Trump Says He Won’t Host Debate in Iowa
by PubliusNEW YORK (AP) - Donald Trump says he is pulling out of a Republican presidential debate he had agreed to moderate in Iowa.
Donald Trump says he is pulling out of a Republican presidential debate he had agreed to moderate in Iowa.The real estate mogul announced Tuesday that he was stepping back in order to preserve the option of running for president in case he’s not satisfied that the eventual Republican nominee can defeat President Barack Obama. The conservative website Newsmax was to host the debate Dec. 27.
But the debate has been in jeopardy ever since Mitt Romney signaled he would not participate. Other candidates bowed out. Only Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum agreed to take part.
Many Republican strategists warned that a presidential debate moderated by Trump, star of “Celebrity Apprentice,” would create a circus-like atmosphere that might diminish the candidates vying to challenge Obama.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
97 Comments
Would you consider this a Flip/Flop? lol
Are you talking about his wig?
I hope that Trump sticks with his real estate and TV show. If he runs as an independent all he will do is help Obama. It will be H. Ross Perot 2.0. The time has come for the games to end, for showmen to leave the arena and for the country to get down to the business of figuring out our future. Are we going to be a free and prosperous country or not?
….Good, now Eason Jordan, who was to co-moderate, can be tried for treason instead…..
"Many Republican strategists warned………………………….."
I've heard enough from ANY political "strategists" to last me a lifetime. Bunch of know-it-alls that do more to irritate than they do to illuminate.
f*** this guy
Trump beats Obama hands down…
…in absolute arrogance.
"Trump won’t moderate the Newsmax debate"
I was looking forward to the chat between santorum and gingrich. With The Hair now out, will the “debate” still be held, and will the cowards who were afraid of trump now find that their “prior commitments" have suddenly disappeared?
I suggest Sarah Palin as the new moderator for this debate. That should pull in some fantastic ratings, while driving the d-cRAT socialists into an even greater level of hysterical insanity.
So it sounds like Trump will run to attempt to give victory to Obama.
Someone besides the mainstream media should host many republican debates because the goal of MSM is to make republicans look bad and create a scene where they bicker and fight.
Why give them that power. Use alternative methods to get out the message….
He's running, he's not running. He'll host a debate, now he won't host, because he may run again… :- / Maybe in the art of the deal, this bobbing and weaving is effective. But if president, what's he going to do? "I'll cut spending, I won't cut spending…" Don't we have that already? Donald, decide what you are going to do, say you're going to do it, and do it. Or take your "deal" somewhere else.
donny stay with the real estate.
I too hope he does not run as an independent. However, I don't think he will get as much support as Perot.
Folks dislike Obama more vigorously than the did George H.W. Bush.
The Donald has always left me with a big, huge, question mark.
I think the maybe I'll run for president myself talk is purely a face-saving tactic. If he had gone forward with only two candidates showing up it would be fairly embarrassing. As everyone knows, Trump is always about self promotion and a high-profile black eye makes it hard to continue the constant I'm #1 rhetoric.
So, we are going to have Huntsman, Johnson, Paul, and Trump all running as "3rd party" candidates if the primary doesn't go their way.
2012 is beginning to sound like a 3rd world banana republic clusterf–k.
I agree.
Kudos to Santorum and Gingrich for feeling like the only ones able to stand up to The Donald.
If they can't handle this blowhard, how are they gonna fare against Iminadinnajacket?
The Donald is a self-promoting, pretentious, arrogant blowhard. That being said, Trump is also an American success story. I'd never vote for the guy, but it really bugs me when people who have accomplished a whole lot less than Trump ridicule him for agreeing to moderate a debate. Maybe it was his idea all along, maybe it wasn't, but it doesn't matter.
Look: This country elected the single most unqualified person EVER to be president. Chelsea Clinton got a primo gig at MSNBC simply because her parents are celebrity Democrats. Congress has an approval rating that doesn't even approach the low TEENS.
And yet some have the gall to say that Trump, arguably one of the most successful and influential businessmen in modern American history, somehow is unqualified to moderate a debate on TV? That makes absolutely no sense to me. If the other GOP contenders had opted to join the debate, it would have been the most-watched debate in TV history, simply because The Donald was moderating. The conservative message would have been beamed straight into the homes of millions of Americans who tuned in just to watch The Donald fail and make a fool of himself.
Whether the debate would have been a failure or not isn't the point. What matters is that the nominees missed out on a opportunity to get the conservative message out to a lot of people.
This effing ass-clown simply needs to disappear for the 11 months. It's going to be hard enough for the GOP to win back the White House. Trump's antics and mucking about isn't helping matters.
I want to thank the candidates who DECLINED to join this Clowns little Media Circus. Trump is a shameless self-promoter and a narcissist megalomaniac. He would be worse than Obozo as president of this great nation. No thank you! If he does run as an Independent, (and I really don't think he will) he is going to be totally humiliated. His ego will suffer a brutal beating. It would almost be worth it to see him take a good "shellacking.' What a joke he is!
He always leaves me with a big, huge urge to GAG! What a phoney self-promoter he is!
You make a good point. I don't know that I've ever seen a president as reviled as Obama seems to be. He is the most polarizing president I have ever seen and I say that even with the fact that so many people hated G.W. Bush. Trump does worry me though.
Thank God.
If ANYBODY runs as a 3rd party candidate ( other than the usual tokens – Nader, " Green ", "Blue ", whatever ), the " fix " will have been in. That as of now appears to be the only approach the Community Organizer & Co. can hope to be re-elected.
So much of the news is orchestrated to create chatter for big brother. The outcome of having Trump host a debate was calculated before it ever happened. Our next election could be as big of a sham as the last. Do you know why Sarah Palin's bus tour was really canceled? Do you know why she stayed 30 miles away from the second debate and chose the death of Steve Jobs to announce that she's not running? Know what leaked out? She's dodging the media now because of this http://PalinsDirtyLittleSecret.blogspot.com/
Your not going to like this, but I think the Donald would make a pretty decent president. I have listened to him and agree with just about everything he has said, especially about China taking advantage of us, starting to make products in the USA again, charging China for bringing in their cheap azz goods here. I think a businessman, not a lawmaker should have a shot at the presidency. His foreign policy however, I know nothing about. Hell, anyone has to be better than what we have now and Donald seems like he won't take chit off of anyone. I kinda like that in a president.
Trump's OK, but I prefer Darrell Hammond.
As I look and listen to him, I am more and more I'm finding a distrust. e.g., On Obama's BC, at first Trump charged hard, then after Barry presented a forgery, instead of following up, the Donald disappeared leaving the forgery as being the real deal. It was though it was planned.
First smart thing Trump has ever done.
It is time to break the msm deadlock on presidential debates, with their predictibly loaded left wing, or right wing RINO questions.
I am sure that Mr. Trump could outperform all of these so called pundits asking irrelevant gotcha questions. We have lost the opportunity to have some substansive questions asked and hopefully answered.
Trump needs to take his candy and go home. Personally, I am tired of all his bloviating even though I agree with some of his ideas. He had his chance to get in the mix for the republican primary and then backed out. It appears he likes to play too "In the pool and out of the pool". Running for president is not a realility show.
Well, now we know who is willing to toe to toe with anyone and risk having to answer the hard questions. Trump may be a egomaniac, but we all know he will ask the questions that the candidates need to be answering.
No. I would call this a 'slip and fall'……………. right on his face.
Bingo! Have a cigar on me.
"Your not going to like this, but I think the Donald would make a pretty decent president"
Actually, I do like this. There's nothing quite like a good morning laugh!
And a good cry……… If Barry get's another term we can thank rubes such as yourself for turning the most important election of our lives into a circus.
And if Simon, Randy, Paula and Steven Tyler would "ask the questions that the candidates need to be answering", would you have them moderate a debate as well? They're succesful people.
Why not?
Too bad that Paul Lind is dead. We could put him, Phylis Diller and Jonathan Winters in a square and have them ask the questions in the next debate.
Hey…. if you're going to go down that road with the qualification being to "ask the questions that the candidates need to be answering" Why not keep the circus going?
Next up. The cast of 2 and 1/2 Men. With a special guest appearance by Charlie Sheen. Who all promise to "ask the questions that the candidates need to be answering" per Eyes_Open of course.
Yeah….. that's the standard!
Um. well yes that is the standard. They need to be asked questions about policies, not asked questions that are designed to start arguments between the candidates just to help load the DNC mud slinging. I don't give a rats @ss who the moderator is specifically, as long is it isn't someone that is working for the DNC or is afraid for their job if they if they don't go along with the MSM. This will take someone like Donald Trump, or hey your favorite Phylis Diller.
Just someone with enough personal clout to ask the questions that should be asked instead of the BS that so often is being thrown out there.
"I don't give a rats @ss who the moderator is specifically"
That's my point, you should. When you grow up….you'll understand what I am saying.
Now…….. take this into consideration. If you need just anyone to moderate a televised debate to help you decide who to vote for then I suggest, you stay home on election day. You're not intellectually qualified to participate in something this important.
And you won't be until you learn to put down the remote and learn to think for yourself without any moderator at all. Do your own research. Read something! Ask your own questions. If there was anything new you thought you would learn about the candidates from Donald Trump, you simply aren't doing your homework. You're letting the "box" tell you what to do. The problem is, you probably don't even know that!
To assume that anyone commenting on this forum isn't reading and doing their own research is rather naive of you. And if you would prefer the liberal moderators that have been trying to escalate the mud slinging between the Republicans to help arm the DNC, then you have outed yourself as one of them. That being the case, I can see why a liberal hack like yourself wouldn't want Trump to moderate, not enough mud to make you happy.
Wow how nice and civilized to assume that Mr. Eyes lets a box tell him what to do. After reading his comments and going over your profile you will loose this one.
I'm afraid I have to agree with you two this time, but I'm still thumbing you down for going to work and using your work terminal to post comments on taxpayer funded equipment.
Because I care about TD's. That comment would actually have merit if I worked for the government.
Maybe if you would get a job and get out of your mothers basement, we wouldn't bother you so bad. Maybe it wold give you something else to dwell on.
Why is it you only post during business hours?
Yeah, as if you are suddenly telling the truth about anything.
At least you're not declaring for jihad a church burnings again.
I have a job.
Just because you can't keep up doesn't mean you have to get so jealous about it.
"….prefer the liberal moderators…."
That's just it. I don't like them either. I stopped watching about 10 debates or so ago. You obviously enjoy the mud slinging or, you'd stop watching as well. And…. to even entertain the notion that Trump won't try to stir up some mud…..well…again. Stay home on election day. You're simply not equipped .
And again, those doing their own research don't need the Donald. Why do you? Oh wait…. that's patently obvious…my bad!
Now for this…… going to the "I must be a liberal" card is saying you are clearly are out of your element and lack any reasonable retort. The same as when an Al Sharpton goes racial. He doesn't have a leg to stand on either..except…..he knows that…..I don't think you do. Kinda' scary. They don't let you drive… do they?
There is a bright side here. We can all thank God that most of America has seen through this Trump circus and he has pulled the plug.
If the rest of America thought like you…….. then I would really be worried.
Oh yeah…. I wasn't saying that everyone on this forum isn't reading.
Just you!
L-O-S-E Lose…. One (1) o only.
With folks like you watching Eye's back…..no wonder he has the problems he has.
Hey Rog! Don't thumb them down. You may not get your SNAP card this month!
I have no jealousy toward you, you are the one complaining about people being on here during YOUR time…….
I don't like the idea of a government employee using his work terminal for propaganda.
Call me old fashioned, but I think public servants should be above that.
Yawn….
Oh, let me pretend that was witty or intelligent.
Oh No how about I do it this way loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooser
Not a public servant, don't work for the government. Why continue to spread lies?
Who ever said you actually worked?
And it's just based on the things you've slipped and said.
Like the time you wanted to burn a full Christian church.
Is that how you talk in Iowa?
Or was that for the muslim friends you know there.
Have you read the headlines ignored by a lot of the media?
http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID...
Your basis is incorrect
Him, have a job?
Funny, then he would not be able to spend 18 hours a day on here.
So you work at a job in Iowa with muslim coworkers and only use a terminal during business hours.
Go for it, out yourself. Who do you work for, Soros or some other muslim friendly charity?
Unless I have a terminal and gaps between clients.
I work for a large corporation with locations all over the country. Maybe I work nights?
We also have chirstians, scientolgists, and buddists here as well. We don't discrminate based on religion
So you work at a job in Iowa with muslim coworkers and only use a terminal during business hours.
And a large corporation that doesn't test you for drugs lets you sit and use a terminal each day during business hours to spread propaganda?
That doesn't pass the smell test.
I don't even have a tv, I just like reading the highlights the next day on here. And if you are getting all your information from what they are willing to put on the web sites, after careful editing, you should be the one staying home.
You get a real idea of how people think when the questions are live and they don't have time to prepare a scripted answer. So again, if you are ignoring the debates, please stay home on election day, at least the primary. And if you are as liberal as you are sounding right now, stay home in November as well.
We are subject to random drug tests. Again you don't know what hours I work and as I said we have people from all sorts of religions here as well. We even have people from different ethnic groups.
Your smell test does not mean jack $hit. BUsiness hours are from 9-5 I am on here earlier than that and am off way before that. Your lies are apparant
Really, where? Because you are on here 24 hour a day, so you must be waisting somebodies money.
So anyone that works in a company that employs Muslims is a Muslim friendly charity now? Showing what a bigot you are again.
Oh, but nobody else might have similar gaps in their day. Shouldn't you be finding something productive to do with your time?
Yep, his comment pretty much sumed that one up.
This is his life.
From sun up to well after sun down
I know you only comment between 8 and 5 Iowa time and never on weekends.
That speaks volumes.
It does if they want to burn full Christian churches.
The only computer I use is my own.
And never has a client had to ever wait because of it.
Yep, not just business hours like some other muslim friendly people.
And what problem would that be? An intolerable hatred for lies?
Odd, I would have thought the Christians (12 of them) that beat up a women in the middle of the night, for not believing in the same religion as they did, would be more in line with the Muslim friendly values that you stand for.
By client, are you talking about the 14 year old boys that keep coming to you house all hours for the day and night?
And other than one blog of questionable agenda was not exactly a reputable source.
And he never showed it was done for the things Christ teaches. And he never showed the complete story. His telling of the story was less complete than a Katie Couric story.
And violence is the muslim friendly approach.
Not the Christian approach, not as the Bible teaches the modern church.
I've done some tutoring years ago. I haven't even taught piano lessons in years.
But if I had youth depending on me, I'd still l'd still consider it a compliment and responsibility. Don't you think mentoring the young is a good thing?
Wrong again buckwheat. Except for the weekend part
8 o'clock eastern time, you must be actually showing up to work on time today!
So, is it quite in the push back office?
Here we go again with his BS "modern church" excuse. So I will take a page out of his book . That does not pass the smell test
Again, how do you know I don't work nights? How do you know I don't get paid to do this? You don't. You know nothing about me except what I have let you know and you don't even know if that is true.
Like he has any "clients"
It's enough to knock your lies out of the park.
Why? It's true. You just don't like it.
So, are you ready for a long day of liberal propaganda and insults to religions obama doesn't like?
As if you have a real job besides posting propaganda.
So is the office quiet this time of day?
Imagine you showing up on time, who would have guessed?
So, you have another hard day at the office posting smears and attacks.
Is the supervisor checking up on you today or something?
"Mentoring" is that the new name for molesting these days, I can never keep up.
OK, ok. Let us take a look at it from Rogers point of view. These people were not Christians, even though they claim to be, they were more like Muslim Extremist. So, as we all know, Roger would love to see all Muslims wiped from the face of the earth. So, the building they gathered in would not be a church, but a mosque, and Roger has no problem with blowing up mosques with Muslims inside. So Roger and Todd are in agreement here! Kill the cowardly ba$tards. Right, right….
Let's look at it from Roger's point of view.
I don't know the entire story. I don't have an unbiased source giving the entire facts and I don't like you telling me my religion is something that it's not.
Right….
Anything else I need to set straight?
Only if you work for the Obama education dept like Jennings and are passing out fisting kits.
lol, Ok that was a good one. this subject is getting out of hand so I'm letting it go and getting back to real debates. Good play.
Nope, got it, you like burning Mosque but not Churches. Very clear.
Trying to put words in my mouth again?
Either quote me or you owe me an apology. Of course with you being a troll that won't happen.
You have alluded to it for months. You can't stand anything that is against Christianity and you can't stand anyone that doesn't hate Muslims. And you have not denied that you would do it in a second.
Either quote me or apologize.
Unlike muslim friendly values that encourage violence I have not supported or encouraged any violence against any peaceful place of worship.
You are despicable.
Then why does he get a pass on the Flip/Flop thing when the only other person who does is the Golfer in Chief?
No, not referring to his wig; to his ever changing stance on hosting the debate. But thanks for asking.
You must be logged in to post a comment.