Administration Uses Obamacare to Unilaterally Stimulate Economy; Says, ‘We Can’t Wait’
by Dr. Susan BerryOn the same day that the Supreme Court announced that it would take up the challenge to President Obama’s healthcare reform law, Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) launched the Health Care Innovation Challenge, a competitive program that will award up to $1 billion in taxpayer-funded grants to applicants who will “implement the most compelling new ideas to deliver better health, improved care, and lower costs to people enrolled in Medicare, Medicaid and CHIP…” At a press conference, on Monday, Ms. Sebelius said, “Efforts like these to improve the health of communities and reduce cost while sparking the economy are a priority of the Obama administration.”
Using the Obama administration’s new theme of “We Can’t Wait,” a slogan which refers to Congress’ inability to obtain the votes to pass the president’s Jobs Act, the secretary said, “In recent weeks, Congress has failed to act on the full jobs agenda, so we will continue to do what we can.”
A new Rasmussen poll, however, indicates that most American voters oppose the Obamacare jobs plan, and believe the president should wait to enact the plan in order to reach an agreement with Congress. 63% of those polled said that the president should wait to work with Congress.
Once again, the effort on the part of the Obama administration is an incredible usurping of congressional power, and serves to illustrate how the wide banner of Obamacare will ultimately be used as a shield for many purposes that have little to do with the actual delivery of healthcare. All the more reason for Americans to demand that Obamacare be suspended entirely until the Supreme Court delivers its ruling next year.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
59 Comments
I can't wait until January 2, 2012!
Where in the hell is she getting this "up to $1 Billion" in taxpayer money? I sure as hell hope the House is not appropriating this money that we do not have to begin with. Unbelievable.
" We Can't Wait "
translated
" We Don't Have To Obey The Constitution "
"Services (DHHS) launched the Health Care Innovation Challenge, a competitive program that will award up to $1 billion in taxpayer-funded grants to applicants who will “implement the most compelling new ideas to deliver better health, improved care, and lower costs to people enrolled in Medicare, Medicaid and CHIP…"
Proof positive, this is straight up cloward and piven. They know their wet dream is going down in court, so they will rush to spend as much money/ install as much of the regulatory infrastructure as they can. One more turn of the knife.
These people are maddening to say the least. I hope they find a special place in HELL
please would some wealthy conservative pay for an ad to run every day on various media listing the people who voted for obamascare.
thank you i would gladly contribute to such an effort.
errrr, the treasury prints it.
The $1 billion will be "awarded" to an Obama campaign donor.
“Efforts like these to improve the health of communities and reduce cost while sparking the economy are a priority of the Obama administration.”
reduce cost, then why do they need a billion bucks to reduce cost?
Fed prints, Treasury borrows
just saying..
Guess what Barry , our new motto is also "WE CANT WAIT"
We cant wait till get your sorry arse outa office to start rebuilding this country .
You clowns ram a law down our throats and now your looking for somebody to
figure out how to solve the problems created by that law
Barry you and Kathleen Sillybus are both JOKES !
Here's my entry…. REPEAL OBAMACARE!
Silly me. In the "good 'ol days" the US Constitution made it clear that it was the House that did the funding and appropriations – not the Treasury or Fed Reserve.
Automatic funding of between 100 billion and 150 billion per year in automatic funding were improperly written into the text of the bill. So they get a minimum of that much each year by default.
Yet another reason to euthanize obamacare.
Get it done before the Republicans take control and try to repeal it. (The Republicans will need a majority in the House and 60 Senators to do it, plus a Republican President.) Obama, the time is running out. I can hear it ticking down. First of the year, the countdown really begins.
I feel you win this debate petee! Coupled with the earlier post that some Obama bundler shall "win" the award and cycle the money to the darkside.
Let me spin that a little…REPEAL OBAMA!
BO and his cronies love to bribe people with OUR tax $$. All dems know how to do is spend, spend, spend. Then we taxpayers get to pay, pay, pay. Come on 2012!
California will will the challenge. It's in the bag, besides they are the leading socialist state in the union.
California, a state full of beggars.
or Jan. 20, 2013, 12:00pm EST
I am a disenfranchised voter. I have no representation in Washington at all, I am persecuted under the regime of the man child in chief, who thinks he is King. Washington has never been more broken then it is now, time to fix it.
Except for me……. ;-]
How much money does a person need to donate in order for their idea to qualify as compelling?
This is pathetic……
God help us all.
Even you stupid ignorant liberals.
I'll ad to that…
phuck obama and repeal obamacare
Forcing people to pay for things they don't want is immoral. I don't want to fund abortions, obese people's operations, drug addicts and so on. In fact, it's unfair and wrong that the government can put a gun to my head and steal my money in order to fund other people.
will *win
Obama spends it. Who needs Congress anyway–bunch of losers.
Oh, about $50,000 now, then 25% of your 'award'. Your 'contributions' should come from different off-shore bank accounts.
She is just another corrupt pig who should be locked up.
"We Can't Wait" Until January 2013, when this mistake has to go back to "community organizing".
Nothing this bunch of Socialists do will work. Except to send a lot of us seniors to an early grave!
I'm not laughing. I'm crying over the shredding of the Constitution.
Or to Obama's Reelection fund.
Expediency of the moment… rears it's ugly head once again. The commieCRATS have used it over and over in the last two and a half years.
WHAT A COUNTRY!!!
.
Piece of cake:
1. Cap Medicare spending at 100 percent of the FICA revenue stream
2. Eliminate Medicaid and CHIP
Reducing health insurance premiums is equally simple. Prohibit insurers from offering coverage for:
1. Chronic conditions such as asthma and diabetes
2. NIC and intensive care
An alternate translation: WAAHH!! I didn't get my way! WAAHH!!
BINGO!
So, she is dipping into funds from the massive stimulus passed in 2009 that they planned all along to use for the 2012 election. Did we not expect this?
"With ObamaCare, we're tying both hands behind your back and blindfolding you and expecting you to provide quality health care. But with this contest, we'll untie one hand or take away the blindfold–your choice!"
This is just like what the moochers offered John Galt…while holding him prisoner. The parallels are getting eerier by the day.
We are going to reduce costs and will only cost us 1 billion dollars.
Thus is a 15 trillion dollar debt built.
Let's tell China they need to shake down Odumbo for their borrowed money. After all, it is Odumbo's stash.
The Emperor and his cronies are becoming more aggressive in the destruction of America…all that stands in the way of the NWO. Expect to wake up one day to discover Martial law has been declared…probably as a result of a disease outbreak (now that they are pushing new 'flu' shots)…but anything will work, possibly even the fleas and lice at OWS events.
Have a plan and be able to communicate securely with your loved ones. For a free survival planning thought-provoker eBook and encryption tool, go to http://www.rongoulden.com/Literary.htm (no pruchases required, the book and encryption tool are really free).
How do you stimulate the economy by stealing taxpayer's money, keeping half of it and returning the other half?
Sounds like an old Abbott and Costello episode:
One for you, one for me;
Two for you, one, two for me.
Three for you, one, two three for me.
This is really doodoo economics. Something that someone with a FUDD degree would think up after a strong toke on a funny butt.
It's time to Death Panel Progressive Disease in all its forms, at all the levels of govt….media….and schools….filter and delete it. It is far too toxic to remain on our shores….America free from Marx, shariah and Democrapp poison is the goal. Where's the money? Pay it back. Then Adios, BunnMothras!
As long as Obama is in office, there will be no improvement in the economy. Jobs are created by businesses, large and small, who have no idea what crazy thing Obama will propose to cause them grief. Obama has been so anti-business, in addition to his attempting class warfare, that business is right in waiting for stability in this office.
I don't get it.
Inauguration Day, when we'll have a new President sworn in.
What happens on Jan. 2, 2012 ?
Oh. OOPS! You are right! I meant inauguration day! I guess most got my drift.
Call it a 'ditzy housewife moment'!
Only Obama could pass a law that penalizes employers PER EMPLOYEE and call it a jobs plan. The Obama plan for jobs is to force businesses to automate or move overseas where they are not subject to $2000-3000 per employee PER YEAR. http://cobrahealth.com/Obamacare.html
Indeed, one hell of a question…
those ignorant liberal idiots would just bog down heaven's political system I say no help for them
or even "Badges! We don't need no stinkin' bad-jezz!"
How is offering incentive for cost savings plans to be developed going against the Constitution? I thought the idea of finding new ways to save money is what everyone wants to do? That is part' n parcel to the ongoing debt crisis–medicare/medicaid cost increases. Helping cut those cost increases is good and part' n parcel to health care reform.
BTW, if you are referring to the overall health insurance mandate in Obamacare being heard by the SCOTUS as to it's constitutional validity then you know that as it stands now the ruling of the second highest level court in the land affirmed it's constitutionality. Unless and until the SCOTUS rules otherwise, it is constitutional.
Except for the fact that private sector job growth is good and companies have record profits and record levels of cash and many don't pay any taxes, pay very low taxes or even negative taxes yea, businesses hate Obama and are doing very poorly. Not. It is the shrinking public sector that is putting the drag on the economy bc those crazy, get back the WH at any cost republicans are cutting jobs and programs that support, create or protect jobs with a vengeance. Shrinking government is their mantra, along with rolling back regulations and cutting taxes further, claiming to eliminate uncertainly so the job creators can do their thing. Yea right. Problem with that besides the points I wrote above is that the job creators themselves don't agree with the republicans mantra. The job creators say it is about demand for their products. Increase demand, they hire.
Simply put, if the guy with the lemonade stand has no customers would giving him a tax break motivate him to hire help? Or, if he has customers beyond what he can handle by himself would higher taxes prevent him from hiring?
Saying Obama is anti-business is like saying the courts are anti-constitution or the DOD is ant-military.
Check your back pocket…notice your wallet's gone? Thank OhBummer
Knuckles – glad to see you are paying attention!
I just wish everyone was.
ObamaCare killed the Jobs Recovery.
Believe it or not, the economy was producing jobs at a real recovery rate.
And, the day ObamaCare was passed, it stopped. Check out the Department
of Labor's own statistics.
http://blog.heritage.org/2011/07/20/obamacare-no-...
michelle bachman pointed this out when the law was first passed. they funded it w/o congressional approval with 105bil i think it was (pls don't hold me tthat number), it's an amount that can NEVER be defunded now that the law has been passed. the other thing people need to keep in mind is that starting in 2013 there can be no more wavers issued, so any candidate who says their first move will be to issue 49 state waivers is not being totally honest (unless there's been some new development i'm not aware of)
You must be logged in to post a comment.