Clinton Redux: The Joe Sestak Affair
by Marinka PeschmannIt might be 2010 but because the Obama White House has taken another page out of the Clinton White House play book, it feels a lot like it is 1998.
This latest episode features the Congressman Joe Sestak Affair and the-job-offer-for-the-non-paying-job-to-fix-an-election-scandal. Sestak-Jobgate appears to be a dubious remake loosely based on the 1998 impeachment success: the it-was-all-about-sex (not obstruction of justice) Clinton-Lewinsky scandal.
Some of the notable differences, however, include President Bill Clinton’s paramour, Monica Lewinsky, a Pentagon staffer at the time, thanks to the Clinton White House, received more than one paying job offer as opposed to Mr. Sestak’s alleged non-paying offer. Moreover, Ms. Lewinsky could accept the job, as opposed to Mr. Sestak, a sitting member of Congress, who is barred from serving on a federal panel.
It was before the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal erupted in January 1998, in the most “ethical” administration in history-– pre-Obama, when some Clintonista’s helped Ms. Lewinsky find a job. Critics claimed, in part, that job hunt activity constituted obstruction of justice in the ongoing Paula Jones sexual harassment lawsuit against President Clinton in which Lewinsky was ultimately called to testify.
Words like ‘felony,’ ‘perjury’ ‘impeachment,’ and ‘special prosecutor” peppered the political dialogue; similar words that are attributed to the Obama White House today thanks to Sestak-Jobgate.
As the official story goes, according to White House Counsel Robert Bauer, Rahm Emanuel, a former Clinton consigliore, enlisted President Clinton’s help “to determine whether Congressman Sestak would be interested in unpaid service on a Presidential or other Senior Executive Branch Advisory Board.” This effort was apparently to persuade Sestak to drop out of the Pennsylvania Senate Democratic primary to ensure the Obama favored Arlen Specter’s victory. Unfortunately for the Obama White House, President Clinton’s alleged lackluster performance with Sestak was met with a “no,” and Specter lost the election. Interfering with an election outcome is illegal.
In 1997, President Clinton did not directly offer Ms. Lewinsky a job, as he allegedly did in Sestak-Jobgate. Instead, like the Obama White House, the Clinton White House used an intermediary, actually more than one. Power lawyer, Mr. Fix it, Vernon Jordan, who was a close friend of the Clintons, John Podesta, President Clinton’s then Chief of Staff, and the President’s personal secretary, Betty Currie.
Let’s rewind to 1997-1998. Mr. Podesta contacts then United Nations Ambassador Bill Richardson to find Ms. Lewinsky a job.
According to Ambassador Richardson’s Office of Independent Counsel (OIC) 302:
“Richardson remembers that probably a few days before he received the resume of Monica Lewinsky at his New York office, he had a casual conversation with John Podesta at the White House. Podesta mentioned to him that Podesta would like him to interview a person who is moving to New York and is a friend of Betty Currie, the president’s secretary about a job with the United Nations in New York.”
Mr. Podesta scored Ms. Lewinsky a job at the United Nations — which she turned down.
Next up was Vernon Jordan. Mr. Jordan, who like Mr. Podesta, and unlike President Clinton allegedly in Sestak-Jobgate, not only got Ms. Lewinsky a terrific New York job at Revlon but he also helped her find a lawyer who incidentally helped her sign under the penalty of perjury an affidavit denying having a sexual relationship with the President. Ms. Lewinsky’s affidavit wasn’t true, but as the Clintons will tell you, that’s not the point. The real point was stopping the sex crazed prosecutor, Ken Starr who was investigating the Clintons, and the Clintons’ evil Republican political enemies, who according to Hillary, were trying to undo the results of two elections.
Then according to Independent Counsel Ken Starr’s report, “Prior to January 1998, the OIC possessed evidence that Vernon Jordan — along with other high-level associates of the President [Bill Clinton] and First Lady [Hillary Clinton] — helped [Whitewater figure Web] Hubbell obtain lucrative consulting contracts while he was a potential witness and/or subject in the OIC’s ongoing investigation.”
Oops, that’s another Clinton scandal involving jobs, which is business as usual and not obstruction of justice, witness tampering, or suborning perjury as the Clintons will surely tell you.
Last Thursday, regarding Sestak-Jobgate, President Obama said, “I can assure the public that nothing improper took place.”
And in 1998 President Clinton said: “I never told anyone to lie, not a single time, never. These allegations are false and I need to go back to work for the American people.”
It might be 2010 but it sure feels like business as usual circa 1998 in Washington.
[Note: This is part of an ongoing series about Clinton Redux, and the Obama Administration. Click here for previous installments]
Cross-posted at marinkapeschmann.com






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
117 Comments
I wonder if they get Clinton under oath again whether his perjury history will be pertinent. It will be interesting to see — how can the Obama administration be so stupid to rely on the testimony of a liar (if it ever gets to court)?
HAHAHAHA…The messenger boy committed perjury in front of Grand Jury by lying under oath. He then gets his asss disbarred and impeached. BBWWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
Mac Daddy tops himself!
Everyone knows he was offered a job for stepping aside….question is will the lame stream media continue to report or protect the whitehouse…I would guess the latter..ABC NBC and MSNBC ought to just come out live and say that they will not report anything negative about this administration…I mean damn we know it anyway…Man up and be truthful
For the Left life is Politics and Political Power and Political Power and Politics is Life.
This is the lens through which they view the world and the motivation behind all their actions.
They are the ones who, through political power, will right all the wrongs that conservatives and jingoistic patriotism have caused.
Oh yeah….rules? laws? Their work is so important you can't expect them to be hindered by those.
Anyone who believes high-ranking government employees do not use cronyism and nepotism to score jobs for friends or backers of politicos is likely to believe in the Tooth Fairy and the Easter Bunny. It exists. We just don't normally get to see it. For example, how many of us have applied for a job in the private sector to discover that the position was in reality already filled by an insider? Human resources was just going through the drill due to company policy.
Do you really expect these weasels to change?
The Kenyan Marxist and his kabal of liars and criminals learned from Billery and that den of vipers.
It's dejavu all over again.
What are the RULES for this White House.
1. The RULES are whatever they say they are!
2. There is no RULE # 2
And they actually expect us to look by all the coincedence that happen to this poser in the white house. The only difference here is that Clinton jumped under the bus, thus saving the poser from shoving him under it.
Guess what CLINTON IS LYING.
I love the spin that this is politics as usual. Sorry, I beg to differ. If this offer was after Sestak declared candidacy this is clearly federal crime, probably a felony and it goes to the heart of our democratic institutions. if they are willing to do this to subvert one of our most treasured rights- what else are they capable of? In my book this is much more serious and worthy of investigation than the whole trumped up Valerie Plame non-crime. But if a crime goes to the heart of self governance and right to vote then its just "politics" and so what…. I would like a semblance of my country back now please.
It took them months to come up with this lame explanation. Bill probably called Obama and said "Dude, I wasn't gonna get involved, but this is easy. I've messed up this bad and got off scott free a bunch of times. Lemme help you out."
I wonder what Bill got out of the whole thing? I'm pretty sure his services weren't free.
PS: Anyone who believes anything Billy Clinton says is in need of some serious, professional assistance.
I really don't know if Obama could have made a worse choice for the bag man than Clinton. What this means is that Billy has Obama by the short and curlies and is now the defacto shadow president AGAIN.
Obama HAS to do whatever Bill wants or his career is OVER
Regardless of Obama's guilt or innocence (what a joke) HE IS COMPROMISED!!
Not for gross incompetence. But certainly for dereliction of duty for not enforcing the borders as the constitution say's he must. But then again Bush didn't either.
I'm starting to doubt if Bill was ever in the loop, or that he ever had that conversation with Sestak.
this is a few journalists short of a full blown watergate, to bad many of them have their heads burried up obama's back end.
Yep, I trust them both. Everyone knows that neither Bill nor Obama would tell a lie!
Just ask Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky or the American people.
/sarc
lol, he didn't have that conversation until last week, when they rehearsed what Sestak would choke out -
Don't point that finger at me, Billy boy. I know where it's been! What a red-faced lying hillbilly!
K D J maybe Hill's campaign debt will be lessened?
Makes you wonder what/who ol' Billy boy did for Hillary to suggest that he should be thrown under the Obama bus.
So this administration wants us to believe that they sent none other than BILL CLINTON, to offer a "NON-PAYED" position on an advisory board, to a SITTING CONGRESSMAN, who would have to SURRENDER HIS HOUSE SEAT to accept, if he would give up his shot to be a US SENATOR?
There's no part of this that makes any sense. No congressman resigns his seat without a major payoff. No serious contender for the US Senate gives it up for an unpaid position. And if there's a promise of a payoff job offer, that could only come with the approval of obama himself. It doesn't matter that Bill Clinton might have delivered the offer.
This administration has committed multiple felonies with these actions, and justice must be served.
If Clinton offered Sestak the same "job" that he offered to Lewenski, no wonder he turned it down! Talk about a truly worthless offer! OMG. This man befouls everything he comes in contact with. He and Obama could have been twins. There is not one shred of truth or decency between them.
Maybe. Can't see Obama ever agreeing to owe a debt to bill without it being serious shit, and for some reason I can't see him caring that much about Hill's debt
Where I live, we call them Ringnecks. And I'm not talkin' about pheasants!
"I did NOT have sex with Joe Sestak!"
Oh, well………..
I have the same feeling. What makes sense is that they needed a world-class liar who could deliver this bogus story with a straight face. Who could be better than ol' Slick Willy himself?
Whatever Klintoon touches, he screws!
Because Obama and everyone in his administration are crooks, liars, and frauds. They think that Clinton "got away
with it ", so he's the one who can help them to do the same.
"How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!"
Samuel Adams
Shall we debate the meaning of the word "is" again, Billy?
I'm sure it wasn't for lack of trying! lol! As it stands, I think they've all screwed themselves.
Inquiring minds say that he decided to bat for the other team.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AP-IM7maxbI&fe...
This is CHICAGO PAY FOR PLAY, which is also criminal, but all that Obama knows.
Sure this kind of "offer" has been done in the past, but NOT like this; the way this was handled IS criminal !
Wouldn't THAT be a breath of fresh air?!
You're correct, OCG; Slick Willy was never involved in any of this until last week. It's so obvious, that nobody can miss it……………………………….unless they want to.
[...] Read the full article… [...]
Nixon was NEVER impeached, nor was he thrown out of office/removed by the Senate and he/those in his administration EVER "steal democratic ( SIC) party strategy election papers. " !
You just might want to learn the facts before you post about something you clearly don't know about.
BTW, Clinton is the ONLY elected president who has been impeached.
And Sestack WILL now continue to lie through his teeth; of that you can be certain. Yes, he did kind of "tell the truth" about being offered an illegal bribe, to drop out of the primary, but he's a weasel. Why you believe that he'll now come clean is beyond me.
November can't come fast enough. What else are these people going to pull out of their asses? They have no shame. Nobody can act like this, without knowing the fix is in.
Sestak is a craven opportunist. They had him pegged from the begining, and that's why they tried to buy him off.
They're doing/trying to do every rotten thing they can do, before 2011, when even they know that both Houses will no longer be solidly in Dem control.
You can take the politician out of Chicago, but ,……..
Great quote, Looking4 !
And the meaning of "IS" was once very well know; too bad Slick never learned it.
Add to that reports that as sitting Congressman we would have been ineligible to take the job that was supposedly offered. Its a clumsy farce that is just enough for MSM and committed Dems to use to bat their eyelashes and deny anything illegal happened. Just politics.
[...] at Biggovernment.com |del.icio.us ||Digg it ||Earthlink ||FeedMarker ||feedmelinks ||Furl [...]
Why would the Obama administration use a past President who perjured himself and was Impeached as the go-between person? This makes no sense.
Maybe Rahmmy couldn't get anyone else to–you know–willingly break the law?
Exactly so, but they never guessed that he is a loose canon, who would blab what they did all over the place. .
You LIE!
And the same is true of Arkansas and the "SOUTHERN MAFIA" .
Payback for Obama stealing the presidency from Hillary. If Obama thought his group was bada$$e$, did he follow the trail of bodies the Clinton's supposedly left behind between Arkansas and D.C.
If this were the REAL story, it wouldn't have taken months to come up with it! Sestak could have said ALL of this from the beginning if it were true! Sadly, I don't think it is!!
Clinton wasn't disbarred. His Arkansas law license was suspended for 5 years. That is not disbarment.
I think Obama promised to dump Joe Biden and have Hillary run as VP in 2012 campaign. Bill will do anything to get back to the White House, any which way he can.
Ooooooooo…look how red in the face Bill is. He must be REALLY angry!
Too bad that Progressive demonstrator isn't around to bite that finger off.
That Samuel Adams was really something, wasn't he?
Amen! Are you taking odds that it will?
Of course you're 100% correct. Several reasons stand out …. first, if this silly explanation was the truth it would have been disclosed months ago….and Secondly, if Obama and Emanuel didn't think there was anything wrong with offering a non-paying position in exchange for Sestak dropping out of the Senate race, then why did they need an intermediary? Emanual knows how to use a telephone, doesn't he?
Never under estimate the stupidity of the American people.
"…..I'm starting to doubt if Bill was ever in the loop,……"
It's the other way around,……..
they (Obamaistas) are the ones who were never in the loop.
the loop:…..the Clinton campaign to put Hillary in the White House in 2012.
Clinton saw the situation (the Sestak job offer / crime) and has taken advantage of it
now he is in position to take over the Democrat Party.
he's got Obama by the short hairs.
Blab just enough.
When he was so willing to "play" the voters for his own gain, anyone who votes for this man in the future is nuts. They will never be able to believe another word he says.
What part of "Thou Shalt Not Lie" do these politicians NOT get?
Maybe they knew the "stink" would rub off on Hillary, keeping her from beating him next time.
I'd put the chances of this administration being toppled through impeachable offenses at near 100%. There is simply no way for a criminal operation from the White House to work with impunity forever. It may take a Republican victory in November to begin the real investigations, but once that begins, Pandora's Box is going to open up. And once all the powerful people who obama has stepped on get the scent of blood in the water, they will all gladly turn on this administration. It's just a matter of time.
Oh, goodie.
Looks like the sleezebag was DISBARRED for 5 years. DISBARRED = DISBARRED, HE COULDN'T PRACTICE LAW IN AK!!
DISBARRED, would you call it VACATIONED or SUSPENDED, or DISENGAGED?
HIS ASS WAS THROWN-OUT! DIS………………………………….
Sestak is a rotten liar, and if anyone is dense enough to believe his bumbling lie, they are part of the problem – fools fools and more fools –
We ARE the joke of the world, how painful is that?!
[...] Source:"Clinton Redux: The Joe Sestak Affair" and related posts [...]
So Wild Bill the paragon of virtue relays from his old buddy Rahm Emanuel an offer for Sestak to quit the race in exchange for a non-paying "volunteer " position like escorting tour groups around the White House. Then yesterday Bill Clinton shows up at the White House to talk with Obama about "soccer"
Yeah this is all so believeable.
For 8 years Dem's tried to destroy Karl Rove and now we have Rahm Emnauels head in a noose, oh how the worm turns.
There is no way Clinton and Obumble, or any of their idiots can convince me that they
didn't make up this story for Sestak….Seems if it were so simple Gibbs would have
blurted it out the first time he was asked about it….For nearly two months they were
all afraid to tell this simplistic story???….No Way!!…Bunch of lieing a-ho*es……
Where has that finger been that Bill Clinton points (At US) been, that is the question? We All Already know, piss on BILL('s finger, literally (No pun intended))!!!!!!! Grab a SHOVEL BILL, there's work to do!!!! Don't just stand there and point and admire your finger (Pointing), dig a ditch and give the proceeds to the likes of you. like we are forced to do!!!!!
Many in POLITICS /JUDICIAL/MEDIA Are overdue For conviction and incarceration for TREASON TO THE CONSTITUTION, they swore to protect……Ha, Ha, ha (From their perspective)!!!!!!!! They are exempt, they are the experts, the "Progressive" Preachers", the new Religion, ALL MUST OBEY!!!!!
Not "just enough", since he is still sorta/kinda "blabing".
At first it did help him ( to beat old Arlen ), though why, I don't know, as it opened up this whole can of worms for the Dems. Now he's still blabbing……………as part as the cover up.
The people of Pa. should never vote for this lying knucklehead; I agree. Not only is he a liar, he has proven that he will cover for all manner of corruption and do whatever Obama tells him to.
Set in a motion by a February 18th interview with Philadelphia news anchor Larry Kane, Congressman Joe Sestak’s allegation ignited a political firestorm.
“Were you ever offered a job to get out of this race?” Kane was referring to the Democratic Senate primary against Arlen Specter.
“Yes,” Sestak answered.
“Was it Navy Secretary?”
“No comment,” said Sestak.
According to Kane, Sestak talked about staying in the race but added that he “was called many times” to pull out. Later, Kane asked: “So you were offered a job by someone in the White House?”
“Yes.”
Road kill, all of them, impeachment/subpoenas should begin third week of January 2011.
Don't forget that Sestak was an Admiral. I know that many a General is called a "PERFUMED PRINCE" ( not something anyone wants to be called, since it connotes a wishy washy, politics playing, anyway the wind blows desk jockey…………………..think about that damned weasel Clark ) and it sounds like Sestak is just that !
Not only is he a liar, but yes, he IS a damned fool too !
We ARE "a joke" all around the world now; thanks to Obama !
What on earth? Clinton had to have a great reason to go along with this. I wonder if he is triangulating? Does he expect that his story will be disbelieved and the Good Ship Obamapop will be sunk? Was he offered cash from someone into his Foundation? A little sumpum-sumpum from the intern of his choice? He and O are on opposite side of the power struggle.
Maybe this explains it? Clinton is the only Golden Boy left in the party. They figure it is possible that if Billy throws this stick, the media will run to bring it back and beg for more.
They were really busy with Presidential stuff, you know.
Why not Clinton ? And what was his price? Numbers of commentators have mentioned Clinton's perjury. WHAT
perjury? What exactly does perjury mean for the highest ranking law officer in the land — when that representative of the System of Law IN A COUNTRY OF LAW NOT OF MEN — just happens to be a member of the so-called "Democratic" political party? And when the judges / "representatives of the People" are lawyers who know how to shave definitions of words and meanings.? See Clinton's sworn testimony in the "impeachment" hearings., accepted as valid — and even "witty" by the judges. NO — not perjury, but a production mocking the System of Law / Constitution of the USA.. An "impeachment" of the President of the USA based on a sexual pecadillo, and obstruction of justice, played as French Farce. So entertaining to the nation and the world that his penalty was re-election to a second term in the dare it be said White House. The Impeachment Committee of the House is, mustn't forget made up of members of BOTH MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES. Why not Clinton, A REAL CHARMER!
"Scooter" needs to go back to Arkansas and play golf. He is in way over his head with the Chicago crowd.
I would like to check Sestak's late nite phone messages. My advice would be for Sestak to call James O'keefe and blow the lid off of this sucker, and become a Patriot.
Sorry, Mac …. words have meaning …. disbarment is a permanent cancellation of one' license. Suspension is a temporary disruption.
Personally it was my view that perjury in a federal judicial proceeding was cause for his removal from public office for violating the public trust. And it seemed obvious that he should have been disbarred. The suspension of his law license was a mockery … but then, most politicians probably viewed the whole Clinton mess as "there but for the grace of god…"!
lol, I'm betting the pols viewed the entire clinton years as a practice in propaganda at it's finest!
If Clinton is the Golden Boy of the Democrats then The Dems are in even worse shape than I thought. O_0
[...] If he is telling the truth, a felony has been committed. And this cannot be twisted into being just about sex, as it was with [...]
Heard yesterday the obvious, that there is no love loss between Washington and Sestak…….ha ha ha, it's a breeding ground for nitwits!
Every lie that clown has ever told was done with a straight face, he is joke, and rightfully so!
When will the IMPEACHED PERJURED ex-PRESIDENT leave America alone? Remember the GREAT EXAMPLE he set for America during his administration? He should have gone to jail for lying under oath. Our leadership has suffered a steady MORAL decline ever since.
The rule is "Thou shalt not bare false witness against thy neighbor."
Lying is acceptable in some situations. You are allowed in the bible to spy and sneak and hide when enemies are near. You can use deception in warfare.
But you cannot bare false witness in court. This is why Joe Sestak may still do the right thing yet, if brought to court.
TR, right after our discussion, I see this article on American Spectator:
"The Coming Resignation of Barack Obama"
http://spectator.org/archives/2010/06/02/the-comi...
I believe that, but where did you hear it ?
Andrew Johnson was NOT removed from office ( he was saved by one vote ) and neither was he an ELECTED president.
The House was nowhere near even voting, when Nixon left; it was still early days of the trial.
Having been riveted by that event, I remember it very well.
1redcent, your knowledge is needed on another thread.
It is White House Sestak Story Doesn't Pass The Smell Test on Big Gov.
Comment was by Petee363 on the first page regarding the "advisory board" offer.
Okay, I see what I can do…………..on that thread.
You must have missed the 2,845 page addendum to the commandment that was passed by the democrats using budget reconciliation process a couple of months ago.
They slid it under the radar when the MSM published a pic of the amazing first ab's on a shirtless Obama.
Of course he's a lair, he's a politician. Its a job requirement.
There's lying and then there's LYING !
Sestak et al involved in this garbage are in the latter group of lying poltroons.
Not in my book, it's black and white, either the truth or a lie*.
*Exceptions are acceptable for questions such as concerning whether or not certain articles of clothing are unflattering to wives.
I hear ya, but "some" lying is always to be expected from pols; especially during an election cycle. Hell, even the FFs lied some.
But this Sestak stuff IS the BIG DEAL of lies and cover ups.
I expect politicians to lie too, but when they do I call them liars.
I do not tolerate a lying politician if the fudge how much cake they had with lunch.
And yes Slestack (spelling intended) is a big deal, but nothing will come of it. With Congress in democratic hands, they'll never even mention it.
I agree, there is something there. We record Red Eye and watch it when we feel like (my wife and I), so I'm not sure which date it actually aired on, but the one I watched yesterday they discussed this.
Ann Coultre had an brilliant comment on it, remember, she's a lawyer. She said the hardest part of prosecuting a bribery case is proving quid pro quo, or you do this and I do that.
By offering the job if Slestak the job if he dropped out, and Slestak not dropping out, and Slestak not getting the job, that alone does a pretty good job of proving quid pro quo.
Why did he not get the job anyway? Ergo, because he didn't drop out.
Yes, we do the same thing ( record RED EYE ) and watch it later and I saw that show.
Sean Hannity is like a dog with a bone and will NOT let a day pass without talking about and theer are many others too; even a few Dem pundits.
Coulter wrote a couple of books about impeachment and she knows what she's talking about.
Sestak has admitted, over and over and over again that he was "OFFERED A JOB" to quit the primary; it's on tape and he can't recant now.
And last but not least…………………Issa is NOT going to let this go.
Just because the MSM may or may not decide it has legs, means less and less these days.
The new media is making them irrelevant. Follow the story there, ignore the MSM. That's where I'm looking to find my news and see what's really going on.
Which is also the reason I'm here!
To me, the MSM has been irrelevant for decades!
I watch cable ( FNC ) and read English, French, German, Asian, and a few other foreign papers, on line, every day, as well as this site and many others.
The LameStreamMedia is dead, but nobody has had the sense to cover their graves with dirt……………….yet.
You must be logged in to post a comment.