Comments on: The Moral Hazard of Big Governments

By: Score One for Free Speech: Supreme Court Ruled Government Can’t Ban Political Spending or Political Speech by Corporations in Elections « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Sat, 23 Jan 2010 01:59:05 +0000

[...] View: Feds Use Intimidation To Silence Critics On Health Care Reform John Loudon, Big Government: The Moral Hazard of Big Governments Washington Post: Citizens United used ‘Hillary: The Movie’ to take on [...]

By: Mike

Mike — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:29:13 +0000

The easy solution, and preferable lack of actually researching, is to blame the left or liberals as big government. But, those characterizations are not accurate. Both parties are now big government. In fact, very little has changed under Obama from the Bush administration. The point is, both sides are corrupt and they are pushing vaccines because they are getting paid, not because they are trying to control us. Don't be so silly.

By: GregZ

GregZ — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:52:15 +0000

…..The government mandates the use of seatbelts when driving because they say it saves lives. However, the government does not tell us how many people died because they were wearing seatbelts. The seatbelt law generates revenue to the states because of the fines. So is it about the money? Is it about control?

People’s rights and freedoms are being eroded when Government and employers want to mandate that you receive a vaccination under penalty of law or the threat of being terminated. I say people need to “question authority.” It should be up to the people whether or not they get the vaccine.

Greg Zotta

By: GregZ

GregZ — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:51:42 +0000

…..Kathlene Sebelius, the Health and Human Services Secretary encourages all Americans to get the swine flu vaccination and stated, “This is definitely a safe vaccine for people to get.” Does she know what is in the vaccine? The ingredients for the H1N1 vaccine are chicken embryos, formaldehyde, (embalming chemical) squalene adjuvant, polysorbate 80 (a carcinogenic preservative) aluminum, and thimerosal, a (mercury (poison) derivative). What is Sebelius’s definition of “safe?”

Data from two dozen peer-reviewed scientific papers, from 10 different labs in the United States, Europe, Asia and Australia claim squalene-based adjuvants can induce rheumatoid arthritis and can produce injury to the nervous system and brain. Mercury is a poison. Formaldehyde (an embalming chemical) and Polysorbate80 both are known carcinogens……

By: GregZ

GregZ — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:51:16 +0000

….We have been told that the vaccination is only effective if you get it before the start of the “flu season” which is usually around September-October. In 2004 there was a shortage of the flu vaccine and there were calls for the Federal and State governments to declare a state of emergency. Some people were panicked because the government had told them that 30000 people die from the flu each year. The government encouraged only those in high-risk areas, those over 50 and young children, get the flu shots due to the limited supply. However, after the flu season was over more vaccines became available and people were encouraged to get the vaccine. Why? They said the vaccine is effective if the person receives it prior to the start of the flu season, so why would the people be told to get the flu shot after it. Could it be because of money?……..

By: GregZ

GregZ — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:46:20 +0000

Swine Flu Vaccines/Government Propaganda
Healthcare workers in hospitals, clinics and home care are mandated by state regulations to get flu vaccinations this year with the threat of being fired if they refuse to get one. Other employers are threatening their workers if they refuse to get the flu shot. It should be up to the individual, whether or not to get the vaccine and your livelihood should not be threatened.

Some people are saying no one has the right to refuse vaccination in a civilized society and risk the lives of others and their children. How is someone not taking the vaccine a risk to others or their children? If the OTHERS and their children received the flu shot they supposedly should not be at risk. History shows that sometimes the vaccine was worse than the flu. In 1976 the government’s propaganda about the swine flu caused more than 46 million people to receive the vaccine and more people were paralyzed and died from the vaccine than the actual flu……..

By: kadaka

kadaka — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:50:24 +0000

According to our government: The U.S. government has purchased 250 million doses of 2009 H1N1 vaccine... Also by our government, the "resident population" (which includes "international migrants") is just past 307 million. So they have expected practically every legal citizen will end up getting a dose, and have spent our tax money to buy accordingly. Remember the really old days when such vaccines were normally bought privately, for those who wanted them, even in those circumstances where a government program ended up paying for them? Why, it seems like just last year...