Rep. Brad Miller and Dr. Anna Chacko: The Politicalization of Government Health Care
by Michael VolpeLate in the afternoon of December 4th of 2006, laboratory staff of the Veterans Administration Pittsburgh Health Services (VAPHS) based on an order from Dr. Mona Melhem, the associate chief of clinical services, a few minutes earlier – in less than three hours destroying a unique collection of legionella and other isolates that had been collected by two prominent infectious disease researchers over their nearly three decades of research.
So starts a report by the Science Sub Committee chaired by Congressman Brad Miller of the 13th District of North Carolina into a strand of legionella that was destroyed by the Pittsburgh VA and with it thirty years of research by Dr. Victor Yu and his partner Dr. Janet Stout.

This report and its conclusions began a series of events that climaxed with this news broken on in January by Walter Roche of the Pittsburgh Tribune about the same Pittsburgh VA.
A top Pittsburgh Veterans Affairs physician, who got her job back temporarily after congressional intervention, is about to be terminated from her position as the head of radiology in the Pittsburgh facility.
VA officials have issued a formal notice of termination effective Jan. 25 to Dr. Anna Chacko, who has been on administrative leave from the University Drive facility since October.
What, one might ask, does an investigation into a destroyed strand of legionella have to do with the firing of the chief of radiology at a hospital nearly two years later? In reality, the two probably have little do with each other, except in the mind of Congressman Brad Miller. Because Miller made a connection, the events of one lead directly to the events of the other.
In my opinion, the events that lead to the destruction of this legionella is a classic case of he said/she said. In the summer of 2006, Dr. Vu and the administration of the Pittsburgh VA got into a dispute that turned acrimonious and ugly. The Pittsburgh VA claimed that Dr. Vu was running a private business out of their lab. Dr. Vu claimed that he had been doing this since 2000 and no one had a problem until 2006, when he and hospital administrator, Dr. Mona Melhem, began clashing. The Pittsburgh VA claims that Dr. Vu was fired for insubordination and the lab was being closed because it was inefficient and a “drain on VA resources“.
From there, the VA, at the direction of Dr. Melhem, cleared out what they claimed was biohazardous material that wasn’t marked out of this lab. Dr. Yu, meanwhile, claims that he was making arrangements to move said strands of legionella to another facility when this order was given and he claims the strands of legionella were clearly marked.
After having his life’s work destroyed, Dr. Yu reached out to the Science Committee and the result was this investigation that ended in September of 2008. Whatever the truth is in this situation, it’s clear who the Science Sub Committee felt was at fault, Dr. Mona Melhem and the administration at the Pittsburgh VA. (it should also be noted that these events are now the subject of litigation)
Meanwhile, Dr. Anna Chacko arrived at the same Pittsburgh VA shortly after the investigation concluded. Even though Dr. Melhem was one of those responsible for bringing her over, Dr. Chacko immediately began to attack her competence and integrity. For instance, Dr. Chacko complained to the VA administration that Dr. Melhem was endangering patients by authorizing the use of Thallium in radiological tests. Dr. Chacko felt that Molybdenum should have been used instead. (The VA IG later found those charges to be without merit) Then, in the beginning of 2009, an employee of the Pittsburgh VA slipped in their driveway and was concerned they had broken their wrist breaking their fall. Dr. Melhem approved for the Pittsburgh VA to x ray the employee even though they weren’t a patient of the hospital. Dr. Chacko called the VA whistle blower line and accused Dr. Melhem of “fraud” in this incidents.
Chacko’s complaints became so loud that the Pittsburgh VA convened an administrative investigative board in March. Only by then, much of the radiology department had complained formally to the VA about Chacko’s behavior. As a result, the board convened not to hear testimony about this incident but about Chacko’s behavior. In April, the board recommended that Chacko be removed.
Chacko hired a lawyer and she reached out to Congressman Miller. It appears that Dr. Anna Chacko convinced Congressman Brad Miller that her own ouster was being orchestrated by the same Dr. Mona Melhem. That’s because Congressman Miller wrote exactly that in this letter to General Eric Shinseki.
Senate Letter 2009-05-19[1][1][1] –
Weeks later, General Shinseki put the word down to the Pittsburgh VA not to remove Chacko and she was reinstated. Her behavior didn’t improve following her reinstatement and things climaxed with the news broken that Dr. Chacko has been terminated. (that’s no small feat because a termination is something that must be disclosed to any medical board and usually means the end of someone’s medical career)
Everyone has a bias. As a conservative, I am likely to reject most if not all government programs. When we allow our biases to cloud our judgment, we become dangerous. Congressman Brad Miller has a bias against the Pittsburgh VA and Dr. Mona Melhem. When Wally Roche interviewed Miller, Miller explained that the hospital was “given to infighting” and in “chaos”.
What is less clear is how much Congressman Brad Miller knew about Dr. Anna Chacko prior to writing this letter. Prior to arriving at the Pittsburgh VA, Dr. Chacko spent fourteen months at St. James Hospital in Butte, Montana. During that time, her name is mentioned in no less than four lawsuits. Chief among them is this lawsuit filed by then radiology manager Kristi George against Chacko and the hospital.
Looking at numbers 12-16 of the complaint, it details how Dr. Anna Chacko started working at St. James, immediately began attacking George’s competence, integrity, and credibility, and then number sixteen reveals that Kristi George returned from vacation. In other words,according to the suit, Dr. Anna Chacko began attacking Kristi George before they’d even worked together.
Prior to her sixteen months at St. James, Dr. Chacko spent about a year at the Boston University Medical Center until charges of sexual harassment forced her to leave. Prior to that, Dr. Chacko spent about five years at Lahey Clinic in the Boston suburb of Burlington where she was famously carried out of the hospital screaming…
Kiss my big Indian Ass
It’s clear that Congressman Miller thought that the Pittsburgh VA was rotten. (the letter leaves no doubt) It’s further clear that his previous investigation into this VA has lead him to this conclusion. (again, the letter leaves no doubt) How much did he know about Dr. Anna Chacko before concluding that fault lies with the administration? Did he know about George’s lawsuit? Did he know that Chacko, now 64, spent time in Boston, Butte, and Pittsburgh, all since 2006? Did he know about the charges at the BU Medical center or the manner in which she was carried out at Lahey Clinic?
Miller told Roche that he plans no further involvement in these matters. I should hope not. After all, hasn’t he done enough? There’s a dynamic to stories like this. Now that Chacko has been removed, it will likely go away. After all, the problem has been resolved. The problem has NOT been resolved. The problem is Congressman Brad Miller’s judgment, as well as the judgment of General Eric Shinseki. They inserted themselves into a situation of which they didn’t have all the facts. As such, they sided with the individual that was causing the problems. Just because Dr. Chacko has now been removed, doesn’t mean that both these men don’t have a lot to answer for.
For instance, according to this article, Congressman Brad Miller was one of three to send a letter to the Secretary of Navy regarding funding of health studies related to the contaminated drinking water at U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in North Carolina. Given what we know about this situation, is anyone reading this really all that confident that Congressman Miller had a grasp of that situation before writing that letter?
This is about judgment and power. Congressman Brad Miller has a lot of the second and the first is in serious doubt. That’s a very dangerous combination. Dr. Anna Chacko is a manipulator. That’s what she did while serving as head of radiology at Lahey Clinic. It’s what she did in the same post in St. James. In the same way, she manipulated Congressman Brad Miller and made him believe something that was simply not true. As a result, he acted and Dr. Anna Chacko manipulated the situation in her favor.
It’s really as simple as that, and nothing Congressman Brad Miller will say can change that. Nothing that happened between September 2008 and the present had anything to do with the legionella investigation. Whatever Dr. Mona Melhem may, or may not have done in that situation, it doesn’t change how Dr. Anna Chacko behaved upon arriving at the Pittsburgh VA. It doesn’t change that her behavior warranted her removal in April. She would have been removed had Congressman Brad Miller not decided that the internal dynamics of the Pittsburgh VA were his jurisdiction. When he did, he had a duty to everyone to be right. In fact, he was wrong, and he couldn’t have been more wrong. Such a lack of judgment combined with a plethora of power is a dangerous combination. Those in the thirteenth district of North Carolina should heed that come November of 2010.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
31 Comments
Miller is another of those whose deafness and lack of comprehension regarding his constituents demands his removal. I look forward to actively working on the ground to supporting candidates in North Carolina who are mindful of the U.S. Constitution and its intended limitations on federal governance.
Pittsburgh is a hot bed of cutting edge medicine. Knocking heads with bizarre and over-reaching administrators is something I witnessed in my youth.
Hence the foundation for repelling indoctrination was established. Speak truth to power? What I learned what THEY meant was Don't Ever Speak To Power.
Sue the living **** out of Mona Melhem please. And let's not stop there. Are they still lurking at Allegheny General too?
Meanwhile, the politicos let real MD victims of malfeasance rot:
http://drjshousecalls.blogspot.com/2010/01/dr-mar...
Miller is just like all of the other deep blue progressive snobs in North Carolina. It's all about them.
What is the motivation of Dr. Chacko? It's not clear from this story, is she just a deranged person? Ditto, Miller. Is he just hunting for notoriety?
[...] Is On ‘5 Yard Line’ And ‘We’ve’ Got To Punch It Through’ Michael Volpe, Big Government: Rep. Brad Miller and Dr. Anna Chacko: The Politicalization of Government Health Care Brian Darling, Big Government: Earmarks Buy ObamaCare Publius, Big Government: C-SPAN Asks to [...]
Radical Reductionist has it right: support Bernie Reeves for NC-13. Who's Bernie Reeves? Meet him at American Thinker, http://www.americanthinker.com/bernie_reeves/
i live in his district, one he drew while serving as a state senator in the nc general assembly, and trust me he does not represent all the people, just those who agree with socialism – hey brad, where are those 6000 jobs you promised the stimulus bill would create last year in my/your district, i guess they went the same way the destroyed strand of legionella -moron! oh yea, hows that global warming thing going for you also, glad you voted for crap and trade, once again – moron! and lets not forget the hcr bill vote, moron moron moron! or as rhambo would say – "f*&king retard"!
Her motivations are not always clear. You'd have to get inside her mind which I don't recommend.
I don't know what motivated Miller to investigate the Pitt Va the first time but I firmly believe that he was then biased against certain people in this situation.
VOTE BERNIE REEVES 2010!!!
GOP Conservative Congressional Candidate
13th Congressional District, North Carolina
Make this Miller's last term!!
I think the point of this article is that if we have government run health care any politician can stick their nose into the operation of said health care at any time, This would be to the detriment of the organization strictly because they want to leverage some political agenda. This is why government health care is such a bad idea. The VA is another story. Being a 50% disabled vet I can tell horror stories about VA health care.
It was interesting article, thanks for it. I had not heard a whit of this one before.
what about Mona Meyhem?
Whats the Allegheny General connection?
I'm into horror stories and movies; let's hear some
I agree with RadicalReductionist and FrankLaw vote for Bernie Reeves in the North Carolina 13th district send Brad Miller to hell!
The mask has come off the democrat/proggies they ARE communists, no doubt about it anymore.
If you vote for ANY democrat you are voting for communism, period.
Thank you for help in getting him out of office. I live in his district in NC, hope November, 2010 will be the time for him to leave this office.
Edith,
Burlington, NC 27217
I believe that while it is true that the Democratic Party houses the Progressives(Marxist, so to prefer Populist), but not all Democrats are progressives, like all Republicans are NOT conservative in thought, some are progressive in thought too!
I have first hand knowledge of both Dr. Yu and Dr. Chacko's cases. Suffice to say much of your information is incorrect. The devil is in the details. Your posting is based on assumptions, innuendos,erroneous conclusions, misstatements,faulty information etc. Apparently VA employees, outside the scope of thier employment, are leaking information to you and you are accepting many things as fact which are not true. The sources, unless legitimate VA officials speaking within the scope of thier employment, are sources that have thier own private agenda. I was an attorney for the VA most of my 32 year government employment and am now in private practice. My sincere hope is that appropriate litigation, wherein sworn testimony and admissable evidence are evaluated by judge or jury will result in specific findings of fact and some measure of justice for those wronged will be granted. These issues should be resolved in court and not tried in the press.
Interesting "Mr. Love", what information is inaccurate? What's more interesting is that you claim to have knowledge and say that this should be adjudicated and not in the press. If you have all this knowledge, why are you unfamiliar with the administrative investigative board that was convened following Chacko's indefiinite leave in October? That took the testimony that you claim needed to be taken and the conclusion was that Dr. Chacko should be terminated. So, everything you claim to want was done and the conclusion agreed with me. So, what was innuendo exactly?
I have my suspicions about who "Mr. Love" is but I'll keep those to myself. I stand by all my reporting which is backed up with significant documentation. Dr. Chacko has always been welcome to tell her side to me and so far has refused. The same goes for Congressman Miller and General Shinseki.
The ABI you speak of was rescinded and is closed. Neither I nor the VA may comment on it. Therefore your source is not an authorized VA official. An ABI is not subject to the adversarial process, there is no cross examination of witnesses. An ABI is part of an investigative process generally conducted by non-attorneys and questioning may be inappropriate and objectionable and certainly maybe inadmissable in a court of law except for impeachment purposes. My experience as a VA attorney indicated in my opinion that ABI'sgenerally fall into one of three catagories, fair and balanced, whitewash, which hunt. Dr. Chacko has been advised by her attorney not to discuss her case with the press. If your sources could be identified they may possibly be violating the privacy act and subject to at least disciplinary action to the extent that they supplied you with truthful information which is subject to the privacy act. If they supplied you with erroneous information they would not be guilty of a privacy act violation and they arent under oath ? If you want additional information as to the problems with what you are publishing please consult an attorney. I am not going to engage in an online debate with you. Respectfully submitted for your consideration.
[...] this article: » Rep. Brad Miller and Dr. Anna Chacko: The Politicalization of … Share and [...]
[...] post: » Rep. Brad Miller and Dr. Anna Chacko: The Politicalization of … Share and [...]
[...] original post here: » Rep. Brad Miller and Dr. Anna Chacko: The Politicalization of … Share and [...]
I'm ashamed to live in his district. Right now we have three Republicans fighting for the chance to take him on in the General Election. Believe me, we in the NC 13th District are doing our best to bring him back home to Raleigh, even though we don't want him. Help us by donating to our 13th GOP Congressional Dist. as it's our job to elect a winner in November. Personally, I'm supporting the most conservative candidate. Thanks for the info and I'll make sure to alert the folks here in NC, on my State-based blog, Katy's Conservative Corner.
Good work, Mr. Volpe. Breitbart is my hero!
Katy Benningfield
Katy's Conservative Corner
North Carolina Politics from a Conservative Perspective
[...] Is On ‘5 Yard Line’ And ‘We’ve’ Got To Punch It Through’ Michael Volpe, Big Government: Rep. Brad Miller and Dr. Anna Chacko: The Politicalization of Government Health Care Media Research Center: CBS’s Schieffer to Biden: Doesn’t George Bush ‘Also Need a [...]
[...] That Be: Obama Doing His Best to Validate His Critics on the Right Michael Volpe, Big Government: Rep. Brad Miller and Dr. Anna Chacko: The Politicalization of Government Health Care Brian Darling, Big Government: Earmarks Buy ObamaCare Publius, Big Government: C-SPAN Asks to [...]
[...] in Washington Axis of Right: The Bi-Partisanship Healthcare Summit Michael Volpe, Big Government: Rep. Brad Miller and Dr. Anna Chacko: The Politicalization of Government Health Care Boston Herald: Health bill talks to bar Republican lawmakers Caffeinated Thoughts: What is a Right? [...]
[...] in Washington Axis of Right: The Bi-Partisanship Healthcare Summit Michael Volpe, Big Government: Rep. Brad Miller and Dr. Anna Chacko: The Politicalization of Government Health Care Another Black Conservative: The Ding-Dongs go for Ping-Pong on health care Caffeinated Thoughts: [...]
[...] Writings of SamHenry: It’s Theater of the Absurd, Mr. President. Michael Volpe, Big Government: Rep. Brad Miller and Dr. Anna Chacko: The Politicalization of Government Health Care The Conservative Pup: 51 Kings and Queens Gateway Pundit: Mark Levin: Obama is “Biggest Disaster [...]
Hi Guys, You ought to try to pay a visit to the Alban Arena the most stopped at arts venue in St Albans has national touring shows, concerts, comedy, films, exhibitions and pantomime. We have many local st albans advertisers in our local magazine you can check it out here St Albans Tips Click here
The Kreg Jig takes advantage of a technique called Kreg Joinery. Unlike other techniques, Kreg Jig requires no glue, no complicated math, and no small army of clamps to make wood joints that will last.
You must be logged in to post a comment.