Comments on: LA Times Issues Correction on its Op-ED: The War on ACORN

By: Steynian 396 « Free Canuckistan!

Steynian 396 « Free Canuckistan! — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:51:56 +0000

[...] LA TIMES Issues Correction on its Op-ED: The War on ACORN …. [...]

By: Carl

Carl — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:32:58 +0000

You forgot New York Democrats don't need ACORN they have Tamamny Hall

By: kory

kory — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:25:40 +0000

their staff are normal folks, its their editors/writers/etc . . . . . the circulation dept, financial, legal, events, advertising, order entry, etc are very great and very understanding for the most part…… its those editors that think they are the reason people ever bought the paper and not just to see the NEWS….. we shall see if Sam Zell will have any influence on making the Times a more lucrative/balanced newspaper for those of us on the West Coast

By: Anderson Villars

Anderson Villars — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:28:00 +0000

I think ACORN must have been hehind the massive vote fraud that took place in the 23rd district. A number of us saw the blatant bussing in of ringers and I for one saw them in the county park switching hats and jackets as a different set of IDs were handed out. This took place right in the entrance to the county park. At least three other people here in Watertwown saw what I saw. The only thing that makes me wonder is that these folks were mostly white, very few that looked Mexican and only a couple of black fellows. I always thought that ACORN hired only blacks but who else would do something like this? We are gonna try and find out more but it's gonna be hard, the local paper has only Obama people working there.

By: 1redcent

1redcent — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:14:50 +0000

I've previously given you "proof" and facts…………….all to no avail.

You post links to lefty, error filled sites and expect us to accept them as "proof"; which it is anything but.

I am a civil person, until pushed to the wall. I've even asked YOU to clean up your language, without replying in kind.

And the post you have just replied to, is all you deserve. I now refuse to keep on reposting, to satisfy your obsessive need for attention.

By: Syntax_game

Syntax_game — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:08:41 +0000

Yeah 1RC, this is usually the type of response I can count on getting when I ask for "proof" but at least yours is a lot less colorful and more respectful than a lot of the other responses I'm used to getting.

By: 1redcent

1redcent — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:32:05 +0000

You must be very bored; not to mention yearning for attention, no matter what the cost.

By this time, your arguments have become not only ennui inducing, but hacknied, repetitive in the extreme, and patently ridiculous.

Just reread all of my previous post; I can't be bothered to retype it all to you.