Defeat Socialism: Save America From the Obama-Pelosi Regime…Draft Sarah Palin for RNC Chair
by Jim HoftDefeat Socialism in America – Draft Sarah Palin for RNC Chair
The bottom line is this…
America is under attack. The progressive left is attempting to forever alter the foundation of this great nation with their record deficits, record spending, record unemployment, corruption, thuggery, assault on liberty and socialist policies. The Obama-Pelosi Regime must be stopped before they destroy this great nation. Republicans need a great and dynamic personality to lead the party in a vigorous offensive against the Socialist agenda of the Progressive Democrat movement. We don’t have time to waste and we can’t afford to lose this battle against the immoral statists destroying our country.
Michael Steele has made too many critical missteps and has failed to lead the party against the radical Socialist agenda of the Progressive Democrat movement. The failure of Chairman Steele to successfully sell Liberty over Socialism, and to cultivate and facilitate those future candidates who can, is emblematic of the dysfunction of the Republican party, a dysfunction which has over the past four years led the party to near-ruin. We need a true and tested leader.
We need Sarah Palin.
The Republican Party needs Sarah Palin. The country needs Sarah Palin to battle the radical progressives in Washington.
We need Sarah Palin.
PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION–
WHEREAS the current Chairman of the Republican National Committee, Michael Steele, has woefully and repeatedly misstepped in his capacity as party Chair, failing to provide the leadership and vision necessary to battle the Progressive Socialist Left’s agenda, and
WHEREAS he has also failed to cultivate and facilitate emerging Conservative candidates who are able to convincingly argue that Liberty is superior to dependence upon the State Apparatus, and
WHEREAS Sarah Palin, by way of radical contrast, consistently and enthusiastically argues on behalf of Liberty, Free Enterprise, Individualism, and a small and Constitutionally limited Federal Government, and
WHEREAS she has also demonstrated an innate affinity with the great majority of Liberty-Loving Americans, a capacity to inspire them to action, and a willingness to act as a National Leader on important Conservative Issues,
THEREFORE, We, the undersigned, submit that Sarah Palin, as soon as is practicably possible, ought to replace Michael Steele
And, follow our website -Draft Sarah Palin – and our Twitter account (draftsarah4RNC) for updates.
We Can Do This! You Betcha!
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
204 Comments
God Bless America…God Bless the American Patriots exposing the radical transformational Leftists and their attempt to destroy our Liberty, and our Founding Fathers honor.
Works for me, she has the balls to fight back aggressively. And my God, the liberals heads would explode…what fun.
I signed on!!!! Got to love Sarah, she speaks her mind, has principles, experience, and believes in the Constitution. And to toss a bone, she can produce her birth certificate. LMAO…. (sorry some humor in the mix from moi)
Even though I love Palin, like Rush said, the Dems are waiting for the RNC to kick out Steele so they can say that we're the ones that are being racist. We need to be careful here.
I agree Stan, I'm giggling at the thought!
Yes, if you disagree with Obama's troop increases in Afghanastan, you must be unpatriotic.
You must agree with Obama, McCain, Liebermann, and Lindsey Graham to be the head of the RNC.
There are going to be a wide range of opinions on this, even from conservatives. I'm a Palin fan for the most part, but I'm wondering if the RNC could use someone that most of the country hasn't already made their mind up on. People either love her or hate her, and I don't know if the RNC needs someone who won't have an easy time converting people from one side to the other.
Then again, many conservatives that have abandoned the RNC might feel more comfortable throwing them cash when they haven't been recently.
Either way, like it or not, Palin is pretty polarizing right now, and she already has huge influence through her PAC without being RNC chair. And though there are reasons that can excuse her endorsement of McCain, there's a little fear in me that she might endorse other RINO's as RNC chair where there will be a lot more inside pressure.
I think it would be better for the RNC's bank account, but I'm not sure it would be better for the party. I guess we'll have to see how this pans out, but either way, Steele has to go, and quick like.
Why does the left HATE Sarah?
Why do moderates feel as though something is wrong with Sarah?
Because the zeitgeist is socialism and Sarah is the antithesis of socialism.
Anyone who is moderate to any degree is simply Communist lite.
An open minded person is one who is too lazy to form an opinion.
Conservatism is thought to be uncompassionate but it is more compassionate then the end result of socialism.
Sarah is not afraid to voice her conservative opinion and therefore gives voice to all of us who love the truth.
The Hell with all the lefties, progressives and moderates (Yea, I mean YOU moderate republicans like steel)
Remember the Dylan song. The Times they are a changin?
Well don't stand in the door just get out of the way, you moderate lose minded lilly brained nice guy republican.
Take a stand or get off
Let's give them their favorite target and then let's all stand behind her.
Yeah, Dems calling "racism" … does anyone really care anymore when they do that? It's rather like crying "wolf" these days.
A fantastic improvement over Steele. Bravo!
I have to disagree with you somewhat, Flexo, not everyone who is moderate is Communist lite. Some people hold very conservative views on some things and much more liberal views on others; IMO, that's what makes them "moderate" as there is no middle ground on many of the issues we face today. And the liberal definition of "open-minded" may lead to being too lazy to form your own opinion, but I think it really means that you are intellectually honest enough to grasp an idea that differs from your own and examine it critically to determine how it compares to your own beliefs and opinions. I do it all the time, and while my opinions and beliefs have not changed in many places, I have become steadily more libertarian in other aspects as a result.
They don't get to define the debate. Besides, they're ALREADY calling all of us racists. They do it so often that it has lost all meaning. Keeping someone in a job that they suck at just because of their color is just as racist as not hiring them because of their color.
Steele is a HUGE part of conservative failures and was chosen by the "big tent" RINO progressives. It is way past time to clean house and reboot with leaders that believe in OUR REPUBLIC and not a democracy.
Individual freedom, liberty and life is what We the Citizens want, need and require.
It is time to "JUST DO IT"!!!
Or else we need to grow a pair, tell the left that they have played their last ridiculous race card- now they can go jump in a lake, and that we are putting into that office the person who best represents the GOP's ideals. Sarah, for one thing, has not hosted a GOP fundraiser at a bondage party. Slimey Steele has. Dr. Martin Luther King told us that character matters. Steeles' character is suspect. Sarahs' isn't . Black Panther Shamear is telling everyone that they should kill crackers. Sarah isn't telling us to kill panthers. Call them on their stupid race card bluff and on their character deficit.
Great Idea!!!!!!! Let's do it now dump steele, what a jerk!!!!!!!!!
You conveniently ignore the fact that she vociferously supported John McCain…a RINO. You can't have it both ways and something doesn't add up with her.
you can't do that!!!!!! she's white annnnnnd female!!!!! but it would make the demonCRAPS/liberals krazy……okay do it!!!! she's has bigger cajones than mikey TINFOIL does anyway….
Be prepared for major polarizing this November. Our country won't move out of the Obamunist quagmire without it. Once you find that a majority of independents will vote for America above and beyond ralley-of-the-moment-white-guilt, will you then acquiesce to the fact that sometimes polarizing is what is needed?
All it takes for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing.
And you are right, Steele has to go.
I think both political parties have too many corrupt, self-serving politicians in them. Therefore, I'm hoping Sarah doesn't take on a position where she is raising money for dishonest people–regardless of what party they belong to. I think she has too much integrity and common-sense to do this. Let's defeat Socialism by either electing Sarah as President, or by another way.
[...] BigGovernment) The petition to draft Sarah Plain, is on: WHEREAS the current Chairman of the Republican National [...]
She also supported Joe the Plumber, the Tea Parties, and the Republican Party.
You can't have it both ways either. We need to support people who are good people, regardless of whether they have some socialism or not. Because like it or not, we aren't going to kill all socialism overnight.
Good point and a realistic concern, but the Progressive/Socialist have used the Racism card at every turn to secure more power. Thats why we have a bogus and problem census report coming out and why the Progro/Socials want to encourage more illegal immigration (which hmmm, if you oppose makes you a racist anyhoo), to gain more political power and take away our liberties. Time to grow some tougher skin, and point out how their side is the real racist and violent ones.
I like Sarah, but my choice would be Liz Cheney.
The war in Afghanistan is being fought by politicians. Same damned mistake we made in Vietnam.
I don't give a damn WHO is in charge, just as long as they have the stones to let the military fight the war with everything we have. Carpet bomb the whole damned country, strategic nukes, napalm the friggin' mountains, just stop being so sissy-ish/PC/sensitive and WIN the war!!!
The way we're fighting it now, we'll be there for the next 2 decades.
I think RNC chair is a much better position for her than a run for POTUS… and yeah, watching the libtard heads exploding over the idea will be a ton of fun to watch – I'm in!
Yep, I agree. Wait until Steele's term expires. I have to admit, Steele has been a huge disappointment to me, I thought he'd do a much better job standing up for conservative values. I guess his encounter with ACORN/Soros in the Ohio 2006 debacle scarred him more than we realized.
you may be correct…..but you folks from minisoda sent frank'n'beans to d.c……
Not with THAT attitude, we won't! My daddy always said "I can't" never did a damned thing. He was right.
"……something doesn't add up with her." Please flesh out this remark. What do you suspect?
Would appreciate further detail. Gut-feeling or other?
Nice Hobbes,,,,,,,,,thought provoking. Liz for the front 'man', Sarah as the cheerleader.
My husband likes Sarah, but thinks that as a mom of young children–she should stay home and raise her family first.
I go back and forth about Sarah. She is a force to be reckoned with and did a good job campaigning for the Republican women this set of primaries, but I don't like the way she campaigned for McCain either.
Morning Hobbes! I like Liz too or even Michelle Bachman.
I'm perfectly fine with polarizing, and you're right, it's totally necessary for the country right now, but in the case of the RNC, they're reputation could handle having someone that doesn't already have 40%+ of the country disliking her greatly, including many right leaning folks.
I just think she's making a great impact right where she is, and the RNC could pick someone just as fiery, but that the general public hasn't totally made their mind up about already. At least they would have a chance to bring some new people to the fold. Many people just tune Palin out.
Wait–Michelle Bachman might do us better somewhere else.
More of a gut feeling than anything concrete. All of the little missteps she's made since the campaign have a cumulative effect on my confidence in her. I'm not expecting perfection in anyone, but some of the situations she's been in give me pause. I'm not discussing any more detail than that…my purpose is not to run the lady down. I'm just saying that I have my reservations concerning her.
I love that idea! Liz Cheney for RNC chair…knowing how the left feels about her father (and I adore him) would have as much head imploding impact as Sarah and yet she is much more saavy and, as someone said, not already a polaring figure….someone get THAT going and I will sign on!
[...] the rest of this great post here Comments (0) Posted in President Obama [...]
Fair enough on the harshness of such a comment as Moderate is Communist lite.
Might want to read a book called Americas 30 years war on a good explanation of that comment.
In this way I am Libertarian.
I believe in allowing a person to think and do what they think is right, or even what they want, without the constraints of Government intervention. (When I say Government I mean the people who think they know better in the Nanny state)
In this way I am Conservative. Give me back my Constitution and return to the original constraints of Government.
Conciliatory politics only works with honest people and I am afraid there are few if any in our Government offices today.
How about Fred Thompson for chair? He has experience herding cats, which is required for the job. Sarah should continue to be a free-range lib-slayer.
Fred Thompson would be fine, Colonel West would be better and Cheney would be best. Palin is too polarizing and is best utilized as the hatchet woman/fund raiser.
Yes your right I did.
I don't understand why she did such a thing.
He is exactly the moderate I am talking about.
But look at him… he has redeeming qualities…its just his politics I don't like.
Same with Newt sitting down with Pelosi on …Climate Change?
But Sarah's political sins don't out weigh her political savvy the way McCain's do.
It sure wouldn't break my heart if Sarah was RNC chair. But, I like the position she has now…which is no official position at all. Regular folks don't trust anybody in an official position anymore….we trust Sarah.
I don't trust the RNC anymore with my money…only contribute to the candidate.
My vote would go to J.C. Watts…..smart ,conservative, trustworthy and had the integrity to keep his promise to his family of only serving a couple of terms in the House…..like our founders wanted.
How's this: Those that consider themselves "moderate" are really Communist Lite.
I'm a libertarian, and I'm pretty extreme. My positions are firm, thought they lie on both parties platforms. I'm not a Republican or a Democrat, but I'm certainly not a "moderate".
"its just his politics I don't like. "
That's a pretty big sticking point in choosing a politician!
"Sarah's political sins don't out weigh her political savvy the way McCain's do. "
I'm not following the logic here. McCain has FAR more political skill and muscle than Sarah ever did. Being a Governor is a totally different situation from being a mover and shaker in the US Senate.
Both of them have "screwed the pooch", so you're choosing the one with the least experience? Quite frankly, I wouldn't choose either of them…I'd be looking for someone better in the first place.
I've sent Steele numerous emails…to date none have even been acknowledged…not surprising with the volumes he probably receives. Steele has failed in MHO but so have the RHINO's who claim to be members of the GOP. I'd like to see Lt. Col West as Chairman…he has courage, is a true patriot, and is willing to stand up to what is going on!!
“If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.” Samuel Adams, 1776
GOOOH – Pronounced “GO”
Is a plan to remove all members of the U.S. House of Representatives and replace them with everyday Americans just like you.
http://goooh.com/home.aspx
Sarah Palin, in her own words.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsUVL6ciK-c&fe...
All that matters to me is that we get someone who will steer the Republican party back to true conservatism and fiscal responsibility. We don't need party leadership that continues to pander for the liberal voters. We need to strongly educate America about true Constitutional values and how government is really supposed to work as laid out by our founders. We need to expose the lies of the left and explain why they are lies. We need to jump on the wagon with the Tea Party ideals and once again make our country the worlds leader instead of the worlds laughing stock.
As I write this, I am listening to this amazing woman on video on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnHUF8hzJcs After hearing her I have an even stronger faith that we will prevail over the parasites.
http://www.teapartyexpress.tv/
OH YEAH! But, I'd rather see that dude as President. Chair of the RNC would be like making Einstein a 1st grade math teacher. Although, it wouldn't take him long to clean up the mess, would it?
Palin or Cheney would be both good choices and would nudge the RNC to the right. Not sure if Palin wants a paycut though…
Steele is an OK Republican, but he is hardly a conservative, and he has a high gaffmeter rating, right up their with Obiden.
Steele seems to be the Republican equivalent of the dimwitted, gaff-prone Joe Biteme(Biden)
And Sarah would be fantastic. It would drive the Dems up the wall. Steele should serve out his term so it won't appear we're being mean to a Black guy.
Only Dems can do that.
While I agree the RNC needs a new chair, I'd be opposed to drafting Palin. I like Palin but the chair can't become part of the story. Palin is a lightening rod to the left and it would take away from the RNC plank. I favor Haley Barbour but I doubt he'd become the chair again as he's the governor of Mississippi.
I don't get this petition. Steele has less than six months left in his term, national elections are four months away, and the primary job of the RNC chair is fundraising. Is the idea to remove Steele from the position before his term expires? While Ms. Palin is an unbelievable fundraiser, can even she make up for Steele's lackadaisical efforts inside a four-month window during which the RNC will be spending huge sums, too? Moreover, do we want the political turmoil that goes along with an ouster?
Despite being well-intentioned, any idea that revolves around deposing Steele at this point in time seems ill-considered and fraught with downsides (or, at a minimum, few – if any – upsides). Removing Steele at this stage of the game is, at best, an impotent solution to the immediate problem of Steele's gaffes and his fund-raising failure. If popular sentiment desires Palin as head of the RNC, she should be solicited to submit her name for the regular RNC chair election.
If
We need a fund raiser… Not, a very capable but somewhat bland ideologue
That's the truth! It's about time the RNC stop expecting the Left to like us. Fringe liberals and their media enablers can't even act like decent human beings.
I have always liked Michael Steele… but I can't understand the target he has created on himself and the problems that follow. He is supposed to help the conservative cause. I don't agree with the idea that he needs to stay because he's black. It's not an affirmative action position and to keep him there for that reason is an insult to all black Americans.
Now Sarah Palin would be a blessing in more ways than one. If you really want the Republican Party to come home to the true conservative movement… if you really want to clear up any thought that the Tea Party and the GOP are not together in this fight… She can and would bring us all together. My only concern is that Sarah wants to run for President in 2012… and this position may take her out of that. Plus she may be having just too good of a time in her current position. I would support her whatever she decides.
And where are all the anti-war protestors?! Anyone who misses the hypocrisy of the left is deaf, dumb and blind –
Ger rid of Steele and screw being labeled a racist, like THAT bothers us at this point! I AM racist, against white/black elitist Anti-American pols – who cares???
I asked weeks ago for someone to tell me what the hell we are doing in afganastan (sp) truth be told, nobody really knows! Do the damn jjob or get the hell out, this is NOT a big mystery – you are correct Larry, it's a battle for the pols, which is a lose lose proposition – sounds like everything else barry touches, LOSE/LOSE -
Sarah Palin has shown she has great influence among the electorate. The last thing we want to do is hamstring her in the role of RNC Chair. She is far more dangerous to the Dems as long as she remains a type of loose cannon. Don't ruin a good thing by formalizing her role in the RNC.
Maximum damage to the National Socialist Party on a daily basis. I love the idea of Sarah Palin as the chair of the RNC. She would not be running for office, but boy she would smell out the Rino's and make the Communist go crazy. I like it.
I always liked her jabs at Barry Soetero. He would try and do a come back and would look and sound stupid. I think she squarely kicked him in the groin on those exchanges. Even his recent come back of "We can't just drill baby drill" is hollow once you know Barry is using it to destroy the economy and enslave people through Cap & Tax.
Liz Cheney is "somewhat bland"?
The difference is a Governor has to DO something……..while a Senator talks about DOING something …then compromises…..
Agreed, if we aren't going to fight this to win it then get the hell out. Just "being there" is needlessly killing our men and women in the military.
But then again, when in the hell did Barry ever give a damn about our military. . .
No one is really listening to them anymore and PC is dead.
Go Sarah.
only when he holds them captive for his filthy words – case in point, 4th of July and him giving a speech from a BALCONY!! and talking crap about the founding fathers, big shock – NOT
got cha, thx for reply L4S
There are a lot of people that could do that job better than Michael Steele. The man that he defeated (Ken Blackwell) would be a fantastic choice and should have been the GOP Chairman.
With that said, I don't think that Sarah would take the job if offered. She's got her sights on a much bigger job. If she gets the job as the GOP Chair, then she's pigeonholed and won't be nearly as effective on her own. She is too smart for that.
As for me, I think anyone that wants her in that job is either thinking too shallowly or has an ulterior motive for doing so.
NOT!!!!!!!!!!
I wouldn't support Sarah Palin for anything, and I'm a conservative. But more than once she has supported RINOs rather then the true conservative, such as Carly Fiorina in California who has ties to Obama, and supported Barbara Boxer. And in Oaklahoma, conservatives wanted Randy Brogdan, and she threw in for the RINO Mary Fallin.
Palin works AGAINST true conservatism. Dump her like a HOT POTATO.
Excellent reply, Sanity
They don't GET to call the shots. Scream racism all they like. Just reply by running that Black Panther tape 24/7! Send it out to every registered voter via email!
Stand up and fight, you GOP wussies! My baby granddaughter could deliver a knock out punch to the Republican party and not even get a bruise!
Grow a pair, you equivocating, poll addicted, groveling weasles!
You called it, OCG…..
This party is being handed a 1994 style rout of Dems by we the people and the squander that gift and shot themselves in the foot at every opportunity. Steele….bondage parties, private jets, and they expect us to "help" get their candidates elected by what???? Sending Steele and them more money???
Idiots. What so frustrating is that Obama is losing big and congress is handing the election to Repubs on a platter and these GOP idiots cannot even figure out how to capitalize on that.
Says way more about the party than I want to know right now. Way more.
My opinion is no I don't think she should be head of the RNC. Her value is greater outside the constraints of that position. She should continue to do what she is doing and gather experience on the world stage to make her more polished. Within the next ten years she should be sufficiently poised to make a run for a worthy office in a national race.
Gentle Readers,
I like Sarah Palin, but I like Michael Steele too!
All Chairman Steele did was commit the unpardonable election year sin of speaking the plain truth. Since 9/11 the U.S. has under-resourced the Afgan Theatre. Pres. Bush made Iraq the priority, and Pres. Obama has arbitrarily cut troop levels, set pullout dates and imposed difficult ROE, all based on domestic political concerns, not advice from the JCS. Over the past 9 years we've provided $24 billion in aid to the Afgans, but that is less than $250 million/month. The Afgans requested aid to build a 400,000 man army & Pres. Obama arbitrarily reduced that to 240,000. For all you've heard about ' Afgan corruption ' they've done alot with very limited resources.
Mr. Steele told the truth, & Republicans and Democrats both share some blame here.
Honest people in Washington are becoming scarce: We really can't spare this man!
Kindest Regards,
John Lepant Brighton CO
[The superior man] acts before he speaks, and afterwards speaks according to his actions.
Confucius, The Confucian Analects
Chinese philosopher & reformer (551 BC – 479 BC)
Screw the DNC. The word rascist has lost all effect and WE need to do something to get the RNC off the potty-training toilet.
Gentle Readers,____One of the problems we face right now is that the Democrats have won the past 2 elections ( 2006 & 2008 ) on terms under which they cannot govern the country.____They want carbon taxes to reduce CO2 emissions & cheap gas for peoples cars: they demand solar & wind energy & conservation but there will be nothing to conserve on a still night. They demand CO2 reductions but refuse to utilize hydroelectric and atomic power – the proven zero-carbon energy sources. They cut Defense and expand the war in Afganistan. They seek to extend unemployment benefits while refusing to crack down on employers hiring illegally.____I could go on: but the point is this: Mr. Steele, as Chairman of the RNC is attempting to prevent the Republicans from making this same mistake. When the RNC wins in this election cycle, it must then govern. To succeed where the Democrats have failed we must have coherent, rational, workable policies.____We should be grateful to Mr. Steele, and personally, I find the man to be a tonic! Invigorating! He speaks the plain truth and presents workable, real world alternatives!____Honestly: I really like the guy!____- J Lepant
No one said he never told the truth or tried to do the job. He just doesn't have what it takes to be a chairman of a party thats totally lost. He doesn't have 'chutzpah" . He can't lead or direct. Period.
The RNC has had enough airheads at the helm. They don't need another one in Palin.
As to Fiorina, the last thing the R's need is to elect FIorina, one of the original lawyers for the Black Panthers. She's worse than a RINO.
Screw the Dems. We need Sarah now. Steele can then go back to his clubs and play.
Peony,
Energizing the RNC would take more C4 explosives that we have in the war zone and every drone we own. Complacent looks ADHD compared to this collection of dull blades.
Somethin is up, peony. Nobody is this stupid at the national level. I see NEWT has dropped off the radar, lost weight, and picked up a nice tan.
HEAD'S UP!
We're bein primed to get screwed by the RNC. They think this is 1994 all over again and we're gonna deliver all the power back to them so they can save us….AGAIN….just like they did then.
OH WAIT. THEY DIDN'T.
Lay down with dawgz….don't come bitchin to me bout the fleas.
The petition is cathartic to those that are dissatified with Steele's performance. Palin would not take the job, I believe. She, as a lightning rod, is the de-facto leader of the conservative resergence. The real leader of the conservatives/Republicans will emerge in 2011.
On a separate note, peony, I would like your input.
I'm seriously….and I mean that….McCain's never gonna change and Hayworth is WAY LESS THAN IMPRESSIVE OR MUCH DIFFERENT. Is Deakin even still in the race or expected to survive the primary? If so what would you think of a Deakin vote as a STRIKE vote?
I know voting is serious…Gawd don't I. But given two crummy choices what's your advice? I don't want to give the Dem an advantage, but voting Deakin seems the only moral choice and the Tea Party keeps sayin if we don't do somethin different for the right reasons, we'll always get the same thing.
Hit me with it….
Being from Arizona, and wanting to retire John McCain, my only other choice is JD Hayworth. I'm not sure which is worse! Would love some advice from you all!
Excellent! When I get the clue that an IntenseDebator can tell the difference between the representative republic and a democracy, I get so excited that I nearly want to start following that person…..except that I haven't signed on to follow anyone because I don't have the time to read all of the postings. Keep up the good stuff, fellow analyst!
Kudos to Jim Hoft for getting the discussion going!
Ask John McCain if he will check the arizona voting list for legal aliens and illegal aliens. Ask JD Hayworth if he will as well.
Tell them whoever checks and removes the alien vote will get your vote. It will be like voting a million times!
Whoever is in charge of the Republican party should do one job, for the honor of our country. We need to take a stand on immigration and aliens. That is – we need to explicitely reject any support to the Republican party from voters who are not citizens, and we need to remove them from the voting lists if they are on them.
This is a huge deal, and there are potentially millions of votes at stake. Obama is pushing amnesty now to continue to pander to unlawful voters! And we are just watching the republican party ignore it! I estimate about 3-5 million voters (3% of the total) are unlawful voters.
http://www.federalobserver.com/2010/05/09/08-04-0...
You are exactly right! It's been the party going after the liberals and moderates that has caused it to lose such an enormous part of its conservative base, which is the reason it is now floundering. The whole IDEA of two parties is their opposing views. If they are no longer in opposition, it leaves an entire ideology (i.e. millions of people) totally unrepresented. And I believe it has now come to the point where it is the actual MAJORITY that is unrepresented. You are right also, in regard to jumping on the Tea Party Wagon. I read comments on so many sites saying how they can't support so and so because of one particular point, but that is exactly what will divide us, and in so doing, leave us once again unrepresented. We have to COME TOGETHER, which may mean some compromise with each other, but that certainly beats compromising with the liberals!
Gentle Readers,
Dear copperpeony,
Thank you for the favor of your reply.
On the contrary: When Mr. Steele took over the RNC, Republicans were reeling from the losses of 2006 & 2008, and the Demo's were predicted to be in power for at least 50 years.
Mr. Steele turned that all around. Gotta give him credit for turning around the RNC, and personally, I give him credit for attempting, unlike the Democrats, to establish rational policies for governance. Every poll shows Republicans winning in 2010, thanks in no small part to Mr. Steele.
However, once we win, we have to govern. This man is hard working, honest ( possibly to a fault, but honest ), and plans ahead.
Sincerely,
John
That is an overly simplistic analysis of the situation. Senators make National policy. Governors make State policy. Senators also serve on crucial committees. Their jobs are virtually identical; with the Senators having as much or more overall responsibility than Governors. You may not like it, but those are the facts.
Fill me in on Hayworth. I already know everything I need about McCain. You are right to want to put "the maverick" out to pasture. He was an honorable warrior who lost his way at some point. I'd like to see him retired before he REALLY tarnishes his legacy.
The LAST thing the GOP needs is for him to make another failed run at the presidency. We also don't need him selling us out in the Senate at a critical juncture. I'm a long way from AZ, but I'd love to help you sort out this mess if I could.
OK…Be mean to the Black guy…
What I mean is Liz is not Sarah…Do I have to spell it out?
When have we had an RNC chair that was not a go-along, get-along DC Insider? With the dems calling for Steele's ouster, it's time to nominate someone who is not cut from the same boring cloth. What we need is a rock ribbed conservative with name recognition to that effect, and Sarah Palin fits the bill perfectly. What's more, she's another member of the Democrats' prized victim groups, not that we care about that sort of thing, but we gotta reach out to the dem-rats somehow.
Maybe that's what you should have said. You certainly didn't make that clear in your obviously ignorant evaluation of Liz. And, in the words of Vice-President Bite-Me, do you always have to be a smart-ass.
Yep, Michelle is a jewel that we need to keep in Congress.
Not too mention the RINO heads exploding too!
I love Sarah Palin, and I'm beginning to detest Michael Steele.
However, I can't rub those two facts together and start a fire for Palin as RNC Chair.
We need a replacement for Steele, certainly. That replacement should be someone who is more politically savvy and possessed of more credentials than Ms. Palin.
I wouldn't use C4 anyway. Much prefer the slower burn of chickenshit and diesel fuel, AKA ANFO.
Steele: if you are reading this, please resign now. Just walk away dude. Go to the strip club and get a lap dance man, you deserve it. Afterall, you have been giving the Democratic Party lap dances at our expense and that $hit has to stop.
Put Fred Thompson in to ride herd over the RINO's and boot them out. Purify the Party. NOW. The big tent business needs to end as the period from 2000-2008 proves it.
Fred: if you are reading this, step up man!
Sorry to disagree John, however I must. I had hoped that Steele would stop the support of Progressive candidates by the party however he has increased the support for those candidates. The RNC provided almost 1M to a "Republican" (progressive) candidate (Dede Scozzafava) in NY23 only to have her drop out of the race and endorse the Dem candidate. This is just one example of the RNC's continuous support for Progressive Republican candidates which has led me to not support the RNC. While his comments about Afghanistan may or may not have been the best point to make, it is more of the same. Instead I am supporting, in my small way, my local candidates for office thereby ensuring the little I can do goes toward people who are worth the effort.
BTW, Susana Martinez running for Governor of NM was another candidate supported by Sarah.
I understood what you meant, Kevin, Sarah has a certain savoir faire and chrisma that. Liz, who I like, lacks as a fund raiser…Do let the" thin skinned" people here get you down…
I like your comments and you seem to be getting you "sea legs" here on the BIGS just fine..
Keep up the good work..
I'm signature 784…
Go Sarah! No More RINO's or Progressive GOP candidates!
If Sarah gets the job, MAYBE I will start giving the GOP money again…
Ronald Reagan was polarizing too however I seem to remember him being reelected in a landslide.
If I understand correctly you are saying: Defecate or get off the solid waste processing unit!
Not so much being mean to the Black guy just replacing one minority status individual with another minority status individual (i.e. breaking that glass ceiling).
Yes, I am a little surprised at the negative reaction to simple observations and some obvious light hearted tongue -in- cheek. Will watch my P's and Q's in the future.
I've been saying this for almost a year now. Nice to see BigGov, NRO and others are picking up the flag on this idea.
Palin's a perfect choice for NRC chair. Genuine mainstream "flyover state" Conservatives who represent the vast majority of potential GOP voters haven't had a voice inside the GOP leadership and she'd fit that bill admirably.
To the misguided partisans who're calling this some kind of insider Republican plot to kill a 2012 Palin presidential campaign – stop looking for enemies in your own camp and appreciate how this could benefit not only her party but Palin herself in preparing for a campaign on down the road (say 2016 or 2020). She's not ready to run in 2012 (polling shows 61% think she's not qualified) but she could be later. Stop pushing the kool-aid on everyone and let them see her in action on a national stage for a few years and that number will hopefully improve.
Are you out of your f'ing mind? Sarah Palin?
First, she's about as smart as a box of rocks.
Second, she's a f'ing QUITTER.
This is the type of person that should replace Soul Brother Steele?
You guys are doomed if this is the best you have to offer.
On second thought, if it will keep her out of office, then go for it.
I thought they sent Stewie Smalley?
Naw, don't watch your P's and Q's. Sometimes you may have to respond with more elaborate pontification since we can only read the words. Besides, it will take a little time to get the feel for a poster.
I didn't watch satnitelive so stewie smally is an unknown to me….I have heard that it was a frank'nbeans character that wasn't funny…same as today…..I just wonder who the dumbasses were that voted (several) times for 'em…..acorn?????
Won't take long for the progressive to make her polarizing especially with the dad being Darth Vader although if we carry the analogy then that would make her a princess and one of the good guys.
Ding, ding, ding…Got it on the first attempt. ACORN is the right answer. Funny how they kept finding new votes in Dem districts.
Interesting that I too have stopped providing money to the GOP because they kept giving it to Progressive (aka RINO) candidates.
It would be interesting if Sarah ran the RNC like she runs her PAC. Now that would be fun!!!
Are you really claiming to have had two thoughts at the same time? Will miracles never cease to happen.
BTW, we still haven't seen Barry's grades. We at least know that Sarah worked to get through college and actually completed a degree, not to mention she actually governed a state and made decisions unlike Barry who always voted "present" while in any office including the current position.
I even got thumbed down for stickin' up for him…
Trust me, there are thin skinned folks here who look for a reason to go off and confrontation…They can all thumb me down now…
If Sarah would take the job, she would immediately restore credibility to this unglamourous job…
She wouldn't even have to beg for crumbs,
I would send in the donation in my own envelope with my own stamp…
Don't be such a stranger, RT
I stopped when the refused to support the conservative in Rhode Island and supported that fricking rino Lincoln Chaffee.
I don't live there but he made Dede Scuzzyfava look conservative…
I was LIVID…
He also was running for President of the United States, not being the fund raising and PR person for a much maligned political party. There is a huge difference.
Did you see me say polarizing is bad in general? I just said that putting her in charge of the RNC when everybody already has their mind made up about her isn't going to influence the people that already hate the RNC aside from the few hardcore Palin supporters that have distanced themselves from the RNC.
They don't need to make their tent bigger, and they need to state very clearly what they stand for, but they can do that with someone that isn't hated by nearly half the country.
and read the comments below this. There seem to be a lot of people, even here, that agree with me.
Grow up and stop reading into what I wrote.
Palin isn't hated by half the country, just the progressives both Democrat and Republican because of exactly what you state the RNC needs to accomplish. She states clearly where she stands.
In case you haven't noticed anyone, including Reagan, becomes "polarizing" and a target of the progressives once they take a stand on an issue in opposition. This has been Steele's biggest problem, he hasn't made clear statements followed by confirming actions.
IOW we need a leader and Sarah happens to be a leader. I also would enjoy having Ken Blackwell however the progressives in the RNC couldn't afford having him in control either.
As Reagan used to say: "Raise a banner of bold colors, not pale pastels."
It is not a popularity contest, it is an Intense Debate!
Gentle Readers,
Dear Flame,
Thank you for the favor of your reply.
Actually, that money came from the NRCC, over Mr. Steele's objections: It was Mr. Boehner's decision to provide those funds to the Scozzafava campaign.
May I ask: Will you now call for his resignation? Will you support a ' Dump Boehner ' movement? Not to be smart-aleck, because I wouldn't. The man made a decision that you and I disagree with, but he made it in good faith.
I'll give Mr. Steele the same discretion: Mr. Steele simply made a statement that I agree with and you, and many others, do not agree with, in good faith. Didn't cost any money. Let's leave it at that.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/boehne...
Sincerely,
John Lepant Brighton CO
Hell, I got thumbed down for pointing out that Reagan was polarizing. Although I expect it is better to be pissed off then pissed on!
I enjoy Intense Debate
Couldn't help the play on words, I apologize. 
You're trying to imply that I'm a supporter of the Chosen One. I'm not.
I can't stomach either party, I left the Republicans to become an Independent.
I have not implied anything. I just pointed out the fallacy of your statement regarding Sarah being uneducated or in your words: "she's about as smart as a box of rocks". Nice try though.
"We need Sarah Palin…"
Why? She'll just quit.
Grow up and stop reading into what you wrote?
You compared Reagan to Palin. Sorry, but that's a bit of a stretch. She doesn't have anywhere near the speaking ability nor the persuasive ability. She is where she is because she's one of few politicians that has been considered "honest" over recent years, but she's made choices that have even put that into a questionable area, like endorsing McCain.
Palin actually is disliked by half the country, because on the left, people buy into the media bias and she is heavily disliked even by moderates, and on the right there are plenty that find faults with her quite easily. Her approval rating barely gets out of the low 40's, and that's pretty bad for what is now a regular public figure and not a politician.
Reagan was right with the bold colors and not pale pastels, but you confuse smart politics by the RNC with running for national office. The RNC doesn't need to mince words with where they stand, but they do need someone who will at least have a chance at convincing people who are willing to listen. Palin loses that battle right out of the gate, because most who don't like her will ignore her. There is a big difference between the job of RNC chair and President.
If I lived in Boehner's district I would have worked hard for a replacement candidate in the primary. He seems to be continually losing his cojones (a little Hispanic lingo)
Wilson said the President lied during the State of the Union (since proven to be an accurate statement) and Boehner forced him to apologize.
Barton apologized to BP for the administration's coercive actions and Boehner forced him to apologize.
While it is late in the game to remove Steele, it is the right time to let him know that he should leave at the end of his term. Let us not forget that the progressives in the RNC are already working on their plan for the end of his term and that includes continuing to push conservatives out.
And my point was that if even people in this Palin loving website agree with me, then there is a real problem. It has nothing to do with a popularity contest, it's that Palin isn't going to help the RNC aside from getting a few doners back that they used to have.
Polorizing people, taking flack from ignorant leftists, just means they're over the target…..
Semper Fi to your family…Our son was AF 1998-2006….His wife is still in and serving in the big "SandBox"…as we speak..
First I said: "Ronald Reagan was polarizing too however I seem to remember him being reelected in a landslide." Which points out that Reagan was polarizing yet still achieved his goal.
It is you that keeps reading your own bias into what is being written. Your first response claimed "Did you see me say polarizing is bad in general?", now your response claims: "You compared Reagan to Palin." In neither case does your response match what was written.
Now please explain how bold colors and not pastels equates into your statement "The RNC doesn't need to mince words with where they stand, but they do need someone who will at least have a chance at convincing people who are willing to listen." You appear to be advocating bold colors AND pastels at the same time.
Polarizing people, watching the flack behind me, means I've already left the target.
My daughter was in the Sunni triangle during the bad times. I too got to play in the Kitty Litter, actually several different KittyLitters before most in this country knew about them.
I'll keep your daughter-in-law and family in my prayers.
Or I'm advocating bold colors and no pastels from someone who the entire U.S. public, even those politically uneducated, doesn't already have their mind made up about.
Get someone who has the same positions and fire (like an Allen West for example), but doesn't already have a huge enemy base. The RNC chair is a fund raising and PR position. Palin is past the point of helping with PR except for within her own camp, and she can only raise funds from people who are already in her own camp. She can do both of those without being the RNC chair…
It's like trying to decide if you want lung cancer or brain cancer. Hard choice my friend and thank you for asking me for an input. I need to think.
this is a brilliant call.. makes sense in every respect.. to bad the gop would never do it
No, I won't. I dont' think Palin's the person for the job. I think she's better off doing what ever it is SHE thinks she should do.
First. have you even found MANY reliable sites with info on AZ candidates. Like you, I need to think. Especially since I'm leaving the state before 2012 and, like the oath says, first, do no harm.
The AZ Tea Party groups are very rollercoaster from vitriol…no really hateful people…to cheerleaders for hopeless lost cause candidates…less than useful. I tried to find out stuff on Hayworth but, and here's where this takeover of the media really has hurt us, they are less emotional, but read like right/left blog sites….no dispassionate analysis or just factual info.
this is ridiculous. We're supposed to vet candidates who have no record or whose information is so skewed as to be useless. Seems like that's the very LAST THING ANY CANDIDATE WANTS KNOWN.
It's like they've SCRUBBED THEMSELVES the way Obama makes stuff disappear, lol. I'll keep diggin….you too, lets see what we can pull together.
Very very frustrating.
I could are less if he had a magenta face.
Gentle Readers,
Dear Flame,
Thank you again: I must be more of a pragmatist than you are: I prefer a United States with policies primarily determined by Mr. Boehner, Mr. Steele and Gov. Palin to a U.S.A. with policies directed by Pelosi/Reid & Pres. Obama.
Probably wouldn't be perfect: But one heckuvalot better! Back in 2005 we had 4.5% unemployment. Speaker Gingrich did get a balanced budget. ( The Media credits Pres. Clinton for that, but fiscal policy is made in the US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. )
Pres. Obama might pull a Clinton and ' triangulate ' to a successful Presidency, if he had Republican Congress.
Most Kind Regards,
John Lepant
Here, for what it may be worth, are some clues as to why you've run up against some disagreement with your posts, Kevin. Phrases like, "Do I have to spell it out?" invite and deserve answers in kind. Liz Cheney is nothing close to bland, and far more than simply an "ideoogue". While, as I said earlier, I like Sarah, she has run out her string and is the joke of the day to our opposition. She may be able to raise some $10 contributions, but the big dollar supporters which we need are more likely to respond to the persuasion of a bona-fide heavy weight like Liz Cheney. Sarah's endorsements of certified RINOS like Mc Cain work contrary to our objectives. Does it help when I spell it out? Are you able to accept honest disagreement without playing the classic liberal "victim card"?
Those who choose to open by dishing it out get along better if they are also able to take it. As Harry Truman said, "If you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
Another reason to sign. I was a pathetic #914th. Where are the rest?
You understand it! And, I will certainly sign on too!
Thank you for your considered response and deserved rebuke..
I agree it was a major mistake for Sarah to endorse McLame but I don't think I have to spell out why she did it.
She is no doubt sorry about that decision–. As ALL McLame types MUST go.–
It would have been better to stay on the sidlines on that one, especially,. after the shabby treatment she recieved from the '08 campaign big shots, as she describes vividly in her book. I would have run fast from all of them.
Liz Cheney should be POTUS
Sarah would make a great party Chair and terrific fundraiser.
From my posting 11 weeks ago
Here is my wild card, Palin is another possibility for a little different reason she is 100 percent ideological but lacking in the insider skills would her charisma and physical presence make her the darling of the circuit. I know the Rinos would prefer her off the trail. The tea party folks would follow her into the party and the MSM might embrace her in a non-electorate roll
I don't think the RNC needs a chair who supports RINOs like McCain and endorses candidates like Carly Fiorina over the superior, conservative Chuck DeVore in the CA Senate race. I don't trust her judgement on whom to support. We need an RNC chair who supports REAL conservatives in the party.
I'm sure we could do better than Palin.
I don't have any thing against her, I just don't think she is the most qualified for the job.
being a resident of the state of MD i was proud to see mr steele put in as chair
but as time went by i became very disappointed with him
Yeah all of you would luuuuuuuvvvvvvvvvvvv to pat the girl on the head and tell her to be a Part of the Repubican establishment!!
We see RIGHT THROUGH YOU!!!!!
lol, yeah I saw the goooh website, the person who told me about it was all sold out for McCain, lol too funny.
Oh, I thought you meant thin skinned people like you who can't handle it when Christians on a public forum share Scripture with each other. You know, those Christians who in your word should "keep their Bible to themselves." And here I thought you were a "live and let live person." You might want to start practicing what you preach.
I put in my 2 cent's worth in Hobbes in your thread. As always, you are spot on in your evaluations of politicians.
is not drinking the Palin Kool-Aid.
Sarah backed Carly in the CA senate race, a political nobody with no track record, other than sending American jobs over seas. The real conservative in the race? Chuck DeVore. Six year solid track record fighting bloated government at the state level. A solid conservative. Sarah has become a RNC party hack. I gave her pass with the McCain endorsement, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me,
Palin and other beltway blowhards like Gingrich, ought to stick to writing books and making Fox news appearances.
Only "live and let live" when it serves their purpose. It's hard to take a person seriously who one minute says Liz Cheney is a "bland ideologue" and the next minute suggests she should be President.
Here's a Bible verse you may want to commit to memory
JAM19 "My dear sisters, take note of this: Everyone should be quick to
listen, slow to speak and slower to become angry and critical."
[...] » Defeat Socialism: Save America From the Obama-Pelosi Regime … [...]
This is the exactly WRONG thing to do. The problem with Michael Steele, aside from the fact that he is clearly no where as smart or skilled at leading as Sarah Palin, is the role of the Chairman (or Chairwoman) of the RNC is to raise money and organize campaigns. It is not to be the spokesman/woman for the party. Steele has gotten in trouble trying to promote his ideas and himself at the expense of raising funds and addressing critical election issues like changing the primary system to eliminate the ability of non-Republicans from choosing our presidential nominee – e.g. John McCain. For Sarah to do that job, she would have to give up her strength of public speaking and instead manage the organization. She could do it, but it would not be the best use of her talents.
Excellent advice although I do remember that Paul had difficulty in this area also.
Yeah, while I am pragmatic, I am more a realist. Thanx to Uncle Sam, I have lived, worked, and seen numerous socialist countries and the detrimental effect on the average people. There are times in life that one must set aside pragmatism and instead deal with the realities because eventually pragmatism will lead to the same outcome just at a slower pace.
Maybe, you should practice what you are attempting to preach. Seems to me you were the one that quickly spoke out about Liz Cheney! And, don't try to put us down because we're women. Look around, most of the people willing, these days, to stand up for the Constitution and our rights under it are women. Perhaps some whiners, like you, need to ask their mommies what they should think and do!
Incidentally, I favor a Bible verse which begins, "Put on the whole armor of God, that you be able to stand against the wiles of the devil." But that's not your style, is it, Kevin?
Another Bible verse for you to ponder and memorize.
"ITI6 Some harpies have wandered away from the main points and have turned to meaningless talk."
You as a woman shall have the last word…I'm sure
Perhaps some whiners, like you, need to read and evaluate instead of being so quick with the claws at what you appear to be reading into what is written.
Incidentally, I favor Phil 3:20a "But our citizenship is in heaven " and 2Peter 1:3-11 "I can pray this because his divine power has bestowed on us everything necessary for life and godliness through the rich knowledge of the one who called us by his own glory and excellence. Through these things he has bestowed on us his precious and most magnificent promises, so that by means of what was promised you may become partakers of the divine nature, after escaping the worldly corruption that is produced by evil desire. For this very reason, make every effort to add to your faith excellence (aka goo morals/virtues), to excellence, knowledge; to knowledge, self-control; to self-control, perseverance; to perseverance, godliness; to godliness, brotherly affection; to brotherly affection, unselfish love (aka agape not eros). For if these things are really yours and are continually increasing, they will keep you from becoming ineffective and unproductive in your pursuit of knowing our Lord Jesus Christ more intimately. But concerning the one who lacks such things – he is blind. That is to say, he is nearsighted, since he has forgotten about the cleansing of his past sins. Therefore, brothers and sisters, make every effort to be sure of your calling and election. For by doing this you will never stumble into sin. For thus an entrance into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, will be richly provided for you."
ForConstitution/Hobbs/ any other snibbling whinners:
You've drained my vast resevoir of patience and will now bring out the big guns of the good book…
An appropiate Bible verse for you to ponder and perhaps memorize.
James3:1 " Not many of you harpies should presume to be teachers, my sisters, because
you know that those who teach will be judged more strictly"
I'm going now to find a good verse that talks about "those who can't read, distort points, and are thin-skinned harpies looking to argue lamely about opinions they disagree with"
I'm sure I'l find it straight away…
Troll. How many Intense Debate accounts do you have……3 or 4?
I am here all alone and I don't think you could convince anyone I am a troll. Try reading my now voluminous comment stream.
Why do you feel the need to attack me?
I have done nothing to you but express an opinion.
It is you who have been on the attack . I see you same Bible Thumpers all over the BIGS, you give Christians and followers of the 10Commandments a bad name.
Please try and develop some maturity and patience in your golden years.
I would hate to see a nice, Conservative, elderly, Christian "lady", such as yourself, succumb to stress unnecessarily and prematurely.
Can you believe the vitriol here?
I'm amazed—They even thumb down and criticize appropriate and spot on Bible verses.!
Go figure..I've had it with the lot of them.
I come here to mingle with kindred spirit Conservatives, not be bumpin' ugly with a bunch of disrespectful looney women.
I get enough estrogen overload at home and at work. Geeez..
Only better position for Sarah is to be on Republican ticket in 2012 as V.P. to Ron Paul's POTUS nomination.I believe Paul is the only solution to the progresive-Neocon.-corparate controll over our goverment.Take a good honest look at the last 50 or so years in America. The mega-corparations, the unions and federal goverment are always the winners with both Dems. or Republicans in power. Paul is the only person to restore our individual freedom. Check his record, his votes ,his pork. He is the only,repete ,only person in congress not to deal away his integraty. Or should real freedom only be for the governing and corprate elite? Time may be running out before the theoretical fight becomes all to real.
Hey, it's like HPD said, if your getting flak then you must be over the target. It's not worth getting annoyed because a few posters are having a bad day. Sometimes I have those kind of days also and have to go back and apologize.
As to estrogen overload, I am one of four males working for an organization of over 150 people so when I say I understand, I understand. Kinda like some women have trouble with testosterone overload or as they say here in NM, machismo.
While Ron would be good for the USA domestically, he has some issue in foreign affairs which is under the purview of the President.
[...] to when, some people suggest that it should not be until the end of his current term. For our position, please see the petition: THEREFORE, We, the undersigned, submit that Sarah Palin, [...]
How many accounts do you have HilBill12 or should I call you LOL? You should seek help for your schizophrenia and your multiple personality disorder. It would be interesting to have BG check the IP addy of all three of your accounts. Alinsky troll. Don't worry their are many many who are on to you and it won't be long before you are thrown off of here and the sooner the better.
God Bless and have a nice life!
Wow how sexist and chauvinistic of you. I'm sure your daughter would appreciate her dad saying such condescending things about women who are strong and know their own mind by saying they have PMS. So what's your excuse?
You are so gullible to believe "Kevin Stonewall" who set up this account to harass Kevin Stowell. You have been suckered in by a poster who has several accounts with Intense Debate with the sole purpose to divide and conquer.
"Perhaps some whiners, like you, need to read and evaluate instead of being so quick with the claws at what you appear to be reading into what is written. "
Wow–you are a hypocrite and do not even practice the verse you quoted. Nice "brotherly love" you got going on there. How do you know that "Hobbes" is a woman?
[...] » Defeat Socialism: Save America From the Obama-Pelosi Regime … [...]
I couldn't agree with you more. Some interesting comments on this thead with some good options. If Sarah wanted to be the RNC chair, I'd support her.
I signed the petition. If I remember right I'm number 1142. In fact, before I ever read about it anywhere else, I posted about the idea of Sarah Palin replacing Michael Steel on my own blog here-
http://thepagantemple.blogspot.com/2010/07/who-sh...
However, there's something that everybody who is a Sarah Palin supporter should be aware of. I made the very bad mistake of posting about this on Red State, on a diary I named Federalist Pagan, and I was promptly kicked off Red State for my troubles.
See, it seems as though its not just leftists that hate Sarah Palin, she has more than her fair share of moderate Republican haters as well. After they banned me, I posted about the experience here-
http://thepagantemple.blogspot.com/2010/07/red-st...
And was promptly assaulted by a Red State troll on my own blog. One of the initiators of the problems at Red State is a former Murkowski government employee who has a load of resentment towards Palin. But it really goes deeper than one mere retired labor relations thug.
The Republican Party insiders, the people who currently control the party and its direction now, know full well the GOP stands to make potentially massive gains at the polls this year. They intend to be the beneficiaries of that voter largess, as they see it. They are not about to go quietly into that good night and in so doing cede all that potential power, money, and influence to the Sarah Palins of the party and the Tea Party types.
They will fight her, and they will fight you, tooth and nail before they see that happen.
This is potentially a lot more serious than people realize, and you all need to realize the implications and what's at stake. I went blindly into Red State and ended up feeling like I had walked into a viper's den. People don't give up power easily, especially when they see a real gold mine ahead. And this coming election is a potential motherlode.
As much as I would love to see Palin head of the RNC its going to take more than just her. It's going to take a whole new mindset, and that means new, fresh blood in control of the party. I don't see how that can happen between now and 2012. Maybe I'm wrong, and maybe it can happen. Maybe we can all make it happen. But it would be a blood bath, and it might impact the election this year, very possibly in a negative way, if the Tea Party and conservative Republicans conducted what would amount to an open revolt for control of the RNC.
Its just something everybody needs to weigh in the balance.
[...] Sarah,’ agrees Jim Hoft over at Big Government, who already has a poster, website, and Twitter account all set up. The [...]
God only knows why you have chosen to act like a deranged, bitter, paranoid old crone who sees everyone you have the slightst disagreement as a troll or a "poser".
I've been nothing, but polite to all of you thin-skinned harpies.
I would normally ignore you, but your accusation of stalking KevinS are really beyond the pale, because I like Kevin and find him to be compelling poster.
In fact, if you bothered to check, he, and a few others greeted me warmly on my first post this week.
I don't know what your problem is but I was forced to report you as a delusional escapee from the rubber room.
The funny thing is I never attacked anyone! I simply expressed an opinion about Sarah and Liz.
You have problems beyond any one's ability to diagnose or treat here.
Please seek help.
[...] to when, some people suggest that it should not be until the end of his current term. For our position, please see the petition: THEREFORE, We, the undersigned, submit that Sarah Palin, [...]
[...] to when, some people suggest that it should not be until the end of his current term. For our position, please see the petition: THEREFORE, We, the undersigned, submit that Sarah Palin, [...]
[...] to when, some people suggest that it should not be until the end of his current term. For our position, please see the petition: THEREFORE, We, the undersigned, submit that Sarah Palin, [...]
Pattaya Police arrest Woman promising new life for Thai’s in USA…
I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my website
…
Clay Aiken wants America to “save the children? Should we?…
I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog
…
My daughter did/does appreciate what I said because she has heard it many times. Please note that I pointed out the difficulty not only for a male in a female dominant environment (estrogen) but also a female (like my daughter) in a male dominant (Marines) environment (testosterone).
It appears you have a bad habit of reading into what some people write. In particular you assume my comments were sexist, chauvinistic, and condescending about women and throw in your assumption that when I mention that some people may be having a bad day then that automatically means I know the poster(s) is/are female therefore I am saying they have PMS.
Your behavior is more like the progressives and liberals, whining and making personal comments than a person who is strong and knows their own mind. And as for whether Kevin has several accounts or not, I will debate with them just as I have with other posters on other issues.
Finally, I will repeat what I said from my previous post: "It's not worth getting annoyed because a few posters are having a bad day. Sometimes I have those kind of days also and have to go back and apologize."
I understand that the physiology of claws is not specific to the male or female of a species therefore I made no assumption (although Hobbes does mention women) as to the gender of the poster. Once again, you have read into what was written which is what I have tried to get you to understand.
Beyonce sings ‘America the Beautiful’ @ Obama Concert…
I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog
…
Beyonce sings ‘America the Beautiful’ @ Obama Concert…
I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog
…
lol, I know you are more than upset with the GOP and I get it –
I happen to take a bit of a different view of the situation as it unfolds, but still, Steele needs to booted,
NOW!
I can't imagine how awful it has to be for decent people to be in DC now, to know you are surrounded by liars, crooks and thieves! It would make me crazy!!!
LOL, OCG,
I hear that. My cousin is Cong. Marsha Blackburn. Wouldn't do what she'd doin for all the gold in Soros's bank accounts.
As for the party, I'm not pleased but I'm not suicidal. Unless an indie is already LEADING or has a strong chance, I'll vote R but I'm only donating to candidates directly…not the party, until this marooooon is history.
How can they drop one pass after another? They get a PERFECT opportunity, there's so many now….Holder and ANY CASE HE TOUCHES, the economy, jobs, voter FRAUD, RACISM, open threats of violence, and what do they do…a rousing chorus of "The Sound of Silence."
sigh……..
I couldn't do it either, no matter the money and especially NOT money from that filthy pig soros!
I know they are mute and I used to get so pissed about that too, but I'm learning there is a bit more to that method – maybe not one we like per say, but I honestly can't imagine how they would get their butts kicked no matter WHAT they say!! There is so much evidence that even a peep out of them and the LSM goes off! Better to let the soros run media keep stewing up the garbage their heros spew – in other words, I'm all for NOT giving them anything to spin!
But yes, I'm mad as hell that just ONE doesn't get up on a freakin soap box and YELL, beyond Sarah of course, or Jan Brewer – so in that respect, I'm with you 100% –
I know this world has turned on it's head and nothing makes any sense these days –
we are on a cliff, a good gust of wind and we are done – THAT is what I focus on, what and where I go with my kids when the grounds gives way!
You know what…..THAT MAKES PERFECT SENSE, OCG. Wow….must have a "brain cloud" to have missed that big picture, lol. Indeed, why say anything when you know the media will crucify you.
Let Hoola Hoop Shazzaam keep it up about "killin crackers," and idiot democratic reps like that congressman today who "assured" constituents that Justice would NEVER have a policy not to try cases with white defendants….just keeeeeep on talkin.
Rule o holes is alive and well in DemOville. And it's more than evident the Clinton machine has LEFT THE BUILDING. Dumbo's twistin in the wind and doesn't even know it.
works for me…
[...] to when, some people suggest that it should not be until the end of his current term. For our position, please see the petition: THEREFORE, We, the undersigned, submit that Sarah Palin, [...]
Novatel Wireless MiFi 2372 Unlocked 3G Mobile Wi-Fi Hotspot GSM For North America (AT&T & T-Mobile)…
I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog
…
Novatel Wireless MiFi 2372 Unlocked 3G Mobile Wi-Fi Hotspot GSM For North America (AT&T & T-Mobile)…
I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog
…
Novatel Wireless MiFi 2372 Unlocked 3G Mobile Wi-Fi Hotspot GSM For North America (AT&T & T-Mobile)…
I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog
…
» Defeat Socialism: Save America From the Obama-Pelosi Regime ……
I found your entry interesting do I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog
…
Awww, you are being far too kind Texas, I am sure you thought this as well
Was it Mike Meyers who said that the obamanator machine is looking more and more like the THUGS that they are, and THAT does and WILL turn normal average everyday people OFF! So yea, as painful as it is to hear all this vile crap, I hope they all keep flapping their pie holes and make it ever more clear to everyone just who the hell these freaks are!!
USO Los Angeles Area Proudly Presents Its Distinguished American Award for 1977 to Gerald R. Ford, 38TH President of the United States of America (Signed by Pres. Ford Program ) November 30, 1977, 11/30/77 Reviews…
I didn’t quite follow this to begin with. But when I read it a third time, it all added up in my mind. Thanks for the insight. Definitely something to think about. Thanks for sharing…
Lincoln : Speeches and Writings : 1859-1865 (Library of America)…
I didn’t quite follow this to begin with. But when I read it a third time, it all added up in my mind. Thanks for the insight. Definitely something to think about. Thanks for sharing…
BORN AMERICA USA ROOTS IN GHANA ACCRA COUNTRY PRIDE FLAG T SHIRT (adult xl)…
I didn’t quite follow this to begin with. But when I read it a third time, it all added up in my mind. Thanks for the insight. Definitely something to think about. Thanks for sharing…
Honda of America American Flag Mouse Pad…
I didn’t quite follow this to begin with. But when I read it a third time, it all added up in my mind. Thanks for the insight. Definitely something to think about. Thanks for sharing…
How come mortgage brokers provide better rates than big banks like Chase, Bank of America or Citi?…
I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog
…
[...] for not measuring up to the standards that should be ours as a nation. (And, of course, as Righitst screaming heads loudly instruct us, we must all dutifully be terrified of governmental efforts to ease such [...]
You must be logged in to post a comment.