Climategate Spreading to NASA?
by Greg Knapp
It’s not just the scientists at the Climate Research Unit of East Anglia University who may have criminally violated the Freedom of Information Act (some profesors in the UK and some in the USA), NASA has been stonewalling a FOIA request as well… for years.
Chris Horner, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, said NASA has refused for two years to provide information under the Freedom of Information Act that would show how the agency has shaped its climate data and would explain why the agency has repeatedly had to correct its data going as far back as the 1930s.
“I assume that what is there is highly damaging,” Mr. Horner said. “These guys are quite clearly bound and determined not to reveal their internal discussions about this.”
NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies is saying they’re “working on” the FOIA request.
Right. For two years?!
The public affairs guy at GISS is using the Sgt. Schultz defense (“I hear nothing, I see nothing, I know nothing!”)
He said he was unfamiliar with the British controversy and couldn’t say whether NASA was susceptible to the same challenges to its data. The White House has dismissed the British e-mails as irrelevant.
What we are seeing is in total contradiction to the scientific method. Honest scientists don’t delete their data or use tricks to hide data they don’t like. They don’t insist the science is settled and that anyone who questions them is a nut. They gladly release their data to other scientists so their results can be replicated or errors can be corrected.
Once upon a time the “science was settled” that the world was flat. The “science was settled” that the world was the center of the universe. Whoops.
Much of the data used for the “consensus” that manmade global warming is real came from the CRU and NASA’s GISS. If that data is not accurate and/or has been manipulated it undermines everything. When you consider the trillions of dollars at risk here by policy pushed by this “science,” it’s understandable that Christopher Booker is calling it The Worst Scientific Scandal of Our Generation.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
81 Comments
The so called scientists promoting this are NOT Scientists. Rather a bunch of misguided individuals hoping to change the world with other peoples money. Some are sincere and misguided, and some are frauds motivated by greed. The fool from India (I think) traveling over 300,000 miles a year for speeches is a greedy fraudster. As is AL GORE who has a main goal of enriching himself playing all powerful giver of other money.
Specific scientists have placed themselves in the position of Gods. Having used their influence granted through more than $40-million from the tax payers, they have abused the trust afforded to them placing a dark cloud over the scientific community as a whole. Surely, science will recover from this event as time heals all wounds.
‘Truth is the daughter of time’ was forgotten by this specific Scientific Fiefdom, but acknowledgment of other traditional philosophies which built science to the current respect also have been ignored, such as “Politics, religion, entertainment, fame and wealth have no place in Science”. Often, however, such important socially advancing fields as science need set backs and thus force both current and potential abusers to fall back to traditional thinking. This is the nature in the evolution of human thought and growth.
The hubris of denial by these abusers of social trust, along with their followers, of the devastating magnitude of their deceptive and deviant activity, while trying to maintain their stature in civilization, is incomprehensible. This denial will continue dragging the entire scientific community into the pit. Unfortunately, a self awakened reality of their misdeeds likely will not appear until admission followed by humility becomes obvious to society. Forgiveness is the divinity of our civilization but forgetting never can be allowed.
" NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies is saying they’re “working on” the FOIA request.
Right. For two years?! "
In 1961 John Kennedy called for a space program goal of landing an American on the moon, 8 years later that dream was realized.
Now NASA can't get information together after more than 2 years?
DISGUSTING !
Hansen, of NASA's Goddard, sits on Al Gore's GIM board and has been paid in carbon credits.
NASA should see the writing on the wall and feel the heat. They should get ahead of this and release their data before they are exposed.
well said
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by mikepfs and Partisan Media Group, Big Tweeting. Big Tweeting said: BigGovt: Climategate Spreading to NASA?: It’s not just the scientists at the Climate R.. http://bit.ly/56YHHY #BigTweet [...]
They know their careers are over in 2011 when the real investigations start, they are just playing to their puppet masters to buy time and are most likley being promised fat jobs if they take one for the team.
This is why they are trying to force this, cooling is starting to accelerate, and the timing could not be worese. If they can get something in place they will simply make the claim that it's "Working" and that we need even more.
But that's getting harder and harder to do, they will force something through, they have to or risk losing it all.
Ann Coulter said it best in her comparison of the Man Made Global Warming to the Aztec's in this weeks article:
Even if the Earth were warming — which apparently it is not — the idea that humans using energy-efficient lightbulbs would alter the temperature of the globe is approximately as plausible as the Aztecs' belief that they were required to wrench the beating heart out of living, breathing humans in order to keep the sun on its path.
Sadly, the "human sacrifice deniers" lost the argument to Aztec CRU scientists, who explained that there was a "scientific consensus" on the benefits of ritual murder.
But at least the Aztecs only slaughtered tens of thousands of humans in the name of "climate change." The global warming cultists want us all dead.
For an overview of the crap nature of the data and data analysis produced by NASA and already squeezed out of them please see:
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/gistemp-a...
Much of the data used to calculate global temperatures is made up or 'estimated' from stations hundreds of miles away! This data is in turn used to 'estimate' further data and so on. This is not science. At best it is an incompetent pretence but it might be worse than that.
There is simply not the data available to calculate global temperatures and it is a deceit for anybody, whether NASA or CRU to pretend otherwise. These people are discrediting a great institution and science as a whole.
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by AZgrassroots: Climategate Spreading to NASA? http://bit.ly/7dIB5U
#dripusa #ocra #tcot…
Very well said! Thanks.
They could get that data together in under an hour.
We need to get Beck to do a money flow chart on his blackboard about climate connections. I bet he is working on it as we speak. This is all about money and power.
Thanks Terry. That was a lovely read at the site you posted. I find it easier to read stuff like that now since I have read most of the Health Reform Bills. Anything after those is a piece of cake.
"Forgiveness is the divinity of our civilization but forgetting never can be allowed. "
Incredible response!
My God Greg! Don’t you know if the con is up, these “scientist” with have to get real jobs.
Dig Sgt. Shultz reference!
NASA was already forced to make two major changes to their data, because it was falsified, good possibility they fudged more.
There is no question climate change exists and a VERY small part of it is due to human activity… just as part of it is due to the activity of ants, gazelles, ardvarks, and polar bears. The boogey man they picked to attack us with, CO2, is the single greatest cause of life's abundance on the planet next to the sun. Without CO2, photosynthesis wouldn't occure. Plants metabolize CO2 while converting solar energy into usable chemical energy…. and as a by product, the process produces usable O2. So… CO2 not only enables the growth of our food, it repleneshes the gas we use to metabolize that food energy into energy useable by our cells. My question is… did the politicians forget we all had science class in elementary school?
I think they have forgotten everything they ever learned about science. They have become fiction writers.
I like that post..now they will have to earn their green, instead taking mine..the real green job..
Robert Gibbs is starting to sound more like Baghdad Bob every time some news comes out that is not favorable to this administration. The media is also doing their part, as expected.
Hogan's Heros" one of my all time favorites. Also "All in the Family." Can you imagine what would happen to someone if they wanted to make shows like those now? Christians and Conservatives are open season. Everyone else if off limits.
As I believe Lord Monckton pointed out, the climate scientists rely on just four main datasets, two ground-based and two satellite-based. The satellites are calibrated by the ground-level observations. The ground-based sets are NASA/GISS and CRU. CRU's data is now discredited, what wasn't thrown out, And McIntyre at ClimateAudit already made GISS recalculate once to fix a "flaw" showing higher readings, which have since been "recalculated" higher. And Anthony Watts at WattsUpWithThat has been documenting the terrible state of the surface stations at surfacestations.org, revealing how they should really not be trusted, unless you don't care that they are showing higher temps than there really are.
So of the major temp datasets, everything rests on the integrity of just two, one of which has now been shown to be hopelessly compromised, which just leaves NASA/GISS…
You can see why they are Clearly Enthusiastic about Verifying The Absolute Integrity of the one remaining dataset that global warming is perched on.
Don't forget good old Dr. Wang that co-authored with Dr. Jones about heat islands, pretty much just made stuff up to prove that didn't matter a bit, they investigated themselves, found themselves innocent, and then refused to release the findings.
Now that they have been caught out they are claiming it makes no difference anyway, if so then why bother committing scientific fraud over a worthless study?
With satellite thermal imaging it would seem to be a fairly straight forward exercise to "calibrate" the offsets for thermometer stations as well as predict the gaps much better, then apply that to raw data vs. this non sense they do now which is akin to a Monet painting vs. and objective photograph.
But then they removed the bulk of those thermometers didn't they, so we can't go back and check the accuracy of their tweaks, how convenient.
Sickening
"Working on IT for two years, huh.."? Therein, my friends, lies the ugly reality between the government public sectors LACK of accountability to the electorate versus the private sector where this moron would be terminated for dereliction of duties !
Why Copenhagen should be flushed:
FRUIT OF THE POISON TREE, TARTS FROM THE POISON FRUIT
http://naturalfake.wordpress.com/2009/12/03/fruit...
Just saw this posted at PJMedia, more debunking about Mt Kilimanjaro snow melt being a sign of global warming. Remember this when the warmist trolls cite the shrinking ice cap as "evidence" again.
Thanks, I have been wanting a clear definition of a "green job". That is the best I have heard.
i see a greenie is busy buzzing us…
Thanks for that link. Lovely writing.
They said they're working on it. Massaging the data, not assembling it.
"NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies is saying they’re “working on” the FOIA request.
Right. For two years?!"
And you may as well plan on waiting at least another two. They are going to stall as long as possible and if they do cough up what you are asking for, you're probably only going to get it with most of the information blacked out.
No matter how fast the house of cards known as Global Warming falls, too many people are too heavily invested in the fraud to easily give up the information that will permanently seal the downfall.
As a space nut, it's disheartening to see NASA wasting millions/billions (?) on AGW when we'll have no space vehicles after 2011. NASA was always about exploration and pushing the envelope, not this. More importantly, it is common sense that if people are being asked to change their lifestyles and cost the economy trillions of dollars, the science and the process must be above reproach. They have failed the common sense test and need to go back to real science. After all, remember that this is the administration that said it was bringing science back into government.
Here is the problem. Gavin Schmidt is a PHD at NASA GISS. He is blogging full time down the hall 2 doors at Real Climate. He works for the Federal gubment and has time on his hands. He is too busy blogging to work up files and FOIA requests. James hamnsen the leader, is too busy preaching warming. They are some lazy butts and can't get fired. Real climate also has Michael Mann work there on the side. The FOIA requests could have prevented this fiasco.
i just read that the mighty "goracle" has cancelled his speech at dopenchagen *cough*..umm…copenhagen due to unforeseen changes in his schedule. maybe he's doing a recount of the polar bears? getting a new rectal temp of the gawdess gaia?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/03/al-gor...
There should be a complete and thorough investigation of the global warming scam. Money for research obtained using junk science should have to be repaid. These "scientists" should be thrown into jail along with Al Gore.
If NASA will not comply with the FOIA request then call the Russian hackers. Maybe a petition to cut of all taxpayer funds to NASA will get these devious parasites to release the information they've been hiding.
We should contact our Congressional Representative and Senators and ask them where they stand on man made global warming and post there response on the internet for all to see.
Uh, smarterthanlibs, I KNOW you meant to put water in second behind the sun (actually, you apparently need both). But excellent point anyway.
A private citizen requests information he has a right to and the government stonewalls for over two years without consequence.
The government "requests" private information information from a citizen and will patiently wait how long?
Hmmm…
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
I just read that the chief propagandist himself, Algore, has dropped out of the Copenhagen farce. Algore should have criminal charges brought against him for attempting to defraud the American taxpayer. His propaganda video alone is evidence against him. This global warming scam is similar to the email I'm sure we've all received from Africa asking us to send all our money to them in exchange for millions of dollars; but first send the money sucker. AGW is the same shyt; the people that believe in it have probably wired money to criminals in Africa as well.
Anyone whoever entertained this patently absurd notion of AGW should be thrown out of office and publicly flogged. Who in their right mind would listen to these leftwing tree hugging drug addicts that break into tears when trees are cut down? How were so many people suckered into forgetting about the half dozen or so ice ages that have come and gone naturally and into believing it's now our fault for any change in climate? How does one become so stupid?
This is pure comedy gold, how many NASA/Globull Warming one liners can we come up with starting with the line: "We can put a man on the moon but we can't…" ?
Personally I think the folks who slammed several probes into Mars due to simple math errors were put in charge of their Climate Research division. (See? Comedy gold!)
Why even look at the emails, the question of AGW is moot, the theory has already been disproven.
In science the burden of proof is on the theory.
The theory must provide the proof.
If the theory makes a prediction, which it must to not simply be a hypothesis, and the prediction is wrong then the theory is discarded.
That is part of the scientific method.
The AGW theory predicts that an increase in CO2 causes an increase in global temperature.
CO2 is higher now then it was in 1990.
Average global temperature is the same now as it was in 1990.
The prediction made by the theory is wrong therefore the AGW theory must be discarded.
QED.
It is called the scientific method.
For a satirical look and the climategate programming:
Anthropogenic Global Warming Virus Alert.
http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s...
Can't you see! We must pass $1,000,000,000,000 climate change legislation by next Wednesday or the earth will be destroyed. Hurry call your Senator, there's no time to spare.
Ok, seriously–there has to be a spew alert when Sgt. Schultz is going to be the next thing up on my screen.
Pass the popcorn. This is good, clean, global cooling FUN.
Klatu, Barada, Nikto
That is what Patricia Neal said to the Robot in The Day the Earth Stood Still
Isn't it delightful!
Please stop <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Scientific+fiefdom%22+%22daughter+of+time%22&complete=1&hl=en&filter=0">pasting this crap all over the Internet. Thanks.
within a year the feds will lien your bank account and lead you to jail
It's natural to be mad, after being tricked, conned, fooled by so many things. I keep hearing the word "transparency" in my head. Like the scene in Apocalypse Now when Marlon Brando says "the horror" over and over.
The email climategate scandal has peeled open an insightful view into the strange and criminal world that so called scientists manipulating climate data have inhabited for nearly half of my lifetime. The email tells a sordid tale of corruption and racketeering and alone is damning enough. But of the contents that were leaked on the server, 95% of the materials were source code. Source code that can be analyzed and evaluated for discrepancies and oddities.
And the tale the source tells is even worse. It isn't just clear that criminal activity exists, it is without a doubt. No hack programmer that is worth his salt can ignore this outrageous attempt to code their way into the biggest global scam in history. Check out the source, it's on many sites, but this one describes it quite nicely:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/crus_sourc...
That, my friends, is a smoking gun… and is more than enough evidence to put the whole lot of the culprits in any one of a number of nation prisons for quite some time.
Now onto the next logical step. Who in the current administration, house of representatives, senate and other federal institutions had a hand in this. Their email needs to be peeled open as well. We need to see the publicly paid for servants email to determine if they were in on this collusion. Any organization that has anything to do with global warming, climate change or environmental studies needs to open up their servers and materials for full evaluation so an audit can be conducted to find out who is responsible for this horrific crime against humanity. Trillions of dollars have been spent, lifetimes of opportunities have been forgone, and continuous harassment of the general population has been all a part of this farce and the individuals responsible need to be held in account for it.
Funny you bring up water since it accounts for the VAST majority of the green house effect here on earth… will they call THAT a polutant too?
Great work! Thanks a whole heap.
Attacking those who have claimed collusion amongst climate scientists as 'conspiracy theorists' constitutes an 'ad hominem' attack. It ignores some real evidence of collusion and attempts to paint them as a bunch of nuts in order to hide an unpleasant reality.
Psychiatrists have a saying that goes "It ain't paranoia when they're really after you." In this case, it is no longer a conspiracy THEORY once the conspiracy is demonstrated.
The recent email release shows leaders in the climate research field engaged in some extraordinarily unprofessional behavior — including suborning the peer review process, denying access to and threatening destruction of raw data and cooking the analysis to fit preordained conclusions.
Such actions, if proven, would end the careers of many scientists.
Whatever your views on CO2 and climate, dismissing these acts as 'no big deal' and painting those who call attention to them as 'conspiracy nuts' only strengthens the deniers arguments. –PEACE. Michael Santomauro
Just another reason we all need to Learn The Constitution, The Bill Of Rights, The Declaration of Independence and More. Everyone please check out this FREE resource http://www.AmericanCitizens.org and tell as many people as possible. Watch videos of Constitution classes or Listen and download the the Constitution to MP3. It is getting VITALITY IMPORTANT folks that we take some time to learn the constitution and to teach others. It's not good enough anymore just to something is not in the constitution. We need to understand what we speak of. Please enjoy the video entitled "Is this you" ( Very Funny Video but Deadly Serious) http://americancitizensorg.wordpress.com/is-this-...
Now would be a great time to go after all of that UFO stuff NASA has been hiding. We know they would rather work on that, after all it has more credibility than Climate Change.
So tell me again the difference between Al Gore and Bernie Madoff. I still don't see it.
NASA is the laughing stock of the scientific community. They really haven't been doing a lot of useful science for many years now. They've become far too politicized, and act based on that rather than sound science. A good example is that lovely "space station". All that money spent to put a station…. in an orbit that is better suited for Russian launches. SO much for using it as a stopover for the moon, bad orbit. They actually did a "study" on how to use the station for moon missions. (Anyone that's had basic orbital mechanics could have spared them the taxpayer cost of the study.) The result was: either disassemble the whole stupid thing and put it in a decent orbit, or don't use it at all.
[...] not even heard about the ClimateGate scandal. (Gregg Knapp at Big Government calls this the “Sgt. Schultz defense.”) Mark Hess, public affairs director for the Goddard Space Flight Center which runs the GISS [...]
Add NASA to the list of government agencies not complying with the law. It will be hard to compel the to since the DOJ is at the top of the list.
Well thanks for massive egos! Of course they had to put in writing how clever they were. These folks just really believe they're way above the little people. So inflated, they actually made a clear record of their fantasy world. The one with Nobel Prizes, Department Chairs, endless grants, and oh yes, that filthy lucre, money. Where they are just accidentally superheroes. Because really they were only in it to Save the World, no token payments necessary. But if the world insists on showing it's gratitude, well. It would be so ungracious to refuse.
Bless their hearts.
"Schultz!!!!!!"
Gotta love the picture with this article. It makes me chuckle every time I scroll down the page.
If they can't come clean and follow a legal request in a timely manner, cut their funding…severely.
Let's look on the bright side here, folks.
When the CRU announced that they no longer had the original data, they also pointed out that they had only the "value-added and homogenized" data. I'm sure that this refers to adjustments they had to make because, for example, a climate station had been relocated. "Smoothing" and all that. Statistics 101. I remember it well.
But they surely know what adjustments were made to derive the "value-added" data, don't they? I mean, you have to record the operations you perform on the data, don't you?
So perform the reverse operations and we're back to the original data, are we not?
Let's see if we can predict some of the reasons they'll come up with to explain why this just isn't possible. Can't put all of the spilled milk back in the jug and all that.
I had great respect for NASA before the politicians co-opted them into the Global Warming Scam. James Hansen, head of the NASA Goddard Institute, is a bought and paid-for “Global Warming Hack” and he is destroying the credibility of NASA and its a crying shame. Hopefully Hansen and Al Gore will be sharing a jail cell when this is all over with.
I’m afraid science will have to suffer at least one generation because of this, they should be much more careful who they designate “scientist”.
Sgt. Schulz defense!
Did anybody read Michael Crichton's State of Fear? Because it's exactly what you're watching on the news – well, what you're seeing ignored on the news.
Now I can understand why hollywood was not tempted to make 'another disaster film' from another bestselling author – that man called it and the names are but thin disguises for the real actors.
I'm convinced that at least some of the warm mongers have read it and are using it as a screenplay.
PART 2
There are four reasons the UN and IMF, Global Elitist Members Re: Ban Kai Moon ( Who has openly expressed his stong desire for Global Governance ), PM Gordon Brown, Bilderberg Member Henry Kissinger, Senior Bilderberg Member David Rockefeller as well as an unprecedented number of Dictators that run various countries who are members of the United Nations this Copenhagen Treaty that was designed to acquire four goals, the least of them being climate improvment or protection as Lord Moncton has stated!
PART 3
(1.) To de-industrialize Sovereign Countries ( No Jobs keep you dependant on State ) ( 2.) Take your money and assets – Hence, Fraudulent Carbon Emmissions and Carbon Gases for Carbon Credits and Carbon Taxes! (3.) Take away your property (4.) Take away your Sovereignty and Freedom!
Check out what Government is doing behind your back at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU
To request that PM Harper doesn't sign the Copenhagen Treaty, therby causing Canadians to lose
their Sovereignty and Freedom email the PM at: pm@pm.gc.ca
Environment Minister Jim Prentice: PrentJ@parl.gc.ca
Protest the inaccuracy and Fraud of Climate change measurements that are going to be used in the Copenhagen Treaty: http://www.gopetition.com/online/32485.html
Check out what Government is doing behind your back at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU
When you see "smoke stacks" on Television to boost the argument of man-made climate change, you have to be a dummy not to see that most all the "stacks" spewing out white stuff, are actually spewing out steam, which, for those who quit thinking, is moisture. Now, moisture in the atmosphere is, by far, a bigger heat-sealing blanket than heavier-than-air plant food (carbon dioxide), but it is a useful ingredient just like plant food. It would appear, the promoters of man-made climate change are simply trying to fool the many so they can walk off with the control they seek, and the money. Claysamerica.com
This is all true. And don't forget that CO2 is the fizz in your Coca Cola and 7Up for that matter. CO2 is not only NOT harmful, its an essential compound of life. Its part of the life-cycle. No CO2 in the air means a dead planet. But since literally no one can live without making CO2 (remember, you exhale it) it makes it the perfect target of a tax. They didn't think they would get away with taxing the air you breath so they settled for the air you exhale.
PART 1
I believe the Copenhagen Treaty Summit should be cancelled! How in God's name can this be considered a legal contract when a Huge Amount of the basis for the Climate Change Data has been found to be Fraudulently Sabotaged and absolutely Inaccurate? This is signing an agreement Document that has no Legal Foundation of Realistic conditions or elements due to inaccurate and Manipulated Data as described and therefore, anything stated on this Copenhagen Treaty Document should be considered Null and Void! Why create a Pandora's Box, subject to Lawsuits and Misgivings due to total inaccuracy of Scientific measurements? Which now is proving to be the case! This Treaty has no Legal ground to stand on and is and will be a False Document from day one!
Any lawyers want to help out by filing this Copenhagen Treaty be classified as an illegal Treaty!
[...] It’s not just the scientists at the Climate Research Unit of East Anglia University who may have criminally violated the Freedom of …Read Original Story: Climategate Spreading to NASA? – Big Government (blog) [...]
[...] [...]
[...] [...]
I found your blog on google and read a few of your other posts. I just added you to my Google News Reader. Keep up the nice work Look forward to reading more from you in the future.
[...] a task that he unfortunately would never see fulfilled. NASA as of late has been stained by its involvement in the Climategate scandal and Obama’s clear as mud direction for the agency by cutting the budget for its bigest [...]
Worrying indeed, despite the fact that emails could just as well be a bad joke on someones part.
You must be logged in to post a comment.