Obama’s Big Plans for Justice Department Nominee Johnsen
by Ken Blackwell and Ken KlukowskiThe Senate is about to act on the nomination of militant leftist Dawn Johnsen to be the chief of the U.S. government’s elite legal team. But that post is a stepping-stone for top judicial offices, including the Supreme Court itself. That’s likely Barack Obama’s plans for Johnsen, and it’s why she must be stopped now.

Ultra-liberal activist Dawn Johnsen, currently a professor at Indiana University School of Law, is President Obama’s nominee to be assistant attorney general in charge of the Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). As the OLC chief, Johnsen would shape the legal positions of the Obama administration on every issue. OLC is the elite legal team for the federal government, giving legal advice on every important issue to the attorney general, other department heads in the government, and to the president himself. That’s why the head of OLC is called “the attorney general’s lawyer.”
The problem is that Johnsen is a radical. As the former legal director for the extremist abortion-rights group NARAL, Johnsen argued in a brief to the U.S. Supreme Court that denying a pregnant woman the right to demand unrestricted abortion is to subject her to slavery, which was outlawed by the Thirteenth Amendment after the Civil War.
She also argues that wiretapping a known terrorist is illegal without first obtaining a warrant, that military detention of terrorists captured on foreign battlefields is illegal, and that being commander-in-chief gives the president no constitutional authority to use wartime measures that would not be allowed against U.S. citizens during peacetime.
And finally, she believes in “economic justice,” which is the euphemistic term of the Radical Left, referring to the concept that government should confiscate and redistribute personal wealth to create a more “just” society. In one word, it’s socialism.
Even worse, Johnsen passionately argues that liberals should, “focus on the courts as the vehicles for desired change.” In other words, her legal advice would not only be advice; she intends to craft legal strategies to cram ultra-left outcomes down America’s throat through judicial activist court decisions.
The normal rule is that the Senate should give tremendous deference to any president when it comes to whom that president wants to assist him in the executive branch. Such appointees serve only at the pleasure of the president, they are there solely to carry out the president’s directions in steering the government, and they go out the door the instant the president does, if not before.
But even tremendous deference is not unlimited deference. The Senate defers, but they do not give a blank check. Otherwise there would be no Senate confirmation process; the Constitution would instead just empower the president to appoint anyone he wants to all executive-branch departments and offices.
And for low-ranking officers, called “inferior officers,” the Constitution does allow for the president to directly appoint without the Senate. But for senior executive officials, called “principal officers,” the Appointments Clause of Article Two of the Constitution requires Senate confirmation as a check on the president’s power.
This is one of those extraordinary circumstances where the Senate should reject a nominee. Comparing being pro-life to supporting slavery is a grossly offensive statement, especially to African-Americans, and her other extremist views are so radical that she is a textbook example of someone who must be denied confirmation.
What’s so important about the head of OLC is that it’s also a stepping-stone to top judicial positions, including the Supreme Court. Antonin Scalia was the head of OLC before he was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, and then on to the Supreme Court. Samuel Alito was the deputy chief at OLC, before he went on to be U.S. attorney, then a judge on the Third Circuit, and now serves on the Supreme Court.
But former Chief Justice William Rehnquist is the best example. He was the head of OLC in the early 1970s, and then was nominated directly to the Supreme Court. The assistant attorney general at OLC is prestigious enough that a person can go straight from that position to our highest court.
That may be Obama’s plan for Johnsen. She’s a dream judge for the Radical Left. Although she likely wouldn’t go straight to the High Court, she looks like someone being groomed for our nation’s second-highest court, the D.C. Circuit, from which she would be on the top of the short-list for a Supreme Court vacancy.
And even if she never makes it to the Supreme Court, she could do terrible damage to national security and other issues as a judge on the D.C. Circuit. Several former OLC chiefs serve on our nation’s appellate circuit courts.
To the extent that she can be exposed now, she may become too much of a liability for a lifetime judicial appointment. And if she can be stopped now, then she’ll likely never wear a black robe.
Senator Orrin Hatch, who as a principled statesman is consistently deferential on executive-branch presidential nominations, is one of the senators leading the charge against Johnsen. Hatch, the former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, knows all too well how OLC is a springboard to our top federal courts, and this is doubtless driving part of his opposition to Johnsen.
Finally, it’s poetic justice to note that this is also Johnsen reaping what she has sown. Johnsen has called on the Senate to refuse confirmation to any judicial nominee who believes in the slightest restriction to abortion, or even to any person who belongs to the legal debating group called The Federalist Society, a mainstream conservative/libertarian legal studies organization. Having taken such a rabid and militant stand against others being confirmed, she can hardly cry foul that the Senate is now applying an even less-severe standard in opposing her.
Dawn Johnsen is a radical who has no business heading OLC. The Senate should stop her from being confirmed to this vitally-important office.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
130 Comments
Will the next President fire all of the people that Obama appoints. Clinton did it to Bush. I always wondered why W. did not do it to Clinton.
Marxist, neo-commie!!!! Ridicule these idiots!! That is their alinsky m o ..
Another tell as to obowma's bent, pure socialism and communism
Another fallout from the 60's who grew up thinking that the "I'd like to teach the world to sing" coke commercial where the world joins hands and we all live on love in our global commune happily ever after could actually happen.
She believes:
1. that wiretapping a known terrorist is illegal without first obtaining a warrant
2. that military detention of terrorists captured on foreign battlefields is illegal
3. that being commander-in-chief gives the president no constitutional authority to use wartime measures
4. in “economic justice,” that government should confiscate and redistribute personal wealth
5. that liberals should “focus on the courts as the vehicles for desired change.” or judicial activism
Aren't these in line with what Obama believes? Isn't this why he picked her?
Is America awake yet?
From NRO:
Her bizarre equation of pregnancy and slavery was not an off-the-cuff remark. It was her considered position in a 1989 brief filed in the Supreme Court. At the time, she was legal director of NARAL (then the National Abortion Rights Action League, since renamed NARAL Pro-Choice America). The case, Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, involved a Missouri law that did not ban abortion but restricted the use of state funds and resources for abortions. It’s an obvious distinction, but one without a difference — at least according to Johnsen. Any restriction that makes abortion less accessible is, in her view, tantamount to “involuntary servitude” because it “requires a woman to provide continuous physical service to the fetus in order to further the state’s asserted interest [in the life of the unborn].” In effect, a woman “is constantly aware for nine months that her body is not her own: the state has conscripted her body for its own ends.” Such “forced pregnancy,” she contends, violates the Thirteenth Amendment, which prohibits slavery.
jee…from her picture she looks like a clean cut all ameriKian whatcha-callit. be sides hussein needs to keep surrounding himself with dubious trash. after all half of hussein is white trailer trash….was that politically correct enough?
Another example of how our Government and the current administration are moving farther and farther away from what the general public believes. We'll see how actions like this work out for them…
I don't particularly like the gobbed-on makeup look on women -enough to brighten up the features without venturing into clown-territory is nice for public appearances- but come on! What is it with these Über-libs? Do the all have to look like some Siberian nomad?
remember that old song "She has Bette Davis Eyes"? this woman has Charlie Manson eyes.
Socialism comes to the USA. Everytime I see the question "is Obama a socialist" the answer is always YES. But my comments and thoughts have been too kind. He is really a Socialist, Progressive, Marxist communist. How can anyone look at the policies and people he surronds himself with and not see him for what he really is.Wthat he is shoving down the throats of the american people and then say he is only interested in what he persives that the people need. Remember in his own words "judge me by those that surrond me". It's judgement day.
What the people really need is him to take a very long vacation on the beaches of Cuba with his buddies Chavez and the Castro brothers PERMANENTLY. Lets start a recall of our congressional leaders and intall those that would impeach Obama for lack of confidence by the american people.
Has anybody bothered to look at what populates the Justice Dept. right now? She fits right in with all the other extremists that the administration has put there over the past year. The GOP rolled over and allowed Holder & his goons to take over and now they are intellectually and legally trashing the dept. If the truth coffee doesn't wake you, try researching the background/bios of some of the people who've flown over the cukoo's nest to be next to Holder.
She looks like she is channeling Tim Geithner.
Aren't you going apeshit about her just because her views on abortion?!
Sorry about the bad grammer and spelling errors. But there was blood in my eyes.
all the good looking women are smart, they are conservatives.
they are going to cut the Constitution up into little pieces and reassemble it into their own image of what it should be. And uprising in this country is needed.
She also argues that wiretapping a known terrorist is illegal without first obtaining a warrant,
More sophistry. Putting a "known murderer" in jail is also illegal. Pre-pending "known" before some boogey-man term doesn't make them guilty and it doesn't make illegal actions by government just.
…that military detention of terrorists captured on foreign battlefields is illegal,
LOL! "Battlefields"? This isn't WWI – there are no real "battlefields." What we have is our military being the POLICEMAN OF THE WORLD – something you guys rush to say you are opposed to. That's ok, just call cab drivers you kidnap "known terrorists" and it is all ok, right? Why did we have to release so many people from Gitmo? Wheren't they "known terrorists" at the time. I guess being "known" is a fuzzy thing to you neocons – which underscores the close relation you have with liberals. (cont…)
…and that being commander-in-chief gives the president no constitutional authority to use wartime measures that would not be allowed against U.S. citizens during peacetime.
Neocons are ideological descendants of Trotsky – and this statement supports it.
Oh, and we aren't at war. No declaration of war.
You are so right! That scared me. All that is missing is the tattoo above her eyebrows.
Wake up Chuck. I wish it was just her views on abortion that we will have to contend with if she is appointed to this post. when you have people in the justice dept making determinations about what is constitutional and what is not and tese same people don't like the constitution, the constitutian and the way of life as you know it is in dire straights.
Your question is evidence of your ignorance, chuck.
Native Born Hawaiian thinks Obama's Birth Certificate is a fake.
Native Born Hawaiian thinks Obama's Birth Certificate is a fake.
Learn More by Clicking Web-link
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pag...
Learn More by Clicking Web-link
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pag...
Gigi…it is so much like bill clinton under oath looking America in the eye and lying….at that mount in time all of America's youth,young business people and young leaders…all of whom are todays leaders…they where told under oath that you are not responsible for your actions, nor does the truth of office mean anything. with out TRUTH there is no FREEDOM.
Looks like she needs to be Beckanated and Hanitized. Nothing clears up an infection like good ol' sunshine.
The battlefield you mentioned could very well be right down the street from your house. These people don't want to change us they want to kill us!
These appointees are so virulently opposed to the constitution it makes me angry. It so speaks to me of the battle going on for this world between good and evil. These folks are so fascist in their make up, its like they are the living dead! How is it O thinks he could get this one past us….other than keeping the onslaught going so maybe we will tire out? Overwhelming the system? Ten more months of this sheit! Then its payback time! We are awake you leftist b@$t@rd kook's!
I will yet again call the senators of CA to voice my objections. I will again wake up to see that they are all for this person as much as they were for Becker, and had no trouble voting Yea for him. I will again try to go to sleep tonight, which is becoming increasingly difficult thanks to the government, because each morning I wake-up it seems worse than when I went to sleep, if that is even possible.
Same justification was used for lynching.
ooooooo, that is an angry/nasty looking face she's wearing
look at her eyes and see her character… or lack of same.
i wonder if she is walking the walk and redistributing all of HER income in the interest of her espousal of social "justice"?
Why do all of these leftwing feminists look like former nazi concentration camp guards?
Looks like the spawn of Frances Fox Piven to me…I guess Obama thinks Congress is as stupid as the American people are. Reality sure can bite at times, eh Barry?
Is anyone is the Senate going to ask her these and other tough questions ? Anyone ?
It's easy to see how Mr. Obama mimics his mentor, FDR, as he stacks the deck with progressive wild cards to shift not so much the balance of power but the direction.
Wrong again, Bug-wit! There is no provision in the constitution that prescribes how a declaration of war must be worded to be legitimate. By approving the funds necessary to WAGE war, Congress is, in fact, DECLARING war…just as they are by approving and ratifying his decision to use military force both in Iraq and in Afghanistan. Those actions by Congress are de-facto declarations of war. Therefore the wars in which we're engaged ARE legal, declared wars. By the way, I suppose that you were not aware that the U.S. ran POW camps right here on U.S. soil during WW II, in which were kept incarcerated, German, Italian and even Japanese POWs–who were ALL kept locked up until VE Day and VJ Day…almost all without ever being charged with a crime.
Maybe HER mother should have aborted HER!!!
lol…I'm glad you said it first…I was thinking she looked manish, and
was wondering if she shaved….
Put the breaks on one nut job already this week, why not another. Where do they find these extreme ideologues? There are so many qualified people who would be impossible to object to.
Not her legs and armpits, I'm sure.
I saw that movie too.
I'm sure she came out of the other orifice.
KIck over any flat rock.
I cannot think of a single progressive that would be acceptable. The Obamao administration and many members of both houses (on both sides of the aisle) are progressives. Progressives resent our Constitution and all for which it stands. The only difference between Johnsen and the rejected Becker is that she claims to be a female.
I had similar thoughts about some of the statements when I read the article…
Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law… known <> proven guilty. The police can witness a guy shooting someone else, but he still has to be proven guilty in a court of law. I agree a warrant is required if on American soil.
But, No Military detention on a battlefield… I disagree with. A battlefield is where we have a battle… duh. We can shoot the guys that are shooting at us, but detaining them is illegal? That's rediculous.
Our Pres already assumed TOO MANY powers as it is. The Patriot Act is Anti-Constitutional…
Her statement needs more definition. Does wartime measures mean actions on US soil? Does it mean actions on foreign soil?
When they say "detain" notice there is no time limit mentioned. Nor is "battlefield" defined. As "MadDog" above proves, they can call anything a "battlefield."
NObama is out of control…
I think it had something to do with way Barbara Bush raised her sons…
No street smarts.
Awake…?
Are you kidding there 'rightbrain'
99% of us have absolutely no clue who this Ho is.
Can you please explain just how the COLD WAR belongs in this trio.
I believe the President has approved MURDERING Americans on foreign soil.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/04/dennis-b...
You think our past Presidents, intelligence agencies and military haven't been doing this 'in the dark' for years already? They're just getting bold enough to verbalize it.
Now… If they're on a battlefield and shooting at us, then they should be shot.
I hope the Senate will not take the step into hell and elect this person. She is the last person America needs.
…depends what the definition of 'is' is… Another great Democrap said that one. Point is, they can give a definition and change it whenever they want to. It doesn't matter… not the point.
I think each case needs to be looked at individually… Battlefield or not. Problem is, they'll create smoke screen facts in order to justify their actions. To me, that's the scariest of all… Remeber Waco?
[...] Obama’s Big Plans For Justice Nominee Johnsen: Big Government [...]
One of his uglier contestants.
Aw c'mon. You don't find Jeanine Garafolo, Joy Behar and Janet Napolitano attractive? hee hee
Lots of competition in that contest…
i'm reminded of a young hillary c. very pissed at the world . that type of bitterness will turn her into a sonja whats her face attitude.
I guess we should tell the men and women in Iraq and Afghanistan that they aren't on a real battlefield.
I really don't care of the terrorist was born here or not. If they are on foreign soil battling AGAINST our military then the deserve no more consideration than anyone else trying to kill our guys (and gals).
too bad we can't just save an email template where all that was required was to insert the lastest anti-American up for confirmation. Would save soooo much time!
those that expect others to have their wealth redistributed NEVER are willing to part with their own.
"Known terrorist?" Known to whom? Who decides that. What if an agent decides you are a known terrorist but is either mistaken or does not care?
Boehner and the other Rs meeting at the white house should make cease and desist on these crackpot nominations as the first condition of any discussion of health care.
I keep going back to look at those eyes of hers. Besides looking reeeeeeealy angry, they look somewhat manic to me. I keep trying to liken those eyes to others we have seen along the way and am forced to flip a coin between the eyes of Charles Manson and/or Rasputin.
She already looks very, very ANGRY
First 3 seem like good ideas to me. Funny how yours is the type to whip out the Neimoller (sp?) quip about "first they came for the Catholics," communists, whatever….
First they came for the "terrorists" and I didn't complain because i wasn't a terrorist……
You guys being against liberty at every turn gives quite an advantage to the liberals – it is the very reason you have Obama in the first place!
Some agent wants to sleep with your wife and accuses you of being a terrorists. THIS IS LIKE THE SOVIET UNION.
I've said over and over and these guys can't help revealing themselves……NEOCONS are ideological descendants of Trotsky. PROVEN ONCE AGAIN. "What, you want rule of law – are you a terrorist or something???" LOL! Neocon self-destruction.
Why not. We were told long ago the wars were over.
If they are on foreign soil then what threat are they to the US? Kinda shot yourself in the foot. If our military is there, beyond our borders, we are an occupying force. What would you do if foreign troops were in this country, huh COWARD? LOL! Sure check-mated you. You can say you would do nothing and be a coward or you can say fight in which case you are acknowledging the right of these others to resist.
this turns my stomach a few paragraphs in….the left must be halted.
shes a card carrying member of the crazy eyes club for sure….spooky
I think spelling and grammar issues are really related to your intelligence. What exactly has Obama done that is remotely Marxist or Communist? Don't spout about nationalizing banks etc. First of all, Bush started that. Secondly, he did not nationalize anything as the large bonuses indicate. Who are the people who he surrounds himself with who are Marxist, Socialist, Communist? There is nothing wrong with being Progressive. Look it up in the dictionary. It means trying to make progress and help people in their lives. What a bunch of nitwits comment on this blog.
What part of the Constitution are they opposed to? All you nitwits do is spout general attacks without support. Can you define fascism and tell me who is a fascist?
She believes:
1. that wiretapping a known terrorist is illegal without first obtaining a warrant
2. that military detention of terrorists captured on foreign battlefields is illegal
3. that being commander-in-chief gives the president no constitutional authority to use wartime measures
4. in “economic justice,” that government should confiscate and redistribute personal wealth
5. that liberals should “focus on the courts as the vehicles for desired change.” or judicial activism
Aren't these in line with what Obama believes? Isn't this why he picked her?
Come on Republicans make Obama publicly defend these nominee point by point and dont let him pull one of those c-span wiggles….better known as a lie.
Don't bend now republicans…stay strong…
"yours is the type"
Funny, I would think you would be careful about trying to pigeonhole people.
Sometimes things you say make sense, but then a strong dislike for Israel crops up all too often in your posts for my taste.
It's like you've just memorized Alex Jones broadcasts and are repeating it here. I'm surprised you don't put a link to his website in every post.
It seems that your job here is to spread ignorance.
You're doing a fine job!
Good. Your citizenship only goes so far.
Terrorism against your own country kinda means you're not one of us.
Checkmate? You're not even in the game dude.
No dipstick. Read the article. Can't read? Call a friend. Got no friends?
No wonder.
Wow! She sure looks like the friendly type. She belongs on the steps with those Panthers on election day.
Another thug marxist with a degree. I'm shocked!!
I declare war on you and the other progressives. Now you've got your war little man.
"U.S. ran POW camps right here on U.S. soil during WW II, .." but these were run following the Geneva Conventions, and the POWs all released after the end of the war. (It helped much in the later stages of WW II,
German soldiers were aware they'd be reasonably treated by the American troops, and thus more likely to give themselves up)
But now we have the Usbeks, considered terrorist only by 'Red China' in Gitmo, and random shepherds caught on a bounty hunt, and apparently they were not released after the 'Mission Accomplished.' And a questionable process to keep them there.
my favorite was clinton over Connie RICE. husseins judgement is clouded by his nose in the air first black-berry president.
You are not worth responding to you troll.
I am a 3L at the IU-Bloomington school of law and can say unequivocally that everything that is said in this article regarding Dawn Johnsen is true. I had the great misfortune of having her as a Con-law professor, and after having spent 60 some hours listening to her anti-American drivel I am absolutely positive that, in addition to her radical views on abortion, she is an extreme statist. This woman has no business getting anywhere near a position of power in this country, it is bad enough that she has the chance to indoctrinate 70 skull's full of mush each semester.
Who's this Johnson guy?
E-mail to my senator already transmitted demanding a NO to another Obama POS confirmation. It never ends.
Nip this appointment in the bud. If she ever gets a judgeship she is young enough to have many years to cause problems.
"my children just drink the coolaid",so saith jimmy and hussein.
I really wish that these 'creatures' mother's had the option of abortion!! I am appalled that they hate other women so much!!
OK I need to say something….DAWN MAKE UP HELPS…WEAR SOME…..the au Natural look is vomit inducing. Why do these ancient harpys all think looking like a pasty faced, grey skinned crone is cool? She showed up to a senate hearing like this to? No hair coloring, nothing to update her look beyond 1969 and her shirt is wrinkled. If a woman cannot spend a half hour in the morning showering, throwing on some makeup and a few hours a month at a salon then she really doesn't care about herself. She doesn't exude confidence or class. We need the peeps from What Not to Wear to come in and fix her. Hows that for catty? MEOW!
I'm sorry to say that she sounds like an ideal fit for the Holder DOJ, the most corrupt Department of Justice in the history of our republic.
So then we are in the time of the living dead? You know I think your right. I do know that everything Obama touches dies. No one can name anything good that he has done.
Bush did fire all the policital appointees as did Clinton. Obama has not. There is a difference between a political appointee and a career DOJ attorney.
He has not accomplished one thing for this nation. Anyone still following this leftist fool is of the living dead. The scary part is there is 29% of the nation in that category, that number is to big for me.
She looks mean.
She can be best described as a "temp" in my opinion. We will weed out every single radical inside the beltway, just as we have been doing. It is time to administer a serious spanking to the CHILDREN who would even consider putting this type of scum on they payroll. Just watch us!
Hopefully the Supreme Court justices will remain healthy until Obama is gone.
You must be logged in to post a comment.