Lawmaker Sends Letter to Obama: Fire Jennings Now
by PubliusByron York has a story at the Examiner on the first lawmaker to call for the scalp of Kevin Jennings, “Safe School” Czar (no we can’t believe we just typed that title, either).
Republican Rep. Steve King is sending a letter to the president today calling for the firing of gay activist Kevin Jennings, head of the Education Department’s Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools. “The totality of Mr. Jennings’ career has been to advocate for public affirmation of homosexuality,” King writes. “There is more to safe and drug free shools than can be accomplished from the narrow view of Mr. Jennings who has, for more than 20 years almost exclusively focused on promoting the homosexual agenda.”
In the letter, King points to a foreword Jennings wrote for a 1999 book entitled Queering Elementary Education, as well as Jennings’ work as founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network. King also mentions a 1988 incident in which Jennings, then a teacher, chose not to alert any authorities when he learned of a teenage boy, a student, who had become involved with an adult man. Finally, King points to stories Jennings has told of his own drug use. “Kevin Jennings cannot gain the approval of parents who want their children safe and their schools drug free,” King writes.
Full story here. Personally, we’re not so much offended by Mr. Jennings as we are that this position even exists. We don’t believe anyone should occupy this position.
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
112 Comments
He knew what jennings represented before he was appointed. Letterman, Polinsky and Jennings. What a trio of news hungry sex maniacs.
Wooo Hoooo !!!____Thank you Rep. Steve King !!!
Why didn't Obama just cut to the chase and hire Roman Polanski?
You know, if this was a Republican president the press would be all over his "judge me by those who surround me" line by now. Instead they will villify Rep. King as a homo-phobe and he, and anyone who agrees with him, will, at best, be ignored, at worst, an attempt will be made to run them out of office. I knew my whole life the media was biased but I never realized until Obama how incredibly stupid they think we all are.
Please sign our petition http://mywhitehouse.org/dont-tread-on-me/
Also if you have a petition idea, we will put it online for you. Just let us know and we can add it to our petitions.
http://mywhitehouse.org/contact-us/
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Big Government and Big Government. Big Government said: Lawmaker sends letter to Obama: Fire Jennings now: Byron York has a story at the Examiner on the first lawmaker.. http://bit.ly/2lKSoo [...]
Done ever give up on this – If jennings wants to live his life the way he does – fine – but dont put him in a position where he can further his odious agenda of forcing his lifestyle on my kids. Jennings should not be permitted within 1,000 miles of schools or our kids
It's funny how the writers on this site are always careful not to appear openly homophobic or racist, but are revealed by the comments every time. " Worried Parent" above sums up the real argument behind this Jennings situation very well.
More CHANGE I believe in!
Kevin Jennings also thinks the founder of NAMBLA is a great man.
I can definitely see why Obama appointed him.
If anyone could "force" his or her lifestyle on your kids, you may not have done the greatest job raising them.
Because Obama is…………BI…..Polanski isn't
Will be interesting to see how Obama reacts to the letter.
"You will know me by the people I surround myself with."
http://www.congress.org/bio/id/2917 go thank Rep King for standing for our children and grandchildren!
It's time to stop being worried about being perceived as anti-gay.
AMEN..if you all don't have a Twitter acct, I recommend it. It's very exciting and much info gets through. Fight on against this tyranny, Patriots. God bless*~
I was never worried.
Queering elementary education on Google Books.
http://books.google.com/books?id=3jrULETBwt8C&...
Your site is infected with a virus. As soon as I clicked on the don't tread on me link, I got a virus notification.
Huh?
That would be the first I have heard of that. Maybe it's a program on your computer or something telling you that. Do you know what program gave you that error, and what the error said?
Your remark to Worried Parent is either ignorant or obtuse. Worried Parent obviously dislikes the idea that children will be subjected to the types of sexual information and material that have been used by Kevin Jennings and many other teachers. Some of it is simply age-inappropriate and others are downright sickening, like Jennings describing practices like fisting. Go away, troll.
I agree. The concern is our children's protection, not how we look. I don't care if Jennings is gay, but to overlook and promote child sex abuse is another matter altogether.
He has nothing to do with the founder of NAMBLA , that's a false smear, not that you care.
Obama's admin is to foolish to let these people in at these posts. Thinking the America would not care by "their" standard is an understatement. 2010 the czars will have to be tested and kicked out.
EXACTLY SO……….just ask Larry Sinclair !
Childxren ( mostly male children, BTW ) who are sodomized at an early age, then become homosexuals and child molest5ors themselves, when they grow up. It has also been proved that with enough propagandizing, children can bed lured into lifestyles that they were NOT so inclined to be interested in.
Go away troll, your kind is NOT wanted !
HOGWASH, BALDERDASH, AND HORSEFEATHERS, you jerk.
Besides being a troll, you're also extremely uninformed.
Well, I can be a jerk that is true, but I don't really think I'm the jerk here. I'm not the one smearing a mans name on flimsy evidence for political reasons. From what I've read about Jennings he seems like a decent guy. You could read about him here if you are interested:http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/03/kevin-jenning...
I flipped a coin and it came up obtuse. Obtuse it may be, but true nonetheless
Checkout the site BigGovernment.com and there is a you tube of Jennings complaining that the schools recruit 'heterosexuals'… instead of homosexuals. Opajama isn't going to like this one. BWwwaaahhhhh..
I agree, as far as I know he has nothing to do with NAMBLA, he's merely praised the founder of the man-boy love association, and, unrelated of course, didn't follow the law and report when a boy, his student, had sex with a grown man.
Keep on plugging your ears though and calling the truth "smears" – heaven forbid you actually admit your fault.
Palm
I am never afraid to say how I feel. Sex has no business in our school system. It is the parents right to tell their children. This Jennings should keep his mouth shut about sex or resign. End of story. If one of my children would have been gay, I would still feel this way. Government is butting in to our lives and trying to say they know better than the parent and that is BS
"DECENT"? An avowed homosexual who claims to admire the head of NAMBLA, who didn't turn in the poor kid who was being sexually abused by a much older male, when he was 15 or 16, and who has claimed that schools are propagandizing all children to be , *gasp*, HETEROSEXUALS, is, in your view a "decent man"? REALLY?
And you also approve of Jennings approval and write up in the book "THE QUEERING OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS", which advocates making small children into HOMOSEXUALS and the fact that Jennings began the GLISTEN organization, which holds conferences in schools, FOR CHILDREN, which explicitly teach "FISTING" and goodness only knows what else, to those as young as 11 years old ? THIS IS WHAT MAKES JENNINGS A DECENT GUY, IS IT?
You're not only a JERK, writ large, but an ignorant, immoral, irrational, piece of offal !
You condemned people on this site fore being racists and homophobic, for NO reason at all., yet it is YOU and YOU alone, who are proselytizing for deviant behavior being taught to children below the age of consent and sticking up for a guy who should NOT be in any way placed in any position that involves children of any age, but especially the one that Obama has put him in !
And as far as your pitiful claim that the evidence about Jennings is "flimsy", I suggest that you are the one making flimsy excuses for the man, for NO obvious reasons. Are YOU a homosexual?
And before you even contemplate posting that I am a homophobe, let me assure you that no, I don't believe that homosexuals should be stoned or anything else may try to come up with.
You must lack a great deal of understanding where child training is involved. The best parents can be completely subverted by the rhetoric the schools shove down our children's throats day in and day out. When they have them sequestered for several hours a day, 10 mos a yr, for 13 yrs, it's a hard thing to fight. "Indoctrination" was why forced education was invented in the first place.
You really need to educate yourself on a topic prior to posting here; especially since others know the facts and YOU do NOT !
Hopefully Barry will throw this one under the bus. Boy is that space getting cluttered !
Brian Sussman, a local San Francisco KSFO talk show host, claimed during the election campaign that B. Hussein O. Jr. met with gays in the Los Angeles area and made a deal that to get their support he would work to include a gay slant in text books for second graders.
I don't have the details, but Sussman can usually document his accusations.
In the next few days, I wil try to contact him to find out if he still has that documentation.
I have to wonder if Jennings is one of B. Hussein O. Jr.'s hitmen he's hired to keep his promise.
As an aside, most who have no interest in homosexuals are not suffering a phobia, but dealing with perfectly normal insticts. For openers, the thought of inserting my penis in another man offends, as it should, my sense of smell, not some prudish fettish for the missionary position with a female.
Well…at least Fox News stopped and acknowledged they were wrong (lying) about Jennings.
I flipped a coin and it came up obtuse. Obtuse it may be, but true nonetheless.
Looks like you struck a nerve, palmtree.
A little paranoid perhaps? Are you afraid of the dark, too?
Wow.
If he's smart, he'll throw it away. Steve King's grasp on reality is tenuous at best.
What…………………yet another NAMBLA loving GLISTEN cheerleader ?
No "nerve" was struck, if you are referring to my rebuttal post. Facts are stubbron things and since I don't suffer fools lightly, I posted quite a lot of said facts.
there was a mountain of explicit evidence against van jones that made a call for his dismissal valid. in this jennings case, however, there is little more than a desperate smear campaign against him simply because he happens to be gay and, therefore, has a natural empathy for the issues facing gay students. one need look no further than the comments on this board to see why prejudice against gay kids needs to be considered when working to insure that schools are safe environments for all students.
you are mistaken. he said that students only hear about heteros in school so, if their sexual orientations can supposedly be so easily influenced, why are there any gay students at all ?
there's no such thing as 'recruiting' someone one way or the other. a person is who they are.
FIRE NOW!
Not sure where my original comment went. It's on my board but not here. At any rate, I would explain the history of forced education in America but I think the fact that the "safe schools" czar agrees with me about how schools indoctrinate our children should suffice.
What's really funny is how, when someone makes a stand that is in opposition to a liberal's point of view, the liberal is always ready and willing to slap a label on him. I thought liberals were all about tolerance and understanding?
You're correct, facts are "stubbron" things. The only problem is that your post is virtually devoid of "facts."
If the label fits, wear it.
Fire him. We don't want scum like him around our children.
That's just not true. It is possible that some homosexuality is DNA based.
What happens, then, if someone is genetically only 40% gay? That person is not driven by only DNA. Hence the psychological/propaganda fight that the homosexuals are perpetuating is aimed to enhance and recruit to their agenda.
This is what the real fight is over. Probably 2% of gay men are genetically determined. The rest can make their own choices and that is why homosexuals want to contribute to forming their personalities while they are too young to understand what they are accepting or rejecting.
Not wanting to participate in the homosexual agenda is not a phobia, but instinct.
The idea of sticking myself into a man where the sun don't shine offends my genetically determined sense of smell, not some perverted fetish involving enjoyment of the missionary position with female.
That's just not true. It is possible that some homosexuality is DNA based.
What happens, then, if someone is genetically only 40% gay? That person is not driven by only DNA. Hence the psychological/propaganda fight that the homosexuals are perpetuating is aimed to enhance and recruit to their agenda.
This is what the real fight is over. Probably 2% of gay men are genetically determined. The rest can make their own choices and that is why homosexuals want to contribute to forming our personalities while we are too young to understand what we are accepting or rejecting.
Oh Peaches, that's not nice.
Nobody said that Jennings belongs to NAMBLA. What he has done, however, is to praise the head of NAMBLA, I suggest that you look it up.
Not so, not so at all.
Try looking into what I posted and get back to me.
Yes,some boys and some girls are genetically different, from birth. The numbers are a lot fewer than what has been pushed since the Kinsey Report came out; there just never was 10% of the population who were/are not heterosexual.
Many boys, who are homosexually molested as children, become homosexuals, though they never were hardwired to become one; some of them also turn into pedophiles and molesters themselves.
Hundreds of years ago, when children ( mostly little boys ) were sent to same sex private boarding schools at the age of eight, it was well known that some developed "crushes" on other little boys. Sometimes, these "crushes" developed into full blown sexual acts.
Later on, when little girls also went to same sex boarding schools, they too developed "crushes" on other girls and/or teachers, which most of them outgrew.
For at least the past 25 years, lesbian profs have pushed their agendas onto college girls, in many different colleges and universities, to be lesbians until the marry and some idiot girls fall for that garbage.
The younger the child, homosexual propaganda CAN turn children into that which they are NOT…………which is WHY Jennings is dangerous !
Do you ever listen tgo Sean Hannity?
I have him on right now and he is talking about how Jennings lauded Hay, the head of NAMBLA. tHIS INFO WAS ALSO ON this site, THE OTHER DAY.
So how is it that I am "wrong" ?
Sean Hannity is not a reliable source for anything. In fact, a good rule of thumb is that whatever he says is the opposite of true, accurate, or correct.
You just have a bunch of assertions, but no actual facts. For example, your statement that "The younger the child, homosexual propaganda CAN turn children into that which they are not" is not a fact. It is your belief, or something you read somewhere, or something someone told you. But it is not a fact. You may believe it, but that doesn't make it true.
You're wrong.
Children can and ARE easily influenced on any number of topics; though yes, sexual physical indoctrination is more forceful in "turning" boys into homosexuals. This was known about at least 50 years ago.
Though The Kinsey report has been shredded now, some of his info was correct.
The info was ON THIS SITE days ago. It was also on Drudge and others, long before Sean talked about it this afternoon.
If Sean is not good enough, is THIS site also not credible? And should that be case, as far as you are concerned, then WHY are you here?
The FACTS I have posted came f\\rom a variety of different sources ( books ), as well as from anecdotal info told me by friends who happen to be homosexuals. I did NOT post assumptions, nor my own opinions.
Read THE KINSEY REPORT ( though most of that has now been discredited; not everything in his books has been ) and other books about human sexuality and child development. Then, perhaps, you'll be more able to post with some credibility.
The info was ON THIS SITE days ago. It was also on Drudge and others, long before Sean talked about it this afternoon.
If Sean is not good enough, is THIS site also not credible? And should that be case, as far as you are concerned, then WHY are you here?
The FACTS I have posted came f\\rom a variety of different sources ( books ), as well as from anecdotal info told me by friends who happen to be homosexuals. I did NOT post assumptions, nor my own opinions.
Read THE KINSEY REPORT ( though most of that has now been discredited; not everything in his books has been ) and other books about human sexuality and child development. Then, perhaps, you'll be more able to post with some credibility.
In other words, you don't have any facts. So it would be pointless to pursue this. Have a good rest of the day.
In other words, when faced with FACTS, which YOU don't like, they all of a sudden don't exist. Well that figures. LOL
Hope those glued on blinkers don't keep you blindsided forever.
Would you…..
http://rasica.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/2009-07...
The "Fistgate" incident: What homosexual activists in schools do with children
Students as young as 12 given graphic instruction in bizarre homosexual sex acts by state employees
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/fistgat...
Maybe it'll work this time.
Would you…
http://rasica.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/2009-07...
Obama wrote to GLSEN asking for their votes. This is their payback. It's all about paybacks with him. No dark and dank hole is beyond the pale and someone who states he's okay with partial birth abortion is beyond me.
He praised a guy named Harry Hay , who was not the founder or head of NAMBLA at all , why don't you look it up.
Harry Hay started one of the first gay rights groups in the US. Lots of gay people including Mr Jennings look up to him for that. That doesn't mean they agree with everything he ever said. What you+Hannity are doing is a classic smear .
It is not a fact that Jennings wants to teach fisting to little kids.
It is not a fact that Jennings wants to convert kids to be gay.
It is not a fact that he praised the founder of NAMBLA.
These are hysterical fears that are being whipped up in order to discredit Obama.
I am glad to hear that you don't want homosexuals to be stoned to death, that's a relief.
It don't take much.
Yes , I am about tolerance and understanding, also free speech and free thought. I understand that some people disapprove of homosexuality for religious reasons. I don't agree with that but I understand it. What bothers me about this website is the way it pushes buttons on cultural issues, but tries to pretend it's not rolling around in the mud. The contempt for gays and blacks on here is seething off the page.
Life always attempts to recreate itself.
Homosexuals by definition do not impregnate each other, so they have to steal from other families. This is the quickest way to replentish a Castro Street whore house. Actually that's thinking too small. What they are trying to replentish a neighborhood of skanks from which they can design a whole nation of whores.
Another point from a News Max article: Gay Family Kids 7 Times More Likely To Be Homosexual (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pag...
In the 19th century a lot of Utopian ( many being quasi religious/religious ones ) communes sprung up, with many of them fizzling out because though heterosexual, held that members had to be celibate.
But point well taken re homosexuals and children adopted by homosexuals and lesbians.
Doesn't it make you wonder, at least a bit, as to just WHY some posters on this site have taken up Jennings' cause and are vociferously fighting FOR him, whilst railing against those who want him dumped?
GLISTEN has indeed held conferences for children as young as 11, where fisting WAS graphically and explicitly taught! Go look it up; one example of this took placfe in Mass. and there were others!
Jennings founded GLISTEN !
He is adamantly against what he considers to be the teaching of heterosexuality in public schools. His example was the study of ROMEO AND JULIETTE ; of all things.
He heartily approves of the book QUEERING OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS ( with his name proudly on the inside flap; of the dust jacket. If THAT, alone, besides everything else we know about him, isn't a tacit example that yes, he wants to inculcate children into homosexuality, then nothing is!
ARE YOU A HOMOSEXUAL?
You noticed that, did you?
Thank you ever so much for standing up for the children in our schools. I am appalled that he even got into the Whitehouse. Makes you wonder what is behind Obama.
Hard not to.
p { margin: 0; }
I counted 5 and that strikes me as a lot. Homosexuals and the Left in general try to be as vocal as possible to control our populations by repeating the same lies as often as possible, in this case with insults, disinformation and out and out deception.
Often their campaigns have nothing to do with their direct statements. The issueof gay marriage isn't about consummatingtrue love. First and foremost it exists to reinforce the propaganda thathomos are victims.
In fact, if romance was the motive, on Gay Day 1,000,000 of them would pair off into 500,000 couples, not giving a damn what the government says, to blow sweet nothings in each other ears. Instead, the Castro is a huge orgy, as are all of their other street events.
One of their important goals is to take over our military from which they will have a huge base of males whom they are in control of to try to influence to get sex and to goalong with their agenda.
Taking over school curricula and legalizing gay marriage is a step to legitimizing themselves within the biggest of all prizes: Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines. So they want you to give up by shutting up.
Well, they picked on the wrong person ( me ), to "shut up"; I don't back off/back down/ shut up and NOTHING they can do will intimidated me !
Re the "gay" marriage thing……………..many, many, many homosexuals don't want to "get married", nor do they want "gay marriage" legalized. And for those who want to try to claim that that isn't so, I suggest that they go look it up, before they complain about that statement.
I'm not sure that they really want to take over the military; however, modern day Spartans they ain't ! ( yes, I was using ain't to make a POINT, I know it's not even really a word, and though I doubt that most will understand my Spartan line, perhaps some will go look that up too. )
I suspect that nothing will ever really be "enough" for the over the top homosexual activists. Their demands keep escalating. But the line in the sand must be drawn now, since small school children are now their target.
p { margin: 0; }
“Well, they picked on the wrong person ( me ), to \”shut up”
It’s not about you personally. They’ll try to swarm anyone who opposes their agenda. You either have the time or you don’t.
Re the \”gay\” marriage thing……………..many, many, many homosexuals don't want to \”get married\”, nor do they want \”gay marriage\” legalized
Exactly, the issue is an ideological ploy to continue to posit homos as victims and to endless repeat that.
I'm not sure that they really want to take over the military; however, modern day Spartans they ain't !
It’s not about claiming a majority in the military but to gain as much influence as possible. At this point most gays don’t understand the possibilities. The first move is to get don’t ask don’t tell repealed. Then they employ the basic Cloward/Piven strategy: http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/02/the_clowar... which is to forever paper our military with law suits until it is too expensive not to do what they want.
p { margin: 0; }
As they gain power, more homos will gravitate to military careers. More importantly, our soldiers defend us in more ways than just from invasions. You can make an argument that to some extent they can control the value of the dollar, both through threats of retaliations against those who choose to destroy the dollar and by killing real enemies who intend to destroy the dollar, say Hugo Chavez.
With gays, especially the Leftists, in control of some of that decision making, their alliances with our enemies could destroy us.
Oh I have the time and the inclination; I also am not easy to intimidate….if at all.
They can "swarm" all they care to, but what I wonder at, is WHY they are even on this site.
Yes, I know, they really want to get rid of "don't ask, don't tell". Nonswishy/flamboyant ones can lie and get into any segment of the military now and always could. What they appear to want, is for screaming queens be allowed to join and continue to act out whilst in battle theatres. They really don't want to be in the military at all, they want to destroy it, so yes, in some kind of convoluted way, I guess that you're right that this is somewhat like Cloward-Piven. Law suits don't even have to be brought………..but WHERE will they ever find enough limp wristed flamers willing to go into battle ?
Now you're reaching !
Don't you realize how long it takes to raise through the ranks? This isn't WW II and even back then, battlefield commissions weren't as easily made as they are portrayed in the movies.
Are there some lefties in our military now? I don't doubt it, but, at the same time, I doubt that any in leadership positions are out to destroy this nation.
p { margin: 0; }
“Oh I have the time and the inclination; I also am not easy to intimidate….if at all.”
I believe that. I was not remotely suggesting that you would cave. The point was that you personally don’t matter to them. If you are not with em, they will try to swarm you to shut up.
In our last connection with that Hawaiian (I believe), your original statement might have been right. He was likely a troll or worse yet a Leftist ideologue. I just didn’t have the time to continue correcting his obnoxious and inaccurate stupidities. I had to cut it off.
If you have the time, good for you. A couple of your points jogged my memory, reminding me of the facts.
“They can \”swarm\” all they care to, but what I wonder at, is WHY they are even on this site.”
Some of them might just like to argue with conservatives. Others think they can destroy a site by overwhelming it with Leftist propaganda, making it nearly impossible for right thinking folks to communicate in a comfortable environment. It’s a kind of Alinsky tactic modified for the Internet.
p { margin: 0; }
“Yes, I know, they really want to get rid of \”don't ask, don't tell\”. Nonswishy/flamboyant ones can lie and get into any segment of the military now and always could. What they appear to want, is for screaming queens be allowed to join and continue to act out whilst in battle theatres.”
Again, I agree that the average homo street hustler and the top exec at Bank of America don’t have a clue of the possibilities in gutting America with a stronger presence in the military. They identify with victimhood, the military being a prime example: they can’t be themselves there. George Soros, on the other hand, knows exactly how to destroy a country from within.
For instance, in one of the Minnesota elections before the last in which Franken prevailed, Soros spent cash to replace the Election Commissioner (probably not the precise name) with a Democrat. Many believe that she screwed Coleman out of many challenges and granted Franken most of what he wanted.
He can pull the same crap in the military to promote his own stooges. He first has to hire somebody to study who is in the specific positions that he wants to control and then develop methods for replacing them: blackmail, attempts to wear em down with Cloward/Piven, pay-offs.
p { margin: 0; }
“They really don't want to be in the military at all, they want to destroy it, so yes, in some kind of convoluted way”
Right now, they are not accepted as homos in the military. After don’t ask don’t tell is repealed, it might be a much more interesting organization to them. After all, they will be surrounded at every moment with their idea of nirvana: the smell of male perspiration. I am being perfectly serious here.
“… but WHERE will they ever find enough limp wristed flamers willing to go into battle?”
You realize that 20 years ago, the WWF was riddled with homos? I have a nephew who at 20 years old could lift 700 lbs. When I told him about the number of gays in the WWF, he laughed at me. After going to an introductory professional wrestling training camp, he had to admit that I was right.
A lot of badasses aren’t swishes. The S side of S/M are definitely not Liberaces.
“Now you're reaching !”
Figured you’d think that. I’m discussing a possible scenario, but one that I believe is more and more likely.
—– Original Message —–
From: \”Robert E. Graves\” <RobertEGraves@comcast.net>
To: \”IntenseDebate Notifications\” <notifications+UV5×2407846zC1o-Fdb591774dmeZ@intensedebatemail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2009 11:04:27 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: 1redcent replied to your comment on Lawmaker sends letter to Obama: Fire Jennings now
p { margin: 0; }
<DIV style=\”FONT-SIZE: 12pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial\”>
“Yes, I know, they really want to get rid of \”don't ask, don't tell\”. Nonswishy/flamboyant ones can lie and get into any segment of the military now and always could. What they appear to want, is for screaming queens be allowed to join and continue to act out whilst in battle theatres.”
Again, I agree that the average homo street hustler and the top exec at Bank of America don’t have a clue of the possibilities in gutting America with a stronger presence in the military. They identify with victimhood, the military being a prime example: they can’t be themselves there. George Soros, on the other hand, knows exactly how to destroy a country from within.
For instance, in one of the Minnesota elections before the last in which Franken prevailed, Soros spent cash to replace the Election Commissioner (probably not the precise name) with a Democrat. Many believe that she screwed Coleman out of many challenges and granted Franken most of what he wanted.
He can pull the same crap in the military to promote his own stooges. He first has to hire somebody to study who is in the specific positions that he wants to control and then develop methods for replacing them: blackmail, attempts to wear em down with Cloward/Piven, pay-offs.
p { margin: 0; }
“Don't you realize how long it takes to raise through the ranks? This isn't WW II and even back then, battlefield commissions weren't as easily made as they are portrayed in the movies.”
That’s true up to a point.
It took the commies 80 years to put B. Hussein O. Jr. in the presidency, but now that he is there, he can promote anyone he wants.
“Are there some lefties in our military now? I don't doubt it, but, at the same time, I doubt that any in leadership positions are out to destroy this nation.”
Clinton, for instance, promoted Wesley Clark, who was also from Arkansas. Republicans at the time were saying that no one in the Pentagon wanted him advanced. Every time that man speaks on TV he mouths Democrat Party talking points, which more and more are written by Soros people.
Clark, himself, might not wish to destroy the USA, but because he likes attention and power he’ll do what sociopaths like George Soros want him to.
Again, I believe that the repeal of don’t ask don’t tell is about two things: 1) telling the world that homos are victims, and 2) increasing their influence in the military.
We got caught with our pants down with B. Hussein O. Jr.; I don't want that to happen within our military.
—– Original Message —–
From: \”Robert E. Graves\” <RobertEGraves@comcast.net>
To: \”IntenseDebate Notifications\” <notifications+UV5×2407846zC1o-Fdb591774dmeZ@intensedebatemail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2009 11:04:27 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: 1redcent replied to your comment on Lawmaker sends letter to Obama: Fire Jennings now
p { margin: 0; }
<DIV style=\”FONT-SIZE: 12pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial\”>
“Yes, I know, they really want to get rid of \”don't ask, don't tell\”. Nonswishy/flamboyant ones can lie and get into any segment of the military now and always could. What they appear to want, is for screaming queens be allowed to join and continue to act out whilst in battle theatres.”
Again, I agree that the average homo street hustler and the top exec at Bank of America don’t have a clue of the possibilities in gutting America with a stronger presence in the military. They identify with victimhood, the military being a prime example: they can’t be themselves there. George Soros, on the other hand, knows exactly how to destroy a country from within.
For instance, in one of the Minnesota elections before the last in which Franken prevailed, Soros spent cash to replace the Election Commissioner (probably not the precise name) with a Democrat. Many believe that she screwed Coleman out of many challenges and granted Franken most of what he wanted.
He can pull the same crap in the military to promote his own stooges. He first has to hire somebody to study who is in the specific positions that he wants to control and then develop methods for replacing them: blackmail, attempts to wear em down with Cloward/Piven, pay-offs.
Oh I know, you your stating that as a generalizatgion. I'm the one who then made it personal.
Unfortunately, not many here are willing or able to stand up against the swarm. The problem with that is, silence is accepting the rancid statements and/or makes it easier and easier for the lefty trolls to feel empowered.
That Hawaiian was easy to do in and hasn't been back. The latest few are tenacious, obnoxious, and will stay until or unless they are banned. It is THEY who need to be taken dxown and taken down hard!
And yes, destroying this is IS absolutely what they want to do. OTOH, if enough of us use their tactics against them, they shall not prevail…….and that is what we must do!
As I said in another post, the homosexual activists ain't no Spartans! And you don't easily get to be a "perfumed prince" ( very high up in military ranks ) quickly nor easily; not even with Soros behind one.
Look at what happened to that female who was the highest ranking officer over the whole Abu Grahab ( sp? ) mess! There are a lot of other examples, all with the same messy, failed outcomes.
Even IF Soros et al can figure out a way to instigate the beginnings, it will take many generations over, to get to the point where it would even somewhat work. Soros will be long dead, by that time, as will everyone else now involved.
p { margin: 0; }
I started out meaning personally, but not as any kind of suggestion that you are weak, just that you, like me, might not have the time. Through the conversation, I explained more clearly that the Left's intentions broadened beyond you or me.
I am glad to hear that you want to go toe to toe with the trolls. It means that it will be easier for me to discussissues that I am interested in with ratonal posters, rather than with liars and other idiots who are driven by motives other than to get to the truth.
p { margin: 0; }
I don't think that we are imagining quite the same thing.
I am not necessarily thinking of whole battalions of Spartans, but rather that enemies locate what I believe Naval Intelligence calls inflection points, times and places when a conflict's overall outcome depends on winning or losing those smaller arguments.
One of the theories why we went into Iraq is that in two years UN sanctions were going to expire and Hussein was going to invite the Chinese in to run his oil wells. He would cut out his own people and collect a personal fortune.
The Chinese would establish a presence in the Middle East which would have to be militarily defended, something like the 4,000 troops they have had in the Sudan for a number of years now to protect their oil business there. It was estimated that Saddam could end up with hundreds of thousands of Chinese soldiers in his land, protecting him from the West.
I'd rather not have to keep taking them down, but I shall, because even one rotten apple can and shall ruin the barrel.
This is a great site and I refuse to allow the damned trolls try to subvert it.
BTW….I could use all the help I can get and if more people would join in, either we'll all just slowly get rid of each troll, one by one, or it'll be known that they can't get away with their agenda here and stop coming.
p { margin: 0; }
This comes from an ex-intelligence officer whom I heard on the radio (can't back it up with documentation). However, at the time I was working around a half dozen to a dozen Palestinians. They were livid about the Iraq War, but confirmed this rationalization for war. They bragged about their plan to quit selling oil to the West. China was their client of choice. Further this plan, according to them,was designed to destroy the dollar. It appears that the Arab street in the USA understood exactly the intention to destroy us, but seemingly none of our public had a clue.
If Wesley Clark had succeeded, say with B. Hussin O. Jr in office instead of Bush, wecould have turned world control of oil over to an Arab/China consortium.
I am not saying that the gay scenarios that I have advocated need to keep us awake at night, but I think that they are another way our armed forces can be attacked.
p { margin: 0; }
Further, since we have a civilian controlled military, who can say for certain what a Leftist Congress will demand. The Church Committee did gut the CIA beginning in the 80s (some of which was justified given MKULTRA).
It is good to hear that you don’t believe that there are enough American Spartans for Soros to succeed. I would feel better knowing that we have spies right next to him who report to our military precisely which committees he is forming, especially ones to find his favorable inflection points.
WOW!!! The Blue Angels just began practicing for their Saturday and Sunday San Francisco shows. Going up to the roof for a while.
Very interesting post.
Of course, I don't believe that all homosexuals are swishes, so that point was overkill ! As a matter of fact, many homosexuals and lesbians are indistinguishable from heterosexuals, unless and untill they decide to tell one who and what they are.
The Chinese ( and the Cubans, BTW ) have been sending "advisers" and "workers into African nations for many decades; they're fully dug in, now, in quite a few of these nations.
The info re Saddam was probably based on similar facts and not some crazy conspiracy theory.
It took a few decades more than 8, to get at least a "FELLOW TRAVELER" in the White House ; however, that was done by fraud and complicity, which WILL be far more difficult to do to our military………………unless it is completely decimated first .
Should our military be decimated, then it doesn't matter…….the enemies from within WILL be killed off or sent off to some gulag and NOT ever again be in line to rule; no not even homegrown Jihadis and/or Commies. That is how such things work. .
Hannity is on and they are discussing Jennings. This is an outrage! We are forced to deal with pure evil face to face. Suit up folks and prepare for some heavy duty spritual warfare. I have reached the point that I am convinced there is a darkness that will prevail unless we stand strongly together in the light of decency. MAMBLA???? God help us. Has it gotten so bad that our soceity is being forced to accept adults having sex with children? My heart is heavy.
You must be logged in to post a comment.