Claire McCaskill: Yes on C-Span Conference, Yes on Fines
by Dana LoeschFriday morning Jamie Allman and I interviewed Claire McCaskill who gave further signs of Democrat infighting as she agreed to issue a press release saying that she supports having a broadcasted conference committee on the fauxcare negotiations. She was challenged as to why, whenever on the Sunday morning talk shows or making other media rounds, she had not taken the opportunity to voice dissent against the actions of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid to make the deliberations private.
She also acknowledged that the legislation does enforce penalties for Americans who do not choose government-run fauxcare.
McCaskill also singled me out by saying my calling her out on her fauxcare vote (because the majority of Americans and Missourians do not support it and her approval rating is sliding as a result) was “politicizing the issue.” I’d say not making yourself available to your constituents (her staff was nice but callers rarely get through and the senator obviously disregards the polling data) and voting for an unconstitutional bill which abuses the commerce clause for the sake of giving Democrats a win under the guise of providing real reform while not actually providing real reform – is real politicizing.
McCaskill did release her statement:
“Hundreds of hours of debate on health-csare reform — both in committee hearings and on the Senate and House floors — have been open to the public through broadcast on C-SPAN,” her statement read.
“I believe that the best way for these negotiations to occur is through the conference committee process, and I have communicated my opinion to the leadership of my party in the Senate.”
Kudos on that end – but so what? I’m not lathering on praise for her doing the job she was elected to do; that awards mediocrity. McCaskill still supports the egregiously unconstitutional aspects of this legislation; her wanting the discussion of merging two faulty bills together does nothing to change that.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
121 Comments
I don't trust the woman. Pretending to be honest while still lying (she has voted for deathcare) is just as bad as being dishonest.
If this bills conference committee gets broadcast on C-Span. I'll be watching for flying Donkeys, no pun intended…
Oh, and btw, turtle-necks were designed for women like this in mind.
“Hundreds of hours of debate on health-csare reform — both in committee hearings and on the Senate and House floors — have been open to the public through broadcast on C-SPAN,” her statement read.
Was she trying to spell Health-SCARE?
Turtle-necks and pant suits
SHE HAS NOT REPLIED TO E-MAILS OR CAN YOU GET A PHONE MESSAGE TO HER OFFICE–THE MESSAGE BOX IS ALWAYS FULL.—SHE WILL GET THE MESSAGE NEXT ELECTION.
Excellent article, Dana."Government-run fauxcare", sorry, I'm gonna' have to steal that one.
You also stated"She was challenged as to why, she had not taken the opportunity to voice dissent". I think we all know the answer to that question~~ she was just waiting for the wind to change direction!….;-) Hanzo
Senator MassKill has a bigger agenda. She hopes to appeal to a broader range of the electorate by appearing to be a more "conservative" free thinker. By doing so, she raises her profile and makes herself a viable VP candidate to replace that DOWG (dumb old white guy) Joe Biden.
The bottom line is, Claire Bear DOES support the fauxcare bill, making her a clear servant of the Party, not the People.
The public has already heard too much and don't like what the congress is cooking up. They have to get the reconciliation done in secret so they can rush it through a vote before the public catches on to what's in it.
In November, those that vote for it can deny that they really understood the bill since they didn't have the time to read it. They will act the victim and want another chance at election time. I don't think that will fly for most voters, but who knows.
She's much like Ben Nelson, who waits till after they've voted yes to complain as though they wanted to vote no. It's designed to lessen the fallout for ignoring the will of the majority, in hopes of salvaging the next election.
I had the same experience. I send emails to her, in one case where I suggested a very legitimate addtition to the bill: to reduce costs, let doctors take a tax deduction for seeing some paiients for free. Lawyers, like Claire Bear, get to write off pro bono work. Why can't doctors do it?
Of course, I have never received a response for any of my emails. Kit, btw, seems to be spending more time writing books, and he doesn't answer, either.
I suggest a club for these female turncoat – has beens…. like the movie "Ex-Wives Club. I'll have to think of a catchy title.
Another waste of human flesh that sucks from the governments teat. No brain, no sense, no guts and NO VOTES. Bye Bye Claire!
Hmm, she must have a Senate seat she wants to defend (whenever she's up for re-election). She can say that she "stood up" for her constituents. I don't buy it; we'll see if her constituents are smart enough to see through it.
Obama, Reid, Pelosi can go to hell!
AFTER HEARING "SENATOR" McCasKILL, SHE CAN GO WITH THEM AS CAN EVERY PROGRESSIVE/LIBERAL TRAITOROUS VIOLATOR OF THE US CONSTITUTION!
They have no authority to be writing this crap "legislation".
McCasKILL is saying compromise is the way to legislate. Doing the Franklin two-column test IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE ROUTE WHEN SO MUCH BS IS IN EVERY PIECE OF LEGISLATION! It is like: well we are only violating a couple CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED UNALIENABLE RIGHTS and look at all the goodies they will have in return.
America will not allow the United States to violate its Constitutional limitation anymore. Amendments 10 and 13 are enough to terminate our contract with the three branches of the FERAL government!
By the blatently circumventing the enumerated WALLS OF SEPARATION BETWEEN US AND THEM and THEIR ATTEMPT TO ENSLAVE US give We the People JUST CAUSE TO DISMANTLE AND RESET THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
NOT ON MY WATCH "SENATOR" McCasKILL!
Dear Clarie,
You are an idiot. That being said, how do you and the rest of your friends in Washington figure your moronic plan is going to help anyone? Just because you want me to join your crappy health care plan you intend to OVER TAX me to pay for the deadbeats. Being single and having what you hypocrites call a Cadillac Plan (my employer contributes over $8500/year) I have too nice of a plan. I don't deserve to have good benefits. News flash: I have a mediocre plan. Based on your stupidity though, I have to pay a big tax on my mediocre plan. Supposedly, according to our President, this somehow will make health care more affordable for me. Yes, as I stated you are an idiot. How does paying more for what I have save me money? Are you nuts? What type of Cadillac Plan do you have? Do you get charged more to help you save money too? Idiot.
She is quite good at obfuscation. However, that tactic will wear thin by 2012, when her term runs out.
Free health care looks like it will end up being quite expensive.
Here's the thing – government-run health care would be better than what they are proposing. If the government is going to do something, they should do it. A good example is how roads are done. Instead of the government just building the roads they add a layer of middlemen by CONTRACTING it out to a bunch of shysters and fly-by-night companies that do slipshod work. Look at how the autobahn has held up compared to American roads! Geez, some Roman roads are probably better! LOL!
Yeah after they ram it through now they start mouthing what we would like to hear. Ot they just retire sucking off the Government teat and enjoying there own personal golden health care bill. Is anyone else getting sick of these fools?
By the way she would make a great Jack O Lantern…
She's just hoping for her 300 million dollar payoff. Besides, if it's so wonderful then why won't she and the rest of the turds in Congress going to have this crap health care plan? They get their own grade A plan paid for by us! It's not about the poor uninsure that they are now going to force to buy expensive health care plans or go to jail. It's about control! It's the Communist way.
At least this wasn't your usual anti-Semitic screed…
You can take care of your own healthcare business.
You can take care of yourself.
You are an American.
You are self-reliant and independent of the need of a Master.
Why are we even having a conversation wiht these people?
You may have a deathwish if you vote for these people again, a deathwish for yourself, your country, your constitution.
I must say, I am glad the negotiations are not broadcast.
It would be like having to watch both sets of your grandparents perform oral sex on every other grandparent in the room. Nancy and Harry doing each other and screwing every American out of their constitutional rights while the other senators wait to vote on something nobody has seen yet.
I couldn’t watch.
Watching the Democrats put a bill together that absolutely angers the citizenry is dumbfounding. All they had to do was write one page that stops preexisting conditions and denial of service while allowing people to purchase across state lines. It could protect Doctors from those lawsuits with tort reform written on the next page. It wouldn’t steal a half trillion dollars from Medicare to pay for who knows what entitlements.
It could use real math instead of the obviously transparent ploy to make themselves believe their plan is deficit neutral. Most freshmen in High School can pick out the trickery. Americans aren’t that stupid and so we know they will pass this monstrosity and then hope they don’t have to pay the price for committing treason against the people they are supposed to serve.
This is treason because it goes against the will of the people yet every Democrat is going to pass a bill they know will bankrupt the treasury and make a general disaster of the health care system possibly to the point it can never be repaired.
Two words…
TEA Movement…
Still hung up on your Third Reich…
(sarc)
Well, you can't expect the "nomenklatura" to associate with the proletariat, do you? That just wouldn't be right…
(/sarc)
Listening to that just confirms my belief that democrats are liers, crooks and thieves.
Does she really believe the words coming out of her mouth? Does she really think the American people are that stupid?
The Libs are so angry all the time! I don't understand why. They are getting their way and making the rest of America miserable…should be happy!
Old Claire has only ONE thing going for her. For a fat b!tch; she doesn't sweat much.
Unclear is a total buffoon and proves her stupidity every time she opens her piehole. Where to hell were Missourians when they elected this cow?
She, like others, will most likely fall on her sword before she allows Obama to lose credibility, not that he ever had any.
A first?
Claire is my senator. When asked why she planned to vote for the stimulus when 90% of the calls to her office were against it, she stated "People told me not to run for senator but I did it anyway." Her husband has made millions off of taxpayers. Can't stand her.
[...] Email this to a friend | Print | Share on Facebook | Tweet this | // [...]
It's not a lie if you believe in the religion of the American Progressive, and "yes" she does think majorities that oppose her progressive ideas are stupid.
I just don't understand why the residents of Missouri were duped into believing that she would represent them properly. I live on the west coast and I can understand the lemmings voting for the democrats here, but I thought there was a little more common sense in the "heartland".
I seem to remember all those "hours" of debate over crap that had ALREADY BEEN WRITTEN in secret and the "debate" wasn't there to be able to actually CHANGE anything, but to just say NO to every attempt to actually let ANYONE read the bill BEFORE they were required to vote on it, most of the time later THAT SAME DAY – on 2,000+ pages.
Word. It's only words. ACTIONS have YET to meet those words. Fire them ALL.
Lake of the Ozarks…drunk…
What a tubby little tyrant this tool is. This is outrageous. The democrats order a mandate under pentalty of prison and then call it a gift and this woman has the nerve to claim that allowing people a choice to buy insurance out of state would somehow dimimish the soverninty of individual states. We are in a real mess with these idiots.
I listened to the interview, you guys kicked her a$$.
And this is why the democrats will ultimately fail. 100 high school seniors who all want to be the prom king or queen and will say anything to get it. Thing is that too many people saying too many different things.
Don't you love infighting in the morning.
I'm pretty happy. Seeing all of the frustration on this list makes me realize that we are on the right path.
Don't pay any attention to the TV libs… they are paid to be angry.
Ouch…. Paul. Very unkind. We can disagree and still remember our manners.
Still hung up on your hatred of the White Race….
You sound unhappy… angry even. Might be time to turn off Glenn Beck and take the kids out for a snow cone.
While you are there, breath in the freedom.
The 10th Amendment. Good call!
How about "The Golden Girl's Knitting Circle"?
That's because they are sick.
They turn my stomach.
She doesn't know what to believe because she is that stupid. If her brains were dynamite, she couldn't blow her nose. And that's giving her credit.
It's funny how Democrats are all worked up about "state's rights" when it comes to allowing states to force their citizens to buy within the state, and yet they are going to FORCE EACH AND EVERy STATE TO ADOPT THIS HEALTHCARE PLAN.
Now Paul, that's not very PC of you to say such things. Don't you know that things that are ugly only need lipstick and things that stink only need some colonge?
It appears as though you are "upsetting" one of our PC posters here. Don't you think it's time for "change"?
Yes, old one, breath in the freedom while we still have some. Wrong weather for a snow cone though(unless you're in Bangkok-86 degrees at noon.
Would YOU ever sign a contract without understanding the content or intent of it? I know I would not! But can I claim ignorance of any contract, so that I may not be held to my signature? Of course not. Unless maybe if I were forced into it?
The Dr Devorkian patient club?
Manners? PC? The clowns including this one are ripping our guts out and you don't want to put up a fight. Stand by. I'm just getting warmed up. You can either get into the fight or get out of the way.
Geez Paul, sorry you didn't appreciate the humor in what I was saying. I'll be sure to keep that in mind in the future.
Canukistan shares the "oil" border
With the great U.S.S.A.
Profile and then Drill.
You get rid of your EPA we'll get rid of ours.
Sorry Ray and thanks. I have a lot of duct tape on my head to keep it from blowing up. I stand with anyone who stands against these progressive criminals. I've got my warface on.
Not really a "reply". I just wanted to be microscopically shallow and say that Dana is easily the most beautiful woman in the political arena today. I also calculated that this particular post would provide the greatest visibility for my opinion. Logic, reason, philosophy, nice hair, pretty smile, beautiful eyes… WOW! great to know we have such a powerhouse of beauty and intellect on the side of human freedom. All due respect intended…
If you are hearing from people who want to do something unConstitutional and others who wish you NOT do, it is not a "balance" – there is a clear right and wrong. Did she just mention "Constitutional Framework"?
If you are hearing from people who want you to vote them other people's money and others who don't, again, it is not weighed evenly.
Paul,
My blood boils at times over what is happening(it's a combination of anger and fear). During my 58 years on this earth, I've spent nearly 38 years in DoD. Have had the opportunity to live in many countries and have seen differerent country's politics/policies. Never expected that I would see many of the anti-democratic policies that I have seen in these countries being applied in the dear ole USA. It's absolutely sickening to see this happening. What's even more sickening is the thought that so many Americans are welcoming what they consider to be "hope and change" that the current Socialist/Marxist
administration in charge is trying to implement. People believing that the government will bring them free this and that. Cont
One only need to ask somebody in the UK or Europe or Canada how "free" all these goodies are. Pay a "minimal" 33% income tax, $8.00 for a gallon of gas, $40.00 for a cheap bottle of booze, 12% VAT etc.
I'm on my soapbox, so I'll quit. I seem to wear my warface every day when it comes to the current state of affairs in the USA. I'm with you in the fight(all the way from Thailand). Stay strong-we have the numbers to make it happen.
If you feel so strongly about it, organize in your state to get them to nullify it. It can be done, but most Americans just watch tv and complain when something massive like this comes along. This nation was set up so that we had more control over local and state government. Most are clueless about what their avenues of redress are and think they are involved when they vote for the President every 4 years. How pathetic.
Lock and load, brother. I've got your back.
This is one of those times a burqa should be as mandatory as a Jihadist wants it to be…
Claire has her talking points perfectly memorized, her interviews are a smoke screen to apeal to her voters. She talks a good game but after a few mins you realize its all BS. I think she makes the effort for the less educated of her voters. She is a toady and groupie of Obongo. You could dump a million petitions at her office of voters against ObamaCare and she wouldn't care. Grandma Claire knows whats best. We need to get her a New Job, at a Fast Food store- Drive Up Window. Would you like Fries with that ?
I heard a Real Rep for Mo, She says ObamaCare is the Largest Tax Increase in History, with a small side order of Medical Services
Another thought along that line, if it is not government run health care, who gets the fine revenue?
Claire McCaskill is all that is wrong with politics: she toes the party line and votes 'yea' like an apparatchik. When the public turns against here she finds a conscious.
She deserves to be voted out of office at the fist chance Missourians get to do so…
I can't wait to vote her out of office.
Im surprised Clair didnt pat you on the head and send you on your way. Her condescending attitude toward her constituents this summer at town hall meetings is what turned me completely against her. Sadly she is my senator, and Im hoping to see her sitting at home after the next vote. then i can send her a stuffed sad faced puppy, awww, poor clairy, did those mean voters pick on you?
Mcaskill sounds really arrogant. They truly believe they can just print money , penalized everyone and distribute it to their favorite constituents.
Corruption and then explaining it away.
McCaskill stated that she read the entire bill. I think the congressmen who vote for the bill should be held to reading and understanding what they are voting for. Many of them don't want to take too much time away from important things like fund raising and staying in office.
Claire is my senator.
When at our local town hall in August she said: "I'm not for this bill, I don't know anyone in the senate who is.
Don't you trust me?"
No senator, your actions prove that we cannot.
Sorry, Fonzie…
Hating everyone and everything like you do really limits your opportunities for female companionship…all of that leads to too much fist wanking…doesn't the rest of the bund notice your hairy palms, or is that a common thing for both of you…?
You should adopt the self-loathing thing as your own personal rice bowl…help make our society more polite…
She does sort of have that pumpkin-head thing goin' on, doesn't she?
Is it as insulting to everyone, as it is to me, that these people who see the rest of us as drooling inbreeders can't find enough ways to steal the wealth and productivity of the inbreeders?
** Does she really think the American people are that stupid? **
Uh huh!
… and those seemed, in the past, to be the only criteria there were for their happiness. What's changed? Now they want us dead.
Point of order: Shouldn't the opening title card indcate that the interview is from 1/8/10 rather than 1/8/09?
As another poster had offered, also allow "Write Offs" on taxes for charity work for those who can't pay…
I'd put that with your suggestions…
Amazing…a small group of posters on a web site can write a health care bill better than the Democratic libtard statists can…and without all the drama…
McCaskill has been passing herself off as a conservative-to-moderate Democrat for over two decades, and at one time that persona may have been legit. She cut her teeth in Jackson County politics, variously as a county legislator, county executive and county prosecutor. She got elected county executive by being less insane than her opponent (also a Democrat), the infamous Carol Coe, a "black activist" and now-disbarred lawyer. All McCaskill had to do to beat Coe was run an ad in the KC Star stating her name and that she was running against Carol Coe. No substance at all. Coe predictably blasted the ad as "racist" (no explanation as to why) and McCaskill hilariously replied along the lines of "If the mention of Carol Coe's name carries negative connotations, that's not my fault." Being not-Carol Coe got her her first stab at prominence. (Cont.)
It was around the time McCaskill was either a county legislator or executive (she would become the elected prosecutor a few years later) that she gave an impromptu talk to my law school class about her experiences looking for a job as a new lawyer. At the time of this speech, she apparently didn't aspire to anything beyond local politics, as she talked herself down, saying she was not a great law student herself and that she had found her first job, in the Jackson County prosecutor's office (as an assistant prosecutor), "because they needed a warm body." Apparently the same hiring criterion still applies for Missouri voters when choosing a U.S. senator. (Cont.)
There were allegations of conflicts of interest while she was auditor, namely that she looked the other way when it came to her husband's nursing homes. I haven't read about it enough to form an opinion, already satisfied that she's a fake. She's had great practice sounding conservative-to-moderate but little practice acting that way once out of local politics. Whether she has any true conservative instinct anymore is hard to say, and it is irrelevant where she lacks the stones to buck the party Dons in any event.
(4th and last of 4 entries – Immediately previous entry under consideration by site admin., why, I have no idea) There were allegations of conflicts of interest while she was auditor, namely that she looked the other way when it came to her husband's nursing homes. I haven't read about it enough to form an opinion, already satisfied that she's phony. She's had great practice sounding conservative-to-moderate but little practice acting that way once out of local politics. Whether she has any true conservative instinct anymore is hard to say, and it is irrelevant where she lacks the stones to buck the party Dons in any event.
There is a third (of 4) entry to go here which the site admin won't let me post and I have no idea why. It has no cussing or anything else in it. Read on for entry 4 of 4 while awaiting entry 3.
What the hell, why not watch for flying monkeys, too?
And while your at it, you can watch for the Wicked Bitch of Mizzoura, Glare Mc Cat Kill.
(Tell me she doesn't look like a bloated cross-breed of Hillary and Tammy Faye…)
GLARE Mc CAT KILL IS A TREASONOUS SLUT.
I thought that was a turtle…oh it's her…sorry Turtles.
I would hope that thoose of you who are making on line posts to all the different blogs, also are making every effort to voice your concerns to your Senator and or Congressman, I have been sending a steady stream to my Senator "Bill Nelson" and my Congressman "Alan Grayson". Neither have ever responded to my concerns other than their already canned responses. The more this goes on the more determined I and many others are to not only vote them all out, regardless of party, but to again do the actual leg work and volunteering to make it happen. Hope majority of you posting here feel the same way. In hind sight, it is unbelievable that majority of us could have been so incredibly ignorant to have voted this imbeciles intpo office to begin with AND then turn around and re-elect them.
OBAMA HEALTH SCARE IS LIKE A BIG STEAK DINNER, THE BIG STEAK IS THE FEDERAL TAX, THE BIGGEST YOU EVER SEEN, THE SMALL SIDE ORDER OF PEAS IS THE MEDICAL SERVICES YOU GET.
CLAIRE SAYS HEALTHSCARE WILL SAVE MONEY, 30-47 MILLION MORE ADDED AND WE WILL SAVE MONEY.
The democrats…..every last one of them…..will vote as they are ordered to vote. Being smarmy liars, thieves, and power mad ideologues shouldnt come as a surprise to anyone. What they are doing is walking the party line, and lying through their teeth to their voters. They cant, and won't have it both ways. The only thing that will save them in 2010 is the efforts of ACORN and the SEIU…who did such a great job of fixing the last elections. Anyone who doubts that only has to look at that pathetic clown Al Franken. The democrat party needs useful idiots. That sums up congress pretty much to a tee. Clair is no different…she is just more erudite in dodging her complicity.
Yes! She does think we are that stupid!
She had ACORN involved in her campaign. That is how she was elected.
She always looks so bright eyed and bushy tailed all while smiling, smiling, smiling and lying, lying, lying….I guess serving BS with a smile must make it OK???
Unfortunately my state is stuck with her until 2012
I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THE DEMS CAN AFFORD TO BROADCAST IT LIVE!!!
Is MO one of the 14 states where Acorn is being investigated for voter registration fraud?
Listened to this interview. I will give her props for accepting the invitation, however, calling for CSPAN to televise the conference committee is just cover for her. She knows it will never happen, but now she can say she called for it. Watch how Claire votes, she only votes against the majority when she knows that the votes are there to give her cover.
You must be logged in to post a comment.