Comments on: ‘Tough’ Decisions on Spending Include $2.5M on Super Bowl Ad

By: Coffee Makers Store

Coffee Makers Store — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:34:06 +0000

French Coffee Maker…

[...]Listed below are links from authority internet sites that have been used as a reference to this article [...]…

By: hockeynation

hockeynation — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:45:23 +0000

Yes, but instead we have a system that gives billions of tax payer dollars to the richest among us, only to have them return the favor by putting millions back in the pockets of the politicians, it is a viscous circle that is only going to get worse in light of the recent Supreme Court ruling.

The only way the system even has a remote chance of working, is to make elections 100% public, no corporate or special interest money, make corporate or special interest contributions a crime, call it BRIBERY!!!

Both the right and left want their country back, and would this not be a good start???

By: cardon

cardon — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:21:27 +0000

I sometimes get carried away….lol

By: Nathan

Nathan — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:12:40 +0000

lol. I stand corrected, and I'm taking my own sarcasm detector to the shop as soon as I get off work.

By: cardon

cardon — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:01:19 +0000

I was aware he used sarcasm, and I in turn used "brilliant" as
sarcasm, saying that the MSM would not use toughest, cause
with Obama, they use glowing terms like brilliant, genius, etc…
etc..I was suggesting he didn't pay attention to the MSM or he
would have used "brilliant" instead of "tough" as Gregg Knapp
said….I'm sorry I'm not as brilliant as you appear to be…I enjoyed
Denverbuilders post..thought it was a great post!

By: Nathan

Nathan — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:25:55 +0000

He said toughest, not most brilliant, and it was sarcasm.

Someone needs to do a study on treading comprehension and ability to detect sarcasm.

By: Nathan

Nathan — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:23:06 +0000

Why don't you explain it to us then, instead of insulting us?