Politico: Weiner Has Not Reponded On If He Reported ‘Hack’ to Authorities
by PubliusJonathan Allen and Ben Smith at Politico:
Rep. Anthony Weiner says social networking identity hacking is to blame for the lewd material that a conservative news website reported was sent from his Twitter and yfrog handles to an unidentified woman from Seattle, Washington.
Weiner’s office did not respond to a request for comment on if he has contacted authorities.
The New York Democrat told POLITICO he thought it “obvious” that his account had been taken over, and he tweeted that his Facebook account had been hacked with the abbreviation “FB hacked.”
A photo of a man’s bulging gray boxer-brief underwear was posted to Weiner’s account with yfrog — an online image-sharing site — on Saturday night, according to biggovernment.com, which is run by Andrew Breitbart. The photograph is from the waist down, and shows no face.
“The weiner gags never get old, I guess, ” the veteran lawmaker emailed a POLITICO reporter in response on Saturday. …
Weiner’s office — generally one of the most press friendly around — did not respond to a request for comment on whether he has contacted federal authorities to report the alleged cyber-attack, which could fall under laws prohibiting cyberhacking and impersonating federal officials.
Read the full piece here.
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
174 Comments
Anthony…..what a little PeeWee Weiner…….. Now, lets see if this this demented little progressive prick gets railroaded out of CONgress like Christopher Lee who only took off his shirt for Pete's sake….
Weiner simply needs to come clean.
There is no point in continually massaging, stroking and manipulation the narrative.
There is no point in stretching the truth.
"Weiner’s office — generally one of the most press friendly around — did not respond to a request for comment on whether he has contacted federal authorities to report the alleged cyber-attack, which could fall under laws prohibiting cyberhacking and impersonating federal officials."
THAT, is the meat of the matter.
Remember when Sarah Palins email was hacked?
She turned it over to the authorities, they shortly found out who did it, and the person was revealed, and punished.
If Weiner was hacked, his office would be all over this story, pulling every favor they had out there, for damage control. Something doesn't quite fit.
The only thing that could have made it better, was if the photo had been sent to Debbie Wasserman-Shultz.
Where is "Deep Throat" when we really need him?
I'll bet that Bwarney Fwank is drooling all over himself.
Weiner’s a little cocky man with no Balls…
Looks like the cat is out of the bag….
Hello Bil.
It appears Christmas came early this year.
In May.
Truthfully, this could not have happened to a more despicable, vile individual.
Although this doesn't quite put this little prick into a category with "Client Number 9", it shows him for what he is. A cyber-creep.
Thank God he got busted.
He is one of the worst members of Congress.
He needs to be tossed out of Office now.
He needs locked up if he reports it as a "hack".
Agreed….
BTW
Nice one liners….
LOL!
Weiner has managed to reach the "G" spot.
Golly gee!
*chortle*
Well Publius, you may be part of the investigation. People are curious how you were able to obtain the picture in the very short time it was available. Were you waiting for it? Were you tipped off to it's anticipated presence? How did you know it would be there? Congressman Weiner took the picture down almost immediately? Did you have advanced knowledge of the intended recipient?
Mr. Breitbart tweeted that "we have much more. Need confirmation or denial". Well if Congressman Weiner only sent one photo in such a short period of time then how on earth can Mr. Breitbart possibly have "much more"? Does he know the hackers? Link: http://twitter.com/#!/AndrewBreitbart/status/7453…
Some people have some 'splainin' to do.
Could it be because he wasn't hacked???
No, couldn't be. Being of the "exalted" party, he wouldn't lie. And we all know that democrats are immune to sex scandals. After all, if the door is unlocked, they are not technically "alone"….
On the other hand, if someone did hack his accounts, then they are guilty of a federal offense for every one of his accounts they hacked. Felony or multiple thereof aside, the potential damage to his reputation should be enough to press him to want the supposed hacker caught, charged, convicted, and exposed. Such a scandal would be devastating to anyone, much less a public official. Especially one that depends on votes to ensure his continued employment.
I think it goes without saying that his silence is more than a little deafening on the matter.
Looks like he may be between a rock and a "hard" place…
Whoopsie…
Weiner probably has other things to worry about right now and hasn't had the time to file a report. Like where to put all of his stuff now that its been dumped on the front lawn and perhaps finding a good divorce attorney to counter the one his wife hired this afternoon.
(off topic, but this appears to be my 500th post on these forums. Woohoo!)
Two words for you, Shirley Sherrod. Nobody is buying this BS until it gets confirmed.
"I think it goes without saying that his silence" — doesn't exist. He's been tweeting and gave statements to numerous news sources about it including Politico and the New York Post.
Photo analysis of the pic in question:
http://errorlevelanalysis.com/permalink/428f7a2/
oops.
Nice try, but it wasn't Breitbart that fired Mrs Sherrod without getting the whole story. And if you'd like to go down that path, let's not forget that fantastic bit of editing in the so called MSM of the man with the rifle strapped on his back.
So yes, we can all play that game if you like.
"Nice try, but it wasn't Breitbart that fired Mrs Sherrod without getting the whole story." — true but then they're not the ones getting sued for defamation either. Name one mainstream Conservative news outlet that's running with this bullsh#t? Here's New York Post: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/undies_in_twis...
Not much support there, huh?
And this dude with a rifle on his back? What the hell are you talking about?
People believe whatever pacifies their ideology without caring if it's true or not. You want to believe this so bad that you could care less if it's true or not. If it comes out that it was BS, I'll bet you a dollar that a limp-minded brown shirt like yourself will still believe it's true anyways.
I feel as if I am teasing myself. I don't believe this is really Mr Weenie that has done this, but, damn if I don't think it would be so very cool to somehow prove it was him. Other than Big Barney and Momobama (Michelle), I can't imagine a more appropriate person to have ruined by something having to do with a hard on. Anthony Weiner . . . wonder how he'll blame this on Bush?
"And this dude with a rifle on his back? What the hell are you talking about?"
With that, any doubt as to your ideology is unquestionable. Not to mention your "brown shirt" comment. People like you wouldn't know a nazi if one spit in your face. If you did, you'd be far less likely to throw such an accusation so quickly. But alas, ignorance is bliss.
Speaking of spitting in your face, how's that search for the proof of the racial slur incident during the Obamacare debacle going? Last I checked, anyone to the right of politics was convicted of that incident without so much as a drop of proof. Much like the perpetrator of the Giffords incident was automatically tied to the right leaning media, despite the facts that became quite apparent afterwards. But I'm sure that is Breitbart's fault as well, right?
Brown Shirt?
That refers to Hitler…..he is one of yours….
But nice try any way little girl….
That was sarcasm in the first half of my initial post…
Maybe you should read the post and not just take the word of your master ….
http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2010/07/19/vi...
Black guy with a rifle? You mean this story? … http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Jwg-f3dqN4&fe...
Awww did these mean men say bad things about your boifriend little girl?
How about some facts to back up your accusations?
Sorry bad aim….
And you still didn't explain the dude with the rifle.
"how's that search for the proof of the racial slur incident during the Obamacare debacle going?" — That was found a while ago. Where you been?
Fist they came for the unions…sorry. All yours.
Don't need a link. A saw the full, UN-EDITED video.
Your youtube link didn't work but I think you're talking about the black dude with the assault rifle? And? What's your problem with that?
I don't know, did they? Proof? Two words for ya, Shirley Sherrod. Ain't nobody retarded enough (well most people) to buy anything from these sites until they get PROOF.
Breitbart didn't edit the video, it was an excerpt. Don't know what an excerpt is? Look it up.
You may have seen the full video, but if you don't know what was said in the post, then you're ignorant, and shouldn't reference the story till you educate yourself. In the post, Breitbart explains that Surely Charade had a change of heart (so she claims) and sent the farmer to "one of his own" to get help. The point of the story was the delight the NAACP members took in listening to her tell of her unwillingness to help whitey. So read the post, or shut your face.
You don't see a problem with MSNBC editing the film of the black guy so you can't see that he's black and using it to assert there is racism in the Tea-Party? Man, you're delusional.
Not accusations…questions and I did provide a link to the tweet that confirmed that Breitbart claimed he had "much more". How?
And that's where the similarities end.
Don't play that card on me, I've seen firsthand what the unions have done to the state I live in. My grandfather helped start the local carpenter's union, and hated them for becoming little more than a machination for the democratic party, while leaving behind the original mission of fighting for the worker.
And last I checked, unions give you no choice but to join them and pay their dues. In most states, including mine, one does not have the choice to work in a unionized workplace without joining said union. That is freedom? I think not.
So back to you. Read a book. Might do you some good.
It's ok, judging by your previous posts, I didn't think you were aiming at me…
LOL!
I see you are are new here little girl…………aren't you?
"We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are determined to destroy this system under all conditions.
If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.
All propaganda must be so popular and on such an intellectual level, that even the most stupid of those toward whom it is directed will understand it… Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way around, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise
National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing a new world order.
This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilised nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!
It is thus necessary that the individual should finally come to realize that his own ego is of no importance in comparison with the existence of the nation, that the position of the individual is conditioned solely by the interests of the nation as a whole.
Gold is not neccesary. I have no interest in gold. We will build a solid state, without an ounce of gold behind it. Anyone who sells above the set prices, let him be marched off to a concentration camp. That's the bastion of money.
Believe me, National Socialism would not be worth anything if it were to be confined to Germany and did not secure the rule of the superior race over the whole world for at least one or two thousand years.
Society's needs come before the individual's needs.
In relation to the political decontamination of our public life, the government will embark upon a systematic campaign to restore the nation’s moral and material health. The whole educational system, theater, film, literature, the press and broadcasting – all these will be used as a means to this end.
The National Socialist Party will prevent in the future, by force if necessary, all meetings and lectures which are likely to exercise a depressing influence on the German state."
Adolf Hitler Quotes
http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quotes_by/adolf%20h...
Just another nitwit with a failed public education…we all know Hitler is one of theirs….
Check please….
Your first problem is in believing that Weiner is telling the truth. The man's a sleaze and I'm not even talking about the photo. He's probably embarrassed because really, is that all there is?
Yeah…saw the full, UN-EDITED video so 'nuff said.
I guess I must have been in the same place you were when you missed the fellow with the rifle on his back.
Because I have yet to see the truth of the Obamacare incident, much like you missed the disgrace MSNBC incurred with their edited footage of the rifle incident. Only difference is that the evidence in that case was irrefutable in any light.
"And last I checked, unions give you no choice but to join them and pay their dues." — You have a choice…don't apply for a job there if you don't want to join the union. It's America…you have that choice. Much better than your option of wanting to punish 1000 people because one person applied for a union job. There is just SO MANY people who are begging to give up union salaries so they can make that $8.00 an hour, those poor poor lost souls.
Here's an option…stop trying to dictate other people salaries and labor decisions. You don't like unions, don't work for them. You have that choice. Stop trying to steal that choice from everybody else.
Run, little coward, run! Hahahah
Man the world is gonna be such a great place when progressivism has been exterminated.
Gosh, you didn't have to prove it to me.
"All propaganda must be so popular and on such an intellectual level, that even the most stupid of those toward whom it is directed will understand it" — My favorite quote. It reminds me of those who constantly complain about how bad biased media is while cowering in their own biased media bubble. *HINT HINT*
"Here's an option…stop trying to dictate other people salaries and labor decisions. You don't like unions, don't work for them. You have that choice. Stop trying to steal that choice from everybody else."
You mean like the choice to not have to join a union to work someplace? Seems to me that you are stealing that choice from the people in this country that does not wish to work under a union. And I don't work for a union. I work for a small, family owned company.
Your arguments are weak. Maybe if you took a moment from Soros servitude, you might actually have a leg to stand on. Here's a hint, the majority in this country is slipping far away from the union debate. So you might want to wait till the polls turn the other way before you use marshmellows as ammo in your cannon….
And of course you have proof that it's his wiener (HA)? Of course you do because you will it to happen. Anything that pacifies your ideology must be true and facts are for the smart…scratch that…facts are anti-propaganda and therefore must be assumed to be lies. You have tons of examples where he's a sleaze because he says things you don't agree with. Oooh…how evil it must be for you when someone you don't agree with exercises their Constitutional right to free speech. WAAH!
Do you at least have a link to support this obsession with a black guy with a rifle on his back. This is the first time I've ever heard you fanatics make an issue out of this.
"Exterminated" as in like a holocaust or something? Gonna round us all up and kill us? Send us off to concentration camps? How exactly do you plan on "exterminating" progressives since history has proven that despots who try to "exterminate" people end up being on the wrong side of history? Guns? Bombs? Just general overall acts of terrorism against your fellow Americans? Gonna re-write the Constitution to strip away our rights? What your "extermination" plan. Propaganda with media? Last time I heard people talk of "exterminating" people was in 1939 Germany wasn't it?
You ain't exterminating sh#t, douche-bag.
I guess you must already know what I am talking about, considering the fact I never once mentioned that he was black.
Let me guess, that was just a typo, right?
"You mean like the choice to not have to join a union to work someplace?" — You got it! Why do all the union members who already work there have to be punished because of one dickhead who has the choice to go work somewhere else? By your logic, if that same guy walked into your family business and said "I want to be hired as a union member", you feel he deserves that choice? If a guy walks into Anheiser Busch plant and say he doesn't want to be a union member, all the workers already there should be forced to quit the union? You don't work for a union so what f##king business is it of your anyways?
And Soros is your obsessive crutch, not mine. People like you dress up like patriotic Pez dispensers and fight tooth and nail for people like Soros to get big tax cuts so obviously you like him more than anybody else does. You certainly like jumping through hoops for him.
I said extermination of progressivism, not progressives. You see, when Obama gets voted out, and the unions get busted, you'll have to join the capitalist society and get a real job. Or you can just off yourself, I don't care.
Then, there is the possibility that you'll start riots, What will happen then? : )
Yeah, you did mention he was black. I think I know who you're talking about but never have I heard an issue made of it.
No it's really more simple than that, you have just been educated…
No, I said he was black, insect. Are you saying we all look alike?
"You see, when Obama gets voted out, and the unions get busted, you'll have to join the capitalist society and get a real job." — Implying I'm not a member of a capitalist society? I do live in America. I pay my bills. I pay my taxes. I believe in the Constitution and ALL people have rights and not just the ones I happen to agree with. I have my part of the America dream with my salary I negotiated and worked hard for myself which apparently, you think is a crime and want your big government to mandate that away from individuals like me. Why so communist? Am I not entitled to Capitalism? If so, then why you trying to steal it from me? You must be a communist if YOU are the one who believes I'm not entitled to capitalism and it's rewards for my hard labor.
Progressivism is a completely made up word, you know. You're hell bent to eliminate or minimally, dictate something that some idiot on TV convinced you was real. Duh!
Eliminate progressivism (did you at least try to look it up) but yet keep progressives? Well that's like trying to eliminate patriotism but yet keep the patriots? You think that can be done.
I did no such thing.
Take care, and enjoy the servitude of your "progressive" ideals. And please feel free to ignore the latest contradictions of the fellow you are working so hard to defend. It's a free country, and many of us fought hard to defend your right to spew your bulls**t. Just take a bit of advice and try to at least get some of your information correct before attacking someone. Blatant lies will get you nowhere with me.
I was always educated wldbil. Americans need to protect themselves from you who brand and demonize so that you may be easily propagated into stealing individual's rights way.
First they came for the unions…
That's what I said…re-read my post. WTF?
Leftists and union punks like you aren't part of a capitalistic society, you're part of a hive. You're insects, and you want to force everyone else to join your little utopian nest. Progessivism is made up? Better tell that to Hilly Clinton. It's really just a vehicle meant to move the country closer to Socialism. And yes, once people are educated and realize that Socialism doesn't work, we can exterminate progressivism (or Socialism, if you prefer) without exterminating the Socialists. I mean, how many people still believe the earth is flat?
Are you going to read the Surely Charade post, of just pretend like you know what it's about. insect?
Always accused of blatant lies, never proven. LOL
Lectures from people like you about attacking someone while you post on an article that is attacking a Congressman without one single shred of proof of truth is what us smart folks call "hypocrisy". Look it up.
Damn, you're one stupid fvckin' insect.
This is your reply to 'gvik'
/// "Yeah, you did mention he was black. I think I know who you're talking about but never have I heard an issue made of it." ///
'gvik DID NOT mention that he was black, liar. You are the dumbest fvckiin' insect I've ever seen on this site.
"Leftists and union punks like you aren't part of a capitalistic society, you're part of a hive." — We're not? I pay my bills and my taxes?
Do you know if I'm a union member building ships for the Navy?
Do you know if I'm a union member building airplanes or helicopters for the military?
Do you know if I'm a union member who builds jeeps and transports for the military?
Do you know if I'm a union member who builds weapons and armor for the troops?
Can you name one single device the military uses that isn't built by a union?
Now you work for some family business somewhere? Wow…you're a real contributor to America, huh? Sound totally useless to me.
You're the liar, insect. When are you going to read the Surely Charade story instead of just pretending like you know what it says? I'm going to have to keep an eye on you. : )
I was always educated wldbil.
No….you weren't, you were robbed ….you are a perfect example of the state funded union run madrassas that now pass for public education these days..
BTW
You are entitled to your opinion…..not the facts….
How about the rights of the people to not have to use a union employee if they don't want to? That's unAmerican. I want a choice, and the union pigs want to deny me that choice.
Once a union becomes an entity in and of itself, it becomes self serving and uses the worker as a tool to serve the wants of the union. When that happens, the union needs to be exterminated.
Quit being a childish punk and answer the freakin' question…is he the black guy with the assault rifle that was at a Tea Party rally? I'm pretty sure you already answered this.
And the reason why I assumed he was black is because you brought him up in reply to Shirley Sherrod, spewing out some race baiting rant against MSNBC for some reason I've never freakin' heard of before.
I watched the full, UN-EDITED video…'nuff said.
All those things would be built better and cheaper without unions, insect. You insects keep insisting we'll return to the Gilded age without unions. Ain't gonna happen.
Find the post where I mentioned he was black in this discussion. It's not there, so yes, it was proven.
Thus, it was a blatant lie.
Don't play the "smart folks" card on me, you have no idea who I am. And let us not forget that I never once claimed you were stupid, only that you need to look a little closer at your history. Being a public figure, he is subject to scrutiny, and his contradictions on the matter are rather glaring, which is far more than anyone can say regarding the Obamacare walk debacle, much less the media aftermath of the Giffords shooting, or the rifle toting fellow on MSNBC incident.
So here is where it ends. You have blatantly lied in saying I referred to the fellow carrying the rifle as black. And that is where I bid you adieu. As I have said before, many of us have fought to give your freedom to spew your bulls**t, but that does not mean we have to listen to it.
Bye, and have a lovely night…
"you are a perfect example of the state funded union run madrassas that now pass for public education these days.." — Case in point….propaganda used to brand and demonize so that workers rights can be stripped away.
First they came for the unions…
No, it's not 'nuff said,' insect. You don't know what you're talking about, and I'm going to see to it that you get an education.
If you've not heard about MSNBC insinuating the guy was white, yet you say you've heard of the story, you are a piece of sh!t liar. But we already knew that, didn't we? : )
So you think rights only apply to certain people? Have you ever had a union try to deny you that choice at your family owned business? You're spewing out biased media talking points and you're clueless as to how it works. You just want to be the Communist and strip rights from people because some a$$hole on Fox News brainwashed you into think it's cool.
"Once a union becomes an entity in and of itself, it becomes self serving and uses the worker as a tool to serve the wants of the union." — And that's total bullsh#t proving you're just a clueless communist idiot trying to mandate a government big enough to strip people's rights.
You run tell that to a member of the military and see how far you get, commie.
"First they came for the unions…."
And rightly so. Unions suck.
Is the military union? It wasn't when I was in. Damn, you're a stupid fvckin' insect.
No! I've never heard the story. You whack jobs lock yourselves in your own little info bubble and just assume the rest of us can figure this sh#t out.
I see you are stuck on stupid and unable to participate in intellegent discourse…….good luck with holding on to your pathetic belief system…
FYI
Rights are NOT given by the state…….or ANY unions ……..they are God given….
You're a Communist trying to brand and demonize workers so that you may steal their piece of Capitalism. Redistribute what you dictate they don't deserve.
"Once a union becomes an entity in and of itself, it becomes self serving and uses the worker as a tool to serve the wants of the union."
That's a fact, insect. Quit trying to bullsh!t your way through life. It ain't gonna cut it here. You admit that you don't know the facts in the Surely Charade story, but pretend like you do. You are a lying filthy insect.
Lying, filthy insect.
You were in the military my ass. If you were then you'd know the value of unions, commie.
Lying, filthy insect. How could you have heard the story about the black guy with the rifle at a Tea-Party and not know WHY IT IS a story. You're a filthy liar or a terrorist islamofascist. Which is it?
Well I was educated enough to not believe the bullsh#t to begin with. THEN I watched the full, UN-EDITED video.
Unions are self serving, insect. The military is NOT unionized. Not in this country, anyway. So what country are you from?
I really don't give a crap if you think I'm lying or not. I could care less about some paranoid "Sally" (white or black) who is so mentally inept and insecure that he has to hide behind a gun. OK?
He wasn't hiding behind it, you racist insect.
What about the left wing pigs at MSNBC, racist? Do you condone what they did?
Name one piece of military equipment that isn't built by unions? With the exception of personnel, the military is all union from the sky, to the land and to the sea. Oh yeah…space too.
And last I checked, military is all sorts of a union with all the sudsy perks of socialism. Free food, free healthcare, free education, free housing, free pensions, etc.
How exactly do you contribute again? Oh yeah…a family owned business somewhere…WOW! My hero!
This may come as a newsflash to you, sunshine but you haven't told me what they did.
Their equipment would be better if it wasn't built by some lazy union hack. And it's not FREE you filthy, ignorant insect. That's the problem with you progressive bugs, you just don't get it. NOTHING IS FREE.
Wow, you are a nutty one, aren't you? What exactly does your post have to do with me calling you out and dismissing you on your blatant lie?
Unfortunately for fools like you, I believe wholeheartedly in people's rights to unionize, if they so choose to, in the private sector. Because of the simple little fact that the private sector has inbuilt limits for both employer and employee. If the employer pushes too hard, the employees go elsewhere, and the employer falls apart. If the employee pushes to hard, the employer goes out of business, and the employees fall apart.
Unfortunately, I also believe in the employee having the right to choose whether or not to belong to said union. Especially when said employee does not agree with his/her union's choice in politics.
On the other hand, much as the man unions often hold in such high regard said(FDR, in case you still haven't bothered to read a book.), I do not believe in unions in the public sector. Not while they are paid through taxes that no one has a say in. Private sector employees are paid through monies made from sales of products that can be bought elsewhere. Public sector employees are paid through monies made by the force of law.
But I digress, you obviously cannot keep your discussions straight, seeing as how that is not my reason for dismissing you. Take care, and try to get your threads straight before replying next time. It will do much to enhance your obvious lack of credibility.
You really can't be that ignorant, but just in case …
http://search.yahoo.com/r/_ylt=A0oGdXwt_uFNCQ0Ai….
No of course…air force pilots would just jump at the opportunity to climb into a cockpit of a fighter jet built by $8.00 an hour monkeys working for family owned businesses.
Willing to sacrifice the safety and security of military personnel just for your Communist, rights stripping agenda. Good luck with that. LOL
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out —
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out —
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me — and there was no one left to speak for me.
The clips were not edited, they were excerpts.
Here is an excerpt of your post …
/// "I was educated enough to not believe the bullsh#t" ///
Here is an edit …..
/// "I .. believe the bullsh#t" ///
Understand the difference?
And if you'd read the post, you'd know that there was nothing slanderous in it.
I Googled it and the editing with white people bringing guns and they didn't show the black "Sally" who felt compelled to hide like a little girl behind his wittle gun.
He may have been black but he's still an inept, insecure punk who has to hide behind a gun. Ahhh…the gun. The most elementary device since the toaster. Good for protection, bad for hiding lack of manhood.
So, everybody that doesn't work for a union makes $8.00 an hour and is a monkey? Your masters have trained you well, insect.
And you see no problem with what MSNBC did? I guess there will have to be an exception made for you, racist.
EXACTLY…He took excerpts of video to create a context of her being a racist refusing to help whitey. He conveniently omitted the excerpts of her realizing that it was bad and helped whitey and her and whitey became life-long friends. Making the black woman look like a racist for hating the white man. Creative editing.
Race-baiting!!!
I wonder how the black guy with a gun felt about that?
Nobody's going to waste time coming for a lying insect like you. The unions will have to go, though. : )
If you had your way commie, yeah!
Have you seen Detroit little girl?
you want to talk unions?
OK
I worked at Great Lakes Steel, in Ecorse, Michigan, (United Steel Worker)
Laid off…. plant closed, job gone to Japan…
I worked for Ford Motor Company in Flat Rock Michigan, (United Auto Worker)….Laid off…. plant closed. new plant opened in Juarez Mexico….
So….you can talk all you want but…you are NOT entitled to the facts….
No it was wrong. It wasn't Shirley Sherrod wrong but it was wrong. That all you got? Hang onto it then. It means a lot to ya. LOL
You must be logged in to post a comment.