Transforming the U.S. Department of Labor to the Department of Organized Labor
by Rick ManningIn their first year in office, the Obama Administration has re-made the U.S. Department of Labor into the Department of Organized Labor, working hard to make certain that those who spent hundreds of millions of dollars to put them in office get a return on their investment. While many dismiss the importance of the Department of Labor, virtually every person in America is directly touched by the rules and regulations that this federal bureaucracy creates and enforces, so changes at the top have real consequences for every working American.

As we evaluate the impact of the past year on the nation’s workforce, it is worthwhile to remember the accomplishments of President Bush’s Secretary of Labor, Elaine L. Chao.
When Secretary Chao left office, workers were safer in their workplaces than at any time in history, the Labor Department was focused upon encouraging private sector job creation, and created an enforcement environment that successfully protected workers from employers who egregiously violated the law while providing the necessary education to limit inadvertent violations.
Secretary Chao put an emphasis on clarifying workplace regulations to make it easier for employers to know the rules of the game. Her efforts led to overtime requirements being more clear-cut for employers while explicitly guaranteeing overtime protections for blue collar workers, police and fire fighters, EMTs, construction workers and others.
The Labor Department under Secretary Chao brought transparency to the spending of Big Labor through regulations which for the first time shined a light upon labor union expenditures. These reports revealed the massive labor expenditures supporting ACORN’s efforts,and were used by LA Times reporter Paul Pringle in his Polk Award winning series that brought down the SEIU powerbrokers in the California SEIU.
This emphasis on transparency and private sector education and empowerment was geared toward preparing America’s workforce for the 21st century, all the while protecting the taxpayer by achieving cost savings in the Department’s discretionary budget of 19 percent in real terms since 2001.
The Obama Administration’s agenda is very different.
The first order of business has been rolling back those pesky union transparency regulations that allowed watchdog groups, the media and union members to know how union dues are spent.
Next, rather than getting out of the way and allowing the private sector engine to create jobs, the Obama Administration is hiring hundreds more OSHA and Wage and Hour inspectors with their job descriptions revised away from helping companies comply with the law to strictly writing citations for as much fine money as can possibly be warranted.
Believe it or not, in spite of record lows in workplace injuries, OSHA inspectors are now financially incentivized to write citations with heavy fines encouraged. This is akin to making a police officer’s income directly related to how many tickets he/she writes. If you have the misfortune of getting pulled over, you know that it is going to cost you big time.
Continuing on the enforcement front, it is instructive that President Obama’s appointee to be the top lawyer in the Department is Patricia Smith who currently serves as the head of the New York State Department of Labor. In New York, Smith created a program that empowers unions to conduct wage and hour inspections of employers – typically, non-union employers. This powerful coercion tool is conducted under the guise of ensuring that employees are treated fairly, but actually allows a union to target employers for organizing programs using this threat as a cudgel against that business.
The theme of expanding private sector union membership permeates the entire Obama labor agenda from the recently announced deal on the health care bill which exempts union members from paying a tax on what is deemed to be Cadillac health care insurance, to the Orwellian named Employee Free Choice Act that strips employees of secret ballot union elections, to Obama appointees changing union election rules that have stood for 75 years in order to help unions organize Delta Airlines.
This emphasis on expanding union membership, even at the expense of job creation, can be seen in one of the Administration’s early acts – to require Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) for federally funded projects. PLAs require scale union wages be paid on all federally funded construction at an estimated cost of between 16-18%.
That’s shovel ready money that is employing fewer workers for the taxpayer dollar – all to force work into union shops and increase union dues payments. Rather than employing more workers in this time of economic crisis, Obama instead has chosen to employ fewer people per taxpayer dollar in order to ensure that union dues payments go up. Of course, the poster child for PLA projects is the notorious Boston Big Dig that ran billions of dollars of cost overruns while having to redo much of the work due to poor workmanship. Of course what else can you expect when using union labor is more important than getting the job done.
PLA’s are not the only example of this Administration putting union membership ahead of job creation. Amazingly, one of the requirements for consideration to receive a piece of the $100 million in “green job grants” was a partnership with a union affiliated group. While union affiliation has nothing to do with whether or not a job is green or not, these grants are structured to force companies competing for these grants to employ union labor and at the least give labor affiliated organizations a piece of the pie.
At this writing, the 60 vote filibuster proof Democratic Senate was predicted to go down in flames in Massachusetts. As a result, regulators, appointees to the National Labor Relations Board and Administrative Law judges are likely to be at the forefront of employment policy. One name stands out as perhaps the symbol of the changes that we are likely to see in the Obama Administration – Craig Becker.
The Wall Street Journal calls Becker, “labor’s secret weapon”. So who is he?
Becker is a yet to be confirmed appointee who would be the deciding vote on the National Labor Relations Board – the decision making body on the rules and validity of union organizing elections.
Instead of being a fair arbiter, Becker has advocated for extensive restrictions on employer communications with employees preceding a union organizing vote. He has gone so far as to call for employers to be barred from attending NLRB hearings about elections, and not allowing employers to challenge results even when evidence of union misconduct is present. If confirmed it is likely that Craig Becker, not Hilda Solis, will have the lasting impact on labor relations whether Congress passes the Employee Free Choice Act or not.
You might ask yourself, why is this Administration feverishly working to tilt the employment playing field dramatically toward the unions at the expense of real job creation?
The answer may be found in those very union disclosure reports that the Obama Administration doesn’t want you to see.
Big Labor is broke and desperate. Declining membership combined with hundreds of millions in political expenditures to elect this Administration and Congress have left them on the financial ropes.
To understand the severity of their situation, you only have to go to the Wall Street Journal which reports that the AFL-CIO has more liabilities than assets, and a key member of their Finance Board worries that, “insolvency may be just around the corner.” Further, Number One White House visitor, Andy Stern’s SEIU’s, is in severe financial trouble with his pension plans upside down and the union’s liabilities totalling almost 80% of its assets, and Jimmy Hoffa, Jr.’s International Brotherhood of Teamsters faces a pension disaster as its Central States Pension Fund teeters on ruin with an asset to liability ratio of only 43%. In short, Big Labor’s finances are worse than a Wall Street mortgage derivatives fund in 2008, and like Wall Street, they are looking for government to bail them out.
Big Labor has bet their entire future on this Administration and this Congress. Not able to compete in an environment where workers are safer than ever before, and there is a big screen in every living room, Big Labor needs the rules changed in order to survive, no matter the harm done to America and to workers across our nation.





Subscribe via RSS
68 Comments
"In their first year in office, the Obama Administration has re-made the U.S. Department of Labor into the Department of Organized Labor, working hard to make certain that those who spent hundreds of millions of dollars to put them in office get a return on their investment. "
Excellent article.
Just like "Organized Crime" is an oxymoron, so is Organized Labor. Whoever says crime does not pay, has certainly never owned, nor had a politician beholden to them. They are so easily bought, and paid for. Further, all politicians are expendable, and can all be traded, at the will of the "owners".
Unions own Barrack Hussein Obama.
Unions, and ACORN.
"Big Labor has bet their entire future on this Administration and this Congress. Not able to compete in an environment where workers are safer than ever before, and there is a big screen in every living room, Big Labor needs the rules changed in order to survive, no matter the harm done to America and to workers across our nation."
If a person doesn't savvy that last paragraph, they have never heard of Wade Rathke or Andy Stern.
Obama and his Minions want the USA to look like Cuba. This guy is dangerous.
Bwa haa haaaa! Must have broken Obama's heart to see SEIU members rallying for Scott Brown. Ahhhh…life is so rich and full…
Actually, this is the real battle. Unions v. People.
The Unions basically killed their golden gooses, so they now have to resort to government mandates for survival. Seems like this is how a communist system works. A little microcosm of this was slowed down in Massachusetts in that if one didn't belong to the party, one's vote didn't matter. The conclusion of this is to only get good jobs if one belongs to the party.
The Unions want to have total control of the jobs so that they are extremely powerful. The end result of all this would be "we pretend to work, and you pretend to pay us" with nothing being on the store shelves.
dept of labor has been a political ball for decades.. it is always the non union private sector worker who get forgotten about and punished.
Fu***** left wing trash!! And to think… people spent there time and MONEY on getting this CLUNKER elected!
I hate to say it, but I told you so ("you" being all those who voted for The One). I saw him making promises with no way to keep them, promising to oppose NAFTA in OH, while promising to support it in south TX, and so many things. I remember his campain ads, where he said, "We can create jobs…" Blah, blah, blah, and we conservatives were all asking where he was going to PAY for those jobs. Well, we see now that he neither intended to create the jobs (except for union ones) and didn't care how much he had to borrow to pay for his marxist/socialist agenda.
Off topic: Does anyone know how to register? I get a pageload of errors.
Obama – parasite in chief
And this is what the other hand is doing while the country focuses on health care.
The adminstration has and will continue do as much as possible outside the legislative process, as much damage that is.
I expect Obama is at best going to take out his frustrations on America through the CZars and various departments doing an end run around the legislative branch.
The left are all dictators at heart and they require a corrupt symbiosis like "Organized Labor" to continue to exist.
You can learn more about Presiden Obama's gift to the construction arm of Big Labor via the pro-project labor agreement (PLA) Executive Order 13502 at http://www.TheTruthAboutPLAs.com.
"Obama's chickens…have come home…to roooost!…"
Make sure to insert a raspy voice-over from the wrong rev wright….
I don't believe what we saw was reality. They were either plants of SEIU to garnish support from the media that they are for the people even if it was Brown that won, or else some guys got a hold of the SEIU sweatshirts. Never in a million years would these thugs be seen voluntarily at something like this history making moment.
Big Union is going down. The only question is are they going to take the rest of us (USA) with them.
Just scroll down to the bottom and choose either Intensedebate or one of the others.
Well, they've already taken down our auto industry…
Union, NEA, "loved" Saul A.ski's book; recommended reading from them.
You know, the book Saul dedicated to Satan.
Enough said about THIS union and the millions it gave to America's deal with the devil.
BTW. Please keep up the excellent work Mr. Loos.
yep and he's about ready to dump 25K additional hatiains in florida…the wife says we are becoming a litterbox for the excrement around the world…perhaps so…
Agreed, they are very crafty at throwing junk out day after day and people get wrapped up in the health care fiasco and lose sight of other plans they have laid.
I hope the next President turns Obama's union mandates completely around and says that NO Government contracts can be done by union workers, that all work must be done by non-union labor. Of course they could basically accomplish this same goal by forcing bidding on all government contracts since private companies would win the bids every time since they don't have to pay union extortion pay scales to their workers so the tax payers save both money and get a better product. We can all do our part to crush Obama's Socialist army by not buying goods from companies that have unions including GM Government Motors.
……..and the aircraft industry in the 90's, the steel industry in the 80's, the railroads in the 70's. History is rife with their collective "progressive" failures.
Should I continue?
Like we couldn't see where these assholes were going after Solis became Labor Secretary. Going to be interesting to see where business is at the end of Our Dear Leaders first (and last) term. I am afraid the inmates will be running the asylum. Who is going to devote capital to a business in this country when the employees (union) can determine what return an owner will make? Kind of like in Venezuela.
I couldn't agree with you more. This is something not to really celebrate because there is always something more to it than meets the eye.
I was born in Eastern Europe. During communist years the labor force had it all – vacations, sick pay, year of paid maternity leave – benefits and protections that even Obama cannot imagine – it all collapsed – because it was unsustainable. And in the ruins of communism what was left were people that forgot what it is to do something by themselves – they only knew how to wait for the government to take care of them. All day long folks complain about government instead of getting started on doing things by themselves.
I was going to quote that same section..
Yup, it must suck to be owned like that.. Kinda like a slave. Hmm. Thought that was bad and we are all evil b/c that use to go on? It's ok that it goes on in other parts of the world, lets not talk about that. Those countries have no money for reparations. /end rant.
Why do you think Andy Stern was pushing so hard for this health-care debacle to go through? It would have been a clear path to the unionization of millions of health care workers nationwide.
The best thing about Obama appointing Hilda Solis as secretary or labor is that we here in California don't have to deal with her anymore hopefully. America's loss is California's gain! I personally wish he would take more of our deadbeat polititions with a promise they never come back here..
That's an agency high on my target list for complete elimination – there ought to be a national Right to Work law – along with the Small Business Administration – if there's anyone who doesn't need Big Government, it's small business.
All politicians should have titles. Not like sir or ma'am but hard paper property titles. It would be easier to find out who owns them. Hold your breath waiting for that to happen.
Why are these people so nefarious all the time? Doesn't anybody in this bunch have a conscience. I refer to most politicans of all stripes, not just Democrats. Everytime somebody waves a dollar in front of these people, they become willing to toss their grandmother under a bus. Don't they fear God? Do they think they'll get away with this forever? It's all baffling to me.
Unions are in the business of politics, not labor…there's more money there.
What can be done, can be undone, but probably not until 2013.
[...] Email this to a friend | Print | Share on Facebook | Tweet this | // Posted by Justin at 7:03 PM Tagged with: ACORN, AFL-CIO, Andy Stern, Big Labor, Boston Big Dig, Card Check, Craig Becker, Delta Airlines, Economics, Elaine Chao, Employee Free Choice Act, green jobs, Hilda Solis, Jimmy Hoffa, Labor Department, labor union spending, labor unions, National Labor Relations Board, NY Department of Labor, organized labor, OSHA, patricia smith, PLAs, project labor agreements, rethinking bush, richard manning, secret ballot elections, SEIU, teamsters union, union disclosure, union pension fund, union secret ballot, Wage and Hour inspectors, white house visitors, workplace enforcement, workplace regulations [...]
I hear that czar saying, "we believe that power comes largely at the end of the barrel of a gun"! And he speaks for the government of a supposedly freedom loving nation? The gun is now organized labor with Andy Stern on the trigger and Barak Hussein Obama providing the shoulder to rest the barrel on. They are hell bent on taking away our freedoms and pilfering our wages.
The unions got a bargain when the bought Obama.
FOR THE IGNORANT SHEEP THAT VOTED FOR THIS CLOWN I HOPE YOU'RE HAPPY. THE UNIONS ARE BEING TREATED LIKE ROYALTY AND YOU ARE GETTING SCREWED ON A DAILY BABSIS BY THIS ADMINISTRATION. HOW'S THAT NO HOPE AND PLENTY OF SHAME WORKING FOR YOU? NEXT TIME VOTE WITH YOUR BRAIN NOT YOUR @$$! FOOLS!
Protecting overtime for police and firemen was one of her biggest mistakes. No government employee should earn one dime of overtime, ever. With bloated base salaries, bloated health benefits and bloated pensions, do they really need overtime? The citizens of this nation can no longer afford to give these tax parasites these golden perks.
And Pres. Opompous STILL can't figure out why Americans are so angry!
Hey Opompous……YOU'RE A FRIGGIN' SOCIALIST! THIS IS WHY MOST OF US HATE YOU AND EVERYTHING YOU STAND FOR!
So take your organized bafoons and stick 'em where the sun don't shine.
REAL Americans will boycott GE, GM, Chrysler, AIG, Fannie, Freddie, Bank of America, and any other enterprise that either is owned now by Pres. Opompous and his goons or is in cahoots with this criminal. We should want no part of any of these companies. They count on us to survive…..I say let these companies die away and take anyone who works for them along for the ride.
WATCH!!! THIS ADMINISTRATION IS OUT TO MAKE AMERICA A MARXIST STATE AND THEY ARROGANTLY BRAG ABOUT IT!
THANK YOU MASSACHUSETTS!!! THANK YOU SCOTT BROWN!!! THE "BOSTON TEA PARTY" COMES THROUGH AGAIN, AS IT DID IN THE BEGINNING TO HELP MAKE THIS COUNTRY GREAT!!!
THANK YOU MASSACHUSETTS!!!
IT's Chicago style "PAY BACK TIME"! What did you "HOPE AND CHANGE" voters (SHEEP) expect. Big labor paid the tab for the "ANYBODY BUT BUSH" campain so now they want their share of the pie. Maybe the "Chosen One" can hawk his Nobel Piece of S*%T prize for not being G.W. Bush to pay them off? Remember in Chicago "Vote early Vote often"
1. OSHA inspectors are "strongly encouraged" to write at least 2 citations at each inspection and questioned when inspections are in compliance, and encouraged to cite a general contractor for all violations of subcontractors on a site.
2. Managers are rated/evaluated on both number of citations and $ amount per citation
3.Managers manipulate both severity of injury and probability of injury in order to raise the penalty amount. ie – a High-Greater penalty removes the employers "good faith" reduction of 15% ( example small employer high-lesser $375, high greater $1500).
4. The complexity of the regulations promote many employers payment of citations which would never stand up in court.
5. Citations are commonly written when the employees are not trulty exposed to a hazard only potentially exposed – the proverbial what if?
6. Union worksites show no difference in hazards versus non-union
7. Employers are cited even when work rules are violated – OSHA says they didn't have strong enough enforcement.
And now we want HHS to regulate Health Care???
This article is full of crap. I'm an OSHA inspector and I can tell you that we are not and have NEVER been "incentivized" to write more or bigger penalties. Yes – more OSHA Compliance Officers are needed and OSHA must be given the power to write greater penalties. Our penalty system is way too anemic to be an effective deterrent. OSHA is the last and only defense employees have against "Time and Money" pressures that cause shortcuts to be taken and safety standards to be ignored. Adam Smith wrote of "Laissez Faire" and letting the marketplace rule. I'm all for that. But Mr. Smith also pointed out that the free market will not provide for National Defense, Environmental Protection, and Worker Safety and Health. These are a "few of the few" areas where Government is actually required. I suggest that the author of this article get a job for a year as an OSHA Compliance Officer in a state where Federal OSHA is used for enforcement before substituting hearsay and opinion for fact.
To anonymous "Former CSHO”:
1)a) No, they aren’t. b) the multi-employer citation policy was instituted because contractors had found a way to diffuse responsibility for safety and health violations. The policy worked.
2)generally for when overall citation activity is abnormally low, indicating that the CSHO’s aren’t being managed to get into the field.
3)Blatantly false. There is no "manipulation". Severity: degree of possible injury/illness. Probability: how likely is the event to occur. OSHA DOES NOT KEEP THE MONEY FROM PENALTIES!! OSHA IS NOT SELF-FUNDING!!
4)Complex?? Like trench protection at 5' ? Guard rails/ fall protection for scaffold fall hazards >10 '? What don’t you understand, Mr. Former CSHO?
5)WRONG! No exposure, No citation. Are you sure you worked for OSHA?
6)OSHA Trench Study, 2003 – 2007: Non-Union shops suffered from 85 – 100% of trench related fatalities.
7)If you don’t enforce hearing protection, but have a rule requiring it, you have a problem. And the employees are going deaf.
I’d love to know where you worked as a CSHO, Mr. Former CSHO.
I have been an OSHA compliance officer for almost 15 years. I would love to know how I'm now being financially incentivized to write citations with larger penalties? Someone clue me in, please! The OSHA penalties were established by law in the OSHA Act, and our pay scale has absolutely nothing to do with how many citations we write or the penalties that may or may not be attached. Compared to other agencies, our penalties are practically nothing – Hardly enough to get an employer's attention alot of the time. Articles like this belittle the hard working people who come in every day actually trying to make a difference. We care about helping people and protecting workers. Our salaries are public information, available to anyone with internet access.
I agree for the most part with your article although it is blatantly biased.
One correction though: PLA's are not required to pay union scale wages. They are required to pay prevailing wages for the area that the project is in. That does not mean it has to be union especially in right to work states.
In this world where everything is regulated to death….don't you think we have enough workplace safeties in place to arrest the most significant threats? In addition, OSHA rules are mostly BS. Having worked in a few different roles that all involved OSHA, none of the jobs I did were very dangerous. OSHA regulations only drove costs up, lowered productivity, and hampered overall efficiency. I'm not saying OSHA is obsolete, but they are no longer needed. HAHA!
The main reason why Obama is in trouble is that he doesn't belong in the White House in the first place! The democrats and the republicans really screwed the American People with this guy! Barack Obama should never had been allowed to run for the Office of the President at all because he is not Constitutionally qualified under ARTICLE 2 SECTION 1 of the U.S. Constitution! Barack Obama's father is the reason that Obama can not qualify for ARTICLE 2 SECTION 1! The democrats and republicans who swear oath to uphold and protect the U.S. Constitution waved their middle finger to the Constitution so this guy can become AMERICA'S ILLEGAL PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA! And the MSM will report to you about some guy being bitten on the ass by a shark while swimming in the ocean before they will report to you this AMERICAN CRIME OF THE CENTURY!
The annual report on union membership in various industries was just released today at:
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nr0.htm
More public sector employees (7.9 million) belonged to a union than did private sector employees (7.4 million), despite there being 5 times more wage and salary workers in the private sector.
If this data doesn't illustrate why unions support Dems and Dems grow government, which increases public union membership, which increases support to Dems (they call this a negative feedback loop in science), then I don't know what does.
I work for OSHA and your an idiot. I don't know what office you worked out of. I like how you twist the truth to meet your needs. Our office and most offices cannot do things that your describing.
Your referenced Article 1 Section 2 of the US Constitution… i read absolutely nothing about Obamas father… Your entire unsupportive comment clearly exemplifies your ignorance!
I'm not the ignorant one here! By your own admission you just simply need to read more! The Law of Nations written about 30 years before the U.S. Constitution defines "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN" And in the Congressional Globe and in a few 19th century SCOTUS cases (one in particular) also define "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN" The democrats and the republicans violated A2S1 and perpetrated a fraud against the American people which includes (I assume) you and me! America has a serious problem on it's hands!
Thank God for Obama and Solis… finally business will be regulated for worker labor protection. Besides, If it weren't for unions….you folks would not enjoy the great benefits employer so hesitantly offer!
James needs to be spoonfed.
In 1758, Vattel, in his legal treatise The Law of Nations defined the term natural born citizen: "The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens."
In 1874, the US Supreme Court, in the case of Minor v. Happersett said this: "At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country, of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."
In both of the above excerpts, "parents" is plural, meaning both father and mother being citizens. Obama's father was not a US citizen, hence Obama, even if born in Hawaii, is not a natural born citizen.
You can spin it and/or cite unnecessary case law, the fact remains that PRESIDENT Obama indeed was born in Hawaii; thus a natural born citizen clearly eligible to the office of President. Besides Obama was sworn in by Chief Justice Roberts, i presume a constitutional expert unlike yourself… Obama is President, accept it, and move on…. Cheers!
Being born in Hawaii makes Obama a native-born citizen, but not a natural born citizen. Do you own a dictionary, James? Go look up the definition of native-born. Does it match your incorrect definition of natural born? Ah, I thought so.
Also, US Supreme Court decisions and opinions are hardly "unnecessary" case law and they certainly are not spin. The Supreme Court is uniquely qualified to interpret the Constitution, which they did in the Minor case.
Perhaps you would like a more recent US Supreme Court case? In 1939, in the case of Perkins v. Elg, the US Supreme Court affirmed that Miss Elg was a natural born citizen. Elg was born in New York to citizen parents (plural).
You are really going out of your way here to demonstrate your blatant ignorance of the U.S. Constitution! Don't you have any self pride man? Just a hypothetical notion here but I bet Obama can murder one of your loved ones right in front of your eyes and you would still stick up for him wouldn't you! You love Obama more than you love America don't you! Spend some time at the library and learn something instead of practicing your obvious Obama worship!
No reply from you, James?
[...] in the 2010 mid-term elections. But, the current “flavor” of Washington is still the most sympathetic to union interests in a long [...]
Still no reply James? Where are you hiding?
Hey NUTN2SAY, where is your buddy James? : )
I would hope he's at the library!
LOL. Checking out Webster's Dictionary, hey?
That is not a bad place to start! 20+ years ago I went through a phase where I was reading the dictionary. I would select a word for a definition and let that one word lead me on a journey throughout the book. I am now thinking about starting that up.
He will find that the definition of "native-born" is "of a specified place by birth". This is the definition they ascribe to "natural born citizen", which is a different term. A natural born citizen is someone born in a country to parents (plural) who are citizens.
[...] Why: Today’s hearing is for Craig Becker, a top SEIU and AFL-CIO lawyer who hates that employers can talk to their employees about little things … like union dues, unions punishing employees who don’t picket, things like that. BG blogger Rick Manning has noted previously: [...]
[...] dues, unions punishing employees who don’t picket, things like that. BG blogger Rick Manning has noted previously: Instead of being a fair arbiter, Becker has advocated for extensive restrictions on employer [...]