Comments on: Obama’s Labor Department Is Serious About Ethics…Except When It Isn’t http://biggovernment.com/dloos/2010/03/02/obamas-labor-department-is-serious-about-ethics-except-when-it-isnt/ Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:21:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: latest news http://biggovernment.com/dloos/2010/03/02/obamas-labor-department-is-serious-about-ethics-except-when-it-isnt/comment-page-1/#comment-5837476 latest news Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:02:37 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/?p=82534#comment-5837476 <strong>Visitor recommendations...</strong> [...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]…... Visitor recommendations…

[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……

]]> By: garment business daily http://biggovernment.com/dloos/2010/03/02/obamas-labor-department-is-serious-about-ethics-except-when-it-isnt/comment-page-1/#comment-5819528 garment business daily Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:22:59 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/?p=82534#comment-5819528 <strong>Superb website...</strong> [...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]…... Superb website…

[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……

]]> By: thetruthandthelife http://biggovernment.com/dloos/2010/03/02/obamas-labor-department-is-serious-about-ethics-except-when-it-isnt/comment-page-1/#comment-2077514 thetruthandthelife Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:41:26 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/?p=82534#comment-2077514 Vic may be a mole... I, but whoa... he may be so right... I speak as an American woman. "Giving" women, or anyone, the right to vote, for 5 minutes a year, and then making every one of them a tax-slave forced to feed the parasites of government corruption for the rest of their life, isnt my idea of Freedom! I might propose the "Change" from property ownership as qualification for the right to vote, to universal voting rights as the very lynchpin in the festering dream of the progressive movement to dismember the American freedom machine. I'd be very interested in the vested-interests that swung that switch. Seems to me that was sold on ballyhooed malarky about 'we'd never enter a war again,cause no woman would ever vote to send her son into battle... ah yes... 'peace in our time' how'd that turn out for ya? In 2 years WW1. Remember friends before 1912, 1000's of white American men also could not vote. Why!? Because if you want a vote in governance decisions, government projects, you must at least be willing to put Your money where your mouth is. That was a good safe-guard. If you had property, you were deemed flush enough to foot the bill and pay the taxes for your government plans. No Pay, No Play! To their advantage any white male Americans before 1912 who did not have their own home were not forced to shell out to provide for the upkeep or projects of their government. Sounds Good to me. All the advantages of citizenship and none of the costs. Recently because of the information Act, Britain's Labor Party admitted to implementing massive immigration policies specifically to change the voting numbers to their favor. Unfortunately not enough people in their country always voted Labor, so the Labor Party insidiously decided to import millions of immigrants into England in order to "fix" the elections 'legally' and cement their power,.(And incidentally keep their own hands in the tax-till.) Sound like progressive clamor to give illegal aliens the vote? Pre 1912 American voting laws safe-guarded the entire population, men, and women of all colors, from criminal corruption on a massive national scale. Because to restrict the voting population to only those who are propertied; citizens who are financially self-reliant enough to own their own home (and therefore pay taxes) created a voting population that would Vote freely for what they wanted to Pay for with their own taxes. At least the voting citizens would not be gullible "victim mentality dupes" for any carpetbagging con artist wanting to get his hands in the government till. The Only voting rule that needed change in 1912 was: include ALL property owning citizens; women, blacks, etc. as voters. Then we really wouldn't be in the distorted debt, corruption, taxation-slave crisis we're in today. Its those very 20th century progressive socialist con-artist promises, made to the gullible unpropertied, that led our entire American citizenry, those very blacks, women, etc. like lambs to the progressive's taxation-slave slaughterhouse. The very taxation-slave slaughterhouse that we must now free our entire people from. And that includes all those 'disenfranchised' women and blacks, brother. The corrupt progressive socialist machine will enslave them ALL regardless of race creed or color, brother... That's the progressive corruption of the American dream. Don't give me your sob-sister crocodile tears for the poor diverse "underclasses" progressives divided up, labeled and chose to cut off from the American dream. It's sob sister progressivism that has put them all in this prison, its sob sister progressivism that took away their liberty and threw away the key, laughing all the way to the bank. The founding fathers set up a liberty machine. and it even included you. Say you are an American citizen, you are protected with justice by all the laws of our land. If you are a propertied citizen, then you have the right to participate in governing our land because you will be paying with your own taxes for those decisions. The American dream of United we stand, divided we fall is that America is an all inclusive meritocracy, and every citizen is invited, regardless of race, class or religion to participate. Vic may be a mole… I, but whoa… he may be so right…
I speak as an American woman. "Giving" women, or anyone, the right to vote, for 5 minutes a year, and then making every one of them a tax-slave forced to feed the parasites of government corruption for the rest of their life, isnt my idea of Freedom!
I might propose the "Change" from property ownership as qualification for the right to vote, to universal voting rights as the very lynchpin in the festering dream of the progressive movement to dismember the American freedom machine. I'd be very interested in the vested-interests that swung that switch.
Seems to me that was sold on ballyhooed malarky about 'we'd never enter a war again,cause no woman would ever vote to send her son into battle… ah yes… 'peace in our time' how'd that turn out for ya? In 2 years WW1.
Remember friends before 1912, 1000's of white American men also could not vote.
Why!? Because if you want a vote in governance decisions, government projects, you must at least be willing to put Your money where your mouth is. That was a good safe-guard. If you had property, you were deemed flush enough to foot the bill and pay the taxes for your government plans. No Pay, No Play!
To their advantage any white male Americans before 1912 who did not have their own home were not forced to shell out to provide for the upkeep or projects of their government. Sounds Good to me. All the advantages of citizenship and none of the costs.
Recently because of the information Act, Britain's Labor Party admitted to implementing massive immigration policies specifically to change the voting numbers to their favor. Unfortunately not enough people in their country always voted Labor, so the Labor Party insidiously decided to import millions of immigrants into England in order to "fix" the elections 'legally' and cement their power,.(And incidentally keep their own hands in the tax-till.)
Sound like progressive clamor to give illegal aliens the vote?
Pre 1912 American voting laws safe-guarded the entire population, men, and women of all colors, from criminal corruption on a massive national scale. Because to restrict the voting population to only those who are propertied; citizens who are financially self-reliant enough to own their own home (and therefore pay taxes) created a voting population that would Vote freely for what they wanted to Pay for with their own taxes.
At least the voting citizens would not be gullible "victim mentality dupes" for any carpetbagging con artist wanting to get his hands in the government till.
The Only voting rule that needed change in 1912 was: include ALL property owning citizens; women, blacks, etc. as voters. Then we really wouldn't be in the distorted debt, corruption, taxation-slave crisis we're in today.
Its those very 20th century progressive socialist con-artist promises, made to the gullible unpropertied, that led our entire American citizenry, those very blacks, women, etc. like lambs to the progressive's taxation-slave slaughterhouse. The very taxation-slave slaughterhouse that we must now free our entire people from.
And that includes all those 'disenfranchised' women and blacks, brother.
The corrupt progressive socialist machine will enslave them ALL regardless of race creed or color, brother… That's the progressive corruption of the American dream.
Don't give me your sob-sister crocodile tears for the poor diverse "underclasses" progressives divided up, labeled and chose to cut off from the American dream. It's sob sister progressivism that has put them all in this prison, its sob sister progressivism that took away their liberty and threw away the key, laughing all the way to the bank.
The founding fathers set up a liberty machine. and it even included you. Say you are an American citizen, you are protected with justice by all the laws of our land. If you are a propertied citizen, then you have the right to participate in governing our land because you will be paying with your own taxes for those decisions.
The American dream of United we stand, divided we fall is that America is an all inclusive meritocracy,
and every citizen is invited, regardless of race, class or religion to participate.

]]> By: thetruthandthelife http://biggovernment.com/dloos/2010/03/02/obamas-labor-department-is-serious-about-ethics-except-when-it-isnt/comment-page-1/#comment-2077202 thetruthandthelife Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:36:03 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/?p=82534#comment-2077202 Whooooa.... Vic may be a mole... I heard they were going to invade, but whoa... he may be so right... I speak as an American woman. "Giving" women, or anyone, the right to vote, for 5 minutes a year, and then making every one of them a tax-slave forced to feed the parasites of government corruption for the rest of their life, isnt my idea of Freedom! I might propose the "Change" from property ownership as qualification for the right to vote, to universal voting rights as the very lynchpin in the festering dream of the progressive movement to dismember the American freedom machine. I'd be very interested in the vested-interests that swung that switch. Seems to me that was sold on ballyhooed malarky about 'we'd never enter a war again,cause no woman would ever vote to send her son into battle... ah yes... 'peace in our time' how'd that turn out for ya? In 2 years WW1. Remember friends before 1912, 1000's of white American men also could not vote. Why!? Because if you want a vote in governance decisions, government projects, you must at least be willing to put Your money where your mouth is. That was a good safe-guard. If you had property, you were deemed flush enough to foot the bill and pay the taxes for your government plans. No Pay, No Play! To their advantage any white male Americans before 1912 who did not have their own home were not forced to shell out to provide for the upkeep or projects of their government. Sounds Good to me. All the advantages of citizenship and none of the costs. Recently because of the information Act, Britain's Labor Party admitted to implementing massive immigration policies specifically to change the voting numbers to their favor. Unfortunately not enough people in their country always voted Labor, so the Labor Party insidiously decided to import millions of immigrants into England in order to "fix" the elections 'legally' and cement their power,.(And incidentally keep their own hands in the tax-till.) Sound like progressive clamor to give illegal aliens the vote? Pre 1912 American voting laws safe-guarded the entire population, men, and women of all colors, from criminal corruption on a massive national scale. Because to restrict the voting population to only those who are propertied; citizens who are financially self-reliant enough to own their own home (and therefore pay taxes) created a voting population that would Vote freely for what they wanted to Pay for with their own taxes. At least the voting citizens would not be gullible "victim mentality dupes" for any carpetbagging con artist wanting to get his hands in the government till. The Only voting rule that needed change in 1912 was: include ALL property owning citizens; women, blacks, etc. as voters. Then we really wouldn't be in the distorted debt, corruption, taxation-slave crisis we're in today. Its those very 20th century progressive socialist con-artist promises, made to the gullible unpropertied, that led our entire American citizenry, those very blacks, women, etc. like lambs to the progressive's taxation-slave slaughterhouse. The very taxation-slave slaughterhouse that we must now free our entire people from. And that includes all those 'disenfranchised' women and blacks, brother. The corrupt progressive socialist machine will enslave them ALL regardless of race creed or color, brother... That's the progressive corruption of the American dream. Don't give me your sob-sister crocodile tears for the poor diverse "underclasses" progressives divided up, labeled and chose to cut off from the American dream. It's sob sister progressivism that has put them all in this prison, its sob sister progressivism that took away their liberty and threw away the key, laughing all the way to the bank. The founding fathers set up a liberty machine. and it even included you. Say you are an American citizen, you are protected with justice by all the laws of our land. If you are a propertied citizen, then you have the right to participate in governing our land because you will be paying with your own taxes for those decisions. The American dream of United we stand, divided we fall is that America is an all inclusive meritocracy, and every citizen is invited, regardless of race, class or religion to participate. Whooooa…. Vic may be a mole… I heard they were going to invade, but whoa… he may be so right…
I speak as an American woman. "Giving" women, or anyone, the right to vote, for 5 minutes a year, and then making every one of them a tax-slave forced to feed the parasites of government corruption for the rest of their life, isnt my idea of Freedom!
I might propose the "Change" from property ownership as qualification for the right to vote, to universal voting rights as the very lynchpin in the festering dream of the progressive movement to dismember the American freedom machine. I'd be very interested in the vested-interests that swung that switch.
Seems to me that was sold on ballyhooed malarky about 'we'd never enter a war again,cause no woman would ever vote to send her son into battle… ah yes… 'peace in our time' how'd that turn out for ya? In 2 years WW1.
Remember friends before 1912, 1000's of white American men also could not vote.
Why!? Because if you want a vote in governance decisions, government projects, you must at least be willing to put Your money where your mouth is. That was a good safe-guard. If you had property, you were deemed flush enough to foot the bill and pay the taxes for your government plans. No Pay, No Play!
To their advantage any white male Americans before 1912 who did not have their own home were not forced to shell out to provide for the upkeep or projects of their government. Sounds Good to me. All the advantages of citizenship and none of the costs.
Recently because of the information Act, Britain's Labor Party admitted to implementing massive immigration policies specifically to change the voting numbers to their favor. Unfortunately not enough people in their country always voted Labor, so the Labor Party insidiously decided to import millions of immigrants into England in order to "fix" the elections 'legally' and cement their power,.(And incidentally keep their own hands in the tax-till.)
Sound like progressive clamor to give illegal aliens the vote?
Pre 1912 American voting laws safe-guarded the entire population, men, and women of all colors, from criminal corruption on a massive national scale. Because to restrict the voting population to only those who are propertied; citizens who are financially self-reliant enough to own their own home (and therefore pay taxes) created a voting population that would Vote freely for what they wanted to Pay for with their own taxes.
At least the voting citizens would not be gullible "victim mentality dupes" for any carpetbagging con artist wanting to get his hands in the government till.
The Only voting rule that needed change in 1912 was: include ALL property owning citizens; women, blacks, etc. as voters. Then we really wouldn't be in the distorted debt, corruption, taxation-slave crisis we're in today.
Its those very 20th century progressive socialist con-artist promises, made to the gullible unpropertied, that led our entire American citizenry, those very blacks, women, etc. like lambs to the progressive's taxation-slave slaughterhouse. The very taxation-slave slaughterhouse that we must now free our entire people from.
And that includes all those 'disenfranchised' women and blacks, brother.
The corrupt progressive socialist machine will enslave them ALL regardless of race creed or color, brother… That's the progressive corruption of the American dream.
Don't give me your sob-sister crocodile tears for the poor diverse "underclasses" progressives divided up, labeled and chose to cut off from the American dream. It's sob sister progressivism that has put them all in this prison, its sob sister progressivism that took away their liberty and threw away the key, laughing all the way to the bank.
The founding fathers set up a liberty machine. and it even included you. Say you are an American citizen, you are protected with justice by all the laws of our land. If you are a propertied citizen, then you have the right to participate in governing our land because you will be paying with your own taxes for those decisions.
The American dream of United we stand, divided we fall is that America is an all inclusive meritocracy,
and every citizen is invited, regardless of race, class or religion to participate.

]]> By: thetruthandthelife http://biggovernment.com/dloos/2010/03/02/obamas-labor-department-is-serious-about-ethics-except-when-it-isnt/comment-page-1/#comment-2077498 thetruthandthelife Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:30:01 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/?p=82534#comment-2077498 I am sick of the progressive determination to deny me my Freedom of Religion and to tyrannically Erase separation of church and state. The Entire progressive platform is based solely on their own sanctimonious religious beliefs. They spout their progressive religion about what everyone "Should" do, "morally" but that is a religion, not a political platform Did America vote to abolish Freedom of Religion? Did America vote to abolish Separation of church and state? No, yet Progressives demand that everyone in America pay TRIBUTE to their religion... via 'stimulus' super-debt, cap and trade super-tax, health care takeover with super-tax, etc. etc. Progressivism seeks to become the State Political Religion of the USA and already Demands every American citizen to bow down and cough up to the Progressive State Political Religion. Well I'm not having it. They are entitled to their Progressive Religion, and they're stuck with their political priests telling them what to think, what to say, what to do, and how many millions they have to Pay their political priests to obtain their Political Priest's forgiveness. And that mighty price tag doesn't seem to be going anywhere down in the future. They are free to practice their religious moral system, - as long as its legal. As American citizens, they have that right. Every Progressive can decide to give any percentage of their income to anyone they claim to want to 'help' with absolute freedom in America. Mmmm the silence is deafening. But their Progressive Religious Morality is not incumbent upon me, my legally protected freedom, my income or my government, and that includes even if they take office. We have separation of church and state. No politician can demand American citizens to bankroll their religious convictions, no matter how 'green'. Sorry, that's illegal. I am an American citizen. Their Religion is not my Religion. And we have separation of Church and state. This destruction of the separation of church and state must be stopped. I Believe we will rise to the higher ground and reclaim our Liberty. May God bless America. I am sick of the progressive determination to deny me my Freedom of Religion and to tyrannically Erase separation of church and state.
The Entire progressive platform is based solely on their own sanctimonious religious beliefs. They spout their progressive religion about what everyone "Should" do, "morally" but that is a religion, not a political platform
Did America vote to abolish Freedom of Religion? Did America vote to abolish Separation of church and state?
No, yet Progressives demand that everyone in America pay TRIBUTE to their religion… via 'stimulus'
super-debt, cap and trade super-tax, health care takeover with super-tax, etc. etc. Progressivism seeks to become the State Political Religion of the USA and already Demands every American citizen to bow down and cough up to the Progressive State Political Religion. Well I'm not having it.
They are entitled to their Progressive Religion, and they're stuck with their political priests telling them what to think, what to say, what to do, and how many millions they have to Pay their political priests to obtain their Political Priest's forgiveness. And that mighty price tag doesn't seem to be going anywhere down in the future.
They are free to practice their religious moral system, – as long as its legal. As American citizens, they have that right. Every Progressive can decide to give any percentage of their income to anyone they claim to want to 'help' with absolute freedom in America.
Mmmm the silence is deafening.
But their Progressive Religious Morality is not incumbent upon me, my legally protected freedom, my income or my government, and that includes even if they take office. We have separation of church and state. No politician can demand American citizens to bankroll their religious convictions, no matter how 'green'.
Sorry, that's illegal.
I am an American citizen. Their Religion is not my Religion. And we have separation of Church and state. This destruction of the separation of church and state must be stopped. I Believe we will rise to the higher ground and reclaim our Liberty. May God bless America.

]]> By: Snow Increases Jobless Rate? - Top News, Music, and Sports - The Blog Conglomerate http://biggovernment.com/dloos/2010/03/02/obamas-labor-department-is-serious-about-ethics-except-when-it-isnt/comment-page-1/#comment-2075222 Snow Increases Jobless Rate? - Top News, Music, and Sports - The Blog Conglomerate Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:00:11 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/?p=82534#comment-2075222 [...] » Obama’s Labor Department Is Serious About Ethics…Except When It Isn’t &#82... [...] [...] » Obama’s Labor Department Is Serious About Ethics…Except When It Isn’t &#82… [...]

]]> By: As Simple as 1-2-3: How Teachers’ Unions are Indoctrinating Your Kids on Unions | laborunionreport's Diary http://biggovernment.com/dloos/2010/03/02/obamas-labor-department-is-serious-about-ethics-except-when-it-isnt/comment-page-1/#comment-2074070 As Simple as 1-2-3: How Teachers’ Unions are Indoctrinating Your Kids on Unions | laborunionreport's Diary Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:34:44 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/?p=82534#comment-2074070 [...]  Nor does it appear that Mr. Wood discusses union corruption, union violence, mafia involvement, union political influence, unionized companies closing, teachers unions protecting bad teachers, nor does Mr. Wood teach his [...] [...]  Nor does it appear that Mr. Wood discusses union corruption, union violence, mafia involvement, union political influence, unionized companies closing, teachers unions protecting bad teachers, nor does Mr. Wood teach his [...]

]]>