Politicians Fiddle While America’s Corporate Tax System Burns
by Dan MitchellKPMG has released its annual global survey of corporate tax systems. For the 10th-consecutive year, the average corporate tax rate fell, and it is now down to 25.5 percent (just 23.2 percent in the European Union!).
In the United States, unfortunately, the corporate tax rates remains stuck at about 40 percent. Only one developed nation, Japan, has a more punitive regime.
Something to keep in mind the next time a politician complains that jobs are going to China (corporate tax rate of 25 percent).
For more information about the corporate income tax, see here. And for more information about tax competition, see here.
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
51 Comments
I'd think that a 15% corporate tax rate difference is driving the off-shoring of manufacturing jobs at a far less rate than the wage and living of standards gap that is a hundred miles wide, no?
Go Nero! Dig that funky music.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Big Government, Big Government. Big Government said: Politicians Fiddle While America’s Corporate Tax System Burns: KPMG has released its annual global survey of co.. http://bit.ly/1oGYP4 [...]
The five-year average *effective* corporate tax rate in the United States for 1997- 2001 was 29.7 percent. The average for 2002-2006 was 25 percent. But I suspect you already knew that, didn't you Mr. Mitchell?
http://www.taxhistory.org/www/features.nsf/Articl...
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by conservatweet, Barb. Barb said: RT @conservatweet: [BigGov] Politicians Fiddle While America’s Corporate Tax System Burns: KPMG has released its ann.. http://bit.ly/3DqTLj [...]
Corps pass those costs on to consumers. We have a tax system that is unfriendly 2 biz & individuals. How long do we sit & watch manufacturing go overseas? Who would get out of bed 4 40%? Why don't we pay more attention 2 profit margins?
FairTax HR25/S296 will bring the jobs home. Corps & biz will not spend time & $ avoiding 67K+ pgs of tax law. No biz 2 biz tax under FairTax means all those imbeded costs go away. No taxes on used goods. No taxes up 2 poverty level w/ a tax rebate 2 every US household every month. Take home entire paycheck. Medicad & S.Security funding. sigh…I DON'T GET IT!!! WHY DON'T WE HAVE POLITICRATS PUSHING FAIRTAX?!!
scott_z
The 40% is determined by the 35% Tax rate PLUS local tax. Read the report.
Interesting Economy went up between 2002-2006 with Republicans in charge of 2 houses and Executive. Democrats take both houses over in 2006 and economy starts a downward spiral. Is that a coincident?
I never knew what the rate was for the U.S. i just wonder why so many have stayed after seeing this.
Japan has lost 2 decades with their tax rates losing business to China. Ditto for US.
Our longer depreciation rules are just as punitive as Japan.
So where should any business build the next costly factory?
In the US with punitive depreciation and corp tax rates?
or in China with cheap labor costs as well?
Boo damn hoo.
1). They would lose their power over you, for most politicians that is their primary goal.
2). No more IRS because the states would be collecting the money.
3). Politicians wouldn't be able to lie to you about reducing taxes as a way to get your vote.
Yet unions support Democrats who want higher taxes!
Tried to have this conversation with a rank and file union electrician and he agrees Democrats will raise taxes which in turn kills large projects….duh.. yet he says I vote my union way!
Now you know why we got a Nobody, Do nothing Obama!
The Government takes 40% and then vilifies "Big Corporations" for keeping 60%. Government produces nothing.
The reason the corporate rate is lower elsewhere in the developed world is that they collect a ton of tax from the VAT, which we do not have yet. One could read the Dem playbook to say that they will burden the U.S. populace with income-redistributing entitlements using borrowed cash until the country goes bankrupt, then impose a VAT to "rescue" us from becoming the third-world country they would have turned us into. Presto–we are France circa 1985!
The problem is not the tax rate, it is the spending. More particularly, transfer payments and free medical care for people who drill holes in sheet metal for 20 years then retire at 50 and live off the government for the next 30 years. Spending a couple of trillion to remake the Middle East doesn't help either.
you are not understanding the words I am typing. just as your personal income tax bracket is stated at x%, does not mean you pay x%. all sorts of deductions, loopholes, bring that number down.
Such is the difference between the 40% corporate tax that Mr. Mitchell cites and the 25-30% average *EFFECTIVE* tax rate that corporations enjoy.
And I think he knows better.
The tax should be zero, only humans pay tax.
Yeah who cares then you'll complain to the government when the corporations leave the US.
what are your feelings on corporate personhood then?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood...
because the *effective* tax rate (what they actually pay after tax havens, lawyers, accountants etc. have a whack at the books) is… 25-30%.
this article is flat out misleading, and knowingly comparing apples to oranges.
Scott, if you want to compare apples to apples, then let's have a go at it! You may be correct at what the "effective" corp tax rate is in the USA, but, what is the "effective" corp tax rate in other countries? I ask this question for two reasons – first I do not know the answer, second, I don't think you know the answer either.
So while you blather on about apples and oranges, why don't you line them all up for us? Give us some tangible examples. Why don't you give us something to chew on, some real stats to convince us. I have to assume that since you do not, that you are merely blowing smoke.
By the way, again assuming that you are a productive member of society and holding down a job, does your firm provide a 401(k) or pension plan for it's employees? If so, then one of the so-called "tax havens" that you refer to is your firm's corporate contribution to said plan. Said contribution, if you have met the plan's eligibility requirements, directly benefits YOU.
Put simply, if you are contributing (and, depending on your firm's plan document, maybe even if you are not contributing) to your 401(k) plan, your employer is probably making a corporate tax deductible contribution to same 401(k) plan on your behalf and for your benefit.
So I ask you, is this a "tax haven" you wish to abolish?
why, its funny you should ask that! courtesy of non-partisan CBO:
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/69xx/doc6902/11-28-Cor...
check out figure 2-14 on page 35.
we're smack dab in the middle, in a tightly packed goup mostly in the mid 20's. What does Mr. Mitchell have to say about this, i wonder?
and btw. Google is your friend. I cannot be expected to be your own personal research assistant all the time
only joking
Scott, I must say, even for a troll, you are an imbecile. For one should never put an opinion forth that one cannot back up with such trivial things as FACTS.
Anyone who has filled out their own 1040 form knows the difference between adjusted gross income and taxable income. (I'd quote lines off the 1040, but to be honest, I am too tired at the moment to go look it up.) The bottom line on tax rates is, the greater the deductions, the lesser the taxable income and by default, the lesser the tax. By the way, do you participate in your company's 401(k) plan (assuming you have a job)? If so, then you are participating in a TAX LOOPHOLE!
Now, let's move onto that "credit default swap scheme" you and your ilk just love to throw into the "anti-capitalism" debate. Let's look long and hard at the credit default swap scheme. Well, maybe we won't have to look at it very long and hard. My question is simple – would we even be having a discussion about a credit default swap scheme if our government, through regulation and intimidation had not bullied banks into making home loans to creditors who were not otherwise deemed credit worthy? Would we be having this discussion if ACORN and their ilk had not the played the "race card" and again, bullied banks into extending credit to applicants they would have otherwise denied?
I know, the liberal argument is that government "control and bullying" is necessary to "level the playing field". I disagree. Government intervention is what has brought us to the precipice of economic failure. The free market would have worked this out on it's own. But since the free market never had a chance in this fight, it is easy to point one's finger.
Read your history. The intervention of government into the free market system has NEVER produced the results intended. Government cannot regulate the hearts and minds of the people it controls. Government can only stifle it. And as a result, government stifles free thinking, ingenuity and the will to better oneself. Government does not empower, it only stifles.
the government's average *effective* take is actually much lower, 25-30%, binging us in line with most other nations.
"the government" produces rural electrification, postal service and telecom, hydroelectric and nuclear power, national defense in the form of the greatest military force ever assembled in the history of mankind, interstate road systems, police, fire, ambulatory, and schools, more than i care to spend my time listing to be perfectly honest.
how much of that do you take from "the government?" Look up your state. most conservative "red" states actually take out more in federal spending than they pay in to in federal taxes.
it hurts, but it is true.
You do not understand what I am referring to, if you did, you would not appear as ignorant as you do.
well then please either tell me where i am wrong, or explain it to me like a 3rd grader so i can converse with sheer brilliance at your level.
the five-year average *effective* corporate tax rate in the United States for 1997- 2001 was 29.7 percent. The average for 2002-2006 was 25 percent. But I suspect you already knew that, didn't you Mr. Mitchell?
http://www.taxhistory.org/www/features.nsf/Articl...
if you'd like to debate facts, i am all in.
Pay up won't care because he's on welfare.
Yes, all those tax breaks thanks to lobbyists that only the big guys can afford. Too bad for the little guy that can't afford to buy off washington or hire an army of lawyers, accountants as you put it to put those tax breaks to work.
BO's father thought that tax rates of 100% are perfectly justifiable. BO is a real chip off the old block, isn't he?
Scott, do you know the difference between federal, state , and local services? Are they not teaching that in public school nowadays?
"Too bad for the little guy"
whoa.someone does not know about the tax breaks available to the small business,and the fact that they generally pay far less than even the *effective* corporate tax rate!
how many of you own your own business? Show of hands?
I do. Thanks,
The more the government taxes the corporations, the higher our costs … the more money the gov gets back in sales taxes. Gotta Love it!
hey! awesome debating skills and reasoning ability! thanks for your input!
xoxo,
Yeah, things are just so cheap for the small business owner, like the (proposed) mandated healthcare, and the increased tax rate on peopd le making over $250k.
Add to that expensive "green" power, Sarbannes Oxley, and the increase minimum wage, things are looking up! Even unemployment. And trolling.
i know what *effective* corporate tax means. it's the number that was intentionally obfuscated by Mr. Mitchell in this story, and is VERY important to understanding the real situation. go look it up.
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/69xx/doc6902/11-28-Cor...
fig 2-14 on page 35.
YOU HAVE BEEN LIED TO!
care to provide a source? no?
so this is just lies you feel on perpetuating?
I see where your camp is coming from. It is dishonorable.
how many small business owners make over 250k?
not me. i think you are confusing business revenue with personal income.
the government actually taxes corporations in real dollars (effective rate) 25-30%, which is about the amount you pay on income.
if they taxed corporations less, we'd still need the money to fund two wars waged under Bush's watch, to maintain a strong military, etc…, so if we lowered corporate taxes, the money shortage would need to come from increased income taxes against you, personally.
Please everyone sign petition to fight cap & tax bill. Spread around. We have to stop this tax bill…………………………….http://www.webcommentary.com Lot's of news there also.
yup.no human caused global warming here, amiright fellas?
LOL losers.
oh, it's far worse than that.
the *actual* average *effective* corporate tax rate reaches parity with china and other nations Mr.Mitchell mentions.
the lower wage rates and standards of living are the ONLY reason labor is shifting offshore.
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/69xx/doc6902/11-28-Cor...
see fig 2-14,page 35
Businesses, and businessmen of all types are simply quitting. "Going Galt"; headed to tax havens, headed to foreign countries, some are just sitting on our asses, playing with the Grandkids. WE, are quitting in droves.
Hope and Change?
You silly sunsabitches asked for it, you got it. Obama, whatta ya goin' to do with him NOW? Only in Amerika!
The 40% tax rate is a threat only. Loopholes and deductions are used by the government and politicians to get corporations to behave the way they want them to, including large campaign donations. We often think other countries are corrupt, we've got corruption built into the tax system right here right now.
The clowns disguised as Obama's economic policy officials should remain in the sandbox from whence they came. These elitist academes simply have no clue as to the private sector and its gear grinding ability to create profit and jobs. They never worked in it and more to the point…distrust it if not hate..capitalism. Cash for clunkers….disaster… We all know the list of liberal economic failures. They have little judgement economically beyond their ideological goals of population control. They must simply be removed…2010. Get going….
The American economy is historically based on entrepreneural spirit, need determination and consumption. If product and services are not developed or slowed by statist (taxing) policy then the consumer simply refuses to fuel the economy by ceasing to buy but only the most ESSENTIAL goods and services. Result ? Look at the revenue lines of specific industries as in auto sales, retail sales, home sales etc.
There will be NO economic recovery until the consumers disposable income rises or his trust in the economy reverts to a level of confidence that this administration ignores for their own objectives. It will only get worse as this administration continues and vowes to punish the spirit of its citizens. 2010 can reverse this demonic agenda !
"In the US with punitive depreciation and corp tax rates? "
No. In the US where one fills out a 2-ft high stack of paper to blow your nose with government approval. Where your factory supervisor gets dragged off in handcuffs because OSHA found a painted wooden ladder. Where you have to pay off local and state officials in the form of licenses, permits, certificates, and other such graft.
Don't forget the unions…
to start with, i will grant you the 25-30% effective tax rate you say, just to get it off the table for the sake of this discussion.
ok, lets talk about what the government produces, shall we?
the government's duties as defined by the founding documents is to provide for the defense, infrastructure, and to facilitate trade between the states. your list defines most of the things that government is charged to do, and some that are not defined by the founding documents. those being "police, fire, ambulatory, and schools" I do believe that those were to be dealt with by the states, and the feds have either co-opted those functions or have held them hostage, i.e. withholding of highway funds to enforce a national seatbelt law for example.
What I believe StlDan refers to when he says that government produces nothing, is that government produces nothing of value that people would voluntarily pay for, nor are the prices anyone pays for a government service subject to market forces, therefore they cannot be considered legitimate as a business, nor should they.
Further, to address the tax question, it is my contention that business' pay no taxes at all, their customers do. if government raises taxes on business, it raises taxes on consumers, thereby negating the idea that raising taxes on "evil corporations" is a just thing to do, when in reality it is another tax on the people.
[...] Politicians Fiddle While America’s Corporate Tax System Burns [...]
I have withdrawn from providing new tax revenue to Beloved Leaders cause, by keeping an eye on the taxes that have been imposed since his installation. Before he jacked the tax on tobacco, I went and bought out my local guy's supply of loose tobacco. I am currently looking for a local grower to do a little bartering with, and I purchased a digital nicotine delivery system (electronic cigarette), and am very pleased with idea that I can circumvent local and federal no smoking policy wherever I go. Every day is smoke at your desk day for me! Any time the government makes a move to tax something out of sight, a new black market will spring up to counter it. It's the American way.
"to start with, i will grant you the 25-30% effective tax rate you say, "
that is all i was ever concerned about, and the ONLY thing this article rallies against is lowering the corporate income tax from 40% to be more competitive with other nations.
Which is completely disingenuous, because if you look at figure 2-14 on page 35 in the CBO report below, you will see that actual effective corporate income taxes are VERY competitive!
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/69xx/doc6902/11-28-Cor...
Mr. Mitchell needs to respond to his intentionally misleading and patently false article!
Superior work ethic and availability of workers also drives offshoring. For high technology, the actual cost per worker ends up being nearly the same. The benefit comes from having skilled and motivated workers who are committed to getting the job done instead of feeling entitled. Think about that the next time your state university system wants to expand "women studies" or the art department.
Other motivators are societies that actually welcome manufacturing instead of tying companies up in red tape to appease loon activists. And, for the near future, the prospect of punitive energy taxes for a non-solution to a fictitious AGW "crisis" will drive even more companies offshore.