Monday Open Thread: NYSE Edition
by PubliusToday, in 1792, the New York Stock Exchange was founded.

Today, in 1792, the New York Stock Exchange was founded.

Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
|
Tags: NYSE
Posted May 17th 2010 at 3:12 am in Open Threads |
12098684 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2Fpublius%2F2010%2F05%2F17%2Fmonday-open-thread-nyse-edition%2FMonday+Open+Thread%3A+NYSE+Edition2010-05-17+10%3A12%3A45Publiushttp%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2F%3Fp%3D120986
When Peter Schweizer uncovered evidence of insider trading by Republican chairman of the House Financial Services Committee Spencer Bachus (R-AL), and 60 Minutes reported on it, I was the first person to call for Rep. Bachus to resign. That was November 14, 2011. Now, with news that the Office...






84 Comments
End short sales and introduce the Tobin Tax to get rid of day traders and parasites like Goldman-Sachs. Until you do this, this CASINO does more harm than good.
the govt. is the solution
Until you start opposing government force in the form of WARS of conquest, you have little room for sarcasm. How's that program to tell foreign shepherds how to live at the point of a gun working out?
what the liberal are you rambling about, i oppose war because its bad for business. I think we need more govt. to solve the problems caused by govt. dont you…
Yes, more taxes, thats the answer. Why don't we get the government out of the mortgage industry?
Every time someone buys a stock thinking it will go up in value, someone is selling the same stock thinking it will go down in value. Sobering thought…..
You failed to criticize Obama, Dodd, Frank, and all the other parasitic politicians who sucked up campaign contributions from your "parasitic" GS
It's far past time to reign in this out-of-contol government and begin to restore America's economic might. Its' meddling in what should be a free market has caused a great deal of damage, which the Leftists then use as the excuse that "capitalism doesn't work".
What is needed in Washington is some good, old-fashioned retro thinking. We once had a diverse job market that provided ample opportunity for folks of all abilities and education levels, primarily in manufacturing jobs. Those of us who enjoyed working with our hands could still make a good living and achieve the American dream. However, economically illiterate politicians intervened and began a misguided effort in social engineering that has eliminated those good jobs and turned us from a nation of producers into a nation of consumers. The move to a service economy has been an undeniable disaster, with millions of good paying jobs shipped overseas, into countries who don't have the best reputation for environmental stewardship nor human rights.
The entrepeneurial spirit is alive and well in America, it's just buried under a mountain of government red tape and regulations.
Thanks for bringing a certain level of common sense to a discussion that will be overrun by irrational "Market" fanatic-supporters. The same ones that confuse "the Market" with the real economy and that the Market going up is some great benefit to Americans in general.
So, when "the Market" is grossly over-valued (as it still is even after the huge corrections) it is worth X dollars on paper. When it drops in value, where does all that "money" go? See, the Market is part of the grand illusion along with fractional reserve banking that allows a cabal of financiers to have far more power than they should. Who are these people? No one elected Goldman Sachs.
Who said this: "Permit me to issue and control the money of the nation and I care not who makes its laws."
It was due to the government being hijacked by academic pinheads who never worked in their life selling snake oil about "Free Trade" that resulted in the elimination of our manufacturing base – something that these same pinheads refuse to even acknowledge is a problem! Funny, nearly all these pencil-necks in Academia live high on the hog in GOVERNMENT funded schools and stare at their navel and come up with BS "Free Trade" arguments. The vast majority of Americans knew it was wrong at the time but were still enamored with respect for these Academics. Hopefully that has played itself out. Even Bill Buckley jr. didn't seem to have much faith in these Academics according to one of his more famous quotes.
It wasn't through intervention but LACK of intervention that this happened – by lowering of tariffs!
One of the Rothschilds. Do you suppose George Soros is related?
Sick of the Obama regime? This podcast will make you feel better:http://www.cashbeechcroft.podomatic.com
From a rising star in the REAL conservative movement!
Great post Stomp. I did some research on the Tobin Tax that Randy is all for and it is being pushed by a group called the Tobin Tax Initiative and they see the tax as a way to push a very progressive agenda. Imagine that, a group wanting to tax us even more so we can "save the planet". Here is link to their propoganda page -http://www.tobintax.org/
The NYSE is a critical part of our great land. However it’s relationship between Washington politicians, K-Street, and the MSM are alarming and will require eternal vigilance. For instance the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) 1977 Jimmy Carter. This one piece of legislation set in motion the collapse of ’08 and our continued malaise to this day.
Amen to that! You won't find a time line naming names in any MSM venue starting with Carter's first step towards socialism to the current day that identifies every lethal step taken to alter the time-honored and proven credit practices that unraveled what was once a rational and prudent system for economic growth.
What's particularly galling is that maladroits like Barney Frank have actually managed to position themselves as reformers when they were, in fact, the perps in this mess.
You pay a sales tax when you buy something. Why should stocks be exempt? Tobin Tax sounds good to me. If you are buying and holding stocks – the way the market is SUPPOSED to work and the way it is SOLD as working – then it will not affect you much. However, if you are like Goldman Sachs and just churning stocks to run up transaction fees and day trading, then it will. Sounds like a great idea to me.
There is a religion of "the Market" – mostly because people learned the hyper-simplified version of what it is in Econ 101 and have never looked more deeply in to it.
There is nothing wrong with our system that better and better-trained SEC regulators couldn't fix. They're overwhelmed with volume without the resources to track events accurately.
There is also nothing wrong with our system that quick and sure justice followed by prison sentences for manipulators wouldn't fix.
The financial services industry which worked well for quite some time was turned into a casino where investment bankers (deal makers) were allowed to commingle commercial banks' deposits and other liquidity with their own as they embarked on exotic, untried, and unproven ventures to increase profits.
It is time to reinstall the Chinese Wall (Read: "The Glass-Steagall Act") between commercial banks' balance sheets and the completely different and far more volatile balance sheets of the investment banking industry. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass%E2%80%93Steaga...
It is also time to flush "no doc" loans down the toilet they so richly deserve, and return to full verification of borrowers' financial condition and capacities to repay loans. The complete irrationality of "no doc" loans was so obvious that only financially-ignorant, or willfully complicit congressunits would have encouraged them. I tend to think that most of them fall into the latter category.
Commercial banks and other deposit-taking financial institutions need to return to the cardinal maxim by which they used to live: "First, protect the depositors' funds." Everything else is secondary.
Do some research-Tobin Tax is another means to take our hard earned $ to push an environmental agenda that will stifle growth and push more jobs overseas. Taxes are not the answer. Getting government OUT of the mortgage business is what needs to be done. We are on the hook for neary $400 billion for Dodd and Franks fiasco called Freddie and Fannie.
How's that paying for others' loan defaults working out for everyone?
Senator Chris Dodd of Connecticut – a true champion for consumers – has opted to change the financial reform bill. The government will clamp down HARD on hedge trimmers rather than hedge funds – the story at:
http://spnheadlines.blogspot.com/2010/05/dodd-new...
Keep smiling!
I don't know about an environmental agenda, but something should be done about the people gaming the system. The Market was created to capitalize businesses, not as some sort of open-air casino.
Chris Dodd is a crook and a liar. Chris Dodd doesn't give a rat's ass about anyone but Chris Dodd.
(You are kidding aren't you? You're not really believing what you wrote, right?)
Soros and the obama administration are the ones trying to unravel our nation:
Hedge Funds Spark World Revolution
By Cliff Kincaid
May 10, 2010
The Marxists used to be the experts in exploiting human suffering for the purposes of sparking revolution. But the hedge funds are doing better than the Marxists.
Consider that the business publication Barron's has an article headlined on its cover, "A savvy hedge-fund manager reveals how to make money on Old World's woes." A better headline would have been "How to exploit human suffering." At a time when people are dying in Greece because of riots in response to economic problems, what kind of publication would openly advertise how to make money at the expense of others and profit from their misery?
But this is how the hedge fund short sellers and their apologists work.
First, our media claimed the stock market plunge last Thursday was a fat finger pushing the wrong key on a computer. That ridiculous assertion was laughable. Now, the absurd claim is that it might have been a cyber attack by some unnamed foreign adversary. A conspiracy theory is not needed to explain this. All available evidence points to the involvement of the hedge fund short sellers. These are people who specialize in selling short and then buying long, in order to make money at both ends of the transactions. Any financial analyst with a brain knows that the hedge fund short sellers operate this way. It is not a mystery.
If anything, the Goldman Sachs congressional hearings demonstrated this fact. These people can make money no matter what happens.
The result has been a loss of even more confidence in the system, putting the survival of American capitalism in jeopardy. It is something the Marxists have only dreamed about.
The on-line version of Barron's has a different headline over the article, which consists of an interview with Adam Fisher, the 38-year-old founder of Commonwealth Opportunity Capital. This headline says, "How to Make Money in a World of Risk." But the point is still the same―there is money to be made while the world―and eventually America―goes up in flames.
Fisher's partner and co-founder, Reagan Silber, competes in the World Series of Poker. No kidding.
While Fisher is betting on the collapse of the European Union's currency, major upheaval in the United States is not too far behind.
The Global Europe Anticipation Bulletin (GEAB), which predicted the current financial crisis, has been predicting a U.S default on some of its debts. The default has been temporarily postponed because of the unprecedented spending and issuance of debt on top of debt by the Obama Administration. It predicts the next debt crisis in Britain, to be followed inevitably by the United States when "a major crisis" will affect its public debt holdings.
Interestingly, while Fisher is quoted in Barron's as mostly talking about turmoil in Europe, he is full of praise for John Paulson, who saw "the forest for the trees" when he bet on a housing market collapse and made billions of dollars.
There are 4 more sections to this story. To read the remaining sections click here:
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/ckincaid/2010/ck...
I would side with PRIVACY. The problem isn't no-doc loans but that the banks could UNLOAD the paper. Something about SELLING loans doesn't sit well with most people. If you issue the loan, you service the loan. IF they must sell it, then about about THEY go through the anal exam, eh?
My husband and I knew the 1000 point drop was not some dingbat mixing up the word millions and billions. There is something going on with this regime every day. I guess, it was just another isolated incident, just like the oil rig explosion. O just sits back and waits a week, and then swoops in with the SWAT team. Now our friend big brother has to "fix" it with more regulation.
We need to be preparing for the worst, and praying for the best. I think the global economy is hanging by a thread and is being shored up because it's an election year. I don't see how long America can last with this kind of debt.
There is no rational reason for financial privacy if you represent and warrant to a bank that you have the wherewithall to repay a loan you're requesting. Without independent means for verifying borrowers' capacities to repay, banks might just as well set up a card table in front with blank loan applications and piles of money with a five-minute process for disbursing the funds.
The loan packages sold to the secondary market were pure garbage. They were permeated with toxic loans to borrowers who hadn't a snowball's chance in hell of making payments on time.
The article is parody – The trueth is that he is the scum of New England, an embarassment to the great State of Connecticut. He sleeps with the payday loan crooks, taking advantage of the poor. Now he is trying too hard to "reform" the industry he is supposedly the expert on. Me thinks the lady doth protest too much.
In 2010, Wall Street will be regulated to death.
Randy, wars of conquest would result in the USA expanding it's boundaries and absorbing the countries we invaded. Have you received information that Iraq is no longer a sovereign nation? Or Afghanistan for that matter? Do you feel that we shouldn't be spending money on bringing Iraq's infrastructure into the 21st century, Or are you as stupid as we know you are?
Never mind, we all already know the answer to that.
actually, I DON'T pay sales tax on anything I purchase. Sales tax is a state tax. NH has no sales tax. No income tax either, and guess what? we have one of the most well-kept highway systems in the country. Don't you libs complain that since Teapartiers oppose taxes, we oppose public services like highways and such?
that post had no common sense attached randy. If you buy stock that is worth selling for a profit, you're buying it at the wrong time. You know, Buy low, sell high. What part of that don't you understand?
Besides, wasn't it the libs who claimed that we are no longer in a recession, claiming that since the stock market rebounded, there's no cause for concern?
I'm sure that's the plan.
"When it drops in value, where does all that "money" go?"
Ummm…ok, it's really simple. If the value of the stock drops, the overall value of that company goes down. Meaning a lower return on investment (that's ROI to you plebians) for the stockholders. That's where the money goes. So, for you it's OK if a stockholder loses money on a deal, but if they make money, they should pay more taxes? You're an idiot.
I have been reading all these posts on this topic, of which I know next to nothing,………….
but somehow after reading your comments there professor,……………..
I get a warm fuzzy feeling,………just one question though,………..???
if this Carter CRA bill, which went nuclear with Clinton never existed,………….
would we be so concerned about Wall Street as we are now,………….?????
Sure would like to read your opinion pro.
Do not allow O'marxist to embed new obama Govt. agencies & Czars, with their Regulations, into our Financial Markets. Re-distribution of wealth will take off like wild fire. I don't trust anything they push and ram through with their created emergencies.
Force the S.E.C. to do their jobs, and double thier force if necessary, and lock some people up, if appropriate, but to allow obama, et.al. to duplicate their Health Care socialist methods in our Financial World would only insure
that their dream of total Re-distributions of wealth and control of America's Freedoms comes true, only in a fraction of the time it would have taken without Govt. embedded in our Financial Markets. No more power to this Administration!
They will create another "emergency" scenario and ram their Financial Socialist Bill through. Be afraid. We only need to look at how Obam-ites handled the Debt to GDP by driving it to 90%, in a short year, to see the extreme danger here. Do anything to block their Financial push.
This regime is removing assets from the American people as fast as he can. How can they tax people who have NO money or assets?
Yeah, Wall Street. Here's the headstone created by the Obama regime.
Born in 1792 by evil Capitalist Pigs died in 2010 replaced by Hope and Change.
RIP.
"Do some research-Tobin Tax is another means to take our hard earned $ . . ."
OUR hard earned money? If by "our" you mean sleazy Wall Street insiders then I guess you're right. I also don't know if I would refer to millions of dollars made by buying and selling pieces of paper "hard earned." Why shouldn't Wall Street traders have to pay sales tax on their transactions just like the rest of us?
I am beginning to suspect that it is not really about the money. I am beginning to suspect it is about the power and "transofmational change".
I think they don't really care about the total amount of dollars, as long as they control the vast majority of them in some form.
It is scary. They are destroying us willy nilly to get what they want, completely confident that they will control all that matters of whatever is left.
These goons MUST be DEFEATED!
The majority of workers have their savings (i.e. 401K, IRA, etc) invested in stocks, that is what I meant by "OUR" you nimwitted proglodyte. Get a clue before you start ranting!
The trouble with the stock market is that everyone on the inside wants stocks to go up (well ALMOST everybody).
How do you regulate something like that?
It is based on perceived value.
There was a time when the value of a company was based on factories, equipment and inventory. Not any more.
We have never really adjusted to the dot.com issue. A market that isn't based on manufacturing is hard to pin down.
I think that Obama wants to be the king of the world. If Americans are stripped of everything, then the left thinks we will be forced to depend on the government for everything.
I am going to dress up as a Black Panther and beat them to the polls in November : ) LOL I'm sure I'll be intimidating with my 5 ft 4 vertically challenged frame!!
Wow, was it really necessary to engage in that type of name-calling? Geez. People who have their money invested in 401Ks generally don't but and sell enough to be affected much by a sales tax on trades. This tax would almost exclusively impact traders like Goldman Sachs. Maybe you should get a clue. I would call you a "nimwitted proglodyte" but I have more class than that.
[...] » Monday Open Thread: NYSE Edition – Big Government [...]
It is when you don't have any facts to back up your argument. Do you realize that corporations (including wall street firms) do not actually pay taxes? Those costs are passed on to consumers, making saving for our iretirement more expensive.
The fund managers DO buy and sell stocks in our investment funds and as stated above those wonderful taxes you think are such a great idea would be passed on to the owner of the 401K, IRA, etc.
And as far as name calling, it is okay for you to refer to people who work on wall street as sleazy, but you get offended when I call you out as a progressive. Thin skin?
"A market that isn't based on manufacturing is hard to pin down." (Thank you, One Vote).
I agree. There is no "there" there. It's kind of like having a currency that isn't backed by anything solid, like gold. Congress abrogated that Constitutional responsibility when it created the Federal Reserve.
Randy is more a xenophobe, anti-zionist, homophobic, NAZI, isolationist, conspiracy theorist, assmonkey troll.
Did I leave anything out Randy?
This is being done – only the "we" that profit are the corporations running this country and Israel and the "we" that pay for it are the Americans who die and pay taxes. It is rather a lot like how profits are privatized and losses subsidized by the tax payers.
Have you received information that Iraq is no longer a sovereign nation?
Yeah, pay no attention to our occupying military force or the 14 PERMANENT bases we are building there ($$$$ for the cabal of war profiteers!).
http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2004/04032...
Perhaps you wouldn't mind some foreign bases in the US….or would you sing a different tune, then?
Do you feel that we shouldn't be spending money on bringing Iraq's infrastructure into the 21st century,
When ours is dating to the early 20th?????
LOL! Good on ya' mate! Indeed, these people who buy in to the neocon outlook are rather silly – in their minds Wall Street traders "work hard." LOL! Work is not just activity….it is USEFUL activity. And these people don't MAKE anything. They just skim money out of the system.
Yeah, everyone gets stocks and they all go up all the time so everyone gets rich with no effort. That sound like a plausible reality to you? Rather, they can all "make money" but then the money becomes useless. For the money to be worth anything, WORK has to be done for it.
Do you even know what a stock is? Do you know how they go up in value. A stock is ownership in a company that produces and that production is done by hard working people.
Maybe when you hit junior high you can take a class called ECONOMICS.
And the the Hedge fund cronies get rich, like Soros and his merry band of Marxist's.
[...] » Monday Open Thread: NYSE Edition – Big Government [...]
Unfortunately, I don't have the time to read through all the comments above, but the thought of ending short sales is so stupid that I had to comment. Short sales are vital to maintaining an efficient market, i.e. one that sets a REALISTIC price. Had the somebody in governemt shorted Fanny and Freddy shares the financial crisis we are in may have been avoided entierly. Randy, just by calling Wall Street a "casino" you prove that you know less than nothing about financial markets. Ignorance may be bliss, but it does nothing for the folks on this discussion board, so next time resist the urge to type, Randy!
Thanks for the link Stan, I've been watching this joke unfold – what I find so pathetic is all the marxist luvin dumbshits who buy into the social justice bullcrap, all the while turning a blind eye to the filthy rich pigs pulling the strings to toss us all into a tailspin -
If barry wants to be king he has some stiff competition, soros, strong, and lets toss in all the other loons who drank the marxist koolaid – it will be a battle for the ages -
You Go Girl!
Deregulate Wall Street.
I would amend your last statement to : A market not based in measurable goods and services is hard to pin down. I get what a derivative is, but it is the dotcom type sh!t you are talking about. Lets not forget that it is the govt. fault for our current mess. The Federal Reserve took the "capital" out of capitalism and turned it into a toy for politicians and the rich-b!tch friends to manipulate. Guess who benefits from that? Hint: not you & me.
Wow, cute girl! Who is that? I think barry is just a Soros tool not a competitor. Maybe if Soros expires shortly before 11/12 I might believe he is trying to ascend to the throne. these turds are on their way out but not soon enough.
ORahmses! Let my markets go! Set the economy free in all sectors, not just wall st and we will boom our way out of the unneeded problems we have now! Hell, you might even get reelected. Nah, your done.
Reminded of Dire Straits – "Money for nothin' and your chicks for free".
“October: This is one of the peculiarly dangerous months to speculate in stocks in. The others are July, January, September, April, November, May, March, June, December, August and February.”
~~ Mark Twain
This guy's tripping on Luddite/Conspiracy theorist mushrooms. He has no idea of how the world economy interacts or how the financial markets work. He wants a return to the nineteenth century.
soros is a capitalist
Valid points. Also found out today that you can't use the FOIA to get information from Freddie Mac and Fanny Mae. Thank you for that, Glenn Beck.
These quasi-government corporations are bullshit!
[...] » Monday Open Thread: NYSE Edition – Big Government [...]
Soros is only a capitalist because he has capital. Like all other progressives he believes that everyone else should live under the 'benevolent guidance" of the ruling elite.
Excellent, Chile!
good one! I shall steal this and use it often, bwahahaha!
[...] » Monday Open Thread: NYSE Edition – Big Government [...]
[...] » Monday Open Thread: NYSE Edition – Big Government [...]
[...] » Monday Open Thread: NYSE Edition – Big Government [...]
[...] » Monday Open Thread: NYSE Edition – Big Government [...]
The CRA required that banks loan a significant percentage of their deposits within a five mile radius (I think that is the area) of their location. That required banks to look for good loans where there weren't any in a significant number of cases. When they couldn't find them and didn't meet the percentage, ACORN-type tactics were employed against them, essentially threatening them through legal action and political pressure, to make the loans, thereby degrading the quality of their loan portfolios.
They packaged these loans and sold them and the loan servicing to large mortgage companies and larger banks that put the loans into pools that were then securitized and sold to investeors in "the secondary market."
Normally, if loans were made according to time-honored principals with rigid enforcement of loan to income and total debt to income ratios, and – this is a bit "AND" – if they were required to independently verify borrowers' incomes and total debt by communicating directly with the financial institutions where the borrowers claimed they had deposits, along with obtaining an accurate credit report, the banks would have loans that were good quality with a minimal number of them, roughly a maximum of 3%, defaulting. (Long sentence. Sorry.)
When all the rules were thrown out the window, the same packaging and secondary market process proceeded as though nothing had changes. Fannie and Freddie made markets for these securitized loans. Throughout the world, investors who should have done their homework assumed that the full faith and credit of the US Government, by virtue of Fannie and Freddie, stood behind these loans.
That had a flaw. The full faith and credit of the US Government DID NOT stand behind the loans.
Further, the repayment streams from these loans were stripped apart, the interest stream being securitized further as was the principal stream. These securities were sold, resold, repackaged, to the point where no one knew for sure what collateral really backed which packages.
When the economy began to tank, the repayment on these securities, collateralized debt obligations, began to taper off and people who wanted to sell them couldn't.
Wall Street did a land office business selling these collateralized debt obligations until they began to crater.
AIG: a major reinsurer, got involved in the process by insuring credit default swaps, which were, I think, hedges against default, in this vast network of repackaged loan fragments, and apparently lost the bubble.
Wall Street: when the Glass-Steagall's important Chinese Wall between commercial banks' deposits and investment banks' more volatile borrowed money were commingled, the exposure of the commercial banks to market fluctuations bulged, exposing them to losses they were never structured to absorb.
Commercial banks are supposed to take "loan risk," meaning they get a limited return in the form of interest rates on loans that are more often than not collateralized with assets that can be a secondary source of repayment if the borrower defaults. Therefore, they are supposed to take only loan risk, limited risk, when lending the money (i.e., from Mom and Pop depositors, company deposits, and lots of other deposits from people and companies looking for a 'safe' place to park their money) out.
Investment banks are supposed to take "investment risk" (theoretically 'unlimited risk') in which the entire amount is subject to loss, is only the money of the investors or money they borrowed ostensibly with collateral, and in return, they are entitled to unlimited return.
When the deposits of the commercial banks are commingled with investment banks' funds, the entire scheme of prudent exposure, and safe loans went out the door.
Back to your question having prefaces this with all that: The CRA was the first step down the slippery slope since it put into the hands of Community Organizers and others the means to extort the banks into making crappy mortgage loans which they unloaded by reselling them as fast as possible. Congress through Fannie and Freddie further polluted the loan pool by permitting "no doc" loans putting even more toxic loans out in the secondary market. When Glass-Steagall's most prudent element, separation of commercial and investment banks was thrown out, that further enabled liquidity to jump into the mortgage market. Investment bankers saw a means for real fast profits by buying the loans, packaging them up fast, and flipping them out the door, apparently without any recourse back to them, to investors, including major pension funds, insurance companies, financial institutions around the world, all of which should have done their homework, but they were relying on industry analysts for ratings. Those analysts allowed themselves to ignore the writing on the wall.
(I'm still at a loss as to why anyone with the tiniest bit of understanding of credit would ever allow non-verified mortgage loans become a major part of the mortgage pool.)
Back to your question again. CRA started it all, but several dumb moves along the way compounded the errors. When the Bush Administration tried in the earlier part of this decade to get Congress to rein in Fannie and Freddie and take a closer look at them, such financial geniuses as Barney Frank stopped them in their tracks. Frank was not the only one, but I single him out because he has now positioned himself as a reformer, vilifying Wall Street, when, in fact, he was one of the core causes of the magnitude of the problem – he obstructed reform long before the meltdown when it might have dealt with the problems before they went nuclear and polluted the entire world financial system, either with the loans themselves, or by scaring the hell out of global business so it pulled in its horns.
That was written fast and is kind of sloppy, but I hope it answered your question, with some context thrown in to help understand the environment.
Saw a science documentary on "Dual / Parallel Universes",……………
I go into my old neighborhood bar to argue politics once in while,……….
Somehow a bridge has to be built,……..in order to truly save this country.
I gotta figure out how to translate all this Professor,……….THANKS.
[...] » Monday Open Thread: NYSE Edition – Big Government [...]
This morning I received an e-mail from a HS classmate,………
seems we lost another fellow Vietnam veteran HS classmate to cancer.
Saw that Family Guy clip there Tex,…………..
going tomorrow to buy another flag for the coming Memorial Day,…..want it to be bright….
going to have a nice cold beer after I hang it on the pole in front of my house.
[...] » Monday Open Thread: NYSE Edition – Big Government [...]
It is none other than Sondra Locke! Of course barry is a TOOL! lol
Recommeneded websites…
[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]……
You must be logged in to post a comment.