Better Late Than Never: Top Senate Dem Admits Un-American Health Bill Was to Address “Mal-Distribution of Income”
by Kyle OlsonNow Max Baucus tells us: the health care overhaul America was just forced to endure was the government’s attempt to fix the “mal-distribution of income.” It’s an admission that sadly comes after the bill has passed and been signed by President Obama. But it’s better late than never.
While the acknowledgment likely wouldn’t have stopped the legislation because chances are it was common knowledge behind closed doors, at least the admission has now become public. And it proves the point the whole exercise had nothing to do with Americans’ health and more to do with the Marxist concept of “redistributing” wealth.
According to FoxNews.com, Baucus said:
“Too often, much of late, the last couple three years, the mal-distribution of income in American is gone up way too much, the wealthy are getting way, way too wealthy and the middle income class is left behind,” he said. “Wages have not kept up with increased income of the highest income in America. This legislation will have the effect of addressing that mal-distribution of income in America.”
Excuse me Senator, but who the hell are you to decide who is “too wealthy?” Given this claptrap, you’d be a perfect candidate for a Fidel Castro or Hugo Chavez administration – after all, Castro did just call ObamaCare a “miracle.” Or would Castro and Chavez fit right into the leadership in Washington, DC these days?
Regardless, all doubts that the Democrats’ takeover of health care was little more than a power grab in the name of “social justice” have been confirmed. And it should be all the more reason to push for a repeal of this fundamentally un-American takeover.
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
595 Comments
Slippery Max.
I sure don't understand how he gets re-elected. Everyone I know in Montana despises him. He is feces.
What the Left forgets to mention is that it was they who regulated, taxed, and strangled with demanding unions until industry went offshore–and in so doing shrinking America's robust middle class.
Max Baucus will not have to sell an acre of his 2000+ acre ranchy in order to pay his tax bill. His ex-wife that he divorced after 30 years and had a staffer break the news to regarding the divorce may have some ideas regarding his total lack of integrity. But hey, even confirmed liars get something right once in a while! He is nothing but another elitist who can tell others how they should live while having the personal integrity of a pagan goat.
Look south to Mexico if you want to know how the Dems will get re-elected
What do you mean, "Better late than Never?" They knew all along what they were doing and they have no intention of repairing the damage. That's not a confession–that's rubbing something in someone's face: our face, that is.
They need to be noted out of office. All of them.
We all knew it was a redistribution of wealth bill. Dems admitting it in public means they don't think we will have any way of ever repealing it. So why not be out in the open about it. Their arrogance is astounding.
Funny how the things that Glenn Beck has been saying, are now being admitted by the Dems after being passed.
Exactly whose wealth is supposed to be redistributed? Max Baucass owns 125,000 acres of Montana ranchland.
Perhaps he'd like to start divying it up now for the less fortunate?
Obama owns a mansion in Chicago that he allegedly bought with royalties from a book he may or may not have written. He also has an enlarged side yard purchased thru nefarious means in a deal he cut with convicted slumlord Tony Rezko. Obie could rent out rooms in his mansion thru Section 8.
Connie,
He did not do right by his wife here.
I do not see him getting re-elected. There are some good people here, who detest him for what he did to her.
Just who the he!! are these people and what gives the the idea that they can dictate to the country how much anyone can earn.
This clap trap of Social Justice and income re-distribution is so contrary to American principles I don't even know where to begin.
Blah Blah has it right, the unions under the guise of caring for the 'working class' have so screwed up the market for labor in this country that they have effectively priced american labor out of the market. Until we can get the average person to understand this fact of life, there will be no change in this headlong rush to welfare statehood.
The TEA Party is our nations only real hope at this point!
We knew that before you started, but we were ridiculed and called crazy for crying "socialist!" and otherwise trying to point it out to the public. By Baucus and those like him.
Go figure.
Of course that is what it is for. All gussied up to look like just providing health care when the middle class's tax money is going to be distributed to the poor.
http://www.PoliticalCentrist.com News and views for independent voters
blah_blah
Compared to Progressive Dems, aka Marxists, aka Statists, your post sounds more like the words of Solomon.
Sarah Palins wisdom, aka common sense, is as close to Solomons Wisdom as I have witnessed from any former or current politician.
I know that Cowboy and I believe we have good people everywhere across this great land. There are just too few of them in DC but the ballot box is a great equalizer!
Income vs "wages"? Most of the wealthy make their money work for them by saving and investing. Most poor people have poor ways. Crime causes poverty. Teenage birth causes poverty. Running up thousands dollars in credit card debt causes poverty.
Dems peddle class envy to get elected. Dems invent problems to solve to get elected. Republicans HAVE to take back congress in November or else things will got a whole lot worse.
PLANTATION POLITICS at is finest just buying votes with Social In-Justice…. No more!!!
Isn't this the guy guy who hired his new "girlfriend" at an inflated pay rate to some state job?
What shocking admissions will come out after they shove amnesty down our throats?
This acknowledgment to the real intent of supposed health care is HUGE. Not only was this agenda suspect in the bill, but LIES purporting it to the nation to be something else. Since this admission comes out now, it is only right and proper to IMPEACH the liar-in-chief, make a motion to impose term limits on Congress, repeal the bill as written declaring the motive of MAL-INTENT since Baucus did say it is to correct mal-distribution of income. Here is the new proposal- all members of Congress, czars, president and vp, government jobs (except military) cut wages by 50% !
That still puts their salary above the average American. It is the right start for their redistribution efforts. Then if they are so inclined to pursue further redistributive efforts in what was a working free enterprise system they can leave all their assets to an illegal alien and move to Mexico, Venezuela, or Cuba to enjoy the rationing of electric, food, & water. This way they can be happy with their ideology of socialism.
Ok Max and who gets to pick who has too much or less…you? What if we think that writing yourself out the health care bill means YOU have to much…What if WE think your pay and bennies in Congress are too much….If you talk the talk be prepared to walk the walk jerk.
What gets a liberals panties in a bunch about wealth distribution in part is caused by both the Democrats and Republicans.
The United States system is by no means a free market capitalism system (think Big Pharma/FDA for example.)
Lots of wealth has indeed been funneled into the top 1% with the aid of Washington. This gives free market, capitalism, and success a bad name.
People then become confused about earning money through hard work vs. earning it through government policies (think Archer Daniels Midland/Ethanol.)
This also allows politicians to please both groups (think evil insurance companies, yet handing them another 30 million customers)
I am mostly unemployed right now and damn near broke. I do not want the govt to solve my problems. I do not want the govt to steal my neighbor's cash and give it to me after they skim 95% off the top for bureaucratic administration. I would rather live in a tent in the woods than to sell my family into slavery to the fed govt. I want the govt to get out of my life and to get out of the way of business so our economy can rebound and I can get back to work. Can't they see that most of the poverty in this country is created by the govt. The only people getting ahead with govt help are lobbyists and congresses family members and friends that get our tax money in grants and contracts. Obama wants to crash the system and start over. He won't live long enough to see his sick dreams come to life. Americans will not stand for this. We will fight for a hundred years to get back our country. Obama may or may not have been born here, but he has no idea what it means to be an American.
He owns a 125,000 acre Montana ranch. Maybe he can redistribute the land………..
In March 2009, Baucus nominated his live-in girlfriend and recent state director, Melodee Hanes, to the vacant position of U.S. Attorney for Montana. Later withdrawn.
Give me liberty or give me death you commie b***ard f***s.
"I'm a rich bastard who never really had to work for anything in my life. It makes me feel SOOO! guilty that I think I will violate the individual rights of millions of American citizens and disrupt the economic engine of the world by adding ANOTHER burden to its back. I don't really understand how it works, but I'm better and smarter than everyone because I won an election. Besides, it has never failed to keep producing.
Yep. That, and a few drinks, and now I feel much better…
What? Me sacrifice? Personally? Only idiots do that…"
I think that's what he really meant.
[...] Email this to a friend | Print | Share on Facebook | Tweet this | // [...]
Obama plans to move his socialist agenda at a fast forward speed, we better fight back now. http://sosssn.blogspot.com/
I was thinking the same thing as I was perusing all the comments… the red phone never rings. Beck has been on top of this from the beginning.
It is almost like a "good cop, bad cop" kind of deal. Demonize the "fat cats" when preaching to the kool aid drinkers and then hand the collaborators whatever they want to keep the vote buying donations flowing.
Progressives hate Beck for a reason. He asks questions and connects dots they would rather never see the light of day.
I'm not quite sure why anyone is surprised by this. Obama told Joe the Plumber that he believed in "spreading the wealth around", the story was broadcast far and wide, yet Americans still voted for him. There are a good percentage of Americans who want wealth redistributed. They want to sit home on their asses and get others to pay their bills. And those people vote 100% Democrat.
David,
You are wrong, and your post is misleading. Max Baucus does not own a 125,000 acre ranch in Montana. he grew up on the Sieben Ranch started by his grandfather. The Sieben Ranch is in the Blackfoot Valley, and is a sheep operation. They aren't cattlemen, or ranchers. They are a bunch of goddamned sheepherders. Don't play the class warfare card, if it isn't factual.
Your second sentence is correct.
Yup, Obama bashes Wall Street in public, yet meets behind cloesd doors to exchange "pleasantries" and drink coffee – while bailing them out and watching as they divvy up billions of OUR tax dollars. This while the Wall Street political donations are running 75/25% towards Democrats.
Yes, and the result is another law, after another law, after another amendment to fix the law, adding another section to the tax code to punish one group and award another group etc. etc.
The car engine needs rebuilt and they change the sparkplugs and oil.
More and more I believe the Constitution is seriously flawed and the experiment is a fail (think federal courts ruling against the federal gov on healthcare one tiny example)
Basically, not enough restriction to central government, I mean the Commerce Clause lets them do pretty much anything under the sun right? I think the Judicial System has also been one of the biggest let downs for regular citizens, but often doesn't take the heat like it should. I think BigJudicial.com would make a great site exposing all these crooked m fkrs.
Excuse me Senator, but who the hell are you to decide who is “too wealthy?”
Ask "Bob."
Lawsuits should be filed against them for this. Bastards!
By the same token, I'm out of shape and can't really play basketball for more than 20 minutes at a time, Mr. Baucus. I want a bill that addresses the mal-distribution of athletic talent.
You can call it Air Force Dumb after the Nike shoes.
By the same token, I'm out of shape and can't really play basketball for more than 20 minutes at a time, Mr. Baucus. I want a bill that addresses the mal-distribution of athletic talent.
Hopefully some of the idiots that did vote for obummer will see the light (truth) about what this administration is all about and come over to our side !!!!
We can get the word out there and change some minds !!!!!!
I talked with my brother today, (he doesn't usually vote??) He does know what is going on though, and doesn't care for obummer!!! I told him I need him to vote in Nov. These are the kind of things we need to do !!!
Bravo your last sentence!! It should be one of the Repubs' campaign slogans next year..
GET UP STAND UP
STAND UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS..
DONT GIVE UP THE FIGHT..
*Bob Marley
I'm so fricking angry I can't even comment on these threads anymore !!!!
I been trying to not even read them !!!!
Max must have been hitting the bottle again, damn the truth slipped out…
Wow. When democrats speak honestly, they sound even dumber!
Democrats are only against mal-distribution when it serves their purposes.
When Tom Coburn tried to counter the Dems' continued deficit spending on unemployment by converting the continued unemployment funding into a draw-down of already committed Porkulus funds, the Dems shot him down, having no use for his deficit-neutral solution that defunds Porkulus pet projects.
They want to redistribute wealth based on class, just as long as it doesn't interfere with redistributing wealth to their pet pork projects and Wall Street cronies first.
I think black people's penises are too big. We should do something about that too.
Idont Know Cowboy My wife did right by me when I divorced her she got everything but the kids. Seemed like a hell of a deal to me at the time.
Why is it that when income is redistributed from the upper-class to the working and middle classes it's called a "Marxist redistribution of wealth", but when income is distributed from the working and middle classes to the upper class it simply goes unnamed?
Batt my friend, we are on the same page once again
snorkling?
That's right! Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann in 2012!
I think our Constitution may not be perfect, but it is as perfect as those who are governed by it. The Framers had a totally different idea of how the commerce clause was to be applied. Over many years, our Constitution has been bastardized by politicians and lawyers of all stripes. It is not a living document, as proclaimed by progressives, but a guide to how our country should be governed and not ruled by tyrants. It simply states what our Creator has given us in the way of rights and limits what government can control. The Framers assumed there would be some semblance of common sense. Unfortunately, that does not appear to be the case.
It has a name its called corruption its in the dictionary just above Democrat
Here is the video of Baucus saying what is in the article above:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY4Qbv7gPbo
Hey Counselor, while you are at it. Can you see where we stand on the redistribution of Melanin? It doesn't seem fair that I live in SoCal and can't have a great tan like so many others!
Sure there is a name for it, it's called a bailout.
You know, like the ones going on at AIG, GM, and the banks, run by Turbo Tax Tim.
These aren't new either. The backroom megabank-bailout was pioneered by Clinton crony Robert Rubin, to save his friends at Citigroup (who paid him hundreds of millions in employment compensation) when Mexico was ready to default on its loans and stick Citi with billions in losses. Rubin stepped in to loan Mexico money that went immediately back to pay back Citibank, so they wouldn't lose billions on a sovereign default by Mexico.
Rubin currently works as an economic adviser to Obama.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Rubin#1990s_g...
I forgot to write that it was TAXPAYER money that Rubin loaned to Mexico when he was Secretary of the Treasury under Slick Willie.
This guy is lying. How do I know he is lying? He doesn't care about the middle class. This bill is not to redistribute wealth, it's to make us all poor, it's to redistribute poverty to the upper middle class, the middle class and the 'just above poverty line' now we can all play in the same sandbox. This bill targets everyone but the super rich, like Hollywood Elitists and Meg Whitman. Even when he is trying to tell the truth he lies, lies like a freakin rug.
This bill has to be repealed or we need a revolution, we can get this kind of socialism from our Northern Neighbor or across the pond in Europe, we don't need another socialist country, socialism was last year's new black, this year the new black is reviving entrepreneurship and setting the Americans free. We the People of the US, in order to form a more perfect union……..
Depends on whether the government is involved or not. Exclusive of court judgments pertaining to enforcement of contracts, or concerning torts, government "redistribution" of wealth, in either direction, is best described as "theft."
When it's voluntary, and government is minimally involved, if at all, "redistribution" of wealth from the wealthy to the less wealthy is called many things…"salary" comes to mind. In the other direction? How about "purchases?"
The press is complicit in this outrage and raping of the American dream
This is how the left works. They call everyone else what THEY are to try and hide it. Calling tea party people "right wing extremists who hold there Bibles and guns a little too close".. or whatever Obama said a while back.. Makes me sick.
Really, MiPain? I don't think you have ever looked at a dictionary (or other books for that matter). There are many words between "corruption" and "Democrat", including the word "crass" which is applicable in your case. Perhaps if you ever looked at a dictionary you would know that the "its" in your reply should be "it's" (a contraction for "it is"). Moreover, you might learn that sentences end with periods. Try reading a book sometime. Or is that too "intellectual" for you?
Wake up two friends a month, it's all we ask…
Every time you get a chance flip a liberal!
Bob,
I think you call it "gravity" Bob – at least it's on the same order as gravity. People who have wealth – in general – got that way by making good life decisions, and teaching their kids to make smart life decsions. Many of the poor got that way by making bad life decisions (having kids as teenagers, droppping out of school, not doing well in school, substance abuse problems, etc., etc. ). Many of them raise their kids to make the same mistakes, and the cycles – BOTH good and bad – perpetuate.
You could take all the money away from EVERYONE in the country – redistribute it out in completely equal amounts – and in a few decades at MOST – the same people who were rich will be rich again. Many (certainly not all – but MANY – if not MOST) of the dirt poor people will be dirt poor again.
continuing to Bob
As long as we seek to demonize those who make GOOD life decisions – we are setting ourselves up for a cycle of continous decline. Instead of "bashing" the successful – or trying to tax them into non-existence – how about the media for a change highlights the many millionares who got that way from meager means, who MADE good decisions in life, and show all the positive consequences??? For example, I know of many people who started out as minority immigrants in this country, but who didn't approach life as though they were supposed ot be a "victim" with their hand out looking for a government entitlement program to live off. I know of 2 Cuban immigrants who literally got here with NOTHING but the clothes on their back, and both of them are now EXTREMELY wealthy. Know how they got there?? Hard work – determination – PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY – and a recognition that the opportunity to live in the United States of America was the greatest gift that God could have provided them.
Batt,
I miss your commentary.
I have noticed that alot of old regular people have gone from here. Is that the reason?
Wasn't it your corruptocrat Slick Willy who tried to school us on what the definition of the word "is" is?
contiuning to Bob,
There are certainly a few areas where we could see some changes in top executive pay. But the government is WRONG to step in and be the "judge" of this – and sowing the seeds of class warfare in the process. As a stockholder in a number of companies, I'd like to see an easier process for the shareholders of a company to have input into public corporation executive pay. But the government should help put a process in place to see that this happens – and then BUTT OUT!!
FYI – the "rich" in the country – however you want to define it – are now paying a greater percentage of the total income taxes that at ANY time in our history – it's not even close. The "higher marginal rates" in the past were also before Reagan simplified (for a time) the tax code – lower rates – but eliminating many of the most widely used tax shelters. His lower marginal rates also spawned greater economic activity – which INCREASED tax revenues by a huge amount.
continuing to Bob,
The government should approach tax policy with the idea of maximizing revenue while providing the greatest amount of economic activity . This is something liberals never understand. Think of it this way – if you raised tax rates to 100% – you would collect ZERO dollars in revenue because no one would take part in a system that saw all the revenue going to the government. If you lowered rates to 0% – you would also collect no tax revenue. Somewhere in the middle – you maximize revenue while also keeping the incentives for greater risk taking, hard work, and investment.. It was proven while Reagan was President that the rates under Jimmy Carter were far too high to provide the "right" level of taxation. They got too high because liberals would rather punish success, and subsidize those who choose to milk the system. For them, it's not about doing what's best for the country – its about "fairness" – which is leftist code for "if I can't have it – then I don't want some rich person to have it either." When we are looking back fondly on the days when we had quality healthcare readily available in this country – remember that premise.
Baucus obviously doesn't understand fundemental economics – but he does seem to grasp socialism – he did a nice job aof describing it in that video.
Say, do you know why divorces cost so much?
Because they are worth every penny of it……….
Keep the blacks right were they want them, in the guetto.
I make a meager living; I have my faith, family, and my country – or at least I had my country. I do not begrudge anyone their freedom to earn whatever they wish to earn, as long as they're not doing something illegal to earn their money. I don't wish for their money, nor am I jealous of those who exhibit wealth. Most of that behavior is illusory and petty.
I'm sick of the intellectuals, intelligentsia, and their minions deciding that they would prefer social equality over freedom. We provide equal justice under the law, and that's the only equality I expect in our democratic republic. I will choose freedom over equality at all costs. Freedom and equality cannot exist in the same space, but with freedom I can choose any life I desire.
We have created a society of victims. Victimization is at the heart of diversity, multiculturalism, hate crimes legislation, reparations, social justice, globalism, social science, ad naseum, and all the other crap they teach in almost every university in America.
Once upona time in America there were several national pizza chains. Though not as good as the family parlor in your neighborhood, there were all over the place and relatively good and reasonable priced. Then they all continues to get more and more expensive and people – facing the Obama Recession stopped patronizing them as often. Not good.
So one national pizza place LOWERED their prices to $5.00 for a mediocre pepperoni pizza. Not bad for $5.00. Business BOOMED!
Other national pizza places saw a decline in business. I wonder why? Maybe people – faced with scarce resources decided to compromise and buy QUANTITY over a bit of quality.
Low and behold the other national pizza places AJUSTED their business model and streesed better quality at new LOWER PRICES! WOW!!!! The MARKET PLACE ADJUSTED and WORKED. COMPETITION WORKED.
We can all buy BETTER PIZZA at more COMPETITIVE PRICES!!!!!
What if we applied this model to say….HEALTHCARE? I bet it would work. More competition between Insurance Companies and providers. Less $18.00 crappy pizzas. I wonder if it would work…
What was withdrawn?
bucking old broncos?
"Excuse me Senator, but who the hell are you to decide who is “too wealthy?” "
The real problem, IMO, is that allowing the middle class and wealthy to buy better care… helps everyone including the poor. If the middle class or rich won't wait 3 months for a MRI, they pay more to get more MRI machines on line… which are then also used by the poor.
By forcing everyone into government managed and equal insurance… it makes it impossible to continue to do this. I.e., we can't easily pay more for better service. Ergo, the system stagnates… for everyone.
I don't know if econ has a name for it but I'll go with this… It kind of reminds me of fast times at Righmont high… if Spicoli could get his two pieces of pizza in exchange for giving away the rest to other students, it might be worth it to him. If he has to buy two slices for everyone in class to get two himself… well… the cost of subsiding others is too high.
Let them eat cake is my mantra. The scumbags have been planning this hi-jacking for years.
Watch Reich and Rangel explain their plan:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opxuUj6vFa4
My plan is to make as little money as possible and get myself some of the handouts. I've gone from paying over $40K a year in income tax (not including FICA) to paying under $1K. I know dozens of others who have saved for years who have also decided to Opt out for a while and let the elitists feel the pain.
Why should I kill myself to earn a good living and provide jobs for others, while the union thugs and long term unemployed wait for their payoff from Yomama? Surely when China stops lending, reality will set in and the Party in power will decide to quit penalizing productivity. In the meantime, let them eat cake.
Another liberal puke fesses up.
Cool. A "faux intellectual" acting out "English teacher" fantasy issues. Get bit.
PS
Whenever I debated a lefty into a corner on this they always fell back on 'fairness and equality" being the real goal…
Amen! Victims and victim mentality, anyone can rise above, but some people are just happy in that place.
I'm "hiding out" in school. Screw 'em. I've paid a boatload of taxes over the years too.
JamesB they are going to impose an 18% tax on pizza now, only the Elitist and super rich are going to be able to afford pizza more than once a month. Tanning and Pizza, if that isn't a racist tax, I don't know what else is. I frequent both tanning booths and pizzerias and I see mostly white people
What they also "forget" to mention is that when they forced so much industry overseas, they didn't just shrink America's middle class, they actually drove UP the wealth of the nation's wealthiest. Now they bemoan the effects of their own miserable actions. It's time to put them all on the same unemployment roles that they have put so many of us on.
My God!!!,…………….Montana,…????/
here i thought all this time it was made up of good down to earth solid folks,…………..
This Mad Max guy makes me believe that all those lib transplants from California are taking over these western states.
Reading some of these posts,………this clown sounds like a solid Illinois / Chicago kind of Pol.
maybe so hollylamb. Don't give 'em any ideas. Europe has VAT taxes so everthing you buy you have to factor in the 18% (or so depends) VAT tax. It sucks.
LMAO that was hysterical. If we all stopped paying our taxes, the government would be in for a very rude awakening. I'm not going to work myself to death to allow lazi@sses to collect a check. OH HELL NO. I give to charity, I volunteer, I put a large downpayment on my house AND i should redistribute my wealth? OH HELL NO. Brock may sound like a liberal puke but he really almost has the right idea. We can't start a revolution, because that would make us 'bad people' we can't have tea parties because not enough black people attend them, that makes us racist, you know I'm tired of being Mr. Nice Guy. I'll work at McDonalds and wait on the people who can still "afford fries with that" and pay my minimum income tax and get my Obama handout. If we all did, it should last 2 years tops before civil war breaks out, then they can't blame it on the Racist Patriots.
Nah, I couldn't do that, I have just a little too much self respect, BUT I CAN DREAM, DREAMS ARE STILL ALLOWED IN AMERICA AREN'T THEY? PLEASE TELL ME THEY ARE.
I recently said as much in another thread- no more Mr. Nice Guys. Gloves off. We need to stamp this idiocy out, and call it what it is as we do so. Yes, My dream is to be Obama and Dem-free by 2012. I wish we could be MSM free as well! The press is doing its utmost to bring our great country to its knees, and so far they are succeeding pretty well. Enough already. We need leaders, not politicians, who will call down the Dems and the media and not kowtow to them. Yes, we can still dream….
This is nothing short of a complete takeover of our country. Has anyone seen THIS??? NOTE HOW BROAD THIS BILL IS… It includes ANYONE.
"A bill to provide for the interrogation and detention of enemy belligerents who commit hostile acts against the United States, to establish certain limitations on the prosecution of such belligerents for such acts, and for other purposes."
Why is this not headline news here on Big Government?????
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s3081/show
This is the link to the actual text of the bill itself. I posted the wrong link. Note that McCain authored it.
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s3081/text
RedWhite&Jew, I'm glad to hear that other people also call it "theft" when Big Government redistributes 54% of our income taxes to the military-industrial complex.
Do not patronize the MSM. They will disappear because the entitled spend on creature comforts.
Rut Row
Jlm, great, let's have a Jubilee! Since the world works according the principles you spelled out, there shouldn't be much opposition.
Where is anon with his "this isn't socialism, this isn't a takeover of healthcare" BS now?
I thought Montana was supposed to be a red state, how do you get so many socialists so high in your government?
sure and if we didn't give to that …there would be that much more money to give the "poor" right??
Some folks have bad water.
I think most of us on BG knew it was a scheme to redistribute the wealth….I just wonder how you get the word
out to all the airheads?….I am also worried that there are too many people with their hand-outs, too many that don't pay attention, and too many do-gooders that have NO CLUE!!
That's exactly right.
You must be logged in to post a comment.