would abolish the IRS and allow Americans to keep 100 percent of their paychecks. Under the FairTax, the take-home pay of American workers will increase by an average of 56 percent by replacing federal personal and corporate income taxes and a litany of other taxes including gift, estate, capital gains, interest income, dividends income, alternative minimum, Social Security, and Medicare taxes with one simple retail sales tax.
Remember, businesses do not pay taxes. Instead, they pass them along to their customers who end up paying them. In reality, businesses collect taxes from their customers and pass them along to government.
Think of a business as two services. One provides the product you purchase, and the other is a hidden, built-in price reserved for the federal government.
Both consumers and small-business owners will benefit from the FairTax. Taxes on business currently make up 22 percent of all retail prices. Therefore, if the FairTax replaced the federal income tax system, prices would drop 22 percent – the cost of complying with the current tax code.
Right now every business must calculate the tax compliance implications of all its business decisions. Government tax collectors audit an ever higher percentage of tax returns and taxpayers pay high fees for tax preparation. Fewer and fewer Americans fill out their own taxes out of fear of an IRS audit. The recently passed Obamacare legislation authorizes as much as $10 billion dollars for the IRS and will enable the IRS to hire 16,000 to 17,000 new agents to force compliance.
The FairTax repeals the entire federal income tax code and abolishes the IRS completely – lock, stock, and barrel. It liberates every American to earn all the reward of hard, smart work. Under the FairTax, there is no tax penalty for earning, saving or investing.
Everyone is free to choose to pay their taxes when they make a decision to purchase. This will unleash the American economy, enabling it to soar upwards to a new level and reestablish dominance in the world.
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
442 Comments
THANKI YOU for your great article!
CALIFSTARHEART
http://www.conservativeteapartycaliforniastyle.co...
Why do we elect drunken sailors to spend our money?
Dear Sir/Ma’am:
I recently completed filing my federal and state tax returns; more accurately, I assembled a bunch of paper, sent it to my accountant, he sent back a form which I am unable to comprehend, and I wrote out a check, signed it, and crossed my fingers and mailed it in – something similar to what Treasury Secretary Geitner did with one exception; I paid my taxes. I have read in the national media that President Obama is trying to find new profits to tax by eliminating deductions, like the home mortgage deduction, and reducing previously justifiable expenses; in short, raise taxes. From the highest earning taxpayer to the lowest, we are attacked by an ever expanding tax code whose only purpose ought to be to secure money to pay for those Constitutionally acceptable functions we cannot accomplish on our own as States, but alas this is not so.
Taxes are critical to the funding of necessary functions of our government that the vast majority of individuals cannot accomplish on their own. I could home school my children, sit outside my home with a rifle and a garden hose, and maybe band together with a few neighbors, and set up a small school and a neighborhood watch program called “You loot, We shoot.” But, It is far more effective and efficient to have a community based school system, police stations, and fire departments to accomplish the same objectives that is accountable to local taxpayers. Thus, I pay property taxes to accomplish the goal of providing an education, policing our streets, and putting out fires. In my local community, though we complain and get upset about how taxes have risen the budgets balance and the community grows, and it produces good citizens who want to live productive lives. I speak from individual experience on this point; if someone opened me up they would find “KATONAH” stamped on my heart. On the State level the same cannot be said. The budget is so in the septic tank that the federal government has bailed us out via President Obama’s “stimulus bill,” because the state of New York promised too much, to too many, in the good years, and did not plan on a time when economic growth would contract. On the federal level we have an enormous problem, in the past 20 years, Republicans and Democrats, have taken the citizens visa and mastercard out for a spending spree and we’re busted; $2 Trillion running deficit, $13 Trillion in debt – assuming the books balance, which according to the last comptroller general, they do not. By this time next year, if we have a flat gross domestic product, only 1/3 of the federal budget will be obtained via tax receipts, 2/3 will be borrowed or just printed – if you think we are going to have a flat gross domestic product next year I’ve got bridge in Brooklyn to sell you. You name the politician, by next year, an election year, they will all be promising more than can be delivered on the economy, and by extension the broken back of the taxpayer. Remember what Reagan said, “ . . . the more the plans fail the more the planners plan.” The schizophrenic nature that the government approaches the economy can best be described using President Reagan famous quote, “If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And If it stops moving, subsidize it.” The conclusion is crystal clear. When taxes are levied and dispersed on the local level we get more for our money, and we have the capacity to alter course if the government loses it’s way. At the state level the risk of fraud and abuse multiplies; and finally at the federal level this abuse multiplies exponentially. Last I checked my home state of New York does not have a printing press.
The current tax system on the Federal level is one giant loophole – 60,000 pages of it it is progressively regressive in nature – the more you make the higher tax rate you pay. For enough money the highest earners obtain lawyers, and accountants to find ways to keep more of what they earn. I applaud them, and their efforts and I would do the same thing if I walked in their economic shoes. The more money citizens and business owners keep the more they can save, invest, and spend to pursue happiness to the betterment of all. Politicians use the tax code as leverage at the State and Federal level to, shall we say, encourage contributions from individuals and corporations to remain in office and feather their nests. This is not how this deal is supposed to work in the United States of America. Bad ideas must fail so good ideas can prosper – and in prospering we all benefit from an ever increasing standard of living.
We need to scrap the tax code and tax earnings and purchases at a combined rate of 10% – everybody pays, no exceptions. You make more money you pay more tax, you spend less money you pay less tax; since there are no more deductions, tax credits, exemptions there is no more tax day or tax season – you pay your taxes as you live your life. This will create a consistent stream of tax receipts that will be guaranteed to evolve from areas that are failing to those that are financially succeeding – hopefully removing the incentive for politicians to tax well run firms to subsidize the pursuits of failing firms or ideas that have no bases in reality.
I'd prefer a flat tax. And I'd like each and every person in America to have to write that check every month, lick the stamp, and mail it to the US Government so they can FEEL the money being sent to DC as a visceral pain.
Maybe then they would read voters pamphlets, study party platforms and voting records, research what a person has done and believes BEFORE electing the moron into office to fritter away all OUR MONEY.
The government would NEVER agree. Because they can't stand the light of the truth shining on all their corruption, greed, and skulduggery.
I don't trust a National Sales Tax–if we move to that, what will stop the Feds from re-instituting an income tax again and putting us further down the rabbit hole of unsustainable taxes? I prefer the concept of a flat tax, where everyone pays the same percent on income after whatever is deemed the 'start point' (minimum income for a family based on size). Period. For small businesses that file their taxes based on a schedule C, there would be a (minimal) list of allowable business cost deductions subtracted then flat % on the remainder.
Here are the demonstrable facts:
http://www.ourfuture.org/fact-sheets-briefs/20100...
"$604:
The average tax cut the working poor got in 2009 under President Obama.
"$22:
The average tax cut the working poor got under President Bush's tax cuts.
"10 percent:
The increase in the average tax return that most working families are receiving this year due to tax cuts enacted under President Obama.
"66.7 percent:
The percentage of U.S.-owned corporations that paid no income tax in 2005, according to the Government Accountability Office.
"The average American is receiving a refund of nearly $3,000—up more than 10 percent over last year—thanks to the Obama tax cuts for 95 percent of Americans [The White House]. Tax reductions that benefit working families include the Making Work Pay tax cut ($400 for individuals, $800 for couples) and changes in the child tax credit and the earned income tax credit that made more people eligible to take those deductions.
"Families in the bottom 20 percent of income (up to $19,792 in 2009) received an average tax cut of $604 under the 2009 tax cuts [Citizens for Tax Justice]. The 2001 and 2006 tax cuts under President Bush resulted in an average tax cut for the bottom 20 percent of income earners of just $22 [Tax Policy Center]. The next 20 percent of earners (making up to $38,000 in 2009) got an average tax cut of $628 under the 2009 tax cut. The same group only got an average reduction of $360 under the Bush tax cuts."
In other words, ordinary Americans do much better on taxes with Democratic administrations than Republican. Corporations do better under Republicans. No wonder big corporations pretty much always support Republican politicians over Democrats.
Put that in your teabag and smoke it. No one should listen to Steve King.
Lock the Federal sales tax and no more than 1% and close the IRS with the same bill.
I'm with you on that one! I also prefer the Flat Tax to the Fair Tax plan. I'm sure we will see much more debate on this issue whether or not either plan is ever implemented.
Dude. If you want to write a book…get a publisher.
Because during the courtship they drink only tea, tell us we are their only love and tell us how important we are to them. Then they go out drinking and whoring providing a trinket to smooth it over.
What would Reagan do?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1i3tkAYU7yM
God Bless America
I don't consider that a valid argument, just so you know. My mind remains unchanged on the subject..
Hmmm… How can some one that pays no income tax get a tax cut? I think they should tax the poor…they can sneak it in by calling it a Lottery.
I know it's probably really, really hard for you to consider the possibility that you have your facts wrong, but give it a shot.
I still prefer my method. And rather than make all of the IRS agents unemployed, with a flat tax, they could become bill collectors. and they could spend their days asking dead-beats to pay their monthly taxes…
Like L4S, I still like Flat better than Fair…
When you actually have to buy things with money, money that you earn not by swiping the little card the government gives you each month, most states add on tax.
There would of course have to be a recieving agency, but the IRS with it's massive regulations, deductions, and government make work jobs, private courts etc. would not be nessecary, one rate, one place to send, fraud easily detecable and prosecutable.
Too simple for you? (probably)
From your link
>>We live in a remarkable political moment: precarious, yet potentially transforming. At the Campaign for America’s Future, our daily work is to bring about the progressive transformation.
Progressive=PickPockets
Sorry mooch, go find another host, the product of our labor belongs to we the people who earn it, the rest of you can joing in an participate or opt out and starve.
The choice is yours.
So if I smashed all the windows on your house, and then next year I smashed all but one, you'd not only have nothing to complain about, but you'd thank me for my generosity?
And by the way, you won't find an American more average than I, and I'm sure as hell not getting any check for $3,000. Try losing a zero. In the future, you might want to get your information from an organization that wasn't founded by a socialist douchebag, and funded by George Soros and the labor unions.
Facts? You think pointing to a leftist web site settles the matter?
How about I quote the CATAO institute, fair enough?
The real question is not who gets what when, the real question is what gives you the right to TAKE the product of MY labor and give it to someone else?
I have to say I am leaning towards the fair tax at the moment for one reason.
Control and granularity. If we wanted to withhold support from government we could just stop buying except for necessities, that's a powerful idea right there, and it's up to use when to do it. No election cycle delays.
So long as the rate was reasonable and constitutionally limited I don’t see a problem with it, why do you favor the flat over the fair?
In either case we would still need a prioritized balanced budget amendment to prevent the left from cutting the military and spending it all on condoms.
I have thought about both…and I would accept either……but….The FairTax is a more stable solution….The empowerment of the citizen to pay taxes at their discretion is more in line with the principals of this nation…You cannot claim unfair taxation if you are responsible for them….Any taxation plan, Flat or Fair must be coupled with responsible representatives to hold the purse strings….That should be the first agenda item….we can argue over the method after that is done…
I have to say I am leaning towards the fair tax at the moment for one reason.
Control and granularity. If we wanted to withhold support from government we could just stop buying except for necessities, that's a powerful idea right there, and it's up to us when to with hold funds. No election cycle delays.
No investment tax would just turn the country into a money magnet. So long as the rate was reasonable and constitutionally limited I don’t see a problem with it.
In either case we would still need a prioritized balanced budget amendment to prevent the left from cutting the military and spending it all on condoms.
Read the Book….but that might interfere with your trolling for hate and discontent….
Reagan would raise taxes because the deficit is out of control. Reagan was a smart man. He learned trickle-down doesn't work so was pragmatic enough to raise taxes when it was necessary. If only the rest of the conservative idiots could learn too, you might become relevant again some day.
While I like the concept of the Fair Tax, it would surely lead to the demise of our mindless consumerist culture, King's point is very misleading. If the entire burden of tax revenue falls squarely on the purchase of goods, the price of goods are not going to go down 22%. Indeed, the price of everything will go up dramatically because its taxed so heavily. King is a typical politician, so its not surprising he would try to mislead us. Shame on people who drink the kool-aid and overlook or are too stupid to identify this bait-and-switch King is dropping on us.
As usual, King makes a little bit of sense amid a whole lot of nonsense.
"When you subsidize poverty and failure, you get more of both." — James Dale Davidson
No one should listen to you, Regressive.
I do not know what you have been smoking, but history proves you wrong, just look at the link tohis speech above.
God Bless America
Cato has criticized corporate welfare a-plenty, and they are to be commended for that.
I am not taking anything from you. Once again a wrong factual premise. The government has the power to tax in the constitution.
Nest question. Never mind.
We the people choose to provide basic public services like any other civilized country. Majority sucks when you lose elections, I'll grant you that. But the constitution provides for majority rule, remember?
What is it with you people and smashing windows?
Teabaggers and socialist douchebags should unite – ladies and gentlemen I present to you —
The Douchebaggers!
Funny, as one of the working poor, I continued to not have any Federal Tax taken out of my check, and I owed nothing at the end of the year. 6 exemptions, and one child did wonders for my federal income tax. Now, I'm going to suffer higher costs to my health care, social security, health care taxes, medicare, stealth taxes on my energy bills, and of course they're trying to add a VAT to my purchases. My boss' taxes are being raised, and so are the taxes on his company, which I garauntee will be passed on to me. So how are my taxes going down under President Obama?
This idea that Obama has “cut” taxes for 95% of working families is nothing more than a redefinition of what the term “tax cut” means. According to the IRS, a full one-third of all tax returns owed no income tax last year. Nearly 20% of returns had neither an income nor a payroll tax liability. These people cannot see their taxes cut any further. Anything they get is just spending. I guess if you call giving money to someone a "tax cut" then you can indeed "cut taxes" for people who don't pay taxes. But this is just income redistribution, since these tax CREDITS are “refundable” – meaning you can still get a check from the gov’t even if you have no income tax liability.
There is no bait and switch….The FairTax would replace all taxes…..not be applied on top of them….It would require the repeal of the 16th ammendment….consumer prices would fall to free market levels because the corporations will not have to spend millions of dollars trying to comply will the current overcomplicated tax code….If you read the books written buy the authers of the FairTax most of your misconceptions will be cleared up…..To make up your mind beforehand as you say is " a whole lot of nonsense."
It would have to be an amendment that limited it to the only kind of tax and abolish the other, else you are correct.
Yes they have the right to tax, not to redistribute. Did you get the talking point about denying that your party is in the redistribution business, or are you saying that's in the constitution?
Then again I am talking to a guy who's parties judiciary "genius" thinks forcing people to buy a product is under the "good and welfare" clause, which apparently is right next to the box of good and plenty's in his desk, because it sure isn't in the constitution.
If you are the recipient of stolen property you are as guilty as the thief who stole it. So yeah you are taking things that don't belong to you.
Essential services are the first things liberals threaten to cut if they don't get their 65% discretionary spending approved.
Riddle me this bat-turd, what is the only essential service that the constitution calls to provide for? I will give you a hint, it's the one you hate the most.
We the people are about to give you the mooches a kick in your political a'sses this November, I hope you enjoy your well deserved political beat down.
No it's not majority rule you idiot, it's majority governance. You don't get to breach the law just because you have a majority, thats why we are a Democratic Republic.
It explains a lot of your thinking though
I think he was mistakenly thinking you can connect dots, he does not realize you are still in the eating crayons stage of your development.
Let me try a different one. If I raise my prices 50% above retail and then have a sale where I give you 25% off are you getting a killer deal?
Obama's redefinition of taxes, breaks, and rates, funny math, and for that matter waht constitutes an "Average American" is well understood by many, and soon by many more.
You trolls are going to have to up your game if you want to continue to play.
Taxation pays for government programs. The constitution provides that congress may tax and spend for the general welfare. Call it redistribution if you want. It's constitutional and there is no theft here. "Taxation is theft" is a lie. It is majoritarian politics and if you dont like it there is a remedy – elect someone else next time. Dont go around calling your political opponents thieves.
The HCR legislation does not force anyone to buy anything. You can buy health insurance or you can pay the tax. Your choice. This kind of thing is very common. Polluters opt to pay the fine all the time.
So I say again you have an incorrect premise. To liken me to the recipient of stolen property is preposterous. You are a victim of disinformation from right wingers, not of anything from progressives. If you look again, you'll see that we are all being ripped off by big wealth and big corporations who have hijacked the government that was supposed to be for us the people. That's the real villian here, not big government.
So which "Corporations" force you to buy their products?
You see left-hump, they earn their own money, just like we earn our own money. We don't depend on handouts. We don't have all this envy about the rich, though we may have aspirations to be rich, but that's a night and day difference. Your "Hate capitalism" rant just sounds stupid to us, you might as well tell us you hate jobs & prosperity.
Our ideology is a simple one. We believe in society, we just don’t believe in redistribution, which is a forced subsidy. You are the recipients, we are the forced benefactors that are used to fund the lefts "Generosity" so don't think you are going to convince us that WE are the bad guys, save it for your base.
I thought my question was simple, how much? You did not answer the simple question, but then tell me it is too simple for me?
I suspect one simple tax to replace all other taxes would have to be at a very high rate, so when people propose it need to ask, how much?
Sure you really care now Steve, really do. After 8 years of mischief, you really care now. Iowa deserves a better Republican.
Btw, you look like a total cheesedick washed up rocker whose career has stalled to the point of playing at harrah's casino when you talk at this tea party conventions.
How much would the National Consumption Tax be and who would collect it once you abolish the IRS?
I disagree. People don't file their taxes now, including government officials. What makes you think they'll file them in the future? FairTax -> everybody who buys stuff pays, including Tim Geithner, Al Capone, illegal immigrants, drug lords, etc.
I love national defense, the constitution authorizes congress to tax and spend for the general welfare, "liberals" would rather cut excess military expenditures and corporate welfare than essential services, name-calling is pathetic , you and I are both part of we the people, the Democrats didnt "breach the law" whatever that means, Im not a Democrat anyway, you have no idea who you're talking to, you have a lust for vengeance that is unamerican, and good luck with the anger strategy.
Y'all are the ones moving the bar. The most prosperous times for America were the 50s. What were tax rates then? Or do you still believe the myth of trickle down?
I have to say that I have a problem with the term "working families." I have a family. My spouse and I both own our own business, often work 60+ hours a week, and today we just sent a check to the IRS for 40% of our income. And we're nowhere near the top two income brackets either. We're not "rich." So I get a little miffed when I hear the term "working families" being tossed about – as if the rest of us who happen to earn over a certain amount aren't working.
And your figures that you initially listed may be accurate. However, I take issue with the term "tax cut" being used because as I stated, these aren't cuts. When someone doesn't pay income tax, then gets a check from the US Treasury, it's not a tax cut. It's a handout, and it comes at the expense of someone else. So I scratch my head a little with you when you say that you think it's wrong to take money from A to give to B, yet say that isn't the same as funding programs that "benefit working families." My working family (Person A) is having its money taking to be given to another "working family" (Person B). And trust me, when I hear people saying that they're getting "free money" from "Obama's stash" after I've finished working a 13 hour day, it does feel a little like theft.
Yeah, corporations earn their own money, by mooching off the public fisc and dumping their toxics in our backyards and then making US pay for it after we get sick from it, then laughing all the way to the bank as they sell their credit derivatives to the latest mutual-fund suckers after purchasing deregulation from congress and members of both parties. Oh and by operating unsafe mines, squeezing profits while workers die in accidents. Killing the competition through market power. I could go on and on. Im not saying you are bad guys; Im saying you are a tool of bad corporations with all the "greed is good" regurgitation. I dont envy the rich, I just want basic fairness which is a fundamental American attribute and a big part of what I understand and support as American Exceptionalism. We are a fair-minded people who believe in both the rights of property and the rights of the community. It's a balance, not all one or the other.
Everybody benefits from public safety nets like Social Security and Medicare. Everybody. By the way I dont get any government handouts of any kind.
The President doesn't have the power to raise or lower taxes. Congress does. The House of Representatives specifically. It's in the Constitution. It's a great little document. I'm sure you can find a copy of it on the interwebs somewhere. While you're looking it up, find out who had control of the House of Representatives when Reagan was President and get back to me.
Tax cuts subsidize poverty?
Know what's regressive? Letting rich corporations fleece the people and convincing the people that it's in their interest.
HOW DARE YOU INSULT DRUNKEN SAILORS THAT WAY?
I'm proud to be a drunken sailor, and I GUARANTEE you that I've never spent more than one billion dollars in my entire life.
So, there. Phhfffftttt! / humor off
Finally an intelligent comment. Thanks for not calling me a douchebag or a bonehead. To respond, I dont think those figures rebut the figures I recited above particularly as to working families, and of course you have not addressed corporate taxation at all.
Hey, I think it's wrong to take money from A and give money to B. But that's not really the same thing as funding programs that benefit working families or small businesses or that penalize moving capital or jobs offshore. I'll grant that the complexity of incentives is crazy, and it might make sense to simplify the whole thing and do away with all the subsidies and incentives and tax cuts but no matter what there needs to be a system that does not allow the very rich to leverage loopholes that ordinary people cant access. That's the biggest problem – the iniquity of allowing the very rich to escape taxation virtually altogether while slamming those in the middle the hardest. That's what the right doesnt get – there is a vast difference between the way individuals and corporations are treated, and somehow the conservative movement against taxation focuses on the taxation of individuals and ignores the lack of taxation of corporate entities. Corporations benefit from this to the detriment of us all.
So which "Corporations" force you to buy their products?
You see left-hump, they earn their own money, just like we earn our own money. We don't depend on handouts. We don't have all this envy about the rich, though we may have aspirations to be rich, but that's a night and day difference. Your "Hate capitalism" rant just sounds stupid to us, you might as well tell us you hate jobs & prosperity.
Our ideology is a simple one. We believe in society, we just don’t believe in redistribution, which is a forced subsidy. You are the recipients, we are the forced benefactors that are used to fund the lefts "Generosity" so don't think you are going to convince us that WE are the bad guys, save it for your base.
Excellent. So you reform how we pay taxes. How does this stop the government spending more than what they are given by the people? You could implement everything above and government would still over spend. So this article, to me, says nothing about how you personally stopped spending more than your state gave you and nothing about how a new taxation system will stop that.
I hope your next article addresses this.
Calista,
LOVE the budget comment!!!! "cutting the military and spending it all on condoms." BWAHA HA HA!!!
I was born and raised in Oregon where we have no sales tax, but we had horrid income and property taxes. We voted down sales tax EVERY time, because we knew the relief would e temporary unless the income and property taxes were abolished as well.
I will NEVER support a sales tax until ALL other taxes ae revoke and removed from legal possibility.
Becuse it is like leaving the door to the hen house open for the foxes… We are just asking for a future screwing by our govt.
OK?
okay you sent your money in the form of a check to the tresury dept…….when the check clears make a copy of it and have it enlarged to 3'X6'……..on election day have a luv'd one staple it to your as……butt….that way you will know who to NOT vote for……
DRIP = DON'T RETURN INCUMBENT POLITICIANS…
POLITICIANS ARE SCUM…..yes yours too!
[...] » Tax Day is Here Again! – Big Government [...]
Great Site……
[...]check this out as this contains important information about[...]…
[...]mechanically clenching and unclenching his fist on the useless buckle and frowning hard[...]…
vanished city with great arcaded marble piles ; with roofs that flashed in the sunlight; with the grim…
Online Article……
[...]The information mentioned in the article is some of the best available [...]……
Superb website…
[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……
Visitor recommendations…
[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……
Online Article……
[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]……
Blogs ou should be reading…
[...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]……
Websites worth visiting…
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……
Sources…
[...]check beneath, are some completely unrelated internet websites to ours, however, they’re most trustworthy sources that we use[...]……
Related……
[...]just beneath, are numerous totally not related sites to ours, however, they are surely worth going over[...]……
Superb site…
[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……
Superb website…
[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……
Websites worth visiting…
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……
Great website…
[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……
Visitor recommendations…
[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following site[...]……
Awesome website…
[...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]……
You should check this out…
[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]……
Cool sites…
[...]we came across a cool site that you might enjoy. Take a look if you want[...]……
Awesome website…
[...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]……
Awesome website…
[...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]……
Related……
[...]just beneath, are numerous totally not related sites to ours, however, they are surely worth going over[...]……
Visitor recommendations…
[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……
Recent Blogroll Additions……
[...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……
Great website…
[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……
Online Article……
[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]……
Sites we Like……
[...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read. Listed below are the latest sites that we choose [...]……
Great website…
[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……
Websites worth visiting…
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……
Recommeneded websites…
[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]……
Cool sites…
[...]we came across a cool site that you might enjoy. Take a look if you want[...]……
Visitor recommendations trackback…
[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……
The best website……
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……
Websites Rolety…
[...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]……
Links…
[...]Sites of interest we have a link to[...]……
Read was interesting, stay in touch……
[...]please take a look at the sites we follow, especially this one, as it is indeed our picks from the web[...]……
Links…
[...]Sites of interest we have a link to[...]……
Cool sites…
[...]we came across a cool site that you might enjoy. Take a look if you want[...]……
Great website…
[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……
Sources…
[...]check below, are some completely unrelated internet sites to ours, yet, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[...]……
Check this out…
[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……
Why don’t others write as good as you?…
[...]If perhaps all the websites at the top 10 can write like you there. You are worthy of lots of credit for this. Thumbs[...]……
Recent Blogroll Additions……
[...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……
Recommeneded websites…
[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]……
Read was interesting, stay in touch……
[...]please visit the sites we follow, including this one, as it represents our picks from the web[...]……
You must be logged in to post a comment.