<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Pelosi Has the Votes, Then Why Does the House Need the Slaughter Solution to Pass ObamaCare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biggovernment.com/sahiller/2010/03/11/if-pelosi-has-the-votes-then-why-does-the-house-need-the-slaughter-solution-to-pass-obamacare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biggovernment.com/sahiller/2010/03/11/if-pelosi-has-the-votes-then-why-does-the-house-need-the-slaughter-solution-to-pass-obamacare/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:02:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Skimmer Weir</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/sahiller/2010/03/11/if-pelosi-has-the-votes-then-why-does-the-house-need-the-slaughter-solution-to-pass-obamacare/comment-page-2/#comment-6233100</link>
		<dc:creator>Skimmer Weir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 03:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=87326#comment-6233100</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Online Article…...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Online Article…&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yosh</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/sahiller/2010/03/11/if-pelosi-has-the-votes-then-why-does-the-house-need-the-slaughter-solution-to-pass-obamacare/comment-page-2/#comment-6225404</link>
		<dc:creator>Yosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=87326#comment-6225404</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Best Links 2011...&lt;/strong&gt;

I was just searching for this information for some time. After 6 hours of continuous Googleing, at last I got it in your web site. I wonder what&#039;s the lack of Google strategy that don&#039;t rank this kind of informative sites in top of the list. Usually ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Best Links 2011&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I was just searching for this information for some time. After 6 hours of continuous Googleing, at last I got it in your web site. I wonder what&#8217;s the lack of Google strategy that don&#8217;t rank this kind of informative sites in top of the list. Usually &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bird feeders</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/sahiller/2010/03/11/if-pelosi-has-the-votes-then-why-does-the-house-need-the-slaughter-solution-to-pass-obamacare/comment-page-2/#comment-5959092</link>
		<dc:creator>bird feeders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 22:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=87326#comment-5959092</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Related…...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]just beneath, are numerous totally not related sites to ours, however, they are surely worth going over[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Related…&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]just beneath, are numerous totally not related sites to ours, however, they are surely worth going over[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garment daily business reports</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/sahiller/2010/03/11/if-pelosi-has-the-votes-then-why-does-the-house-need-the-slaughter-solution-to-pass-obamacare/comment-page-2/#comment-5830112</link>
		<dc:creator>garment daily business reports</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=87326#comment-5830112</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;You should check this out...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>You should check this out&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeinIdaho</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/sahiller/2010/03/11/if-pelosi-has-the-votes-then-why-does-the-house-need-the-slaughter-solution-to-pass-obamacare/comment-page-2/#comment-2303774</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeinIdaho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=87326#comment-2303774</guid>
		<description>Talk about embarrassing yourself, you take the cake! I opposed it then, just as I do now, so go back to your research and let the big folks talk. You&#039;d make your point a lot better if you stopped personally attacking the commenter and concentrated on your side of the argument. Your comments above make you look like a teenie bopper tapping away on the computer in mommies basement.    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about embarrassing yourself, you take the cake! I opposed it then, just as I do now, so go back to your research and let the big folks talk. You&#039;d make your point a lot better if you stopped personally attacking the commenter and concentrated on your side of the argument. Your comments above make you look like a teenie bopper tapping away on the computer in mommies basement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slaughtering the Constitution</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/sahiller/2010/03/11/if-pelosi-has-the-votes-then-why-does-the-house-need-the-slaughter-solution-to-pass-obamacare/comment-page-2/#comment-2256258</link>
		<dc:creator>Slaughtering the Constitution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=87326#comment-2256258</guid>
		<description>[...] 111th Democrat-Progressive led Congress violated Article I, Section 7 to the most obscene extent   If Pelosi Has the Votes, Then Why Does the House Need the Slaughter Solution to Pass ObamaCare - Bi...       These people are traitors they took an oath to defend the constitution not trample on it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 111th Democrat-Progressive led Congress violated Article I, Section 7 to the most obscene extent   If Pelosi Has the Votes, Then Why Does the House Need the Slaughter Solution to Pass ObamaCare &#8211; Bi&#8230;       These people are traitors they took an oath to defend the constitution not trample on it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manamongst Hussein</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/sahiller/2010/03/11/if-pelosi-has-the-votes-then-why-does-the-house-need-the-slaughter-solution-to-pass-obamacare/comment-page-2/#comment-2230882</link>
		<dc:creator>Manamongst Hussein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=87326#comment-2230882</guid>
		<description>On April 26 [2006], the Rules Committee served up the mother of all self-executing rules for the lobby/ethics reform bill. The committee hit the trifecta with not one, not two, but THREE!!! self-executing provisions in the same special rule. 
 
So please save the bed-wetting and hand wringing, please.  Your utter lack of research skills or curiosity makes you all look like hypocites...or idiots! 
 
Please stop embarassing yourselves with the idiotic tyranny speeches, and illogical and wrong as hell constitutional musings... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On April 26 [2006], the Rules Committee served up the mother of all self-executing rules for the lobby/ethics reform bill. The committee hit the trifecta with not one, not two, but THREE!!! self-executing provisions in the same special rule. </p>
<p>So please save the bed-wetting and hand wringing, please.  Your utter lack of research skills or curiosity makes you all look like hypocites&#8230;or idiots! </p>
<p>Please stop embarassing yourselves with the idiotic tyranny speeches, and illogical and wrong as hell constitutional musings&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

