President Obama’s Next Nuclear Disarmament Move? Enriched Uranium Handouts
by Marinka PeschmannPresident Obama is convening a Global Nuclear Security Summit in Washington beginning on Monday. “The purpose… would be to achieve the highest levels of nuclear security, which the president believes is essential for enhanced international security and for the peaceful development and the global expansion of nuclear energy…” (italics mine)

How would the peaceful development and the global expansion of nuclear energy be accomplished? By Americans supplying enriched uranium to other countries.
Sound far-fetched? Not if President Obama intends for American to bankroll an international nuclear fuel bank to dissuade countries from building their own uranium enrichment facilities.
We know that the creation of an “international nuclear fuel bank” is a distinct possibility on President Obama’s agenda by reviewing legislation he sponsored and introduced in the Senate during his tenure as a U.S. Senator. According to S. 1977, The Nuclear Weapons Threat Reduction Act of 2007, Obama’s policy would “provide for sustained United States leadership in a cooperative global effort to prevent nuclear terrorism, reduce global nuclear arsenals, stop the spread of nuclear weapons and related material and technology, and support the responsible and peaceful use of nuclear technology.” (Italics mine) Sound familiar?
According to Obama’s S. 1977, the “responsible and peaceful use of nuclear technology” is accomplished by creating an “international fuel bank” at an opening cost of “$50 million to American taxpayers to “support the creation of a low enriched uranium reserve… that would help guarantee the availability of fuel for commercial nuclear reactors.” The reason why Americans would fund enriched uranium handouts to other countries is because Obama presumes his “international fuel bank can play an important role in dissuading countries from building their own uranium enrichment facilities.” This policy, the President evidentially believes in, would serve as an important deterrent.
Who would administer this international nuclear fuel bank? It would not be the United States but the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) which is part of the United Nations that “works to promote safe, secure and peaceful nuclear technologies.”
According to published reports some of the countries that have overtly or inadvertently expressed interest in developing nuclear energy for peaceful purposes includes: Egypt, Algeria, Libya, Morocco, Tunisia, Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Yemen. Saudi Arabia has denied having any nuclear energy intentions. Global expansion of nuclear energy would ostensibly be used for powering water desalination plants, or to satisfy growing energy demands, but quietly and significantly, with the growing threat of a nuclear Iran in the region, the reasons may ultimately be for defense purposes.
Critics of what has been described as “enriched uranium diplomacy” argue that the expansion of the nuclear energy industry could inadvertently lead to state proliferation. Others contend that it is too risky to engage in with some countries; especially those with minimal regulatory capabilities or histories that point to nuclear materials and technology smuggling.
To ostensibly safeguard against those dangerous risks, Obama would authorize additional funding for the “IAEA’s Department of Safeguards to improve its ability to conduct effective inspections.” The world has witnessed the IAEA’s effectiveness in dealing with Iran and North Korea’s nuclear programs.
Obama would also authorize “to be appropriated to the Secretary of Energy $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2008 and $10,000,000 for fiscal years 2009 through 2012, in addition… establish a national technical forensics program to develop the best practicable technologies and procedures for determining the origin of nuclear materials, whether seized while still intact or collected after the detonation of a nuclear bomb (emphasis mine).
Read Obama’s Nuclear Weapons Threat Reduction Act here.
Last week President Obama signed a new START agreement with Russia’s President Dmitri Medvedev that shook up America’s nuclear disarmament policy. Under this new treaty, the United States and Russia have mutually agreed to reduce the number of warheads in their respective arsenals. However, only the United States has promised to freeze its technology. In doing so, the Obama Administration has opened the door for Russia to modernize its way to nuclear dominance. This week it looks like President Obama will shake up America’s nuclear disarmament policy again.
Cross-posted at marinkapeschmann.com.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
107 Comments
"Daddy, why doesn't the president like America?" "Not sure son, but I think he's delusional"
now in addition to the centrifuges russia sold Iran to enrich uranium, russia can sell the uranium to iran from the missles they dismantle…cool
My daughter jsut walked by and said
"oooooohhh, pretty unicorn"
That about sums up this Nuclear meeting …
He can't get out of the way of new job creation, but he'll spend our money to hand out nuclear material to foreign countries. Are Iran and NK in this line?
one would almost think the administrtion is in favor of nuclear energy…
THAT ain't it. So what to make of it?
Simple. The Iran issue is one of them making their own fuel. If they ceased and desisted the world would be full of rainbows and unicorns, right?
So give EVERYBODY nuclear fuel. Yep, that's the ticket.
Naive doesn't begin to address this lot…
This is silly. Countries that want nukes are going to get them whether we like it or not. But the fact of the matter is that most of these countries will use nuclear technology for energy purposes.
I think nuclear energy is the way to go in the future, and there is no purpose in allowing ourselves and our friends to use but then turning around and telling other nations that they cannot raise their standard of living as well.
But we shouldn't supply nations with anything…they should develop it on their own.
……with the growing threat of a nuclear Iran in the region, the reasons may ultimately be for defense purposes.
Funny how you ignore the present threat of Israel – which uses its nuclear weapons to threaten its neighbors AND EUROPE!
KK – see the pretty Unicorn ….dah dah dah …..
put the crack pipe down ….
[...] Cross-posted at Biggovernment.com. [...]
[...] Cross-posted at Biggovernment.com. [...]
ill put my crack pipe down when you get a brain
Show evidence that they have restarted their weapons program.
Why are we so paranoid about other nations having nuclear technology?
Who is the nation that has been using depleted uranium bombs in Iraq and Afghanistan? Who is the only nation to ever use a nuke?
Is it projection?
Ah if only the other threatening nations would threaten the world the way Israel "threatens",……ay Dhaffy.
Mr Obama, We do not have enough money to buy off everyone in the world. Even if we live in shacks with only a cup of rice per day there is still not enough for all those who want the money. Quit wasting our heirs future earnings. My children deserve more than the debt you are piling up.
..asselhoff
It's called deterrence, when has Israel threatened neighbors with with nuclear attack?
" Funny how you ignore the present threat [to] Israel "
So where are all the Brady Bill for international proliferation of Nuclear arms people? Surely if guns scare the shit out of the little nitwits, this should really get them fired up….
Kinda like finding even one NOW spokesperson speak up while watching the Taliban video of Women executions in a soccer field in Afghanistan….
Or how bout this one, "the government telling a Woman what she can do with her body."
But it's OK for the Government to decide about a hip transplant?
The hypocrisy here is appalling…..
The laws of physics,………..what goes up must come down,…………
Obama's law,……………..the world economy must go up and,…………
the American economy must come down.
well, we have done a deep insertion at Natanz, and seen the reprocessing into U-235…
THAT is a silly, almost inane question. Other than thousands of pages of reports and analysis that shows them to indisputably have a military nuclear weapons program overseen by the Revolutionary Guards, there isn't any evidence at all…
Wise up.
Get a job, K.K. Do something constructive instead of ridiculing others just because you don't like their point of view.
BHO always wanted to be President when he grew up.
He got the cart before the horse.
I believe it was I who was ridiculed first. I don't get it…if I am on here stating my opinion and respond to one who tells me I am smoking crack, and it means I don't have a job and am not being constructive. Yet when another ridicules me that is constructive?
Get your hand out of your pants troll……
It's not paranoia. It's called reality. How exactly old are you? We've been thru this before and put it to bed. I'm not going to debate this subject with you because I can see from your comments above that all you're here for is to stir the pot. You apparently have no understanding of WWII or you wouldn't have said the things you already have.
Thats almost as convincing as the evidence for Iraq's WMDs.
Iran, at one point in time, was developing a nuclear weapons program. They have stopped, and there is no evidence to show they have restarted their weapons program.
Yes, there was evidence of possession of nuclear weapons in Iraq too. Which suddenly dissapeared
Nuclear energy is a great source for power and many countries do intend to use it that way but…reality check KK, the world isn't full of unicorns and fairy dust. There are people that out there with one purpose, to destroy anything that doesn't agree with them. (For a fun read, learn about the Twelvers and their belief in bring on the Apocalypse for just one of many examples)
The UN has proven itself time and time again to be incompetent and ineffective. No one government has the power to enforce any nuclear regulations, nor should they.
Enriched nuclear fuel and nuclear waste can also be used to make a very effective bomb (aka dirty bomb). It doesn't have the big boom of a traditional nuke but the fall out can be just as destructive.
Now with that in mind, the more countries that have access to this, the greater the risk of a terrorist getting a hold of it, the greater risk to everybody on the planet.
Something freaky is going on alright. I think the Progressive/Socialist, led of course by our Dear Leader, are rolling back the Cold War victory obtained in the 90s. Things are starting to become strangely similar to that time. I thought the Russians were pretty knocked out and their nukes were monitored and lowered in the 90s. All of a sudden, we have to cut ours?? All of Poland's leadership killed?? Russia gaining allies left and right, with Obama smiling approvingly?? Something is not right, I just cant put my hands on it yet. Could they be doing a Vietnam Redux on a massive scale. Progressive/Socialist historical myth has us losing the war, when in reality we won the war, secured South Vietnamese independence, and got a peace treaty (Treaty of Paris 1973). The Democratic congress reneged on the agreement, and lo and behold No. Vietnam invaded and won the war in 1975. Just a observation.
That's nice. So now Aruba, and Monaco, and Granada, and Malta will be able to build their own "dirty bombs".
Nice………………
correction… you mean 'when' we get attacked…
NObama is a fool! And he thinks we are fools too.
no evidence?
In what sand pile have you been sticking your head in? Even the IAEA has backtracked on that- and the phony NIE estimate thrown by lefties in the state dept at W in 2007 has been proven wrong. The Russians, and even the Chinese are reluctantly going along with this because the evidence is so strong.
Before you make such ridiculously wrong assertions get your facts straight…
You mean like the depleted uranium bombs we have been using in Iraq and Afghanistan?
One thing is abundantly clear with President Camacho. He is galvanizing conservatives and independents like never before. If there ever was an example of the dialectical method his presidency is it.
About the time that Breitbart caught the Union thug instigating at the Tea Party rally, the trolls have bent sent here. It is interesting to see that some posing as conservative thinkers are threatening violence more often than the few usual ones here. I conclude they are trolls sent also.
Stir the pot? you mean show how much hypocrisy lies in our foreign policy?
Look it up. We are using dirty bombs in Iraq, after invading them to stop them from having dirty bombs.
I understand WWII very well. Nuking civilians is not excusable, even in the midst of a war.
Given Obama's penchant for smoke screens, I would surmise that this 'conference' and potential hand out of nuclear material to the have nots is bait and is a campaign ploy. He is running for god.
Such a kind and generous man, our President. He is handing out switches to those who are envious of us, having us reach down and grab our ankles, and allowing the bullies free rein. So smart, too. His Elegance will soon find out how the switch feels when they turn it on him.
Iran would be 100% ecstatic to sell Hamas depleted uranium to make dirty bombs. If you don't believe that then you either stupid or willfully ignorant.
Guns dont scare me. Everyone should be allowed to have a gun.
Everyone should be able to determine how to manage their health and government should stay out.
And every nation should be free to pursue nuclear energy if they wish. So long as no one threatens them, say like occupying every nation that surrounds Iran, then there will be no threat of a nuclear war.
God man, wear a helmet when you go outside!
Typical “moral equivalence” arguments by the left…very dangerous indeed when it involves nukes!
No shit guns don't scare you, if nukes don't bother you, you are even crazier than I thought….
No, I mean high radio active waste.
DU has a very low radio activity rating and weak alpha emissions The debate with DU is over its toxicity.
This is just another example of Obama's reckless policies. Remember in November!
Ask the Kurds if Saddam used WMD troll…
So its ok for us to use them but not them?
Then why don't you protest our possession and placement of nukes around the world, including supplying them to Israel? How do you think the other middle eastern nations feel about Israel having nukes?
Since that statement is utterly ridicules, I have nothing to protest about it….
Nulcear energy for all, except here of course, here we use wind and magical rainbows in Obama lande.
PS you left a K out of your name
Troll
Yawn
Still leaving that other K out of you handle troll boy.
Dirty bombs is Iraq?
Coo Coo for Cocoa puffs alert
Coo Coo for Cocoa puffs alert
Pathetic
Too late, there is nothing left in his head to damage
Take how you want, I am not the delusional one….
LOL
I believe that Obama is a Muslim Traitor. I've seen more than enough evidence.
He will continue to create chaos, even when there is none, so he can move his radical agenda forward. He is dismantling America so we will be weak as a Nation. The Democrats that voted for him should be laid off first…
Hopefully you did'nt go ever his head,with that…he thinks they are dirty bombs…
LOL
Delusional? Sorry, my arguments are based on logic and facts.
Yours are based on paranoia.
That's correct. Amadinnerjackets greatest wish is set off nuclear weapons in Israel. I'm sure he gets aroused just thinking about setting one off in an Israeli elementary school. Until a country no longer funds terrorist groups they should not be allowed any nuclear material.
Look it up. We have been using depleted uranium bombs in the Middle east.
You do realize that we have funded terrorist groups too, right? We started the Mujadeen in Afghanistan when the Russians occupied their lands.
I'd say that KK is a bit confused. Reading some of his/hers other comments KK hasn't quite got a grasp on the arguments in either direction.
You are a funny little troll….
Last I checked we try to avoid dropping bombs on schools and when we're under attack we don't hide in them either. Hamas, not so much. You're right we did fund the Mujahideen it was the Democrat, Charlie Wilson.
C'mon KK, do you really think that Iran will use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes?? Life outside the US is not all about rainbows, unicorns and world peace
This guy gets his policies while watching Sesame Street. Lets build him a sand box so he can stay out of trouble!
By "nuclear technology" are you referring to Uranium and Plutonium, which can be used for either power or bombs?
By "depleted uranium bombs", do you really mean the anti-armor depleted uranium projectile used against Iraqi tanks? More were used in the first Gulf War.
By "Nuke" are you referring to a "Thermo-Nuclear Device" like an H-Bomb? No,no one has used them…only tested them,or do you mean like an Atomic bomb which the US used twice on Japan in World War Two, 1945?
Let's bypass emotional "catch-words" and go for deeper detail and facts.
To the poster above, GUNS WILL BE NEXT ON THE LIST!
This dude has to get rid of our guns, he can not let in the NWO while we are ARMED!!!!
This nuke stuff is just the start (IMO)..
this is all part of the new world order see: g.soros. Read some Ian Fleming very familiar.
DU is not toxic?
http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/2003/DU-Baby2003.ht...
You are being far too generous wldbil, this dingbat troll is no where near funny, he/she is devoid of logic and believes playing nice always brings the best results.
Gotta wonder how they do in their personal life? Can they solve issues when people in their life disagree? Are they able to create a life that has no strife?! They can't even come here and have a dialogue that gets one single person to take them serious and not a one of us is holding onto a nuke
lol, very clever!
http://pubrecord.org/world/5811/depleted-uranium-babies-afghanistan/
http://www.aztlan.net/du_deformed_iraqi_babies.htm
Who cares if it was a democrat or republican? They are both members of the same organization, they both work for the same ends.
….good one…its super funny because it makes a lot of sense too…..
…….
You have no idea what I stand for common ground
GM and Dodge (aka Gov't Motors) need sales too, why not built and sell pre-made truck bombs too?
"The reason why Americans would fund enriched uranium handouts to other countries is because Obama presumes his “international fuel bank can play an important role in dissuading countries from building their own uranium enrichment facilities."
The road to hell being paved on good intentions,tax-payer dollars and fissionable materials. Pride goeth before the fall(out). Before we had 22 minutes till Soviet missiles would impact,now there will be no time to reach any shelter. They would target DC first or second and no escape,even on airforce one,I wonder if he realizes that?
You care. If he had been a Republican, you wouldn't have stopped harping on about it, and that's a fact. The truth is Charlie took this upon himself with out Carters permission and nearly zero support from the CIA. That doesn't sound like he was working for the same ends, does it?
LOL you think I am a liberal
Our government is one entity. There Republicans, democrats, CIA, Military, Welfare organizations, are all ONE ENTITY working against our interests to enhance theirs. Then they pass it off as if they are trying to do it for your safety. Its BS, wake up.
Nor do I care – your words tell the story and it's not one I find interesting, intelligent, thought provoking or insightful -
Yet you seem to skate over the fact that Charlie acted almost completely on his own. How is what he did the act of the entire Government? It's obvious you need to retune your tin foil hat.
"who is the only nation to ever use a nuke",……??????/
Thank God it was us,…………….ay K.K.
"So its ok for us to use them but not them?" (depleted uranium bombs)
The answer to that is yet to be determined,…however,…………………….
we already know the answer to,………"but not them",……….right,…..K.K.,…..?????/
Nice try but…
All materials labeled as heavy metals are toxic, this includes iron, aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, uranium, plutonium, copper….
Basic middle school chemistry but it is no more than the toxicity of lead or the processing of copper.
As far as deformed babies goes, both countries had high deformity rates prior to either war and I have yet seen any credible studies done that shows anything different nor are we to see any for some time.
"………..we have funded terrorist groups too, right?,……….."
yes we did,………………to kill little Russian children,……??????????
That no fun,…………….there Stevie,………
how can you have a discussion with these lefties if they have to bring in all the facts to the table,….??????.
"Sorry, my arguments are based on logic and facts."
K.K. has put motion on the table,…………………
Do we have a second,…………………..
going,…. once,……………..going,…………….. twi,…………………………….
Markina,
I am flat out cracking up! The first thing I thought of when Oba-Mao stated he would not use nukes to defend the USA was Rainbows and Unicorns!!!! In fact after a serious search I found my psot that day…
"They really believe Oba-mao will shoot magical peace rays at Achmed-in-a-dinner-jacket, and Kim Jung Ill that will turn them into "My little Pony Unicorns" and they will all peace out and chill over a doobie… "
Unfortunately we both seem to be right…
I tried, right under "Extreme left wing conspiracy's" but even they were laughing too hard to take you serioulsy
How about giving the muslim crazy talk a rest.
Obama is a progressive tool that believes his ideology, it's an evil ideology all on it's own, no muslims or conspiracy theories required
True,but when it is so much easier to remember the truth than the shady pathway of what might have been said…or not.I guess I get to sleep easy not having to worry if my "feelings" get hurt.
Gas Fusion would be a better item to trade,plasma makes a good amount of heat without the problems of solid fuel,simple hydrogen, unlike Chernobyl.
Once these crappy countries get nukes we will have to put up with their BS, great job Obama …great job
If we get attacked, mark my words Obama. You'll be held responsible because you didn't protect us.
I take that very lightly coming from someone who cannot spell or use grammar correctly.
So sad and yet, so true Kasteer – it's only a matter of time.
And that would be …. fill in the crazy theory blank ….
You must be logged in to post a comment.