The Mau-Mauing of Rush
by Mike FlynnRush took to the pages of the Wall Street Journal to address the mau-mauing that scuttled his NFL dreams. Personally, I’m a little mystified why Rush would want to own part of a football team. Oversized, preening and pampered athletes set in strictly defined roles and running elaborately orchestrated “plays” designed by a full bureaucracy of coaches seems, frankly, I dunno…unAmerican. Quite unlike the other football, where there are no plays, few coaches and wide latitude for individual initiative and improvisation. (How did we get stuck with the collectivist top-down heavy sport?) But, to each his own.

Of course the NFL is a private institution which can invite–or deny–whomever they’d like to join their owners’ club. But the manner in which Rush was sidelined is, at best, distasteful and definitely more than a little troubling. Alas, it was also utterly predictable. To wit:
Shortly thereafter, the media elicited comments from the likes of Al Sharpton. In 1998 Mr. Sharpton was found guilty of defamation and ordered to pay $65,000 for falsely accusing a New York prosecutor of rape in the 1987 Tawana Brawley case. He also played a leading role in the 1991 Crown Heights riot (he called neighborhood Jews “diamond merchants”) and 1995 Freddie’s Fashion Mart riot.
Not to be outdone, Jesse Jackson, whose history includes anti-Semitic speech (in 1984 he referred to Jews as “Hymies” and to New York City as “Hymietown” in a Washington Post interview) chimed in. He found me unfit to be associated with the NFL. I was too divisive and worse.
Really. Sharpton and Jackson? Please explain to me, Mr. Big Media, how do these two have any credibility to comment on anything? Fitzgerald was wrong when he said there are no second-acts in America. If you can fill the role Big Media needs played, you can have never-ending redemption regardless of the scandal that trips you up. (See for example, ACORN. Has any news organization followed up on their “internal review”. No? Didn’t think so.)
Soon enough, the Rush saga moved beyond the poverty pimps:
Next came writers in the sports world, like the Washington Post’s Michael Wilbon. He wrote this gem earlier this week: “I’m not going to try and give specific examples of things Limbaugh has said over the years because I screwed up already doing that, repeating a quote attributed to Limbaugh (about slavery) which he has told me he simply did not say and does not reflect his feelings. I take him at his word. . . . ”
Mr. Wilbon wasn’t alone. Numerous sportswriters, CNN, MSNBC, among others, falsely attributed to me statements I had never made.
Savor Wilbon’s comment that he wasn’t going to try and give specific examples. Why Michael? Because you can’t find any, you know, specific examples that Rush was the screaming racist you just knew he had to be? I guess Michael can’t let facts get in the way of a good story. Sometimes, it seems, a story is just too good to fact-check.
And, of course, there was a political component:
The NFL players union boss, DeMaurice Smith, jumped in. A Washington criminal defense lawyer, Democratic Party supporter and Barack Obama donor, he sent a much publicized email to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell saying that it was important for the league to reject discrimination and hatred.
Two wars, a tanking economy, a near-nuclear Iran and balloning deficits and Obama’s allies are worried about who owns a middling pro-football team?
Read the whole Rush column here.





Subscribe via RSS
79 Comments
Crazy Al Sharpton and the Right Reverend Jessee Jackson dare critique Rush Limbaugh? Bullshit! They need stick to sticking it to Don Imus, and chasing Tawana Brawley .
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by SavageNews and Big Government, Big Government. Big Government said: Rush: The Race Card, Football and Me: Rush took to the pages of the Wall Street Journal to address the mau-mauin.. http://bit.ly/2gkBjI [...]
I figured it out. Rush Limbaugh is not a racist — he's a pressist. That's what they, the "Drive-by Media" really hate. He's effective. The worst thing they actually have on him is the Donovan McNabb thing, which was not about any person's race — it was about the media reaction to race. Lies, distortions and wikipedia research are par for the course. Really — wikipedia as a source? Wow.
The MSM gave more time and effort to bring down Rush Limbaugh's attempt to buy into an NFL franchise than they did an ACORN scandal that involved lies, deceit and more lies and cover-ups, etc. and etc.
Enough said!
@ Nomad, U hit the nail on the head!! Great response. And if my college professors will not accept wikipidia as a source for a 250 word essay worth 25 point, perhaps JOURNALISTS should find a better source as well!!
Can't we all just get along, and all become racist. Heck we have a President that hires communist, marxist, and tax cheats. It is time to bring in some good old German Nazi's and round out the bunch. We need to sit around the camp fire and cook some s'mores share some stories of how great Mao and Stalin were in the good old days, get a nice tingle running up our leg reading stories from the Red book.
I guess that the NFL is just one more club that conservatives are not welcome at. Well, if I am not welcome at the club, I won't spend any time watching, promoting, talking about or purchasing from your club sponsors (sorry Budweiser, but some of my home town breweries are going to get my business). I stopped going to movies years ago, I don't even miss them, not going to NFL events will become a thing of the past as well.
Oh, I might add that the RNC has become a club that REAL Conservatives are not welcome at. The real question is, where do we turn. We are all dressed up, but have no place to go.
You conservatives just don't get it, the american verison of marxism/communism/socialism/fascism is just different, we will do it better and not make all those silly mistakes like those other guys. We are smarter, we have web sites ya know! Lenin did not know how to tweet, mao wasn't able to 'friend' people like we can on facebook. Our system will be so much better because in america we look out for each other and as long as you are not one of the sick greedy and selfish business owners we will look out for you. Those business owners just have too much money and too much power, like they can fire you just because you decide you don't feel like working today. Thats all different now cause we are gonna take it from those rich fat bas^&$#s adn give it to the people. You are all racist!!!! Hey mom, can I have twenty bucks to go to the mall?
Mike Flynn, great reference to Tom Wolf's classic social parody "Radical Chic & Mau-Mauing the Flak Catchers" which captured the pathetic vanities of the liberal Upper West Side monied and artsy liberals in their hypocrisies. Nothing has changed. Well, except that the Mothership, the New York Times, is a ragged ghost of its past self thank God.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_Chic_&_M...
Thanks for the reminder and the laughs.
Limbaugh has over 90% name recognition and an approval rating in the low 30s. He's unpopular, not a victim.
It's his job to say very controversial things. About once a year he does something outrageous that gets his name all over the news (like mocking the symptoms of Parkinson's disease by flailing his arms around like a rag doll and laughing about it) and revels in the three-ring circus that inevitably follows. This is why he'll never be mainstream.
So go ahead and light a candle for poor El Rushbo. Boycott the league and watch the Home Shopping Network instead. Duct tape your mouth shut and hold silent vigils outside your local football stadium every Sunday morning.
I'll be inside watching the game.
Why is there no story about Newt Gingrich's support for NY-23 Big Gov Rino? He is opposing the true conservative? Whats wrong with Republican party?
Rush has a bigger listener audience than every liberal talking head combined. He may present in an audacious manner but his sarcasm is as sharp as liberal mind are dull. He says things like that just to get the liberal echo chambers resonating and as far as his approval rating, you are way off, unless of course you are polling your friends.
You really do drink the Kool-aid don't you?
You have NO idea the context of what are you saying Rush did in any of that. Like Joe the Plumber, when the Government (whether local, state or national) PREVENTS or INVADES a private citizens (whether a no-name OR someone well known) right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness that's a bad thing. It was prevented NOT because there is anything ILLEGAL, but because one's PERSONAL Political Pursuation. Period.
That is against the Constitution, and everything the Constitution stands for. If you can't see that, then you need to click back on this site and start reading the Federalist Papers and the Constitution again.
"That is against the Constitution, and everything the Constitution stands for."
Wrong.
Rush has no constitutional right to be a minority owner in the St. Louis Rams. Capitalism has spoken. Deal with it.
I love how I'm automatically a "liberal" because I don't care about Rush. I'll see you at the candlelight vigil. Don't forget your duct tape and pocket constitution.
1. If anyone wants to do something about this, concentrate on each of the people who spread the bogus quotes and try to discredit them to their audience; point out to their audience how they lied. Certainly, that won't affect many of their hardcore followers, but most people will lose some respect for them even if they don't like Rush. One way to do that is by writing individual blog posts that focus on each person who lied; another is to leave comments on their online blog posts and the like reminding everyone of how they lied. If enough people did that, it would have an impact on the careers of the liars and send a message to others who might lie.
2. The group that Rush should go after is one he hasn't AFAIK mentioned: the publisher of the book that contained the quotes. I contacted that publisher way back in June, meaning that in June at the latest they should have known that the quotes were at least questionable. That would seem to increase their legal liability, and they also probably don't have the legal resources that CNN and other MSM sources could muster:
http://24ahead.com/wikiquotes-bogus-circular-smea...
Read again what davewolfgang wrote. Rush, as all Americans, has the right to LIFE, LIBERTY and the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS! Rush will recover, but the socialist and liberals will not stop with Rush…YOU might be their next target! Big government and government control over my life is NOT WELCOME!
Rush exercised his right to pursue happiness. And he failed.
It's not his "right" to succeed. We do not guarantee success in America, only the chance to succeed. He tried and failed. Tough luck. His rights were not infringed upon.
I'm amazed at the woe and doom reaction from dittoheads who are up in arms at one man's inability to acquire a status symbol minority ownership in a sports franchise.
I've always woundered what seminaries Revs Tawa. Al and shakedown Jesse went to or were they ordained by devine intervention from the Big O
What's wrong is that the GOP is that the useless upper echelon including Gingrich are fear based and will pick a RINO gaming the party brand name rather than take a risk on a candidate aligned with conservatie principles. If they don't get over this in the new world order of conservatives they are dead in the water.
We can't afford to lose this party and waste years and election losses regrouping so I suggest we all get involved on the local level with the GOP.
or to win the olympics for his city
Ok, StoryKeeper gets a gold star for sarcasm.
Republican Liberty Caucus http://www.rlc.org/
Take it over from the inside to return it to its roots.
The NFL is full of thugs and felons…..personally, i dont understand why Rush would want to own part of a team either. Certainly not a group that are role models for kids.
I saw the segment the other day where Roger Godell said something about Rush owning a team would “tarnish the NFL’s reputation” EXCUSE ME??!! What reputation, Mr Godell? Ohhhh, you mean the one that says “commit a crime, and get your job playing football back” ? WHO IN THE HELL ARE YOU TO CRITISIZE ANYONE? In case you didnt know it, Mr. Godell, your “league” is full of people who are FAR from being decent, honest people!
Rush did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG, and yet your entire league is full of f**k ups!!
The NFL of all places.OK for a dog killer but not for Rush Limbaugh? Rush was asked to get in privately and then ushered out unceremoniously very publically. And yet he rose above it all and stayed classy and fought back effectively. Yet, it showed just what the likes of Checketts are made of. Glaringly. And it exposes another Obamaite in strategic places. Not to mention the fact that ole Soros was involved as well. A good place for Rush to stay away from anyway.
Really, the rats have overrun the country and we need one big Exterminator. WHO will it be. When will it all come to happen that people get a belly full of this nonsense.
And then there is this: http://www.globalclimatescam.com
I imagine the courts will have the opportunity to say whether his rights were infringed or not.
And yet Keith Olberman remains on Sunday night promoting the NFL. I know he's an NBC employee but he was hired to comment on NFL games. The NFL seems to be ok with this divisive person. I don't see how Roger Godell can make the statements he's made about all of this with a straight face, his precious league is loaded with felons and cheaters. The reputation he thinks he's protecting is beginning to rot from the inside.
Excellent comment. This is really their attitude, that's the sad thing, that it's never before been tried by the annointed THEM, the special THEM. Government comes from the barrel of a gun, even in the best circumstances. When it is the most exploitative and terrible of governments (far left) the bullets fly sooner and more often. It's been that way, so far, WITHOUT EXCEPTION. Oh, yeah, but wait. It hasn't been tried by THEM.
Um,, no,, that's not Sarcasm. That's fact. Unfortunately.
Hasuz christo on a popsicle stick. This country has fallen further into the spider's web of Fascism that I'd ever dreamed possible. We've been ignoring the "death by a thousand cuts" thats been inflicted on us by the Left for decades.
I'm encouraged to see the sleeping giant starting to awaken. Let's all try to keep him from yawning, rolling over and going back to sleep. How 'bought them "can you hear me now" rallys today? Anybody seen any footage on that?
While Rush's treatment by the NFL was not unexpected, Mr. Flynn, I take exception with the definition of "football" you have provided.
For a game that puts the American game and the Euro round ball thingy that people try to pass as "football", I give you…..
http://www.afl.com.au
60 minutes of running, hitting and ball handling that put all the others to shame. No pads, no helmets, just pure bad-assery.
If liberals, particularly black liberals, really want to confront Rush, or demand explanation of any alleged comments or views on topics they care about – why don't they invite him to speak at public schools and colleges? They can invite the maniac president of Iran, but not a conservative radio commentator? If I ran a journalism school – I'd want Rush to tell all my students how to be as successful as he is. But, that's not how Liberals play.
Spineless, hate-filled, liars. Go Rush!
Liberals believe in freedom of speech…..
as long as you agree with them.
Me thinks they be Divinely Ordained in "The Church of What's Happen' Now…………."
never looked ia it that way .. good call and so true!
Australian football is awesome. On my first day in Melbourne I went to a championship game there. Not stop action.
Australian football is awesome. On my first day in Melbourne I went to a championship game there. Non-stop action.
These quotes were originally spread without citation. Probably because the reporters didn't get them from the book. They got them from Wikiquotes.
I really don't want to laugh at this, but WTF?? It's SO True!!!
Tells you exactly who they support and who they hate.
ACORN UNIVERSITY: Who says that welfare recipients do not work? Do you have any idea how hard it is to file those forms and to wait in lines to pick up money? It is hard to try and figure out how the system works, which programs pay the most, what do you have to tell them, whether or not you can use food stamps as a source of income to qualify for a mortgage. What happens when my kid I am raising on welfare money goes and has a kid, does that mean I get like a trifecta?
These question and more waiting to be answered at your Local ACORN UNIVERSITY, gaming the system has never been easier or more fun. Graduates of ACORN U go on to wonderful and amazing career opportunities: Community Organizer, Union Boss, Senator, even to President. Our grads can be found in some of the most prestigious locations and knockin down some big money, YOU CAN TOO!
I love the NFL: Amigo, I'll be yer Huckleberry, and take the counter point. Personally, you make some very valid points. Personally, I detest the NFL; I haven;t watched a football game since the Dallas Cowboys fired Tom Landry. Class left the Club with Landry, and when Bum Bright sold the Cowboys, the NFL has been on a downward spiral ever since.
I won't light a candle for El Rushbo. I appreciate parody, satire, comedy and a rapier wit. I agree with you that Rush is not guaranteed the RIGHT to have a football team, or any other success. He works hard, has a big mouth and is passionate about football. He was the sports biggest fan, and proponent and I admire that.
Perhaps it is my AADD that precludes me from getting interested in a football game, a couple hours of football is comparable to five hours of NASCAR going in a citrcle. I caint comprehend it. it stretches my attention span to watch an eight second bull ride at the PBR.
I see everyone went through here and gave you a negative rating. I just gave you all positive ones, for having the 'nads to speak your mind.
I do not automatically brand you a liberal because of your stance on Rush. I do not know where you get your numbers, nor do i know if they are correct. I would tend to agree the 90% name recognition might be correct, but would dispute the 30% approval rating. It would be hard to be such a monstrous success at 30%, and he is a huge success. Personally Rush, Hannity, Coulter and a few other need to tone it down. But look beyond it: they are selling PRODUCT, and in the sales business, there is no such thing as bad press. Press is neither good, nor bad; as long as it is FREE. They ALL understand showmanship, as they are ALL Showmen (and women).
I will disagree with you in this respect; when they have minority owned interests such as Fergie, J-Lo, Serna Williams and other, who can freely use the dreaded word "niggas", then they have set the standard. To shun or blackball a controversial figure such as Rush, they just violated their own "feeble standards" and have just made themselves "Professional Hypocrites". It is a fitting epitaph.
It's all about dragging someone that is Conservative down. If Rush was a Liberal icon and said the things that are claimed, the Left wouldn't make a peep and you'd probably wouldn't even know about it.
If you all want to do something very useful, throw this back at the left as an example of the utter depravity they represent:
http://www.zombietime.com/hall_of_shame/
Rush Limbaugh should make this site go "viral" on his program.
Point taken. That would have been a much better comparison. Cheers
Zombastic Pizza, thanks. It’s been a long time since the 1960’s; I’d heard stories that LSD trippers had “bad trip flashbacks,” always wondered if that was true. Must be. What a fine bunch of thoroughbreds on exhibit!
"Of course the NFL is a private institution "
I'm not sure it really is. It’s a collection of teams with different owners. If they work in tandem via an umbrella organization to make rules on how to play the game that’s one thing. If they work collectively on some other business decisions (advertising and such) its not (and they needed a special exemption from anti trust laws to do so by Congress). Now when they go the next step to denying on set of team owners the right to sell to someone… If there was a single 'owner' company with franchises, maaaybe… but I don't think there really is.
While Rush's treatment by the NFL was not unexpected, Mr. Flynn, I take exception with the definition of "football" you have provided.
For a game that puts the American game and the Euro round ball thingy that people try to pass as "football", I give you…..
<a href="http://www.afl.com.au” target=”_blank”>http://www.afl.com.au
80 minutes of running, hitting and ball handling that put all the others to shame. No pads, no helmets, just pure bad-assery.
well i sent money to help the conservitiv ein NY also rubio in FLA
I don't think football is collectivist, I think it's a perfect model of the big US corporation: run by one screaming egomaniac at the top, a few prima donna stars giving orders and a lot of people whose job it is to just smash into each other, going nowhere and stopping the other guy from getting anywhere too…
…and chickens out at the first whiff of anything new or different.
I will boycott NFL and their sponsors/advertisers. Call NFL comment line and give NFL your comments!
short, sweet and right on.
The dwarf deserved it. He was mocking victims of this horrible disease by acting out symptons greater than he was actually experiencing for personal financial and political gain. The NFL is the loser here. The union members are the losers here.
And just to make it fun, Reverend Al Sharpton has decided to double-down on stupid.
That's right folks. He's going to SUE Rush over HIS ARTICLE IN THE WSJ!
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/10/17/s...
The executives of the NFL are only looking out for their own interests which I'm sure no clear thinker has a problem with. In my analysis they are just trying to avoid any unwanted political problems from the current Liberal Democratic Socialist(LSD PARTY) administration. The LSD party sent a shot across the bow to the whole corporate community in what they did at GM. These are the consequences of socialist governmet intervention in the economy. Insted of free markets and free enterprise we the People get bureaucratic(czars) making decisions for us, robbing us of our right to vote in free markets with our hard earned money. I firmly believe that we need a constitutional ammendment guaranteeing our right to vote with our money in free markets. Thusly we the People send the signals to free enterprise capitalist on what products and services we want brought brought to the free market. Otherwise we get what the political(non-productive) bureaucrats and czars decide what we need. Capitalism is a more efficient and more moral economic system, especially when it comes to health products, which are less available to people when the People are governed by a less efficent socialist economic system.
A const. amendment to vote with our money in free markets?????? What the hell is that supposed to mean. And how can you say one economy is more efficient than another? An economic system is either productive for the poeple, or the state. Efficiency has nothing to do with it. Nothing of what you just said relates to the topic at hand. Blowhards make me laugh…….LOLOL
Being denied of his "pursuing" happiness by falsehoods and lies is what we are talking about. Not just "losing" a bid because someone else bid higher. We have a couple of legal terms for that, that do carry a LOT of weight in the courtroom – Libel and Slander.
Maybe you should actually pay attention to what's going on in the world AROUND you and stop watching TV so much.
As a Packer fan I have to wonder out loud what Mr. Lombardi would think. Towards the end of his life, Vince was growing resentful of these kinds of people who have now infested our body politic and media like cockroaches. He was disgusted with racism and to see this, knowing what what we know about the facts me thinks Rush perhaps would have had an ally in the old man who wore the fedora, who could be seen glaring at his players on the sidelines at Lambeau Field all those years ago. They have taken something that was pure and beautiful, think Starr's Ice Bowl plunge or YA Tuttle covered in Mud kneeling there, exhausted…and they have turned it into this pile of garbage that is rotting from the inside out. I will never watch another pro-football game again.
Where is code pink these days? When are there going to be anti war protests with Obama ar the hater
Excellent point. You're right, collectivist isn't quite right. I was thinking of all the revenue sharing between teams, rather than any specific team. Hey, it is both corportist AND collectivist…a twofer!
Excellent point!
+1 for you!
You're a liberal statist because you ACT like a liberal statist…all up about pocket constitutions, candlelight vigils and duct tape…
Time for the anti-trust busting for the NFL!!
Let's send the "I luv mi gubmint" after you, see how happy you would be…
I love the bureaucracy analogy of Football and I had never thought of it that way. However, I would argue that the other football, aka Soccer, is the true communist sport. Maximum effort for minimum return – just like the Soviet Union! Where else can folks run around for 90 minutes and at the end only one goal has been scored? And that's a good game!
Now all that being said two of the most exciting games of any sport I have been to have been soccer games: the Asia Cup final (Japan vs. Korea in 1996 in Kuala Lumpur) and my daughters' season final last year.
His approval rating is in the low 30s? According to who? I think his program's ratings show otherwise as does his paycheck.
Seems "racist" to me for the media to always be trotting out lying race-baiters, Sharpton and Jackson, as spokesmen for the black perspective…as if there can be no truth in the black perspective.
In a socialist economic system there is no economic calculation. The govt. decides what will be brought to market, making a profit dosent matter ,all they understand is taxes raise revenue then they decide what to do with it. In a capitalistic economic system there is economic calculation. Consumers freely choose what to buy in free markets. The most efficient company that provides products or services to consumers makes profit. The reason the Russian economy finally imploded was because they used a socialist economic system. I visited these socialist countries and their people were for the most part impovershed, their standard of living was very low becasue the govt. controlled the economy, In my opinion the worst part was that because of the inefficiencies food and medicines were scarce.
Capitalism is more efficinet at providing for the needs of the People and we the People are the bosses, the govt, works for us, we dont work for them. Based on this I firmly believe it is in the best interests of the People to demand this right be added to our constitution. Obama is moving the country in a socialist direction which is why I firmly oppose him because I believe in the People, not the govt.
do you have any questions?
had to break up my reply it was too long
…maybe it is "racist" to even have a black perspective.
Maybe, what's needed is SECURITY LAWS to knock this story up a notch.
In other words, you can't have Goldman Sachs doing 'private deals' in the SECURITIES WORLD, without expecting a prosecutor with talent to see blinking RICO headlights now in play.
In other words? Rush is ALLOWED to buy a public share, as long as his 'price is right.' You can't "INTERFERE" with Rush's public options. Checkletts did. And, so did that particular 'consortium of insider friends. You don't even have to invent this law to see how it would work.
I'd bet the RAMS deal is in for some very difficult sailing days, ahead. Perhaps? When all the envelopes are opened, there will be no bid? Nobody buys the Rams. Everybody goes home, rather than LAWYER'S UP?
It's not about Libel/Slander. Rush can enter any Federal courtoom and expect the judge to give him DELCARATORY JUDGEMENT, in favor of the quotes he never said, as BEING FALSE. Da' law's da' law. As long as Rush is willing to walk away from MONEY. It's a no brainer.
SECURITIES LAW, however, isn't gonna favor a 'few insiders,' especially when they 'interfere' with a buy who has enough money to prove he's legitimate. You think I'm kidding? You think most people will fall asleep? Nah.
Football is a subject that's gonna get discussed, now, for the whole season. You know, I'd suggest to Rush to open his mike to Guiliani (maybe just before Guiliani opts to go for the NY Governor's race?) And, just to chew the fat with him over how our country has laws that protect investors. And, what happens to a "social club' like the NFL, when they get hit, hard, by RICO. You think I'm kidding?
I love the NFL: You must feel important now. Go paint yourself up and root for your team then. You aren't relevant to intelligent conversation about the 1st Amendment and the vast wrongness of the political spectrum pushing someone's life, liberties and pursuit of happiness out of the window because of his politics.
Unbelieveable. I love football, but its people such as yourself, armchair jockeys, that have infiltrated this country and could care less what freedoms you lose as long as they don't take your particular 'binky'. You understand nothing.
In conclusion, our society places emphasis on the wrong things. Rather than education; math, science, language or other academic endeavors, the emphasis is on "Sports"; on being an athelete. The chances of a kid making it to the NFL or any other major sports league are slim to nill. I'll win the Natinal Finals and be all around Cowboy with a Gold buckle, before those gheto street urchins make the NFL.
What we are witnessing, is a breakdown in civilization; an implosion of our societal strucure. We are only one step away from the Colisieum. We are living a veritable Circus Maximus and it is spinning out of control. People spend their Sunday Church at the Stadium, or in front of the idiot box watching football as their form of worship, instead of worship in a House of God.
I have my pocket Constitution, and I'll spare you the duct tape. Don't save me a seat on the fifty yard line, but I did enjoy your comments.
Al Sharpton states that he will sue Rush. Give us a break! With Al's background and slanders and race baiting libel will be very hard for him to prove.
http://www.winning-newsmedia.com/libel.htm
Thanks John for the heads up on the article.
Unbelievable! Tomorrow is going to be a must-listen-to show.
Rush, you have my support! Don't back down! Fight!
His rights were violated. He signed a confidentiality agreement about the group as did the other members. someone Broke That Trust. that is illegal and it needs to be investigated. Whomever was responsible owes big time for that but I don't know your code well enough to say it is a criminal or civil offense.
BOO FREAKING HOO. Why is this considered news? Oh right, because poor, isolated, rejected Rush gets paid very well to shoot his mouth off on the radio for three hours a day and has been whining nonstop about it since his partners kicked him to the curb. Toddlers throw tantrums when they don't get what they want too, but most of them grow out of it. Nut up or shut up already, Rush.
Here is Al Sharpton fuming over Rush Limbaugh calling him out on his poisonous career of racial demagoguery:
“He doesn’t have the right to lie and accuse people of crimes,” Sharpton said.
Yes, Al Sharpton, perpetrator of the Tawana Brawley racial hoax crime, is braying about false criminal allegations. The charlatan knows no shame.
Sharpton says he’s going to sue Rush Limbaugh unless he gets an apology.
He’s not going to get an apology.
And he’s not going to sue.
Sharpton has long enjoyed the silence of his coddling enablers about his race-hustling ways.
He loves soaking up the spotlight as a legitimate public policy player out on the trail with Newt Gingrich and Education Secretary Arne Duncan, yukking it up on cable TV, and hanging with politicians in both parties:
The last thing Clown Sharpton wants is a thorough and blistering examination of his vile shakedowns, bigoted incitements, and police-bashing antics in a court of law– and the court of public opinion.
But let’s talk about Al Sharpton’s racial demagoguery, shall we?
1987: Sharpton spreads the incendiary Tawana Brawley hoax, insisting heatedly that a 15-year-old black girl was abducted, raped, and smeared with feces by a group of white men. He singles out Steve Pagones, a young prosecutor. Pagones is wholly innocent — the crime never occurred — but Sharpton taunts him: “If we’re lying, sue us, so we can . . . prove you did it.” Pagones does sue, and eventually wins a $345,000 verdict for defamation. To this day, Sharpton refuses to recant his unspeakable slander or to apologize for his role in the odious affair.
1991: A Hasidic Jewish driver in Brooklyn’s Crown Heights section accidentally kills Gavin Cato, a 7-year-old black child, and antisemitic riots erupt. Sharpton races to pour gasoline on the fire. At Gavin’s funeral he rails against the “diamond merchants” — code for Jews — with “the blood of innocent babies” on their hands. He mobilizes hundreds of demonstrators to march through the Jewish neighborhood, chanting, “No justice, no peace.” A rabbinical student, Yankel Rosenbaum, is surrounded by a mob shouting “Kill the Jews!” and stabbed to death.
1995: When the United House of Prayer, a large black landlord in Harlem, raises the rent on Freddy’s Fashion Mart, Freddy’s white Jewish owner is forced to raise the rent on his subtenant, a black-owned music store. A landlord-tenant dispute ensues; Sharpton uses it to incite racial hatred. “We will not stand by,” he warns malignantly, “and allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his business.” Sharpton’s National Action Network sets up picket lines; customers going into Freddy’s are spat on and cursed as “traitors” and “Uncle Toms.” Some protesters shout, “Burn down the Jew store!” and simulate striking a match. “We’re going to see that this cracker suffers,” says Sharpton’s colleague Morris Powell. On Dec. 8, one of the protesters bursts into Freddy’s, shoots four employees point-blank, then sets the store on fire. Seven employees die in the inferno.
If Sharpton were a white skinhead, he would be a political leper, spurned everywhere but the fringe. But far from being spurned, he is shown much deference. Democrats embrace him. Politicians court him. And journalists report on his comings and goings while politely sidestepping his career as a hatemongering racial hustler.
Jeff Jacoby wrote that in 2003. After the Washington Post wrote another in an endless series of gushing profiles whitewashing Al Sharpton’s lies and crimes, I wrote:
He derives his role in large part because of the MSM’s continued need for minority charlatans to provide demagogic soundbites and deliver good ratings for the cable clown shows…Some readers wonder why I continue to write about the Sharpton-MSM lovefest. Why? Because the enablers deserve to be held responsible and shamed publicly until they stop.
Those enablers run fabricated quotes about Rush while whitewashing Sharpton’s sordid history and propping him up. Now, watch them help Sharpton spin once more.
Truth of the matter is, the NFL "big boys club" are the just the very type of people Rush emulates. I am sure it has bruised his ego. It certainly wasn't his passion for the sport that got him barred nor that he couldn't afford it. Although the owners have obtained their wealth in many a different fashion, it was the method that Rush has employed to accumulate his pile that differs. This was what has caused the Rush ticket to be cancelled.
I have summarized from all the write ups that the owners did not want a demagogue (from the left or right) in their midst with all the baggage that comes along with it. The NFL did not need that stigma and to have to be prepared for 24/7 damage control. Once he was in, he was not going to be easy to eject. It was only going to be a matter of time. Bottom line is Rush is bad for business but he will always be secure with his own niche.
When was this posted? I’ve been seeking all around for many days for this data. Wonderful write-up!!