Sell Bonds, Buy Stocks: An Investment Strategy Built on Pro-growth Tax Cuts
by Larry KudlowFor once, top Obama economic advisor Larry Summers got it right. Warning opponents of the big tax-cut deal, Summers told reporters, “Failure to pass this bill in the next couple weeks would materially increase the risk that the economy would stall out and we would have a double-dip recession.”
Too bad Mr. Summers didn’t advise the president to cut taxes across-the-board two years ago, rather than push for the misbegotten $800 billion government-spending package. That policy dismally failed to ignite a real economic recovery or to lower the unemployment rate.
But it’s never too late to promote good policy. And echoing Summers, in recent months any number of demand- and supply-side economists warned of a double-dip (or nearly so) unless the Bush 2003 tax cuts were extended. The economy would be demoralized from a rollback of incentives to work, invest, and take risks. Plus, roughly $600 billion of cash (including the alternative minimum tax) would be drained from the private sector.
Whether Obama is really changing his stripes and abandoning class-warfare, big-government spending remains to be seen. But at least he is out there defending the huge tax-cut package, which is pro-growth, along with a South Korean free-trade deal, which also is pro-growth. Certainly it’s a turn for the better for the White House.
In the wake of the tax-cut announcement, a number of Wall Street forecasters are upping their growth estimates for 2011 and beyond. The consensus seems to have lifted real GDP by nearly a full percentage point. And if the economy can grow by 3.5 to 4 percent, the likelihood of a sizable decline in unemployment literally grows stronger.
Recent polling data show overwhelming public support for the turn toward pro-growth tax cuts. The most recent Gallup poll reveals that 66 percent of voters support the deal. That includes 67 percent of independents, 52 percent of Democrats, and 85 percent of Republicans. Surveying likely voters, Scott Rasmussen finds that 56 percent favor the tax-cut deal while only 29 percent oppose it. Even political liberals are split on the issue: 43 percent favor the tax-cut extension, and 41 percent are opposed.
However, there is a rump revolt going on in the bond market, where tax-cut naysayers say rising Treasury yields indicate that the biggest fear is a hike in the deficit. Since the Obama tax-cut announcement, 10-year Treasury rates have jumped over 30 basis points to about 3.25 percent. However, three-fourths of that market-rate increase comes from a jump in real interest rates, according to the Treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS) market.
That’s exactly what should happen. Keeping marginal tax rates down for successful earners, investors, and small-business entrepreneurs will increase economic growth. Therefore, the economic-growth component of bond rates reflects that by normalizing upward.
It’s a positive sign, not a negative one. It has little or nothing to do with the deficit, which actually will shrink as the economy grows faster. In fact, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that 1 percent faster growth reduces the ten-year deficit outlook by nearly $3 trillion. Low-tax growth must be part of the deficit solution.
The rise in real interest rates from growth-oriented tax cuts is also helping support the dollar. And all that, in turn, continues to boost the stock market. It wouldn’t be surprising if the tax-cut push for stronger growth moves Treasury rates to 3.5 or even 4 percent as the economy gathers steam from refreshed incentives.
So sell your Treasury bonds. But stronger growth amidst record profits will drive stocks higher.
The Obama/GOP tax-cut package is really a bit of pro-growth shock therapy. The vast majority of folks worried that the Bush tax rates would expire and the economy would face a debilitating tax hike. In this sense, freezing the tax rates provides an incentive effect, and at the very least instills more confidence.
At least for the next couple of years, before real flat-tax reform is possible, tax rates will be held at historically low levels. Thus, a major uncertainty factor has been removed.
Of course, the tax-cut deal is far from perfect. But a price has to be paid for a compromise that will enhance economic growth. And yes, the budget deficit is an ongoing problem. But as we listen to people like Wisconsin Republican Paul Ryan, the new House Budget chairman, it is clear that deep spending cuts are on the way in the new year.
So common sense suggests selling bonds, buying stocks, and holding onto the dollar. This new investment strategy builds on a long-overdue tax-cut-extension package that surely will lift the economic spirits.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
118 Comments
I sure wish I could feel Mr. Kudlows optimism.
While I have always appreciated his viewpoint, I don't buy it.
In order for the extension of the Bush tax cuts to add to the deficit
the Democrats must have already spent the money in a budget they
don't have.
The ethanol and other "alternative energy" subsidies in the bill should be sufficient reason for the GOP to vote against it, as a matter of principle. Talking about spending cuts when it involves 'the other guy's' program (dept of education! Dept of energy! the pentagon! welfare!) is one thing; proposing and cutting spending for 'good' programs that help farmers (for example) is another. So far the GOP have not proven themselves to be up to the task of cutting ANY spending.
To a certain extent, the supply side argument that deficits don't matter–that they can be taken care of by economic growth and the tax revenues thrown off by a growing economy–is correct, but at the present level of deficit and debt, there is no way that marginal tax rates can be cut enough to generate the revenue required to pay it all off.
Ryan is correct that only deep spending cuts can turn the ship around. The real question is whether GOP voters in the middle of the country will support cuts to their favorite programs, too. Putting the guy from Kentucky (whose name escapes me at the moment) in charge of the approprations committee does not engender confidence that the GOP leadership gets it.
Let the bill die, let the Dems take the blame for the tax increase Jan 1, then let the new kids in town take out THEIR pencils….
Great article.
Obama is NOT changing his stripes and abandoning class-warfare …he's stepping it up.
And for the life of me – it is NOT a TAX CUT. Furthermore, SCRAP the whole bill at this point.
The Dem's have piled on all sorts of amendments with NO "Pay as You Go" – None, Zero, Zippo, Nada.
Now they're talking about taking away one's ability to write off their mortgage on their taxes.
Summers is the proverbial blind squirrel…
Ditto.
And most comments on this thread are not optimistic or pessimistic, but realistic.
Common sense demands using that sense to cut the deficit and to pay down the national debt. That's going to be a tough row to hoe since both the dims and repubs only know how to spend, spend, spend. Call me skeptical, but I haven't seen either party cutting spending to a level to initiate the repayment of debt or even balance the budget over the last 50 years. It's not in their genes or lexicon of ideas. Both parties are hopeless and insatiable spendthrifts of taxpayer dollars which we so graciously dump into their pig trough on an increasing basis. Worse yet is the fact that congress doesn't sow. It just reaps, and in doing so it drives us deeper into the money pit.
The problem with the Dims – the only assumption they make is that tax receipts will go up simply because marginal rates will go up by 4.6% on the top earners. The actual fact is that tax receipts will go down if marginal tax rates go up – the rich don't sit idly by when tax rates are increased.
So, the extension of the Bush tax cuts will not cost $700B – revenues will remain the same or go up slightly assuming the economy improves. As long as the Republicans trim spending the deficit should slowly get back to the paltry $400B that GW had (who thought we would wish for that). And, again, over time the deficit will continue to decrease as the economy continues to improve and spending stays down.
In other words – it is the SPENDING – STUPID.
Agreed. A nice Christmas wish but I just don't see it.
Someone should remind Larry that there is no such thing as Santa Clause.
Sorry to get way off topic to all but I got this in my email and I thought I would share. My apologies to Mr. Kudlow too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zasAMvuy18&fe...
Are we cutting taxes or simply leaving the current rate intact….?
How is this a "cut "…?
Mr Kudlow certainly seems to be a team player. GOOO team!!!
Take that and a hand full of excrement and see what it gets you. This sucker is goin' down, and there's
nothing to stop it now, but folks like Larry will squeeze the last drop of blood from the turnip and claim
to be capitalist. Capitalism requires honorable, ethical men to survive. I'm sad to say we no longer
have enough of them in government or in business to be able to float this boat called the USA
Of the current titans of industry, who do we know that would put the interest of the USA ahead of their
own?
Good Luck to us all.
.
The resident anti Semite progressive leftist troll chimes in right on cue.
Keeping taxes the same is not a tax cut.
I'm not a leftist. Leftism is a Jewish movement from Marx to the USSR to modern day Israel.
I wish that I shared Mr. Kudlow's optimism. We are talking about maintaining the status quo, not tax cuts. It may put aside some fears about that particular uncertainty, however, I don't see how it does anything more to stimulate the economy than it did last month, or last year when we had the same tax rate.
TARP, Stimulus I, II, III, Son of Stimulus, Obamacare, the list of chaos creating bills already passed, is legion. We were in a hole in 2008 and now that hole is three generations deep. Forgive me if I fail to celebrate not having to start paying for the trillions of dollars in senseless give-aways for two more years.
No leftism is an invention of stinky hippie nazi democrat douchebag potheads and environmentalists.
Jerusalem always has been and will forever be the capitol of the Jewish state for the Jewish people.
"Palestinians" already have a homeland it's called Jordan and their capitol is Amman.
Jerusalem always has been and will forever be the capitol of the Jewish state for the Jewish people.
Do Whites get a capitol or do we just have to pay for Jews to have one?
Spiking the inheritance tax to 35% from zero is not a cut, taxing someone in death for what has already been taxed in life is pure hatred.
"Rasmussen finds that 56 percent favor the tax-cut deal while only 29 percent oppose it."
Count me in with the 29%. First because this isn't a "tax-cut deal" (it would have to have TAX CUTS to be a "tax-cut deal") But more importantly because the new Congress could have passed a BETTER deal in the first week in January. And democrats would have taken the blame for tax rates going up for everyone; the Republicans could have started their session by fixing that terrible wrong; unemployment benefits in the deal could have been PAID FOR; and actual tax rates could have been cut even more, not just the extension of current rates.
So yes. I am adamantly opposed to this "tax-cut deal" ever seeing the light of passage.
I never thought I'd see myself type this, but …………………………….."Go Nancy."
Now the connection to W.A.R. rears its ugly head too…
Now if they sell bonds won't that create a run on bonds and risks popping the bond bubble? If the bond bubble pops then won't the dollar collapse? Seems to me the fed has painted itself into a corner and the congress is about to walk across the floor.
The progressives are on their path of trying to destroy this economy. I don't think even the new Congress can unravel the damage thats been done to this country in such a devastating way. The economists are not that optimistic and Soros is sipping his cognac and smiling. It will take years to unravel this mess and I agree with the above comments: I am not even remotely optimistic at this point, especially with the executive orders that will be bouncing around like a rubber ball.
"Of the current titans of industry, who do we know that would put the interest of the USA ahead of their
own?"
Well, I started to do a little reading on this guy. He seems like a real philanthropist. (Not the soros kind)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Huntsman,_Sr.
ROTFLMAO. Why just yesterday, this site had the following doomsday article: http://biggovernment.com/prahe/2010/12/10/economi... I pointed out that this author's opinion was in direct contrast with Warren Buffett's and I was vilified and I mean vilified. Well, you lemmings, which way do you like your crow? Baked or broiled?
"Let the bill die, let the Dems take the blame for the tax increase Jan 1, then let the new kids in town take out THEIR pencils…"
I'm with you 100%.
Yes. That's EXACTLY what they've done.
yes, kudlow wants you to sell bonds, and buy stocks. if this was so great, why are big institutional investors dumping thier stocks? the market does not run on reality, and as such there is no reason for it to be this high, except the feds actions. once the music stops, the fools holding the stocks will get taken to the cleaners.and will kudow pay for your losses, nope, just tell you to blow your money on something else.
I don't know how old you are, but you are wise beyond your years…
Yep, he's the ONLY one I could think of as well, NEXT!
.
"No, leftism is an invention of stinky hippie nazi democrat douchebag potheads"
"and environmentalists."
I think maybe you're being redundant.
Yeah, but Anthony Weiner says it's fair. so…………………………..
Well, that's why he's a wiener.
According to tortured progressive logic, keeping tax rates unchanged while spiking the inheritance tax amounts to a "giveaway". In their minds, all earnings belong to Washington, and any missed opportunity to confiscate more of it is criminal.
Well, maybe there is David H. and Charles G. Koch.
There are some who give to worthy causes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_H._Koch
"David Koch has given money to support educational, academic and public policy research focused on "developing voluntary, market-based solutions to social problems."[23] He has given to the Bill of Rights Institute, a non-profit that educates teachers, students, and others about the Bill of Rights.[23][24] He has also given to the Young Entrepreneurs Kansas, an organization that teaches business skills to at-risk youth in Kansas schools.
What is W.A.R.?
The war machine springs to life.
Opens up one eager eye.
Focusing it on the sky.
Where 99 red balloons go by
" Soros is sipping his cognac and smiling "
Now you did it, I'm going to have to get a new drink. I do not want anything in common with that A$$.
I used to think that Alan Grayson was the most offensive person in the party on the Left, until Weiner.
Who's worse on TV; Pelosi, Reid, Grayson, Weiner or Obama?
Weiner and Obama are tied for me.
Why do Obama and the Democrats absolutely HATE the RICH and DESIRE to PUNISH them for their hard work? (those who make $250,00)
Sorry…lol.
It's not a cut neo,
The Left thinks any money, present or future is theirs to spend. So stopping any taxes from rising is money they feel they are "entitled" to. They stopped thinking they worked for us about 70 years ago. They truly believe in their mind, the money is "theirs". It is a mental disillusionment.
Why do Obama and the Democrats HATE the RICH and DESIRE to PUNISH them for their hard work? (those who make $250,000)
Ok, I realize this is a very serious topic but you know guys, we can disagree on certain issues without getting minused by each other. I thought we are all on the same side and just looking for solutions.( Except for HuskersLove Bo)
except for the trolls, they just want to start arguments. i always say, do not feed the trolls!
"Who's worse on TV; Pelosi, Reid, Grayson, Weiner or Obama?"
Wow, that's a tough one.
I'd have to give pelosi the title, queen of evil.
obama's the ultimate con-man.
reid is just a worm.
weiner's the guy who could never keep a girlfriend.
And grayson is, well, nothing more than a one term congressman.
All of them are pretty bad, but I have to give the prize to the queen of evil.
You mean the proverbial male chauvinist blind squirrel (wink).
Buffett sucks at the DC trough, too, so his opinion isn't exactly free of bias.
Buffett sucks at the DC trough, too, so I take his opinions half seriously.
Recently there have been some stealth trolls around who are too chicken to make a comment but love to thumbs-down everyone. You could post "The sky is blue" and still get thumbs-down for it.
Ha, ha, ha. The truth really hurts. The world's smartest investor ever. He lives in Omaha, Nebraska, oh about 1,500 miles from the "DC trough".
We're being TD'd for not having the proper attitude, donchakno. Everything is sweetness and light
and will be perfect after the 112th Congress is seated. The Republicans in the House will save
the world. The thought police allow no negative opinions from anyone. Like when you were a kid,
and were told, If you can't say something good, keep your mouth shut.
.
Hard to do that here. My mouth is probably my downfall because I say it like it is and phuck political correctness. I get very passionate about things.
I think there are too many folks here that do what taxpayer said, but are not trolls. For example, look at some of the Sarah Palin threads.
When you see a thread where there are 20 comments and one post has -85 and no replies I think maybe the interests of civil debate is not being served.
Maybe there should be a rule that you can't click a thumb until you post a comment, I don't know.
But I know this: The zombies who mindlessly thumb down every post that doesn't totally agree with their opinion and never comment are either lazy or cowards or both, and their numbers seem to be growing.
He has a very long straw from which to suck:
"Here are some of the stock holdings of Warren "Supplier not a supplicant" Buffett's Berkshire: Wells Fargo (WFC) ($9 billion worth at end of 2009). U.S. Bancorp (USB) ($1.7 billion worth at end of 2009). American Express (AXP) ($6 billion worth at end of 2009). The taxpayer put $25 billion into Wells Fargo, $6.6 billion into U.S. Bancorp, and $3.38 billion into American Express through the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Berkshire invested $5 billion in Goldman Sachs (GS) on September 24, 2008; on October 28, 2008, Goldman agreed to take $10 billion in TARP money. Berkshire invested $3 billion in General Electric (GE) on October 1, 2008; on November 12, 2008, GE Capital announced it had received approval from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Temporary Liquidity Guaranty Program to issue up to $139 billion in debt backed by a government guaranty."
http://seekingalpha.com/article/191088-berkshire-...
Sorry, but your hero sucks from the government trough. Too bad so sad.
It's time to see who really wants to go back to basics, and who just gave lip service.
Really? I couldn't tell. (wink)
That's possible. However, the trolls have no interest in civil debate. Some trolls are so obnoxious that the only response they deserve is a -85.
They fail epically when they post racist/hateful comments to "prove" that the people on this board agree with same. Their thumbs-down stuff is another tactic just to disrupt and distract, not to participate.
Are you trying to claim that you're good at math? : )
Well, if it's a "White" capitol you want, then I suggest you give N/NE Europe a go.
We're all Americans here and if you don't like it you can skedaddle your posterior the coitus out of here.
Sweet dreams.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WlCdiU9IzA
The trolls have been very busy, Copper. I actually think that there are a good handful who work the BB sites full time thumbing us down and getting paid to do so. Is sad really.
Oy vey – buy some stocks. Brokers need the money. They don't actually create anything and depend on your gullibility. Take it from a former SDS member……
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1sJDhJ-6iE
Don't look now, but I think you're just as bigoted, if not more so, than that idiot is.
Enjoy the hate!
LOL!
The math gene skipped me, so it's very dangerous for me to drink and derive. (snerk) My sister is a chemist (Purdue grad), and my daughter was calculating probabilities for Texas Hold 'Em at age 8.
It wasn't too long ago that I ticked everyone up in this thread. I come back and everyone's down by two.
Not trolls … cowards.
Hateful, vengeful, arrogant know-it-alls………NOT trolls, you are so right WWU.
.
Buy guns and ammo………………………it's the best investment you'll ever make.
They'll never lose their value……………….and one day, you'll be glad you have them.
Let me know how those stocks and bonds taste when they're worthless…………and you're hungry.
And they'll serve no purpose when it comes to bringing down a deer to feed your family.
I'll bet that last remark left a bitter taste in your mouth…………
John, did you read Krauthammers' article about it being nothing more than another trillion dollar stimulus?
Just piling more debt onto our children and grandchildrens backs…………..disgusting.
I'm in the 29% as well………..and i just love the fact that the dems are all jagged off with "effen noblama".
heh!………Brings a smile to my face………………….
I'm with you copper………….i don't give 2 shits what number's beside my name. It goes up, and it goes down, and i don't care.
And if it appears i'm being too insensitive or over the top?…………..i delete it myself.
Its probably a total of 3 people with 4 or 5 screen names capable of dropping you 12 to 15 points on every statement you post. Simply ignore them.
Don't thumb em up, don't thumb em down, and don't reply to them. they'll disappear.
When was the last time you heard anything from mikatollah?
No bonds and no stocks. Commodities. Buy Gold. Buy ammo. Buy fuel. Bye bye!
Huskers, you have to pick a new team dude.
May I suggest one from Texas or Oklahoma? Seeings how you can't get by any of them………..
"No bonds and no stocks."
Not while a Democrat is anywhere near the economy.
'Given the season–Nöel Cowards.
"I'm not a leftist. Leftism is a Jewish movement from Marx to the USSR to modern day Israel."
Not really. Leftism has many origins, and adherents across every ethnic boundary. To call it an entirely Jewish creation is idiotic. Nor does it somehow describe Israel, something you'd know if you had the intellectual curiosity and integrity to visit there yourself. Leftism is also far older than people think. Some of the earliest models of the social-welfare state were enacted by peoples and nations as diverse as the Roman Emperor Diocletian to the Incan Empire.
Israel's had a strong tradition of leftism dating back to the early European-model socialist leanings of Ben Gurion's government. Conservatism has experienced a virtual Israeli renaissance, along with free-market economics. Today the Knesset is pretty much divided between the far-right Likud and moderate right Kadima, with the leftist Labor making up a distant third, an anemic state of affairs for a party which once dominated Israeli politics.
"Oy vey – buy some stocks. Brokers need the money. They don't actually create anything and depend on your gullibility."
Writes the idiot on the machine and using a service that is the end result of the revolutionary economic transformation brought on by the joint stock company.
BTW, you suck at satire, and your humor is leaden.
My word, you two are up late.
I posted this about a month ago. Glenn Beck was telling his listeners to get out of the stock market because it is rigged. He was predicting the Dow Jones to drop to 5000 soon. I don't understand why or how the stock market went up when Russia and China quit the dollar? I don't own stocks myself.
Other than that, I ditto L4S's post. I suspect all hell to break loose once the new Freshman are seated. They will make for a great scape goat for the Democrats.
My husband and I are tossing around the idea of buying a used fire place insert. I don't have the room and to put in a free standing fire place. It would stick out in the middle of my living room.
Hubby picked up two more boxes of 9 mm at Walmart yesterday. They are only 10 bucks for a box of 50. We used to pay 20 bucks at the gun shop. We didn't think Walmart sold handgun ammo since they don't sell handguns.
Maybe trolls should be treated to a Silent Night compliments of us?
Yes Larry, it is surely a "V" shaped recession just like all of your Go-Wall-Street talk and recommendations. You haven't been correct on a meaty subject since 2001 – after it happened.
I see. And what college team do you cheer for? It is too bad we had to play Oklahoma with Martinez hurt and our second team quarterback hurt, too. I guess it sucks to be you. Why I bet you cheer for Auburn.
Hmmm. Who started TARP? Obama. Sorry, try again. Ol' Georgie. Wells Fargo has paid the money back. http://www.dsnews.com/articles/wells-fargo-and-ci... Now I want you to think hard. Think really hard about the next question. When a bank is shut down by the FDIC, are all their loans due? I eagerly await your response.
Correction: Noël
It's the law (or should be). Good morning.
Never much of math whiz myself.
The Summers Harvard "controversy" was a hoot, though — always fun to watch when liberals eat their own.
25% Precious Metals
25% Bonds
25% Cash
25% Stocks
You'll always have something, never miss a mortgage payment, and you'll sleep like a baby.
What are you creating, BeelzeBreath? What's Obama, the lawyer created? Students for a Democratic Society is an organization that creates wealth? Interesting–tell me more. When I was a kid back in the 60s, they were just a bunch of socialist pissants, who were bored with their privileged lives, hated being in school, and were committed to creating as much chaos as they could driven by their misguided view of the world. What has changed?
Oh, that's right. We just call them Regressivist lawyers now.
"My word, you two are up late."
Screwed up and ate a Terri's chocolate orange too late. Stock market's going down.
Economic leeches sucking the life blood from the very thing they hate, Capitalism. Socialist pissants is right! They prove by such comments that they have learned nothing since their little tirades. They prove that they are still the drain on society that they were in the 60's. That portion of the Boomers gives us all a bad name.
BTW, morning bro. Merry Christmas to you and family.
Looks like they are up early this am P2O… so that the sheets can be changed where they wet the bed.
He, he, he. I believe the little trolbots are weeing all over themselves. Just can't stand a free market. LOLL
Merry CHRISTMAS (that's… "CHRISTMAS" without the X) to both of you also.
BTW, good morning to you my brother to the south.
"I'll bet that last remark left a bitter taste in your mouth…………"
Thankfully I only had to type it. But I did have to scrub my hands and disinfect my keyboard afterward.
"did you read Krauthammers' article about it being nothing more than another trillion dollar stimulus?"
I actually didn't. Mostly because I heard him speak about it, and I already know what this "deal" entails. Well, so far anyway. I wasn't factoring in the ethanol subsidies and windmill farms, et al.
Somehow, as this "deal" continues to change, I keep hearing the line from Darth Vader, "I've altered the deal. Pray I don't alter it further."
Personally, I hope nancy lards up the deal so much that it NEVER sees the light of day in the senate.
The short yellow buses don't run that well in the snow and ice…. just sayin'.
Yes, to enjoy the one gift. The same blessings to you and yours.
Morning Kevin!
Stock Markets down? I just turned Fox on. I had the weather channel on cause we go an inch of sticky wet snow. It looks like our Midwestern Brethren are buried and cold. Wisconsin in below zero so I won't complain that it's thirty today. My yard looks like a winter wonderland!
Do you remember the winters in the Midwest during the late 70s? I remember the snow pack was a tall as me when I walked to Grade School. We were all going to die during the Global Cooling Ice Age nonsense.
You must be logged in to post a comment.