Meet The Anarchist Leaders Behind The ‘Leaderless’ #Occupy Movement – Part One: Lisa Fithian
by Lee StranahanThe #OccupyWallStreet movement that been embraced by Democratic politicians, liberal pundits, progressive groups, Big Labor and celebrities was actually created and is being led behind the scenes by far-left anarchists whose goal isn’t reform, but the total annihilation of the American economic and political system.
“Occupy Everything” is the culmination of a decades-long effort by militant radicals to create and fund a mass movement that has broad popular appeal. With the enthusiastic help of the institutional left, that effort finally seems to be working.
Case in point: Lisa Fithian. Fithian is a career “community organizer” and anarchist who specializes in “direct action” protests, and who has close ties to labor unions. She has been on the ground at the #OccupyWallStreet demonstration since its inception.
Local television station NY1 interviewed her as an ordinary “woman on the street,” presenting her as just another well-intentioned New Yorker who’s worried about the big, mean banks.
NY1 did not mention that Fithian lives in Austin, Texas, and failed to inform its audience about Fithian’s true motivations or her lengthy activist resume.
“Wall Street is certainly the heart of why we’re here. It’s the corporations — the big banks in this country have been destroying this country.”
Lisa Fithian says she’s not part of any official group–that this event is the work of many people coming together with the same message.
“Overfees or high mortgages, student loans–the banks are touching every aspect of our lives.”
She says banks and the wealthy have taken money for their own interests and their own survival.
“And the people here are saying enough of that.”
Inspired by events around the world, she drew the analogy to Tahrir Square in Egypt, and says the power of the people is leading to change.
It doesn’t take much digging to discover the real Lisa Fithian.
Here’s how Byron York described Fithian in his 2005 article on her role in Cindy Sheehan’s anti-war protests near President George W. Bush’s ranch in Texas:
Fithian is a legendary organizer who operates in the world of anti-globalism anarchists, antiwar protesters, and union activists; an advocate of aggressive “direct action” demonstrations, she protested the first Gulf war, played an important role in the violent shutdown of Seattle during the 1999 World Trade Organization meeting, was a key planner in protests at the Republican and Democratic national conventions in 2000 and 2004, and organized demonstrations at trade meetings in Washington, D.C., Prague, and Genoa.
Fithian went on to try and co-opt volunteer work that was being done in post-Katrina New Orleans, and helped train protestors for the “RNC Welcoming Committee,” an event that led to the widely publicized story of two young men being convicted of making Molotov cocktails and shields with sharp screws that they intended to use to keep Republican delegates away from the convention.
Her webpage shows that Fithian also has extensive ties to the labor unions that have embraced and Astroturfed the #Occupy movement. In the 1990s, for example, she began working with the AFL-CIO and United Auto Workers across the country performing “direct action” protests, such as harassing employers or staging displays of civil disobedience whose intent was to provoke police into arresting hundreds or even thousands of people.
As York noted:
In November 2003, Fithian was profiled by The New York Times Magazine as she prepared to take part in protests at the Free Trade Area of the Americas meeting in Miami. As she did with NRO, Fithian demurred when asked if she was a leader of the demonstrations — she claimed that the movement was “nonauthoritarian” and “nonhierarchical” and had no leaders at all — but the Times was not convinced. “To say that Fithian is not a leader is an admirable political idea, but it’s not entirely honest,” the paper reported.
And she was a tough-minded leader, not at all a peace-and-love type. Her specialty was action; she wanted to break in, cut through fences, and shut things down. “You don’t go to Fithian when you want to carry a placard,” the Times profile said. “You go to her when you want to make sure there are enough bolt cutters to go around.” Asked for a fuller explanation of her role in the protests, Fithian said, “When people ask me, ‘What do you do?’ I say I create crisis, because crisis is that edge where change is possible.”
Last year, in a radio interview, Fithian confirmed these descriptions in talking about her own activist philosophy:
“I am not a pacifist. Part of the way I talk about that is that I was raised in this culture, which is a very violent culture and I understand that I have some violence in who I am.” (about 19:00 in)
In that interview, Fithian also discussed (about 49:00 in) the tactical use of masks, describing how groups wearing black handkerchiefs were deployed during the Seattle protests.
It was many young people, masking themselves, covering their identity and engaging in property destruction…or not. They might just be more aggressive in their energy, right? They have some powerful and effective energy out there. But it has been really hard to build a mass movement because that type of approach is – vulnerable. It scares a lot of people and it makes it hard to do mass building, as well.
In #OccupyWallStreet, that black handkerchief has been largely replaced by the Guy Fawkes / V For Vendetta masks that appear at nearly every major demonstration site.
Fithian’s statement to NY1 about the “work of many people coming together” is her standard line when she is involved in protests: she downplays her own involvement while directing the action behind the scenes.
If history is any judge, when Lisa Fithian shows up in your town and starts saying that she’s “not part of any official group” and that something “is the work of many people coming together”, it’s time to expect riots, mass arrests, and violence in the streets.
That’s the true background of the movement that the Democratic Party and its cheerleaders in the mainstream media have embraced.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
70 Comments
one of the lead astroturfers.
It's just a matter of time before they go violent. With people like this as leaders and with the union thugs being involved there is going to be a dead body any day now. And the media will blame the TEA Parties and George W. Bush. Somehow.
Today they are taking dumps on police cars. Tomorrow they will shoot one. I'm hoping not but this bunch is unstable and not very bright.
And just why exactly is she and others like her given a free reign to incite riots and "create crisis"? Anarchists should never be welcomed or permitted to continue their subversive agenda. Stop the madness!
On Craigslist….The Woking Families Party that occupy the same building in Brooklyn with Acorn/SEIU are looking to HIRE workers to Occupy Wall Street. http://newyork.craigslist.org/brk/gov/2618821815….
Send a brief email via this link and let NY1 know how bad they stink at doing a simple internet query AKA "research". http://www.ny1.com/content/contact_us/
A search for "Fithian" yields 143K results, first of which is A WIKIPEDIA ENTRY. How many "everyday" people have their own Wikipedia entries???
here's a link to their "story": http://www.ny1.com/content/147351/social-networki...
Please be sure to provide a link to this Breitbart article of Stranahan's. <a href="http://(http://biggovernment.com/lstranahan/2011/10/10/meet-the-anarchist-leaders-behind-the-leaderless-occupy-movement-part-one-lisa-fithian/)” target=”_blank”>(http://biggovernment.com/lstranahan/2011/10/10/meet-the-anarchist-leaders-behind-the-leaderless-occupy-movement-part-one-lisa-fithian/)
The problem is these anarchists etc who destroy property and create chaos never seem to pay for their crimes – if they are arrested they are released soon after, if they had to start paying fines to pay for the property destruction and so forth or face hard jail time, then it would perhaps help in eliminating such behavior. In NYC you cannot smoke in a park but you can now sleep, defecate, have open sex, and do drugs. Insane.
I don't agree with their views and they have a right to them and to express them, but not to occupy and destroy the space (hmmmm where are the greenies?)
Lee, once again, the media is complicit in its negligence to do even the simplest and most basic fact-checking. Until We the People DEMAND better, the media will continue to fail to be objective, fail to be inquisitive, fail to be skeptical and FAIL to look out for the public interest.
HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE, people.
People like Fithian are always so surprised though when they whip their useful idiots to a frenzy – and things backfire on them. If she or any or the rest of these fools resort to violence it is going to go very badly for them – guaranteed.
NH's first Occupy meeting was conducted by professionals from the Unions as well. This has been brewing for quite some time so we in the tea party saw it coming. However, nothing is going to happen since these anarchists can't be motivated to actually DO anything but talk… so they will fizzle out as fast as they appeared. Just like 1968 when the commies tried to organize us on campus.
Move ON dot org STAGED the arrests on the bridge… fake blood and all. The videos are on the teaparty website in NH.
Grass Roots organizers don't normally have years of magazine and newspaper interviews and profiles.
Nice. When you can't respond to ideas, attack their character! And you better be very afraid.
Lee proves when you know very little, it means you know everything.
Of course people like Fithian try to go incognito – even they realize they are extreme.
Mainstream journalism is dead in America.
Great point! I'm going to live in my bomb shelter until the scary protests end. Why can't we have the intelligent and peaceful tea party protests back?
Which makes it even MORE deplorable that NY1 just accepts the "everyday person" story at face value. She has a Wikipedia entry (I don't) and 143K results on Google. NY 1 didn't even TRY.
Smart & beautiful. What a catch!
Lee didn't mention her presence at the Dick Armey school of astroturfing. She was there, I know it!
Wait until you see the whites of thier eyes. It will be soon enough
inciting to riot is a crime. community organizer ? now where did I hear that before ?
Does the Left EVER do ANYthing that is genuine and not contrived? Seems to me they've long since run out of material and are simply flailing about trying to manufacture outrage using the usual unsettled college-agers with every few year-cycle, whatever it may be about. Communists, Marxists, Socialists, Anarchists and the Maskers are sooo boring. Boring! Just boring! They're like the mold that grows on the dish left out over the weekend while you're off making friends and building tomorrows.
It is clear to me that this is just becoming a temper tantrum on the part of the far left. They are merely mouthing off their entire ridiculous belief system, as if we don’t know what it is, and threatening violence because they can’t get their way at the ballot box. It is merely thuggery disguised as civic duty. There is no special message here, except for the same old Marxist crapola.
It's only going to get worse. I think it's the democrats intention to try to make this movement grow. And to make us pass through these mobs to vote.
She should link up with the iron rail gang in Lousyanna
Exposing the reality of who is responsible (Lisa Fithian, in this case, with her record of similar antisocial behaviors and projects) is not a case of 'attack(ing) their character'…
I'm grateful for this expose by "Lee". The American public obviously isn't getting the real picture of what's taking place and who is involved.
Bringing up the truth when it comes to the Left is usually labeled one of two things: violent rhetoric or racism. Congratulations for sticking to the talking points.
"And you better be very afraid."
Now why's that if they're all so peaceful?
Nothing a little pepper spray can't fix.
If true, it lends credence to the notion that they may be working toward some kind of "burning of the Reichstag" event.
If you're into fishing for bottom feeding, scum sucking trash. But hey, to each his own it's just liberals are so disgusting.
Oops, one of the liberals wandered off the Austin preserve. On behalf of Texas, sorry 'bout that, y'all.
Except that we'd get arrested for that. While these dopers crap on police cars.
What is going to happen is the people are going to demand that their cities do something about these mobs. And they will have to. Mayors will be up for election in 2012 as well…
Lisa : Anarchist band together and follow me!!!
Anarchist : But, we're anarchist.
Lisa : Follow me!
Anarchist : I think someone is missing the point.
Fithian lied, NY1 complied.
Thanks for putting a name and face to the Marxists. Maybe we can show up and stand in her yard like they did numerous times in numerous states. These cowards can't handle the sanitation of exposure.
You show a lack of character for crapping on that police car…
They're anarchist trolls… not to be confused with ideological anarchists like myself that realize OWS is about increasing the strength of government rather than getting rid of it.
Fithian is just one more of Satan's tools. Her address, phone number and all her personal data should be made available to everyone so we can tell her how "proud' we are of her.
Is she an American?
Is she one of those "Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire" morons? A red diaper doper baby? Probably.
Clearly she is not human.
I'm thinking their activities are simply a Smoke Screen for Obama's real problems. So, she gets front page headlines from the MSM, and Holder's 'Fast & Furious' situation will be 3 paragraphs on the last page!
Perhaps the first step then is to show this Fithian is actually responsible for anything of meaning. But no, lets go straight to assigning her blame and then recount her sorted history to prove she is guilty of something. I"m sure you're grateful for that, thats how ideological rubes operate.
And what is the real picture? All I see from the media is a protest by young, unemployed and poor people who will turn violent now the Union is involved. Is that really the real picture? Or is it a bunch of communits fomented by anarchists trying to bring down America? Pick your narrative rube.
Nice. You're so wrapped up in your narrative you can't discern third person speech.
"Now why's that if they're all so peaceful?" – Thats what I was thinking. Whats to be afraid of? Other than the scary things Lee is telling us be scared of. Fear is the right's number one motivation.
Pigs like crap, I thought they would appreciate it.
Actually, that is quite an accurate statement Deus. Thats how reality works. Lee's words are just rhetorical agitprop.
Hey, thats why we come here! Its a bowl of bottom feeders.
Wow, the MSM didn't do any investigating of this woman. How amazing. That would be like them not investigating any of the details of Obama's life. That would be crazy and irresponsible, right? That would never happen. Ugh. They can get all the info on Joe the Plumber in 15 seconds, but can't find out about this career activist. Maybe they're just lazy. Or, they have an agenda. Duh.
You banged her didn't you! No one can get that much drool on their chin over a chick unless they stuck their tongue in her pie hole. Nice work Satan-lover.
Yeah, fear of what the left's gonna do.
Talk about being wrapped up in a narrative….pieceacandy, you take the cake. There's enough evidence of the kind of person Fithian is. Either you want to ignore it or you want to encourage it. I think you've already made up your mind.
"Fear is the right's number one motivation."
Says the guy whose protest is premised on the idea that 1% of the population is working feverishly to enslave the remaining 99%.
Why do you fear the prospect of raising the income tax by 3% on millionaires? Thats what the left wants to do.
I encourage the WS protests, I don't give a damn about Fithian. She didn't start the protests. Frankly, even if she did, it doesn't matter, its bigger than her now, and its a worthy protest.
Yours or mine…
As I inhabit the real world, I have little patience for the subjective….
This woman is just a self-serving scumbag. She has been since the 1970s……..yep, aging hippie liberal douche. This is a good article about her. Remember Brandon Darby?
http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2010/05/portr...
"Says the guy whose protest is premised on the idea that 1% of the population is working feverishly to enslave the remaining 99%. "
Thats not quite an accurate depiction. Its the 1% that pulls the puppet strings on the political class, who in turn rig the system so the 1% can grow their wealth and power. Its about profits, stock price, greed and the type of corporate capitalism that gives free capitalism a bad name. That 1% controls a quarter of the nation's wealth, not because they conducted ethical business that benefitted everyone, but becaue they bought the politicians to make rules favorable to their own power. Forget free trade, lets start with fair trade and see if we can achieve that first.
One problem, you assume these anarchists care at all. The only time they would is if you make them see the harsh reality of their views.
I say, dump them in the middle of some lawless area in the world. Good chance it'll show they're nothing but spoiled kids when there's a real gun pointed at their face.
Reality: "You show a lack of character for crapping on that police car… "
An action: crapping on a car. Indicates lack of character. Reality.
Jesus. If you have little paitence for subjectiveness, how in the hell can you stand to be a conservative? Its constructed on a theoretical narrative independent of reality.
"That 1% controls a quarter of the nation's wealth, not because they conducted ethical business that benefitted everyone, but because they bought the politicians to make rules favorable to their own power."
I agree, but you'll have to forgive me if I don't believe the answer is to empower the government even more than it already is. Corporatism is the natural outgrowth of a massive interventionist government.
The protesters have correctly diagnosed the disease, but they have offered the wrong course of treatment.
"anarchists whose goal isn’t reform, but the total annihilation of the American economic and political system"
Sounds exactly like the Tea Party to me.
My brand of Conservatisum is based on natural law…
There's nothing unreal there….
Huh? Where'd you get that bit of stupidity? I know. you were told what to say. You obviously haven't actually looked at what the Tea Party stands for. Otherwise you'd say your own little rant was stupid and inaccurate. They stand for responsible government spending and taxation. I know it's a little too simple for even your bulging liberal brain to comprehend. But try.
As Butters Stotch would say "They're all dirty…"
Lee, another great article. I like when you report on the "the Bigs". I look forward toward part 2.
What a fine article. Many, many thanks, Mr. Stranahan.
Looks like you called this one perfectly, Lee. Great job!
She's from Austin. Texas' version of San Fransisco. Figures.
Hmmm I wonder how much of stimulus dollars (our tax dollars) and loans to Solyndra (that protected the investors and the Dem Party as creditors) is being used for these protests? And where is the line between protection of the freedom of speech and congregation (kind of ironic, the group that wants to disregard those Constitutional rights, depend on them for their little gathering), and rebellion and insurrection?
Nothing like having a small community, communist agitator backed by the AFL CIO, soros, communist party, and the progressive dims integrated into the WSO to instigate mayhem. And she earns her living doing the very thing most of us oppose – riot, destruction, and chaos.
She reminds me of the rabble in the sixties and seventies who were members of the Weather Underground, SDS, communist party, etc whose only desire was to cause social unrest and violence..
And the MSM focuses on some loser dude who pontificates on What-We-Need-To-Do as if he has a clue. Like the 60's radicals: Losers are "winners", the stupid are "smart", the lost can be "leaders" and it all turns out better?
Amen to that gb. I don't want bigger government, I'd venture a guess the protestors don't either. At the same time, what other recourse is there, than what power the government can use to reign in the greed and corruption on Wall Street? Politicians make the rules, the people want rules that benefit the people instead of corporations, that stop corporate greed at our expense, something that reigns in ridiculous Executive salaries and benefits. We want the system set up by rich people, to benefit rich people at the expense of everyone else, dismantled.
The government has to intervene. The meltdown we're experiencing was primarily caused by the lack of government oversite, both lack of regulation and lack of enforcement. I agree corporatism is the natural outgrowth of a massive interventionist government, but the wall that holds back corporatism is the ethics of our politicians. That wall failed a long time ago. So where else do we the people have an influence other than who the politicians are?
What other course of treatment is there? It would be awesome if we the people could organize and bring down a Bank Of America, for example, but we just don't have the power, not when the most powerful among us work with the corporations to improve the situation for everyone already at the top, including themselves and the corporations.
More likely the people support the mobs. I the people make any demand, its that government take a cue from the mobs and end the class warfare being waged by the right and their corporate masters.
America grew up on a system where everyone had the potential to make it rich. Today our system is set up so only the rich can get richer and everyone else falls behind. Thats not what the people want, its why the people support the OWS protests and not the tea parties.
So these are the people probably being funded by the Democrats to stir the pot.
I dare say a karma back fire is due on Obama's tab.
Who is paying her? The same folks who paid Obama's tuition? Someone send me her address so I can mail her a case of shampoo. What a greasy excuse for a woman.
I just threw up…..
Some comments:
1. She doesn't call herself a leader. That's because she's an anarchist, and "anarchy" literally means "no leaders". Being a major player in facilitating an event does not make you a leader of the event. It may seem slight, but it is a major shift in thinking about hierarchy. The rest of this article continues discussing her role as if she's a leader at events, not a facilitator or even co-facilitator.
2. This article quotes another article that mentions her "use of aggressive, direct action…" For those who don't know, direct action is a term that simply means that if you want something done, do it yourself. If you want the homeless to have more blankets, the non-direct action would be to donate blankets to a ministry. The direct action would be to bring the blankets to the actual homeless people. So it's fairly unclear what exactly is "aggressive" about her "direct action", without more details, and #3 doesn't really count.
3. Molotov Cocktails: She helped train people for the RNC protest, and 2 people out of all the protestors threw molotov cocktails…okay, what's the connection. Did she buy the ingredients? Did she advocate for people throwing molotov cocktails? Did the two people who threw the molotov cocktails attend her training sessions and get the idea from there? If so, there's no evidence presented, we're just supposed to fill in those blanks ourselves and jump to rash conclusions.
4. Civil Disobedience to -gasp- get arrested: The way this article describes civil disobedience is almost chastising it's use. Civil disobedience is a "NON-VIOLENT" means of protest, so that should be A-OK in the eyes of the writer of this article. Civil disobedience has a major place in our country as a way that many people finally got rights that were indicated in the founding of our country, but were withheld from most for a long time.
5. Not at all the peace and love type: Those are the words of a NY Times Magazine, the same people who don't understand why "leader" isn't a word used often by anarchists, not because anarchists don't ever lead, but because people who aren't anarchists usually don't understand to what extent it's being used. So when the NY Times Magazine says that she's not at all the peace and love type, I'm skeptical…but let's look at how she's presented as not being about "peace and love".
She hands out bolt cutters to go through fences and shut things down. Okay, now we're getting somewhere…but we don't know what fences she's breaking through. Is it the children's hospital? or is it the Puppy-Killing Factory? It's obviously neither, but those are both extremes for hypothetical: If she shut down the children's hospital, that would mean she's evil and not about peace and love…if she shut down the Puppy-Killing Factory, it would mean that she's not evil, and that she is actually full of peace and love.
6. She's not a pacifist: Right, in that tiny snippet that's quoted here, she likens herself to her culture, so she's admitting to be the same "non-pacifist" that we all are. It sounds kind of metaphorical, but until she says something specific, this quote sounds like more of a critique on our culture. Also, people in our military are not Pacifists, people in our government are not pacifists, and "pacifists" are mocked and ridiculed by conservatives and mainstream society anyway, so finally, when someone on the left says that she's not a pacifist, no surprise, ridiculed again.
7. Bandanas: The quote that's being used here is this woman describing the kids with bandanas, who vandalized…but it sounds like this article is suggesting that she actually led the group of kids and helped them go out destroying…once again, show us some more proof instead of letting your readers fill in the gaps with wild theories. Step one, don't use words like "deployed" unless you're able to back it up with some documented proof.
I don't know who this woman is, I just learned of her a few moments ago, but this article really helps me very very little. This is just evidence to me that there must not be that much incriminating evidence about this woman, if the writer has to leave out so many gaps, and make inference upon inference, and cite sources who don't know what the term "leader" means to anarchists.
Non-hierarchal? Grass roots? Right.
The woman is a professional agitator. Follow the money. What is the value of her net assets, and who paid for them?
X.
You must be logged in to post a comment.