<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outfoxing New York Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/09/29/breitbart-outfoxing-the-new-york-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/09/29/breitbart-outfoxing-the-new-york-times/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: internet connection speed check</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/09/29/breitbart-outfoxing-the-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-1218202</link>
		<dc:creator>internet connection speed check</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=10334#comment-1218202</guid>
		<description>Interesting website, I&#039;m very happy I stumbled onto it through yahoo onna have to put this one on the old bookmark list</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting website, I&#8217;m very happy I stumbled onto it through yahoo onna have to put this one on the old bookmark list</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheRightSide</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/09/29/breitbart-outfoxing-the-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-122230</link>
		<dc:creator>TheRightSide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=10334#comment-122230</guid>
		<description>Bowing to you (in thanks)...  I shall take that gracious comment as a YES !  Nice to have you here...it does make a difference, Cathy.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bowing to you (in thanks)&#8230;  I shall take that gracious comment as a YES !  Nice to have you here&#8230;it does make a difference, Cathy&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La in TX</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/09/29/breitbart-outfoxing-the-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-121318</link>
		<dc:creator>La in TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=10334#comment-121318</guid>
		<description>This is all just a smoke screen to hide the fact that the Mouthpiece Media now just waits for the White House to tell them what to say.  They knew about these stories, they just hoped that the White House and the Mouthpiece Media could just ignore them.  And when the White House realizes they must address it, THEN the mouthpiece media gets the official story and reports that. They do not realize that they are doing themselves out of a job.  Pretty soon the White House Press Corps will only need 3 people.  Major Garrett from Fox, Helen Thomas because she is a fixture, and the Mouthpiece Media representative whose job it will be to distribute the official White House story to all the media wihout question or analysis. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all just a smoke screen to hide the fact that the Mouthpiece Media now just waits for the White House to tell them what to say.  They knew about these stories, they just hoped that the White House and the Mouthpiece Media could just ignore them.  And when the White House realizes they must address it, THEN the mouthpiece media gets the official story and reports that. They do not realize that they are doing themselves out of a job.  Pretty soon the White House Press Corps will only need 3 people.  Major Garrett from Fox, Helen Thomas because she is a fixture, and the Mouthpiece Media representative whose job it will be to distribute the official White House story to all the media wihout question or analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr_cathy</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/09/29/breitbart-outfoxing-the-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-121290</link>
		<dc:creator>dr_cathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=10334#comment-121290</guid>
		<description>LOL. What a delightful comment!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. What a delightful comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CliffD</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/09/29/breitbart-outfoxing-the-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-121278</link>
		<dc:creator>CliffD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=10334#comment-121278</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it coincidental that all of the stories that the NY Times &quot;missed&quot; were scandals involving the left?  They should be ashamed of themselves.  As an aspiring journalist, it is sickening to see how politicized the print media has become.  Opinions are for the editorial pages.  Whatever happened to, &quot;The facts, Ma&#039;am, just the facts.&quot;?  Whether the story is good or bad for a certain ideology, shouldn&#039;t determine its prominence in the news.  At some point, one would think, that economic fact would dictate a change in policy.  With the Times&#039; readership plunging, one would expect someone with a vested financial interest in the company would be infuriated.  However, when financial bailouts from the protected party are probable, I suppose they can afford not to worry about it.  Disgusting. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#039;t it coincidental that all of the stories that the NY Times &quot;missed&quot; were scandals involving the left?  They should be ashamed of themselves.  As an aspiring journalist, it is sickening to see how politicized the print media has become.  Opinions are for the editorial pages.  Whatever happened to, &quot;The facts, Ma&#039;am, just the facts.&quot;?  Whether the story is good or bad for a certain ideology, shouldn&#039;t determine its prominence in the news.  At some point, one would think, that economic fact would dictate a change in policy.  With the Times&#039; readership plunging, one would expect someone with a vested financial interest in the company would be infuriated.  However, when financial bailouts from the protected party are probable, I suppose they can afford not to worry about it.  Disgusting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickatdabeach</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/09/29/breitbart-outfoxing-the-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-121002</link>
		<dc:creator>nickatdabeach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=10334#comment-121002</guid>
		<description>yes, true journalism is dead, but begging for life support via government bailouts -- the biggest laugher of them all </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, true journalism is dead, but begging for life support via government bailouts &#8212; the biggest laugher of them all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: verbaitm</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/09/29/breitbart-outfoxing-the-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-120962</link>
		<dc:creator>verbaitm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=10334#comment-120962</guid>
		<description>@ TheRightSide 
&quot;The Old Grey Lady has seen her day.&quot; 
 
...and what&#039;s so odd, is that they could take back control very easily, but just doing some honest reporting, instead of propaganda mongering. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ TheRightSide<br />
&quot;The Old Grey Lady has seen her day.&quot; </p>
<p>&#8230;and what&#039;s so odd, is that they could take back control very easily, but just doing some honest reporting, instead of propaganda mongering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

