Obamanomics: An Advanced Course in Big Government in the Age of Obama
by John M. O'HaraPoliticians, pundits, and citizens have long bemoaned the power that “special interests” wield in Washington, D.C. and state capitals across the nation. The pharmaceutical, energy, and defense industries and everyone in between employ armies of lobbyists to educate elected officials on their respective industry interests and to persuade them to protect said interests. Other groups represent the concerns of a body of constituents, such as general taxpayer, second amendment, or pro-life groups.

Despite the soiling of the term “lobbyist,” particularly following the fall of Jack Abramoff, these activities are protected under the First Amendment – and rightfully so. If it weren’t for second amendment groups, Chicago, where I currently dwell, would not have a powerful coalition challenging the city’s irrational, unconstitutional handgun ban in the Supreme Court. The majority of Americans own stock – stock in corporations. In today’s legislative environment, corporations would do a disservice to their shareholders not to go to bat for their interests in the Beltway ball game.
It is the existence of this game, and the fact that it is necessary, that frustrates many Americans. The ability of legislators and bureaucrats to change the rules of the game as it is played breeds a cutthroat culture of cloakroom deals. Too often this doesn’t merely ensure fair treatment of certain interests, it secures beneficial legislative loopholes for the interest with the best lobbyists and unfair treatment for their competitors. More often than not, this is done to the detriment of small business owners, taxpayers, and consumers alike.
Tim Carney is the lobbying editor of The Washington Examiner and author of the new book Obamanomics. His investigative reporting on the pages of the Examiner regularly digs below the surface of well-known stories like the cash for clunkers boondoggle to reveal the Beltway shenanigans that enables and produces such common-sense defying policies. In the case of cash for clunkers, Senator Chuck Schumer of New York pushed relentlessly for an increased handout for the middle class car subsidy program. As Carney reported, it just so happens that Schumer’s state is home to a large steel company that would benefit tremendously from an influx in the cheap scrap metal that the clunkers program was sure to create. This is a typical example of corporatism, or the profitable nexus of Big Business and Big Government.
Obamanomics reads like an encyclopedia of corporatism in the age of Obama. As Carney shows, the game’s popularity has increased exponentially under the administration that promised to be the most transparent in history – and cash for clunkers is just one example. Obama has stacked his administration with industry insiders, political operatives, and former lobbyists – all pros in the game of corporatism.
Take Obama’s choice for Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel. Writes Carney, “If a Hollywood screenwriter were to invent the prototypical ruthless political operative, he would create Rahm Emanuel – and the producers would probably reject the character as over-the-top.” Carney cites a 2003 Chicago Tribune article describing Emanuel as “A portrait of the often murky, below-the-surface intersection of money and politics.” As Carney puts it “The Obama-Emanuel White House has governed by standing at this intersection, collecting tolls, and paying out favors – and it’s building more entrance ramps into this intersection and multiplying its own power, all of which yields rewards for the most connected businesses.”
Thoroughly researched with Carney’s typical muckraking fervor, Obamanomics shows that these behind-the-scenes alliances are often between players one would not expect to cooperate. In fact, allegiances are often the exact opposite of what politicians say and the media reports. Republicans are typically maligned as the heartless party of Big Business while Democrats couch themselves as looking out for the little guy (their justification for the constant expansion of Big Government). More often than not, however, Big Business finds itself cozying up with Big Government with Democrats at the reigns. This relationship often leaves the taxpayer out in the cold.
Take the health care debate. Those on the Left, including President Obama, have cited insurance and pharmaceutical companies time and time again as the main opponents of health care reform. Keith Olbermann asserted, “the insurance lobby owns the Republican Party.” As Carney reveals, it is Democrats, not Republicans, that have raked in the most dough from these corporate interests: “In the 2008 election cycle, employees and executives at HMOs gave $5.7 million to Republicans, but $8.6 million to Democrats.” In the nursing home and hospital sector, Obama brought in over $3 million, “more than four times what McCain brought in and 50 percent more than what George W. Bush raised from these companies in both his elections combined.”
What’s more, the leaders of these industry groups have enjoyed unprecedented access to the Obama White House. Insurance and pharmaceutical lobbyists have met numerous times in the West Wing with the Obama administration. As Carney notes, these discussions were closed-door meetings, not on CSPAN as Obama promised on the campaign trail. Interestingly, the administration attempted suppressing Freedom of Information Act requests as to the attendees at said meetings. Many journalists have written such discussions off as the industries merely wanting “a seat at the table.” Both pharmaceutical and insurance companies stand to reap significant profits under ObamaCare. For example, an individual mandate, a likely component of health insurance “reform,” would increase their respective customer bases significantly. As Carney puts it, these industries don’t just have a seat at the table – many of them have found themselves to be the guests of honor.
The media often writes-off these examples of collusion as “peculiar alliances.” Yet examples abound in today’s prominent policy battles. The Big Government Left constantly demonizes Big Business on television, only to turn around and buddy up with them at fundraisers and over closed-door legislative drafting sessions. Carney covers the gambit from energy companies lobbying for cap and trade to the bailouts of labor unions and Wall Street fat cats in the name of “saving main street.”
What’s a concerned citizen to do? Writes Carney, “The appropriate response to Obamanomics is a consistent rejection of government as a solution to our problems. But it is also a clear-throated attack on the misdeeds of Big Business…frankly, Big Business is not the friend of limited government and low taxes.”
As Carney states, “it’s time to grab the pitchforks.” Consider arming the tea partier on your shopping list this holiday season with a copy of Obamanomics. Carney names the special interest moochers and their political enablers and offers some great insight into reforming the system that they prop up to benefit from the labor of hard-working Americans. In the age of Obama, it’s a must-read.





Subscribe via RSS
34 Comments
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vince Humphreys, Vince Humphreys, Big Government, Big Government, Patrick Henry and others. Patrick Henry said: Obamanomics: An Advanced Course in Big Government in the Age of Obama: Politicians, pundits, and citizens have long… http://bit.ly/6BnZq3 [...]
Here are past presidents and the percentage of each president's cabinet appointees who had previously worked in the private sector. You know a real life business, not a government job? Remember what that is? A private business??? This all about making the Government, Lord and King.
Roosevelt – 38%
Taft – 40%
Wilson – 52%
Harding – 49%
Coolidge – 48%
Hoover – 42%
FDR – 50%
Truman – 50%
Eisenhower – 57%
Kennedy – 30%
LBJ – 47%
Nixon – 53%
Ford – 42%
Carter – 32%
Reagan – 56%
GHWB – 51%
Clinton – 39%
GWB – 55%
Obama – 8%
No experience, questionable morals, no qualms about lying to get what they want… Seems like Obama has created the perfect cabinet!!
Our President is a career campaigner, which he even admitted during the election was his only real work/executive experience. It's amazing that such radical, inexperienced people are running our country.
Is Obama a sociopath? I think so:
http://scarlett-journey.net/2009/12/14/symptoms-o...
this is a good post.. a great illustration of how much obama is relying on the 'machine'
How's that hope and change workin out for ya?
Mmm Mmm MMMM!!
Rush said something funny today~ Said these dems need to change the D next to there name to an L.
Berry Santorum L (liar) Ill
Nancy Pelosi L Ca
That is ALL they are. Liars. Every word of it but that does not effect there life one bit. You have to have a soul before you feel guilt or remorse.
This is part of the reason WHY Obama and his administration are nothing but a bunch of far left ideologues, who have NO idea what the bloody hell they're doing.
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by CO2HOG: via @Biggovt : Obamanomics: An Advanced Course in Big Government in the Age of Obama http://bit.ly/5QxxCm…
Or…Lemoncrats!
L (Loser)
I think the Liar Party is a great name.
Is BHO the Economic Manchuian Candidate?
As we all know the definition of insanity is doing something that is bad, (painfull,damaging, does not work) over and over again. So, is this administration insane? I doubt it. Than what is going on here?
A closer look at the administration through their collective writings, the speeches, and backgrounds reveals them to be very far left leaning. Many of them openly quote some of the many architects of the leftst movement. People like Saul Alinsky, Cloward and Pvien, etc..
These are the some of the people who have created the blueprint for tearing down the hated free market system. What else could explain what is being systematically done to this country?
I hope I’m wrong
this is true, "More often than not, however, Big Business finds itself cozying up with Big Government with Democrats at the reigns. This relationship often leaves the taxpayer out in the cold." it's a sad state that the federal government has become so powerful.
John. Really good article! I will check it out! However, I think most of the choir of responders here to Andrews website are pretty well aware of what is going on (Thanks Andrew). It is a 'feel good place' for we conservatives and a point place for obtaining potent information when writing to our congress people.
Wait till 2010! I've heard that a lot in comments here~ hmmm… I have 1 vote in that election, as do all of us! I've got a couple hundred $ that the gmnt gave me this year on income tax, and some additional that the Social Security adm 'gave me' when they (or computer) found a mistake in what they are paying me each month. (I turned 'old' in June!). I'm waiting to donate about $500 or so to help a "tea party something or other" gain as much leverage of the House and Senate as can be gained. Google/Bing results of thousands of hits on Tea Party! Quite a number of orgs wanting my money! We have a 'headless wonder movement'! We need an effective conservativce community like ACORN without the corrupton NOW! Come on Andrew! Glen! Sarah! we need trust and organization. I TRUST YOU!
Continued – sorry for the rant!
I am more than my vote and I will give it. I have even considered running in GA – 4 as a "Teaspoon party candite". I'll mix it up! (Think Cynthia McKinney or currently rubber stamp Hank Johnson) even though I'm not Black which is almost a gerrymanderd pre-requisite. Conservatives have not seen fit to run against any Democrat in this district!
This is from a person who couldn't even spell politics and never voted for anything but president since Kennedy!
I am a power but to have 'power' one needs organization! This is a fun forum but we need organization.
" I've always had a problem with Cash4Clunkers. To me it seems to go against simple supply and demand economics. How can we push all of these new cars into a market already saturated with used and repossessed vehicles (i.e. http://www.repofinder.com)? Now new cars are worth even less, we have more Americans in debt, and eventually more repossessions.
They haven't a clue.
Their "fixes" are from college textbooks, taught by professors whose imaginary "firms" make "widgets," pick out their "plant" and "equipment" before they know what their revenue, costs, and expenses will be, and then expect the banks to make loans so they can do business.
Rodney Dangerfield's interruptions of the business professor in "Back to School," are all the funnier because they are all too true.
What we're witnessing, folks, is what the commies and socialists in the former Soviet Union and its satellites tried for 45 years.
Telling the banks to make loans when companies don't know what their costs will be next year – health care – cap and trade – unknowable tax burdens – market demand, etc., etc. – is what the commies and socialists did with their central planning command economy annual allocations.
They ignore the discipline of the marketplace supply, demand, and cost of borrowing.
In fact, the banks' own credit manuals, approved by the US Treasury's Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, stipulate that banks pull in their credit horns in times such as this.
What "El Caudillo" is doing is telling the banks to ignore his own Treasury Department's regulations. If they do what he says, lend to businesses that are on the ropes right now, they will be written up for violating the fundamentals of credit analysis.
Any loan officer who comes into loan committee with a loan justified because "President Obama says we should make this loan," will be thrown out of the room, and possibly out of a job.
We're doing exactly the opposite of what we told the Poles, Czechs, Hungarians, Romanians, Yugoslavs, Lithuanians, Estonians, Latvians, Bulgarians, and others to do when we sent US Treasury advisors to their countries in the early 1990's. I sure wish some of their leaders would speak up and admonish us for doing everything we told them not to do.
Correction..he is a career criminal..taught by the best!
The really sad part is….it doesn't matter who is at the reigns, as BOTH sides of the aisle are guilty as sin!!
All of Obama's people ACORN, SEIU, and the rest of the Chicago mob ARE the ones responsible for the banking failures…then he has the gall to call the banking heads in, to give them a 'talking to'…something is smelling really bad here…maybe the only way to stop all this madness, is to stop all business for a day and see what that does to the economy!!??
ECEllisonGeorgia
So true.
All the power and energy right here. All we need is to be sure we are going in the right direction for success.
Many people are saying we need a third party. They say that Republicans are as bad as Democrats. I say if you split the vote three ways you are in effect electing Democrats. If that is what you want you can assure yourself of the outcome by splitting of from the Republicans.
My personal opinion is that we reform the Republican party for now.! For the 2010 vote we insist on as many strong conservatives as we can find, be run for office. If we split off from the Republicans we are doomed to Democrats (and how is that working here in 2009?) It is time for a take-over! We conservatives will never take-over the Democratic Party, but by darn we can take-over the Republicans!
Get involved with local elections.
Contact the RNC and insist on Conservative candidates.
Research all candidates and publish your findings. Or better yet, pick one or two and follow everything and publish your findings.
Pick the five most important issues and focus on those.
If you know how—
Start a website for your 'local' voters to express their opinions, and the candidates to express their stand.
Start a 'state' website to track the background and stance of all the candidates.
Just a few ideas.
Christmas with Obama:
http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/12/obama-santa-o...
Maybe the donkey could have it's pants on fire.
Obama is a whore that loves to jump into bed with anyone, and will do literally anything if it makes him money or gets him power.
I doubt any of the Trolls on here that constantly scream about the evils of business will want to get anywhere near the truth about "The One" that the book exposes.
I can already envision the back handed excuses for Obama's infidelities, something about Bush I am sure, they are like the wife that makes excuses for why their husbands beat them and still thinks he loves them.
Pathetic really.
Those IL terrorist prison jobs are gonna really make an improvement in the nations economy, fully funded by the US taxpayers. How many private sector jobs has Obama created? The govt. is a leech.
Better yet, Is Obama the anti-messiah that will ride the world-grabbing SEIU (the beast)! Think of it a world-wide Union to unite the world's workers!
According to those who worked with him during his limited time in a law firm, he was lazy and arrogant and spent his time with his feet up on his desk attempting to write his memoirs. If something good happened to the firm, he tried to attach his name to it and take credit for it. When Obie was a US senator, a committee had just reached an agreement on a certain bill and went to the microphone to announce it. Obie was hanging around outside the room and asked if he could join them. After they all talked at the mike, Obie went to the mike and talked as if he were part of the committee (which he was not) and took partial credit for the crafting of the bill. He was never even in the meetings! Those who were editors of the Harvard Law Review said that he never wrote a paper, but was elected president of the Review because he slapped everyone on the back, asked how ya doin' and organized the coffees. He's been getting a free ride for years and knows all the angles.
That's a great quote and sadly extremely true of the bunch now in Barry's administration; not to mention the fact that all of them are one, several, or all of the following…………………..1)crooks 2) tax cheats 3) Commies 4) old hippies who tried to bring down this nation 40 years ago and are still trying to do it, BY ANY MEANS POSSIBLE 4) thugs 6) felons 7 racists.
Tax Payers Should revolt. The Congress and the Senate will not listen therefore i feel that since they won't listen we as Americans can shut down the Government by not paying our Federal Taxes. Sounds fair? if we all file and just withhold what we owe then the feds will have to listen. Shut the Government down. This is not what we are paying for. Question is How can we get this organized?
[...] with these very same special interests in the West Wing? (For more “odd alliances” exposed, see my review of Tim Carney’s [...]
[...] with these very same special interests in the West Wing? (For more “odd alliances” exposed, see my review of Tim Carney’s [...]
This is a good approach to what, for some, may be a controversial topic. Very well though out post. – Any given program costs more and takes longer. Attributed to Laws of Computer Programming