Military ‘Intelligence?’
by Monica CrowleyOver the past decade or so, there’s been a movement in our schools to make every kid a winner. In gym class, in sports events, in spelling bees, in tests of every kind, every child was often given an award or citation to cushion their fragile self-esteem. Competition was eliminated and “winning” was downgraded to a mere technicality. If you came in second, you still won! No losers here, kids. You’re all equally mediocre.

This politically correct virus has now spread dangerously into the U.S. military. The armed forces exist for this reason: if called upon, to kill the enemy. The military also exists to deter the enemy so that lethal force is not needed. But if necessary, our troops are trained and ready to wipe out our enemies before they can wipe us out.
Now, thanks to same Pentagon social engineers who brought us the ideas of gays serving openly in the military and women on submarines, the military is considering a “courageous restraint” award. What on God’s green earth is THAT, you ask? Good question. Apparently, you will now be able to win a medal for “holding your fire” and avoiding civilian casualties. Implicit in this utter ridiculousness is that our troops do not NOW show “courageous restraint,” do not NOW “hold their fire” until absolutely necessary, and do not NOW avoid civilian casualties. This is an insult to the fine and selfless men and women in uniform who give up their lives—in some cases,
literally—to prosecute a war and defend the American people.
Military awards are bestowed for uncommon valor in combat. They should not be given for doing what the good and decent American armed forces are trained to do anyway: use force judiciously.
This is the worst and most dangerous example of political correctness that I’ve seen in a long time. It could work to get our troops—and ultimately us—killed. Consider that most of our current enemies ARE civilians: terrorists who do not wear the uniform of any nation. Holding out an award to our troops for “holding their fire” could get them slaughtered.
Call me old-fashioned, but I’d like our military to stand ready to fight on our behalf, and yes, use lethal force when necessary. God bless them for doing it so the rest of us can live in freedom and relative security. But there should only be outrage for the crusaders of political correctness who
have infiltrated our fighting forces with a lollipop award for abiding by the liberal platitude that “violence is never the answer.”
Sometimes the violence comes to you, and you have no choice but to use violence to stop it.
The battleground is a life-and-death, hell-on-earth, kill-or-be-killed, no-room-for-error place. Leave the playground awards at the playground.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
489 Comments
I was discussing this with my husband today and we came up with the same conclusion. I don't think this award will be well received amongst the ranks. Even worse is the fear that it will be an award most likely earned posthumously.
SSgt SBT
Why do you hate our military?
It's because Obama loves a good "corpse-man."
He'd rather put a "Courageous Restraint" medal on a dead soldier than a medal of Valor on a live one.
America has been in "Homer Simpson World" for the past 17 months in which everything is upsidedown, backasswards and nothing makes any sense. We have a madman in the oval office.
Each day we hear about something that makes me say, well we can't top that. And each day I'm wrong. I agree with Timshappywife, this will put our troops in harm's way and will, soon enough, be given posthumously. Shame.
This is an affront military! Send them in harm's way and give them a medal for NOT firing at the enemy!!?? WTF!!??
My son is a US Marine currently on the ground in Helmand province and I hope he never comes close to winning this ridiculous medal.
One of my favorite quotes sums it all up.
"Anyone who clings to the historically untrue — and thoroughly immoral — doctrine that "violence never solves anything" I would advise to conjure up the ghosts of Napoleon Bonaparte and of the Duke of Wellington and let them debate it. The ghost of Hitler could referee, and the jury might well be the… Dodo, the Great Auk, and the Passenger Pigeon. Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and freedoms." – Starship Troopers (the book)
"Apparently, you will now be able to win a medal for “holding your fire” and "avoiding civilian casualties."
Let's face facts, baby. What that means, in truth, is that your next of kin will be accepting that medal for you.
Why do you care more for the safety of our enemies than the safety of us?
Thank your son for his service on my behalf.
Monica,
This ship sailed long ago, but we are going to correct is course in short order. This "commander in chief" will be fired by "We the People" in 2012. Obama has lost his anti-war, anti-american base (the same way LBJ did) and they will stay home or vote for Mitch Daniels or who ever we put up. Always remember the men and women of the US Military always do the right thing, always.
Joe
Any soldier or Marine winning such an award, should refuse it and make this nonsense go away..
Heinlein had weird ideas about sex but he was spot-on about war. Nobody wants peace more than a soldier, but sometimes you have to put boot to ass for your country.
Why does your Dark Lord want our military members to commit suicide? And why do you senseless ingrates follow his illogic blindly?
Apparently, you will now be able to win a medal for “holding your fire” and avoiding civilian casualties. (Courtesy of Monica Crowley)
"He who hesitates, DIES"
Funny, you acknowledge what I have said all along – we are targeting civilians. Our military is meant for defense of this country. The only country threatening us is Mexico and they are invading at will. Yet we are fighting wars for ISRAEL'S benefit in the Middle East while paying tribute payments to Israel. Does Israel run our government? Nearly openly they do, it seems.
BTW, don't pretend you are opposed to all this – CFR – the organization you are a part of – supports the dissolving of borders and non-stop war to advance their agenda – their primary goal is that of destroying America to the point it is on par with other nations (to help with globalism).
Evil organization – you should be denouncing it, Monica.
Monica – the National Defense Service Medal is a blanket campaign metal given to all in the service during a national emergency. This medal has the colors blue, red, and yellow. My fellow service members commonly joked that blue was for the oceans that were not crossed, red was for the blood that was not shed, and yellow was the reason why. Many service members just don't wear it. This "Courageous Restraint" medal will never be accepted by service members. I'm glad I am retired.
I’d like to believe that the average military man/woman will look at this ridiculous piece of BS award as a joke and if there is actually a Soldier/Marine/Navy/Air Force that receives it, will likely get f**ked with by his/her piers. NO military personnel will accept something like this in a humbled manner.
The ultimate “reward” for any service personnel is “survival”, the ability to defend another day. And a bit of respect and appreciation from the citizens of their own country would certainly be welcomed as well. God Bless America, out Troops and Their Families!
Why do you pretend to care at all about the military, fairytroll?
Why are you in the red, dude?
Photos of new medal – it stinks:
http://peacemoonbeam.typepad.com/scooters_report/...
Why do you continue with your vile, reprehensible BS?
If the politicians would get out of the way and let the military do what they were trained to do, we would have been done in Afghanistan and Iraq a long time ago.
As a combat vet, there is only one rule. Do what we do best: do unto them before they can do unto you. When are the idiots in this country going to realize that there are no rules in war but survival of the best. A war can not be managed from 7,000 miles away. It must be managed on the spot where lead poisoning is a common malady. Overwhelming force is the answer, and no stupid award for not wasting the enemy is worthy of of consideration when in the $**t.
LMFAO!!!!!! Thanks Scooter
I am hoping for an award for not beating the snot out of trolls like Free Speech. That takes quite a bit of restraint.
The military has been politically correct for a long time…When my husband
was serving, we could see that slowly it was going in that direction….And
today it's more out in the open with the killings at Fort Hood, the persecution
of the 3 Navy Seals, and now this ridiculous medal..God Bless those troops
that are serving, I hope they use their heads and not the political correct indoctrination……
We should let the Pentagon run the military instead of listening to blonde bimbo pundits.
What on Earth makes her an expert on military decisions?
never fear the REAL leaders will dismiss this stoopid award…..by real leaders I mean the sergeants and the chiefs…they will make sure their guys don't win any award for being stoopid…
Thank you and your son for your sacrifice in serving our country. I hope he can still recognizes the USA he is fighting for when he returns.
Then let's let the pentagon run the military, and not the Community-Organizer-in-Chief. What makes him an expert on military decisions?
Why do you studiously work to post your comments early so that you can advertise your ignorance, brainiac?
I think you're right!!…
add mine to NATHANS…and tell him a sailor said it…
I guess you aren't a Christian.
When radical islamist terrorists attacked America on 9/11, they aimed the attack at the core of Wall Street finance and the central authority of the American military.
Since obama's cabal has taken over power in Washington, they have made it a central point to attack the core of Wall Street finance and the central authority of the American military.
Their methods may differ, but it seems their goals are one and the same.
You call him the "commander in chief". I call him the gutless wonder – a true, muslim marxist.
Read the Constitution and you'll know why.
Typical dumbass liberal feel good horse squeeze. Take note America ‘60s radicalism in full regalia…come on November!
Just how, exactly, do you determine when a live "civilian" is one who might otherwise have been dead? How do you know they would have died?
Can I get an award for using restraint for not calling the Restributionist-in-Chief a radical, racist, narcissistic, neo-socialist Kenyan to his face?
ah, well maybe if bo read the constitution we wouldn't be in the mess we are -
Most of our troops would turn down the award – they exercise restraint when it is justified and whenever they can.
It's the ones who'd accept it – who think "I could'a wasted that kid but didn't, they should honor me" – that I'd be most worried about.
I know I'm right….never lost a man…I told them if they ever got a purple heart they would get two…..one from the bad guys and one from ME….they believed me….
TO WOHLFGUY:
In honor of your meritorious and selfless capacity to not respond to your natural God given right to defend yourself, and your Country, from Communists, Socialists, Progressives, Liberals, and others like Anon, Free Speech, et al.
We, the professional commentators of the internet, hereby bestow upon you the:
"Order of the Peaceful Commentator"
Wear it proudly!!!
Signed,
Joe Doakes – Temporary Commandant of the Commentators
(Command subject to his ability to lead, with the respect of his troops)
And what crimes against the Constitution do you want to charge him with?
What you all have been waiting for, the medal's first recipient:
http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/Carter_Jimmy_medal.j...
"Apparently, you will now be able to win a medal for “holding your fire” and avoiding civilian casualties."
Of course, the insinuation is that our military now fires wantonly and casually upon civilian men, women and children.
As is all the insane illogic coming from this WH of Hacks, he's agreeable with us aborting our own children, not to mention subsidizing other countries to abort theirs, at any time, but he's against our military defending us or themselves during wartime.
US MILITARY: JUST SAY NO, SOLDIERS.
see my comment below…did you find timmy y'sterday wit' yo' motor goin'????
It's more code talk from barry to his brethren moooslums – 'no fear, we won't let our military hurt anyone' –
it's disgusting
Hilarious. I hope they pay you royalties for each one issued.
Where did she say she hates the military. Please quote.
NO TROLL. Why don't you cite the Article that defends your position? As if you have any interest in the Constitution–please. What a crock.
She should support the troops and our military!
Not criticize their every decision and emboldening the enemy!
Your tin foil hat is too tight idiot.
You can't, but that's not the point. obama's people just want to signal our enemies that they need to do a better job of hiding among the civilians.
So, in other words, your answer to my question is "I got nothing. Just emoting"
Award announcer: "And the FIRST EVER medal for 'Courageous Restraint' goes to Private Johnson, who bravely held his fire on a group of innocent civilians shouting 'Allah Akbar' while hurling RPGs in his direction from inside a mosque. With this display of 'Courgeous Restraint', we would like Private Johnson to come forward and accept this medal!"
Award Announcer <holding a medal that looks like a golden chicken hanging from a yellow ribbon>: "Ok, looks like Private Johnson couldn't be with us this evening, but we are all proud of him for holding his fire even though he was killed by those innocent terrorists….errr, civilians…. in the mosque, who ended up getting away. But let's give him a big round of applause!!'
Crowd: <silence>
Award Announcer: "Ummm, OK….the next award is the Presidental Medal of Cowardice…this is the big one ladies and gentleman……
Article II, section 2:
Section 2.
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
We 'should' let the Pentagon run the military? You really are an ignoramous, aren't you?
The Pentagon is supposed to run the military along with the DOD. Not the bimbo, terrorist-friendly community organizer now in the WH.
President George W. Bush, in an address to a joint session of Congress on September 20, 2001:
"Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists."
She is supporting the troops and OUR military (not yours, troll–you want them to kill themselves), by exposing the inane ideas from this Hack WH.
Yes, I know. And Crowley demonstrably supports the troops. that is why she is against a new policy which could get more of them killed. This is obvious to those of us with a working brain.
But what is the point of your non-related post? Still got nothing, emo.
The best part of the whole thing is that most military citations and awards are already for showing restraint during combat, you don't win medals for indiscriminate killing. If that was the case, why is it that Hospital Corpsman and Field Medics are some of the highest decorated personal in combat, Mr. President?
This is flying over his head. Not shocking, considering the low clearance
The real issue is that the demoralization of the Military is a goal of the left.
This medal is empirical evidence.
So now the trolls are subject matter experts on the counter insurgency fight? You are laughably uninforomed, and you are doing nothing but embarassing yourself. First, Afghanistan, and to a lesser extent, Pakistan are the "home turf" of Al Queda. The fundamentalist mind cannot be reasoned or bargained with. They will not stop targeting America until they lose the means, the will or they are killed or captured. No one is targeting civilians in either Iraq or Afghanistan. We are in a fight with militias and terrorist groups. They don't wear uniforms or carry signs that identify them. U.S. Forces make every attempt to prevent injury to non-combatants. Get your boots dusty like mine and you would know that. Nothing sickens me more that some arm chair military critic that has never sacrificed a damn thing is his miserable life, and still has the gall to exercise his first amendement rights from the safety of his comfortable house, to complain about those that safeguard them.
No, she doesn't. She's not a military expert, so she should shut up and support the troops instead of pretending to be the great military pundit she clearly is not.
What makes Monica "Aleister" Crowley an expert on matters military?
'Commander' in Chief, idiot.
Military advisors are the experts–Obama's job is to take the expert information he's given and make intelligent decisions. INTELLIGENT decisions.
There's the rub, troll–ADVISING YOUR MILITARY NOT TO SHOOT AT THE ENEMY IS SUICIDE. That's NOT an intelligent decision. My previous comment was rhetorical–You can't cite an Article that validates Obama's poor decision making, liberal.
You did NOT SUPPORT your position–you can't–you only cited the Article that gives a President the role of Commander and Chief of the US military. Dunce.
I have to agree with other posters. Most military infrantrymen/women generally turn into type A personalities when deployed with their teams. Getting something like that may help thier professional carreer but can be guarnateed that at team-level you would get one hell of a ribbing. Our men adn women are the best I have no quams thinking that this won't affect their performance, readiness or killer instinct when push comes to shove.
Bush in no longer in office, troll. Stop trying to deflect attention backward.
OBAMA'S IN OFFICE NOW AND HE IS A TOTAL SCREWUP. EITHER YOU ARE WITH US AND CAN FACE THE TRUTH OR YOU CHOOSE TO LIVE IN LA, LA LAND WITH THE REST OF THE LIBERAL LEFT.
I'd almost go for bringing back the draft…put free speech into uniform and send him to the front lines…of course he'd high tail it off to Canada I'm sure….
"No she doesn't" Prove it. Without proof, your assertion is nothing more than emotion.
"She's not a military expert" She has a PhD in international relations. Again, more unqualified opinion from you.
"so she should shut up" Coming from someone named Free Speech, that is priceless.
"support the troops" We already dealt with and discarded that assertion.
"instead of pretending to be the great military pundit she clearly is not" I didn't read where she claimed that. Maybe you can quote.
You don't need to be "an expert" (which is an opinion, btw) to have common sense, and critical thinking ability, which you demonstrably lack.
So, in other words, you still got nothing.
Very good, dAnconia.
I'm sorry, as a former member of the military I knid of see this as a non-issue. The troops on the ground are not going to do anything that jeapordizes the safety of themselves, their fellow soldiers/marines OR any non-combatants. This medal means nothing, it's just posturing from the lefty administration to show that they CARE.
And why aren't you in the trenches yourself?
Monica, for someone with such a strong ideological perspective on use of military force, I wonder that you don't amplify your arguments with examples you personally experienced during your own tour of duty. Oh waitaminnit… I forgot you had other priorities.
So Free Speech, what are your military credentials? How many 12-15 month combat deployments have you been on? How many friends have you lost? What have you ever sacrificed in service to our country? Do you posess any degree of moral or physical courage? Or , more likely, are you just a cowardly troll that is content to post inflammatory comments from the safety of an anonymous screen name.
No, I meant the Pentagon along with the DOD.
Obama only carries the title–he lacks the expertise, the experience, the respect and most importantly, the principles necessary to give the title he holds any credence whatsoever.
In other words, he insults the Presidency by simply holding the position.
Guest
Somebody didn't like something I said
Why don't you sign up on the IDB and give me a T's UP?
She opposes the policies of the Pentagon, which means she does not support the troops.
"She has a PhD in international relations" still won't make her a military expert, no matter how fervently you wish it to be true.
"Coming from someone named Free Speech, that is priceless."
I'm just going by the Bush playbook.
" I didn't read where she claimed that. "
Her criticism of military policy implies she is an expert in such matters, when it's obvious she is not.
"You don't need to be "an expert" (which is an opinion, btw) to have common sense, and critical thinking ability, which you demonstrably lack. "
People who claim to have "common sense" usually think the earth is flat, so keep your common nonsense to yourself.
No one's claiming she's an expert, genius, so stop trying to bottleneck the discussion by focusing on the author just because you can't legitimately support the ludicrous decisions of your travesty of a Commander in Chief.
Why aren't you making any sense, troll?
Still got nothing.
Can we get some competent trolls in here? I
A Randroid claiming intellectual superiority?
Now that's priceless!
Coming soon, a medal for dropping your weapon and running in the opposite direction.
You are missing the 900Lb. gorilla in the room. The mediocrity that has crept into military intel and their prime contractors is the fear of the EEOC driven charges of discrimination against women, blacks and by false interpretation of the equal opportunity laws by incompetent and agenda driven bureaucrats, gays. This added to the erosive affect of the politization in the upper level leadership. This does not stop at the DOD. It is IC wide.
Dr. Crowley, do you homework. Step outside the pop cause d'jour. I know you can do it. Someone has to before we lose the last of the real braintrust that are leaving in droves because of the dumbing down in the name of equality of the IC community.
I am not the one criticizing Pentagon policy.
Monica "Aleister" Crowley is.
Umm, because they hate America. It's in their blood.
"She's not a military expert, so she should shut up"
She's exercising her 'free speech,' hypocrite. Not being experts on anything doesn't seem to stop this Administration from flapping their lips regarding a wide range of topics.
And thanks for just exposing your joke of a posting name.
I Agree! WTF! They're taught to KILL, not sit down and share a cold one. The enemy wants to KILL US!____I've said it before… time for secession. The stupidity is getting too deep.____Violence in the name of defense is acceptable. We ALREADY go out of our way to not harm civilians. We're the only country in HISTORY that has taken soo many steps to avoid harm to civilians.
That is the plan. They want to go back to conscription.
Do you even know what Commander in Chief means, you sad little man?
"She opposes the policies of the Pentagon, which means she does not support the troops." Nope. Nice try though, but I'll play along: according to what "logic"?
"still won't make her a military expert, no matter how fervently you wish it to be true. " I don't need it to be "true"… you're the one doubting her.
"I'm just going by the Bush playbook. " No you're not. You're just being an a$$hat. I don't recall Bush ever telling anyone to shut up (you must be confusing him with Obama), but if he did, please cite.
"Her criticism of military policy implies she is an expert in such matters, when it's obvious she is not" No it doesn't imply that at all. You're not too good at logic, friendo. You should probably stop attempting to utilize it because you're embarrassing yourself.
"People who claim to have "common sense" usually think the earth is flat" An unqualified assertion. No one has claimed the earth is flat for centuries.
"so keep your common nonsense to yourself. " No one told you to post here. Should you continue to do so, I will continue to eviscerate your arguments with logic. Seriously, for your own self-esteem, stop trying.
Do you remember when Libya was the biggest terrorist threat we faced? It only took Ronald Reagan's military about one week to put a stop to that. Amazing what a REAL leader can accomplish.
That's what he's PAID to do.
Shoot the messenger is the leftist's only option in the arena of ideas.
Those of us in uniform would oppose the draft for the very reason you state. Having to deal with people like Free Speech and that are full of ideas and empty on action.
You must be logged in to post a comment.