<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Massachusetts Is the Game Changer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biggovernment.com/dmorris/2010/01/17/massachusetts-is-the-game-changer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biggovernment.com/dmorris/2010/01/17/massachusetts-is-the-game-changer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:38:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: http://eye-exercises-to-improve-vision.blogspot.com/2011/07/dangers-of-lie-everyone-has-told-lie.html</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/dmorris/2010/01/17/massachusetts-is-the-game-changer/comment-page-2/#comment-5689340</link>
		<dc:creator>http://eye-exercises-to-improve-vision.blogspot.com/2011/07/dangers-of-lie-everyone-has-told-lie.html</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 19:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=60970#comment-5689340</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Improve your vision naturally!...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thanks. Left you a trackback to help your readers improve eye vision naturally....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Improve your vision naturally!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thanks. Left you a trackback to help your readers improve eye vision naturally&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Making Easy Money Online from Home</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/dmorris/2010/01/17/massachusetts-is-the-game-changer/comment-page-2/#comment-3363882</link>
		<dc:creator>Making Easy Money Online from Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=60970#comment-3363882</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Making Easy Money Online from Home...&lt;/strong&gt;

This is a blog provide surefire method and resourse to make easy money online from home....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Making Easy Money Online from Home&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This is a blog provide surefire method and resourse to make easy money online from home&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilary</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/dmorris/2010/01/17/massachusetts-is-the-game-changer/comment-page-2/#comment-1792498</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=60970#comment-1792498</guid>
		<description>That picture of Dick Morris is totally misleading. In reality he&#039;s super fat. Whatever. Republicans are horrible human beings who think the interests of working-families don&#039;t matter and who think that &quot;do gooders&quot; are bad. Republicans and conservative social Darwinism make the world an icky place to live.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That picture of Dick Morris is totally misleading. In reality he&#039;s super fat. Whatever. Republicans are horrible human beings who think the interests of working-families don&#039;t matter and who think that &quot;do gooders&quot; are bad. Republicans and conservative social Darwinism make the world an icky place to live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Kirk</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/dmorris/2010/01/17/massachusetts-is-the-game-changer/comment-page-1/#comment-1578050</link>
		<dc:creator>James Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=60970#comment-1578050</guid>
		<description>heheheh </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heheheh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Achille</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/dmorris/2010/01/17/massachusetts-is-the-game-changer/comment-page-2/#comment-1559486</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Achille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=60970#comment-1559486</guid>
		<description>Dick Morris is wrong.  The current health care reform bill will not get through the House at this point unless it includes only on the most popular parts of the bill:  insurance company reform to prohibit denying coverage for people with pre-existing conditions, letting young adults stay on their parent&#039;s policies longer (to 27 years of age or older),  small business tax breaks or subsidies to help business buy insurance for their employees.  Most even support effort to cover the uninsured.  Even before Nancy Pelosi today (Thurs. Jan 21) pronounced the current bill dead (she said there are not enough votes in the House to pass the Senate bill), I knew it was over for the Democrats on this issue.  They will find out now that the Republicans do want to cooperate and do have ideas of their own like portability of health coverage, competition between states and physician liability reform and ideas to cover the working poor like medical savings accounts--anything as long as its not a government run plan. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dick Morris is wrong.  The current health care reform bill will not get through the House at this point unless it includes only on the most popular parts of the bill:  insurance company reform to prohibit denying coverage for people with pre-existing conditions, letting young adults stay on their parent&#039;s policies longer (to 27 years of age or older),  small business tax breaks or subsidies to help business buy insurance for their employees.  Most even support effort to cover the uninsured.  Even before Nancy Pelosi today (Thurs. Jan 21) pronounced the current bill dead (she said there are not enough votes in the House to pass the Senate bill), I knew it was over for the Democrats on this issue.  They will find out now that the Republicans do want to cooperate and do have ideas of their own like portability of health coverage, competition between states and physician liability reform and ideas to cover the working poor like medical savings accounts&#8211;anything as long as its not a government run plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amphipolis</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/dmorris/2010/01/17/massachusetts-is-the-game-changer/comment-page-2/#comment-1511494</link>
		<dc:creator>Amphipolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=60970#comment-1511494</guid>
		<description>They will not give up that easily. 
 
I think that the Democrats will use the nuclear option, reducing the filibuster to maybe 58 votes, because it is almost guaranteed to work and it will allow them to accomplish more than just healthcare reform. 
 
They are already preparing the ground. Try to argue for the filibuster &#8211; it&#8217;s an uphill fight, assuming people even know what it is in the first place. We will be forced to argue for some obscure parliamentary procedure instead of arguing on the issues. I can hear them now &#8211; we are not eliminating the filibuster, just changing it to make it more democratic, as has been done before. 
 
They will be glad to throw their future parliamentary advantage away in order to get permanent real change now. Talk of ramming through the senate bill is a smoke screen. The rule change will happen so fast we won&#8217;t know what hit us. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They will not give up that easily. </p>
<p>I think that the Democrats will use the nuclear option, reducing the filibuster to maybe 58 votes, because it is almost guaranteed to work and it will allow them to accomplish more than just healthcare reform. </p>
<p>They are already preparing the ground. Try to argue for the filibuster &ndash; it&rsquo;s an uphill fight, assuming people even know what it is in the first place. We will be forced to argue for some obscure parliamentary procedure instead of arguing on the issues. I can hear them now &ndash; we are not eliminating the filibuster, just changing it to make it more democratic, as has been done before. </p>
<p>They will be glad to throw their future parliamentary advantage away in order to get permanent real change now. Talk of ramming through the senate bill is a smoke screen. The rule change will happen so fast we won&rsquo;t know what hit us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1redcent</title>
		<link>http://biggovernment.com/dmorris/2010/01/17/massachusetts-is-the-game-changer/comment-page-2/#comment-1507342</link>
		<dc:creator>1redcent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biggovernment.com/?p=60970#comment-1507342</guid>
		<description>Oh, I see............thanks for clearing that up some, but that&#039;s where the similarities end; lack of support and money from the RNC.  
 
Brown wasn&#039;t appointed, as Scuzzyfuzzy was. 
 
This is far more important seat and Scuzzyfuzzy was running for a HOUE seat. Her vote wouldn&#039;t matter all that much.  
 
As a Senator, Brown&#039;s votes are far more important; for many reason, not the least of which concerns the Senate filibuster, which the House doesn&#039;t have.  
 
It&#039;s not so much that we disagree ( now that I understand what your meaning was ), it&#039;s more on the line of  the details.  
 
FNC isn&#039;t going to have Sarah on every day, or even every week. I don&#039;t think that she&#039;ll be overexposed. She needs to be exposed, exposed in an unbiased, unfiltered light, which is what they are giving her a chance at.  
 
Not everyone belongs to FACEBOOK, where she posts her retorts/rebuttals to Obama and the Dems now. 
 
Not everyone is on line and even some who are,  don&#039;t read Drudge or Breitbart&#039;s sites or any political forums.  
 
FNC has an expansive audience; some in it are even Dems. Seeing her, every now and again, will help to  dispel  the erroneous notions that they may harbor about her, just as Reagan&#039;s T.V. appearances made him a household name, far more so, than the movies had.  
 
Noooooooooooooooooooo................Steele&#039;s job is a dead-ender, especially for a presidential hopeful; however, he MUST go! 
 
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I see&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;thanks for clearing that up some, but that&#039;s where the similarities end; lack of support and money from the RNC.  </p>
<p>Brown wasn&#039;t appointed, as Scuzzyfuzzy was. </p>
<p>This is far more important seat and Scuzzyfuzzy was running for a HOUE seat. Her vote wouldn&#039;t matter all that much.  </p>
<p>As a Senator, Brown&#039;s votes are far more important; for many reason, not the least of which concerns the Senate filibuster, which the House doesn&#039;t have.  </p>
<p>It&#039;s not so much that we disagree ( now that I understand what your meaning was ), it&#039;s more on the line of  the details.  </p>
<p>FNC isn&#039;t going to have Sarah on every day, or even every week. I don&#039;t think that she&#039;ll be overexposed. She needs to be exposed, exposed in an unbiased, unfiltered light, which is what they are giving her a chance at.  </p>
<p>Not everyone belongs to FACEBOOK, where she posts her retorts/rebuttals to Obama and the Dems now. </p>
<p>Not everyone is on line and even some who are,  don&#039;t read Drudge or Breitbart&#039;s sites or any political forums.  </p>
<p>FNC has an expansive audience; some in it are even Dems. Seeing her, every now and again, will help to  dispel  the erroneous notions that they may harbor about her, just as Reagan&#039;s T.V. appearances made him a household name, far more so, than the movies had.  </p>
<p>Noooooooooooooooooooo&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.Steele&#039;s job is a dead-ender, especially for a presidential hopeful; however, he MUST go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

