Lessons from John Galt
by Dan Freeman
Recent headlines seem lifted directly out of an Ayn Rand novel. President Obama decries the “fat cat bankers on Wall Street”. Harry Reid attacks insurance companies for making too much profit. House Democrat leaders call Tea Partiers “Racist, Nazi, Gun Nuts”. How about this nauseating statement made by Army General George Casey after the Muslim terrorist attack on Ft. Hood?
As great a tragedy as this was, it would be a shame if our diversity became a casualty as well
Each of these headlines might well have been uttered by an Ayn Rand character. Rand, whose father’s pharmacy was confiscated by the Soviets during the communist revolution of 1917, and who came to America in 1926, seems uniquely able to speak to us about the inverted morality of our times. Virtue is to be apologized for. Depravity commands respect. Success is cast as evil and punished while failure is blamed on others and rewarded. Rand’s insights into the psychological state of collectivists—those who demand that we sacrifice our individual freedom and happiness for the sake of the state—explain what often seems incomprehensible to thinking people.
An epic demonstration of the inverted morality that Rand described was on display in Copenhagen last week as the world’s worst most evil dictators—Mugabe and Chavez—partnered with the world’s most visible and misguided progressives—Al Gore , Gordon Brown, Barack Obama—in an orgy of depravity. Sadly, even the Pope lent his moral support to the lunacy, saying, “Industrialized nations must recognize their responsibility for the environmental crisis, shed their consumerism and embrace more sober lifestyles.”
John Galt, the industrialist hero of Rand’s 1957 masterpiece, Atlas Shrugged, refers to those in power who stripped men of their minds, wealth and freedom, as mystics. The mystics of spirit were the religious leaders of centuries past who proclaimed that faith is superior to reason. Galt is no fan of these mystics but it is the mystics of muscle—the progressives who force us to submit to their version of the common good—that Galt despises.
And Barack Obama is a mystic of muscle in its purest form, able to corral the worshipping media, the always superficial Hollywood elites, America hating academics, state-sponsored capitalists (e.g., Goldman Sachs), and grant hungry “scientists” & environmentalists hoping to cash in on a trillion dollar loot of the American people called global warming. These are the pillars of deceit Obama used to get elected. This was how he convinced enough of us to give up our minds for the the mystical concept that Rand called the collective. True to form, Barack, master of the mystics of muscle, has used his power mightily to loot from the producers, and hand it to the parasites, crooks and undeserving (read; SEIU, ACORN, UN Climate Fund, General Motors).
John Galt leads a revolt by the productive class and outlines Rand’s philosophy in his 60-page radio address. Here, he explains how human beings—alone among life forms—can choose to be mindless:
A living entity that regarded its means of survival as evil, would not survive. A plant that struggled to mangle its roots, a bird that fought to break its wings would not remain for long in the existence they affronted. But the history of man has been a struggle to deny and destroy the mind.
Sad to say, for a movement powered by the mindlessness, there is plenty of fuel to sustain “hope and change”:
- Who but the mindless can believe that government run health care will reduce costs and improve care while covering more people?
- Who but the mindless can believe that this President is now serious about reducing the deficit after shattering spending records during his first year?
- Who but the mindless can take seriously the sham “jobs summit” held by a President whose every policy is a lesson in job destruction?
- Who but the mindless can believe Obama’s lie that “Cash for Clunkers” which cost taxpayers $24,000 per car was successful?
- Who but the mindless would not outraged that our government has reneged on its promise pay back the unused TARP fund to taxpayers?
- Who but the mindless would not question the morality that the world’s finest health care, which has extended and improved human life in unimaginable ways—conceived and produced by countless unsung heroes in the private sector—should magically be transformed by Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi into a “human right”, taken over by the state and rationed out as they please?
The assault on reason by our President and Congress goes on ad infinitum. It is mindlessness that elected “hope and change” and mindlessness that sustains it. Ayn Rand recognized that the greatest struggle on earth is that between the individual and the collective, and to submit to the collective, the individual must lose his ability to think for himself. Howard Roark, hero of The Fountainhead explains;
The mind is an attribute of the individual. There is no such thing as a collective brain.
The last thing a mystic of muscle wants is for us to start using our minds to uncover their fraud. Galt gets to the heart of the evil of progressive demand that we all serve the state when he says,
By the grace of reality and the nature of life, man—every man—is an end in himself, he exists for his own sake, and the achievement of his own happiness is his highest moral purpose.





Subscribe via RSS
176 Comments
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Michael Chavez, Smoky Mountain 912 -. Smoky Mountain 912 – said: Lessons from John Galt: Recent headlines seem lifted directly out of an Ayn Rand novel. President Oba… http://bit.ly/6rukvZ -VOL360.com- [...]
Hope and change traded straight up for mindlessness.
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by VOL360: Lessons from John Galt:
Recent headlines seem lifted directly out of an Ayn Rand novel. President Oba… http://bit.ly/6rukvZ -VOL360.com-…
First of all – great piece. I think everyone here understands the problems we face if we let our current leadership continue on its path. The questions that still beg to be answer are: 1) How do we show the people that support our current leadership that the best way is to be self-sufficient and not rely on the goverment to solve their problems? and 2) Who is out there that can lead us out of this wilderness?
Galt had another word for our socialist overseers: looters.
this is an upside down world we're living in. alas! We (the People) are hungry for some Reagan-esque leadership. This great country of ours is experiencing a bloodless coup. Who will wrest the steering wheel from the maniac that drives the bus off of the cliff?
New Years resolution
Take this Country BACK
Merry CHRISTmas
Close, but:
Hope & Change = Mindlessness.
“Galt’s Gulch!” Now is the time, to slow down, quit if you can, starve the beast. If you’re a business owner, fire your liberals first, as the new taxes and fees hit. If you’re get paid hourly, claim as many as you can. Civil disobedience, inundate the system, get on food stamps, get housing vouchers Sec. 8, go to the emergency rooms, become worthless. America has been challenged, challenge accepted, see you in the streets.
"Until and unless you discover that money is the root of all good, you ask for your own destruction. When money ceases to become the means by which men deal with one another, then men become the tools of other men. Blood, whips and guns–or dollars. Take your choice–there is no other." – Ayn Rand (Atlas Shrugged)
"Who but the mindless can believe".
Mindless are the minority.
"And Barack Obama is a mystic of muscle in its purest form, able to corral the worshipping media, the always superficial Hollywood elites, America hating academics, state-sponsored capitalists".
All have been working very hard for a long time to muscle us to where we are .
We are now awakening. We have not yet begun to fight. BUT WE WILL!
The progressive attitude toward collectivism is why more and more of us are turning to groups such as the Tea Parties and United in Liberty (http://www.unitedinliberty.org). Principle #3 correctly states that "Prosperity occurs when free enterprise…exists…"
Moron's can't even get the quote right in the picture – "Who is John Gulch," not "Where is John Gulch."
pathetic
Is Atlas Shrugged really how we want to structure our society? The main thesis is that there are a special few in society that are "better" than everyone else, and we should give them complete control over major industries with no guidelines whatsoever. Ayn Rand was a hack writer who rambled on and on.
I am ready with my pitchfork and torch, but where do I go?
Moron's can't even get the quote right in the picture – "Who is John Gulch,"
Speaking of moron's check your spelling
The main thesis is that there are a special few in society that are "better" than everyone else, and we should give them complete control over major industries with no guidelines whatsoever.
Ohhh you mean like the current leadership???………………. MORON.
You mean “morons,” plural, not possessive. The reins of power in the book are with the moochers, who take money from the producers and give it to the parasites …which one are you?
John Gulch? As far the sign goes, it's a play on the phrase "who is John Galt". Wake up idiot.
Great piece about the incidious degradation or American freedoms. I believe people are starting to wake up and pay attention to the double talk and false promises that come out to the mouths of the people who profess to want to help us. Thier lies and deceit and coming to light. We all need to be vigilant of the incidious nature of acceptance to the norm. As we allow more and more into our lives we start to give away more of ourselves. Think about how normal it is to accept cursing now, and provocative television and advertising. These things were severely frowned upon just a few years ago and now they are an everyday part of life. Now abortion is slowly creeping into our lives as an accepted norm. Not widely, but it has begun. Guard yourselves and stand up to the wrong in the world. Don't accept the norm, as in politics, that we can't do anything about it. VOTE!!
I guess I must have a keen, sharp mind… because I am PISSED!!
Kooz, I want to buy you a beer!
Merry Christmas Brother
~~Who but the mindless would not outraged that our government has reneged on its promise pay back the unused TARP fund to taxpayers? ~~
Has anyone investigated that the balance of TARP funds still even exist? Or have they already been laundered for the NWO agenda and sitting in some obscure offshore account. These people need to rape us for more money to cover their corrupt collective a$$es. We already have "our" Mugabe relaxing on the beach in Hawaii. Now all he needs is for his minions to make sure the axe fall on our heads quickly so we have no time to recoup
He has a surprise coming in 2010.
" I believe society would devolve into barbarism if a majority of the people did not believe in an eternal afterlife."
What have we currently devolved into?
Rand's in-your-face brand of atheism turned me off. Something about her quip to WM F Buckley ( "If you're so smart, why do you believe in God?"), coming from an escapee of the communist bloc, led me to question her ideas.
Stan, I agree with some of your thoughts, but the danger in "living off the system" in order to kill it is that we may actually feed into the Cloward-Piven strategy of overwhelming the system in order to bring in the "progressive" state. If we really want to starve the beast, we need to go after its real food supply; the monetary policy control of the Federal Reserve, and the derivatives market of the large investment banks. Withholding our tax dollars and demanding a welfare check will not work. That will only embolden the militant progressives to take advantage of the ensuing "crisis." We need to reimpose a Glass-Steagal standard on the banking system and drag the bogus derivatives market through bankruptcy. There we can write off 10 trillion dollars in phony "debt." Next we crush the fiat monetary system and replace it with a true credit system, based on the real productivity of our human and physical resources and industry, instead of the current system that issues money as debt that is based on nothing.
If we start to do it this way, we restore human productivity and human dignity, and at the same time diminish the "need" for welfare, food stamps, section 8s, and all other poverty programs. This above all else is what will bring down the "progressive" totalitarian takeover.
Bending over backwards for the sake of "diversity" is a big part of the reason our country is going downhill so fast. Diversity is fine and dandy but not when diversity means special treatment for select groups at the expense of others.
JohnK144, you cut straight to the heart of the matter.
I'm afraid that too many will skim over your words, not fully understanding the implications. Example — You wrote: "We need to…drag the bogus derivatives market through bankruptcy. There we can write off 10 trillion dollars in phony "debt." Next we crush the fiat monetary system and replace it with a true credit system…instead of the current system that issues money as debt that is based on nothing."
This is brilliant stuff. These words are easily worth a whole book, drilling down to the different actions you recommend, the historical record that led us to this point, etc. etc.
Great comment.
Ummm, Ayn Rand didn't care much for mysticism, which, in her view, included religion.
Still, though, a person wouldn't need to be an atheist to subscribe to her economic philosophy.
I understand what you mean when you say "especially Christians," but I believe you are wrong to say so. I think that all people who love our Constitution should think and act in ways to stymie the statist currently in power.
There are people from many different religions who would protect the Constitution with their lives. Others love the Constitution, but have no religion at all (Ayn Rand, for one — me, for another).
Ayn Rand pulled no punches. You always knew where you stood with her.
Lots of us would've liked to see her be more conciliatory, more user-friendly, at times, particularly during television interviews. Alas, LOL, that wasn't her style. She was a pretty prickly old bee-otch at times.
That said, she's right about pretty much everything. I even agree with her atheism. (Unlike her, I don't think people who believe in God are stupid. They (religious people) are some of the best I've ever known.)
Rand didn't regard religion or personal relationships as many would today. That being said, she nailed the enslavement of the individual to the collective square on the head.
You ain't wrong and you sure as HELL ain't lyin'!
This is a great article. I love the old girl (Ayn Rand), even if she was a bit prickly from time to time (but only on days ending in "y." LOL)
I would suggest that we are all to some degree capable of 'going Galt.' I'm interested in others' suggestions regarding this. I've read (it is not my idea) that some are forgoing all major purchases until the present tyranny is ended. I can say that this is one thing I can do. Others?
No one said Rand was right about everything. But what she got right was a lot and she was very good at it.
Perhaps you might like re-reading Atlas Shrugged to make the comparison fresh with current events, it's frightening.
Most of us who love Ayn Rand also recognize that she was not a gifted writer.
She was, however, a gifted thinker. If I could only choose one or the other, I'd choose the gift of clear thinking.
Totally agree. Reread it last summer. The parallels are spot on. She truly understood government evil and the value of the individual. She's off the rails about our Creator though.
There is also this which I have referred to a number of times.
http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=a...
"The Democratic Party platform of 1960 summarizes the switch boldly and explicitly. It declares that a Democratic Administration “will reaffirm the economic bill of rights which Franklin Roosevelt wrote into our national conscience sixteen years ago.”
Bear clearly in mind the meaning of the concept of “rights” when you read the list which the platform offers:
“1. The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation.
“2. The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation.
“3. The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living.
“4. The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home and abroad.
“5. The right of every family to a decent home.
“6. The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health.
“7. The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accidents and unemployment.
“8. The right to a good education.”
A single question added to each of the above eight clauses would make the issue clear: At whose expense?
Jobs, food, clothing, recreation(!), homes, medical care, education, etc., do not grow in nature. These are man-made values—goods and services produced by men. Who is to provide them?
If some men are entitled by right to the products of the work of others, it means that those others are deprived of rights and condemned to slave labor."
This is critical and what many of our fellow citizens just don't care about – they want the government hand out. Giving up our freedoms and rights is enslaving us, and this is what the collectivists, the statists, the liberal fascists want.
From what Dubble Bubble gum wrapper cartoon did you get that childish interpretation of the main thesis of Atlas Shrugged? Why not just wear a nice "I'm really stupid" sign…?
Cant get more moronic that your statement. But then again lefites just cant ever be accountable. Moochers and bottom feeders.
Um, you are an idiot.
Make a sensible comment and present an argument, and I will return and address it. All I see here are the inane ramblings of a fool.
Rand and Orwell…..That's because the Libs live in Fantasy Land.
I'm trying to guess which state will be the first to secede and am planning to move there. Alaska seems to be my first guess.
And what religion to the policy makers follow?
Thank you. Could not have said it better myself. I notice people like rearden's beard always start off with the name calling (eg Burris) and then launch with something illogical, historically inaccurate (Reid), or just plain stupid. I guess we are supposed to be intimidated by the bombast. Pathetic.
Absolutely well said.
God Bless you.
Jon Galt and Ayn Rand are the two greatest characters ever!!!! I love how Ayn Rand disconnects herself from reality in order to gauge objectivity. I don't know why, and I can't explain it, but her arguments just make sense!
Don't make that your new year's resolution! They never come true. How about you promise yourself to make a difference in society. It's vague and if you don't do it, who cares???
Largely. Also seeking as many tax exempt investments as possible (largely AMT exempt munis), and I am contributing as much as I can to any worthy cause or opponent to this crap. I feel it is better spent now for that than confiscated later and redistributed to some fraud ridden, inefficient entitlement. Lately, I contributed to givebenthe boot.com. My belief is that there needs to be immediate and publicized negative ramifications to what he and his ilk did or the story and lesson will be lost. Hats off to Nebraskans who show some integrity and and a "greatest good for the greatest number" mentality.
He also was right about EVERYTHING!!!! I would totally bed him if he were real, and I'm not even queer. Just really that right-wing. On that note, I invite the holy spirit into my most private realm tonight. Jesus can have me anytime though!
No, they live in Candyland where everything is free and it's all built on snowcane mountains with little elves running everywhere. P.S. no one makes money in Candyland.
I've already gone "full Galt." That's when you take industry into your own hands and don't give a damn how many people you have to screw in order to make way more money than you could possibly spend. Just look at Taggert Rail! Atlas Shrugged is a story about an inter-continental railway which is totally necessary for our country. I think of people riding trains everyday, henceforth, tons of people must use Taggert Rail. It is such a real story. Ayn Rand is a visionary. Full Galt, and all the moderates can fully screw themselves.
We’re in perfect alignment on several facts; one being that “Cloward – Piven is being enacted as we breathe by the left.” The other is that in order to bring about the changes that are needed would require “several election cycles, fearless leaders, or a collapse of the system.” We can’t afford to wait several election cycles, and we have no fearless leaders. And so all we have left is a collapse of the system.
Where we diverge is that I don’t believe we need to contribute to the collapse. That will come on its own. What we need to do is what the “progressives” have been doing for decades, and that is to strategize. Those of the Cloward-Piven idea have a clear plan of what they will implement when the system finally falls. We need to be ready for the same event, only we need to have a better plan that can overcome their takeover, and we need to codify that plan. This way at the point of crisis, when the “progressives’ make their final move, we won’t be caught flat footed, but we’ll be ready with some moves of our own.
I CARE
I think that horseless carriages are the way to the 22nd century! Ayn Rand is a stupid bitch and you're conservative as hell! I used to think you were a proper libertarian but you're really just a foaming-at-the-mouth neocon.
LOL @ full Galt!
Thanks for the good words.
By the same token, I think your linkage of rearden's beard to the current crop of moochers (Burris and Reid), was masterful. Truly I do.
I appreciate the reply and the food for thought.
Did you just reference devolution?! Q: Are we not men?
Clearly not, or you wouldn't make it your new year's resolution you libiot!!! Go with CHRIST, but be smart about resolutions. You don't care about anything. Not even profit!
Ayn Rand was such a stupid bitch because she wasn't atheist ENOUGH…do it like Mao, stay pure, stay clean.
Neoconservatism is an extension of libertarianism in many ways actually, it's written. We are trying to spread libertarianism to other countries since it's probably impossible here. I mean, we have the constitution. In other countries, you get to make up rules as you're killing. I foam at the mouth for freedom. I don't see how you can possibly be too right wing, FULL GALT PUNTAS!
Democracy is like Sinterklaas…only children believe in it.
Have you ever heard of schwarzen Pete??? True spirit of Christmas. It's for adults, you should check it out: http://www.huffingtonpost.com . Oh wait, that's the site all the people from the junta go to. GO WITH CHRIST YOU DUMB TARD!!!!
Man! The lone troll got trounced.
Invite a liberal for dinner. Recipes to follow.
(I'm resisting the 'Modest Propsal' approach) The menu might include boiled free-range thistle in a kelp sauce.
Sarah Palin will lead you out of the wilderness. You'll note that she tends to "Go Galt" about halfway into finishing anything. ROFL
That is why a flat tax would gut the beast as would a return to gold standard. Sad when someone in Canada can articulate the problem and solution better than most Americans. Can we send our Dems to Canada where they can play around with Socialism- lite. If a few get muched by polar bears or gored by moose- so be it. Merry Christmas!
Easy way to start for the timid: Refuse to answer the damned 2010 census. Worst outcome is they fine you — a hundred bucks, I think. Haven't known anyone to get even that. I've refused the last three. They sent people around to try to cajole me and then finally just left me the hell alone. Would be great if this census was one of the biggest slaps to the face the DC crooks have ever taken.
Fair Tax!
[...] Big Government » Blog Archive » Lessons from John Galt. Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]
MEEEEEEEOWW!!!!
You do realize your name, Rearden, is also the name of one of the main capitalist heros in Atlas Shrugged? Obviously character names are not your strong point, but I'm left to wonder, as evidenced by your upside-down critique, have you read Atlas Shrugged? Have you truthfully even read any of Ayn Rand's writings? Making decisions without reading a bill, er – my apologies, book….well, that could just be downright stupid. Cheers, moocher.
I agree….FairTax!
I want my country back now! I fought in the jungles of Viet Nam – I will fight in the streets of Washington
GOD BLESS AMERICA
Merry CHRISTmas to all
If you haven't read Brave New World Revisited lately you may want to read that as well.
Ayn Rand God bless her is turning over in her grave watching the damage done to this country by the Godless globalist communiststs that have infect this countries government.
God bless us all.
The time draws nye for all good Patriots (especially christians) to practice real and meaningful CIVIL DISOBEDIANCE!
DO NOT SIGN UP FOR HEALTH CARE
(starve the political elite of their victory)
DISCONTINUE YOUR CURRENT HEALTH CARE PLAN
(starve the complicit insurance companies of their profits)
STOP ALL VOLANTARY TAX WITHHOLDING FROM YOUR PAYCHECKS AND BUSINESSES
(starve the federal/state socialist governments of their life blood)
STOP REPORTING CASH TRANSACTIONS IN YOUR BUSINESSES
(turn the worthless Federal Reserve Notes into something of value while you still can)
"…MUTUALLY PLEDGE TO EACH OTHER OUR LIVES, FORTUNES AND HONOR."
(starve the political class of your ignorance by educating yourself starting with the Declaration Of Independence and U.S. Constitution)
"We must, indeed, all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately." – Ben Franklin
You might want to reconsider the name calling. Sir, you flubbed the quote. I AM JOHN GALT!
Rand is not for me. Although I enjoyed reading Atlas, the world described, including Galts Gulch is a world in which I would not want to live. The main characters come across as very unlikeable people.
I do agree that free markets with people acting in their own self interests produce the best society, however I cannot embrace Rands belief that religion is destructive. Galt, and it seems most of the protagonists in Atlas are Atheist.
I believe society would devolve into barbarism if a majority of the people did not believe in an eternal afterlife.
I got your Back
Semper FI
Dan Freeman — You've written a very fine article. Thanks for the great content, well and effectively expressed. This is the kind of inspiration we need, going into a brand new year with new possibilities.
MERRY CHRISTMAS, ALL
HAPPY AND PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR TO ALL MY CONSERVATIVE BROTHERS AND SISTERS.
Correct all the way around, lets just say she is the grand dame of the conservative movement.
"The last thing a mystic of muscle wants is for us to start using our minds to uncover their fraud."
The fraud was uncovered a long time ago, and continues to be exposed on an almost daily basis. My concern is how the majority of Americans will respond to it. There is a split in the river ahead.
What you say is brilliant in the long run. To re-impose “Glass-Steagal,” would require an act of congress with the signature of a President. Eliminating, “The Federal Reserve,” would also take an act of a fearless congress, and a fearless President, no where in sight. We missed the opportunity to crush derivative traders last Fall, but Bush/Paulson (Goldman Sachs) gave us TARP and saved them. I love what you say, but all these things will require several election cycles, fearless leaders, or a collapse of the system.
Cloward – Piven is being enacted as we breath by the left. However, in my mind, this is a double edged sword, and can be done in reverse. If we wait to long, I fear nothing will be left to save.
For me the question is what do we do now?
DumbQuestion (who doesn't sound so dumb) states: "I am contributing as much as I can to any worthy cause or opponent to this crap." In view of the topic, then, I would suggest a healthy gift to the Ayn Rand Institute itself (which also supports the Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights). Check it out at http://www.aynrand.org!
Not sure what in hell *that* referred to, but, just for the record, neither Rand nor myself care much for the form of government known as a democracy, which is just basically mob rule. Both she and I prefer the protection of our rights as afforded by a constitutional republic, which is the form of government we have in the United States (…if, as Ben Frankin hopes, we can *keep* it!)
Mr. Freeman, thanks for your excellent article. Nice to see someone who "gets" it and can communicate it clearly.
(Also thanks for not further bastardising the language with out using the politically correct "himself or herself", or–worse–the destruction of the language by using the ubiquitous "themselves" when referring to a singular noun. For the record, I'm female.)
It is one thing to vote the bums out, but the next step has to make sure to keep an eye on where the bums land. How many Dems who have voted themselves out of a job will land in a cushy gig at one of the new bureaucracies, or an ambassadorship or at the UN or any of the hundreds of other gov't jobs?
If the GOP happens to gain the levers of power again after the 2012 presidential election, they had better begin a quick and massive scaling back of the monstrous governmental apparatus, the education department, the EPA, the energy department, to name just a couple more recent additions to your governmental burden.
The abolition of the income tax would be a good first start. Failing that, at least the abolition of the withholding of tax. Thanks to withholding, too many people don't see the price of gov't; they look at the net on their cheque, not the gross. If that money had to be submitted every two weeks by virtue of writing a cheque to the gov't, it is my contention that that alone would ignite a tax revolt in about 15 seconds.
Perhaps THE most important change they could make would be for the new president, whether Palin or Pence or whomever, to sign an executive order reestablishing the dollar's link to gold (or a basket of commodities). It is only by the devaluation of the dollar that the government has grown to this grotesque size and scope. A fixed dollar does not allow for horrendous fiscal policies to be bailed out (pun intended) by similarly horrendous monetary policy. Too much tax and regulation? A quick recession to remedy will necessitate expansionist fiscal policy.
It is one thing to complain about "the special interests" and "lobbyists," but that misses the point: If government didn't have anything to sell (favors, loopholes, exemptions, jobs), lobbyists wouldnt' have anything to buy (with campaign contributions, voter outreach programs, feet on the ground at election time, etc).
One of my favorite Ayn Rand quotes: "I cannot believe that grown Americans do not understand–as adults–the evils of collectivism as clearly as I understood them at age 9."
It is only by living up to her ideals that any of this can be undone and America can get back to the principles that made it the greatest nation on Earth.
Merry Christmas from frozen Canada!
The energy spent by the left on denigrating the right as opposed to actually thinking is an indication of mental illness. The right thinks. The left feels and what it feels is mostly hate with a healthy addition of dear, envy and let's not forget cowardice.
Who but the mindless and inexperienced believes that change is good for the sake of change? Most of us are old enough to realize that most change is NOT GOOD. Some things are better left as they were.
The only solution I see at this late stage is nullification and secession. If the various state legislatures and governors (or at least some of them; I don't expect much from California, for instance) would take concrete, line-in-the-sand stands on this, it would send shock waves through the rotten DC cesspool. Unfortunately, this also requires that we put faith once again in politicians — even if they do happen to be a little closer to us, both geographically and philosophically.
I prefer to imagine small, independent groups, as well as individuals, "nullifying" the edicts from the DC beast by refusing or evading them. Each of us can "secede," in whatever ways we feel capable of.
Let's start with a pretty easy one: The 2010 census. Refuse to answer the damned thing! I've refused the last three, and nothing happened except a few annoying return visits by census workers — who finally gave up. Don't fall for the propaganda about needing to make sure "our community" gets its share of the stolen loot. Tell them you don't want their handouts and giveaways! Think of it as practice for when things start really hitting the fan and people en masse start refusing to pay taxes, or refusing to fill out paperwork to own or carry a gun, etc.
I am also wondering why xtians need to be singled out amongst "all good patriots".
For someone who wasn't a "gifted" writer, she certainly had an impact on many people.
Perhaps we need to rethink the criteria we use when we call someone gifted.
Fiddle with your W-4 form and claim a large number of exemptions (I used 9 with only my wife and me). Completely legally you will always owe the same amount of taxes, but with many exemptions on the W-4, you can delay withholding payments until April 15 of the next year…the point is to pay the taxes as slowly as possible and starve the beast.
Yes, and I am on the unmentionable side of the split (I've been banned from Hot Air and a few other sites for talking about the possibility of a second Civil War).
There are two things that keep me going in the face of this mystic's world:
They are out of money, so the madness will stop abruptly (whatever form that takes).
Altlas Shrugged is being consumed by the masses (some good must come from that).
Sad…
I'm not doggin' out the ol' girl. Still, I have a respect for excellence in writing.
You're right that she had an impact on many people. I wouldn't change one thing about her, even if I could. I'll pass on rethinking the criteria.
We are Devo!
SO right! Except the current leadership has done nothing to earn it's position through excellence!
It's sole qualifying merits are it's ability to lie and deceive!
To obama, YOU LIE!
Darn glad I found some kindred spirits on this site. America still has a chance!
If you haven't visited them, the Center for the American Idea is a group that is busy educating teachers about the history and principles of America's founding in light of all of Western Civ. http://www.americanidea.org/americanidea.org/Home... Great group of folks making a difference.
I think the answer to your first question has been answered, the political middle has deserted Obama. The people that support our current leadership are irrelevant since without moderates they don't have a majority. No point in educating people that are so far gone. Just respect their differences and remember their true colors the next time they talk about tolerance.
Your second question, regrettably, is still open. Although I think Sarah Palin will generate a lot of turnout for the lucky congressmen and Senators that she campaigns for.
I made my decision November 4th of last year.
I'm not forgoing purchases, I'm actually increasing them for my business. My goal is to eventually be below the poverty line every year Obama is in office and the looters (of either party) control the congress. The less money I have to give up to the feds and my state, the happier I'll be. I've managed to knock my "income" down 50K this year. I will not be accepting any large contracts and I won't be doing any additional hiring.
Read a book called A Distant Crossing if you want to understand what's happening today. Fiction turned to reality. Written 15 years ago, it is uncanny how we are living this story.
best post i have seen yet by new election time there will be so many freeloaders voting that voting its self will be mostly useless
The fair tax is not the way to go. Various studies have shown that it will result in higher consumer prices. The only way it would be a good move is IF it is accompanied by a repeal of the 16th Amendment.
Google it or call Jason Lewis at ktlkfm.com; he has on many occasions given detailed explanations of why it is a bad idea.
If I could be allowed to expand upon my previous comments about the GOP repealing various gov't agencies, I think that the most important place to start is to eliminate the dep't of education, including all government funding of all education. While the Right has been focused on economic matters, the left has infiltrated education (can anyone say Bill Ayers….?) and dumbed down society to the point where children are being indoctrinated about dying polar bears as well as knowing much about Heather Has Two Daddies but nothing about Ayn Rand.
It is these brain dead children who proceed through the education system and into government or NGOs and the UN and the environmental movement.
I have been calling and emailing my local school board and minister of education in order to get them to remove all references to man made climate change from the curriculum. The local school board is the closest level of government, so get to know your trustees and innundate them with your concerns that children are being indoctrinated, not educated.
I love it when an idiot such as yourself posts a comment about something you apparently only skimmed and then proceeds to screw up immediately. The sign reads "Where is John Galt?" not "John Gulch". Clearly this well educated activist wishes someone like her fictional hero will appear. Is that so complicated that you didn't get it?
Rambled on and on? Apparently your brain was incapable of anything more than processing the fact that there were words on the pages. Didn't you even sense that this story was about the consequences of two competing political philosophies? The heroic characters in the story EARNED their positions by their own efforts and ideas. I think you call her a "hack writer" because you are a cool-aid drinking communist too lazy to work for your own betterment.
Don't worry though, a just society like that will never happen. By definition, half of all people have below average intelligence. It's what keeps the Demonrat party in business.
Rand's problem was with organized religion. I believe in a Creator but share her view that "faith" is a poor substitute for reason when dealing with the world of objective reality that we live in. The leaders of any organized religion espouse a set of values allegedly revealed to them by a god nobody can see or otherwise objectively sense. Does this mean God doesn't exist? No. I simply refuse to submit to someone's view of morality, virtue and values when I am quite capable deciding on them myself. Read that official position the Vatican holds about MARITAL SEX and get back to me. Rand's philosophy and rules in a nutshell: Live in pursuit of your own rational self interest (happiness); initiation of force or fraud deprives others of their INDIVIDUAL rights and is illegal. So… Live a happy, productive life and do not harm your fellow human beings. Hmm? Where have I heard that before? Oh, the golden rule… do unto others as you would have them do unto you. The ONE commandment(?) of Jesus Christ? Maybe not so barbaric after all.
Amen!!! The difference between a politician and a mugger is the mugger doesn't expect you to thank him for robbing you.
I, like you, believe it is more than just a possibility.
Considering that liberals have no morals, and will rationalize any behavior on what they think (or imagine) that their opponents would do, and considering that conservatives will continue to stand in their way, they will be left, in the end, with no alternative but to use force against conservatives.
The administration will not be denied what it desires.
ROTFLOL
Actually she did 'go Galt'. She refused to play by the loser rules the libtards were using to destroy the state and its government.
.
the post was supposed to be in reply to the last post on page one about Sarah going "galt".
Well then, what are you worried about, oh "splendid one" ? ROFL
Was she also right in her belief that you can't be friends with people who disagree with you on some philosophical point?
I think you've already answered that question for yourself.
I can't answer without researching the validity of your assertion. On the face of it, assuming there's no more to it than you say, it sounds as if she might be wrong.
On the other hand, I can think of philosophical points that are too important to me, points that would not allow me to have friendship with a person who held them. It sorta sounds like a vague question that I would never be able to definitively answer.
Lansing,
"Making decisions without reading a bill, er – my apologies, book…" was a very good dig at the libs. Thanks!
[...] Big Government talks about the book and the current mess our country is in: John Galt leads a revolt by the productive class and outlines Rand’s philosophy in his 60-page radio address. Here, he explains how human beings—alone among life forms—can choose to be mindless: [...]
We don't want your stinkin' Dems!
Agreed! The "themselves" bit makes my nerves jangle every time I hear it.
What is so wrong about "embracing a more sober lifestyle"?
You go Mr. Freeman!!
Thank you for realizing the essential moral point of Atlas Shrugged: The my life belongs to me — and the good is to live it!!
Sweep aside the mystics and let them perish in and of their own mindlessness!
It is interesting how many would replace collectivist socialists with collectivist preachers
Demand your own special master, Christians!
Well, some 51-52% of Americans chose The One. I would personally say you made the bed, sleep in it but you are messing with my life and my country's banks were the only ones that didn't dive into the buying mortgages from NINJAs scheme/scam
Great post, Mr. Freeman.
Ayn Rand is the thinker that the Left most fears precisely because she exposed liberalism for what it is. You do a great job of showing some of the ways in which she did that.
[...] at BIGGovernment, some Lessons From John Galt An epic demonstration of the inverted morality that Rand described was on display in Copenhagen [...]
It is important to note that among the most important things George Washington did is refuse to be president a third term. For a normal human, clinging to government office, despite the ability to govern, despite any obstacle is madness, not virtue. Nixon did not fight the 1960 election (where he got a majority of popular vote despite massive vote fraud in Chicago and west Texas) and resigned from the presidency when he could not govern. FDR's third term, Gore's lawsuit, those nakedly in pursuit of power for its own sake are truely shameful.
I thank God for the Internet. Where, oh where, would we be without it? I would be handcuffed to a bedpost somewhere, mouthing Om, Om Om….
Must read: " The Closing of The American mind by Professor Allen Bloom. He foresaw, as Rand did, the pretty pass we have come to today. Unutterably depressing, but equally true. Read it, read it, read it.
Ok, we'll throw in a bag of pucks with them. Final offer.
STARVE THE MALIGNANCY
If there is an overwhelming point to come from Ayn Rand’s “ATLAS SHRUGGED” it is to stop supporting our own demise. Just like all those in Galt’s Gulch, it is time to remove from the District of Iniquity (DC) what it requires to both survive and proliferate. As long as we Americans support it, irrespective of which party rules, it will continue to bring about our destruction. Anyone who thinks that they can outwit the looters or escape our collective end does nothing more than delay the inevitable; the downfall of this nation.
When the INDIVIDUAL stands up and claims what is rightfully his, then and only then will change take place. Paying taxes with no expectation of anything in return or accountability is insanity. Paying deference to the ever escalating litany of legislation does nothing more than make oppression lawful. Paying the slightest mind to what comes out of DC or its puppets’ mouths does nothing more than give voice to the tyrants.
Brian Kilcullen
Enemies in War,
And a flat tax will result in lower incomes. There's no such thing as a tax that isn't a drag on people's wealth in one way or another.
Liberals call Ayn Rand a genius? What planet do you live on?
I agree, he has continued all of Bush's foreign policies and extended Bush's bailout of the banks.
Buy a gun and make friends with the Amish people.
I believe that along with we the people "starving the beast", there are 2 events that will stop DC pretty soon: when the dollar bubble bursts and when the government debt balloon bursts. Then it will be Katie bar the door for everyone.
I concure.
Thanks! Will do. I also give to Cato Institute , which is lebertarian think tbnk and policy center. check them out.
Wow. Perfect!
You are so right. I have been a Rand fan for decades and recently reread 1984. The parallels in 1984 to today are absolutely scary. But what, what can be done? I see so many of a similar mind but cannnot get a roadmap to action.
Long long ago in a country not too far from here, there was a constitutional republic. Not anymore, not for a long time. Where have you been? We could not keep it. "All democracies fail". Thus Amerika will fail. Too bad we couldn't keep the republic.
On January 20, 2010, Patriots across the country will be going "off the grid" for a day, refusing to participate in any economic activity – staying home from work, making no purchases etc. (Note the irony of the date… the one year anniversary of Obama's Inauguration!)
John Galt IS alive and well!!
http://www.resistnet.com/profiles/blogs/national-...
Learn more about the 1/20/10 strike! GO GALT!
As generous as your final offer is, I'm afraid I must still decline.
: )
A flat tax, a "fair" tax, any tax on persons at all, is still a violation of the US Constitution, which forbade government to impose a capitation or other direct tax on persons.
When we reach the day, when we have a government limited to the protection of individual rights, why not adopt Ayn Rand's method of "government financing in a free society", instead of any forcible taxation of any kind.
If the purpose of government is to protect your rights, your freely chosen actions, against anyone's use of physical force against you, what in Earth are we doing letting our government finance itself by means of forcible taxation? A violation of its purpose, of its Consittutional powers, of morality.
I agree with your proposed plan. I have already decided and stated that I will not participate in Comrade Obama's socialist healthcare system and I will not pay their equally unconstitutional fine for not getting health insurance. If we all did this, even if we are just half the population, we will crush this redistributionist health care plan before it can get started because our half of the population is the productive tax paying half of the population. We have the power to stop the redistribution of our hard earned wealth and force the welfare left to start paying their own bills.
My guess is Texas will be first. I've been trying to sell my house in the Socialist Republic of Washington for over a year now for the purpose of being on the right side of the battle lines when/if a revolution or state secession happens. I figure Oklahoma will secede or fight on behalf of the real US vs Obama's USSA so that is my target state if I can ever get my house to sell.
I hear liberals taste kind of gamey and if you get a hippie they stink and make you high so I'm not sure if any recipe could make them any better…..or did you mean invite them over as guests? ;o)
Nothing if you choose to do it rather than forcing it on people who don't, the problem is the left wants to legislate and sue us back to the stone age and control us. No thanks!
"Now abortion is slowly creeping into our lives as an accepted norm. Not widely, but it has begun."
What? "Not widely?" Newsflash: one in three American women has an abortion.
It must be hard to spout such moralistic nonsense with your head stuck into the sand that way.
Great article and so true.
rstern said "The right thinks. The left feels and what it feels is mostly hate with a healthy addition of fear, envy and let's not forget cowardice." Do not kid yourself about the "right wing" in this country, they have been the ones that given their sanction to this evil, and in doing so became evil themselves. I am saying to please check your premises: the level of our success will depend on some thoughtful re-education. A is A
Brilliant article! Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged is the most magnificent book I have ever read, and our reality today is resembling that beautiful novel more and more as the days go by. At the end of the day, it's the men of the mind Mr. Obama is destroying.
Human,
Please keep in mind that the literary critics , who are largely responsible for "reputations" are overwelhmingly leftist (much like Hollywood critics) and their polical views will most definately taint their critiques.
Thanks for replying, Shrink the State. (That's a very good description of what we're trying to do: Shrink the State!).
My views on her writing arise purely from my own instincts. In the world of review and critique, however, I have little experience. I first read Ayn Rand a lonnnnggggg time ago, and thought, even then, that her writing skills were lacking. Much later, I read others' (probably leftists') critiques of her writing which happened to agree with mine.
I DON'T CARE HOW WELL OR POORLY SHE WRITES. The things she has to say are terribly, terribly important. Furthermore, she learned them NOT from the theoretical, but from the actual. She had personal experience with the depravities of socialism and communism. That gives her a credibility that no amount of writing skill can confer. I just love the woman. I know, I know, she could be pretty prickly, verging on being a bee-otch (lol), but i don't give a rat's ass. I love her.
Don't need to. I live in Oklahoma!
Best article I've ever read on this site — thank you!
I'm with you. First thing to do is get out of this "purple" state, North Carolina. Then I need to figure out which state will secede and get there.
Yeah, you're clearly the smart one. The word "Where" is underlined twice, indicating emphasis, which means the holder of the sign is calling attention to his paraphrasing of the actual quote. You may interpret the sign to mean that as the holder knows WHO is John Gault (or what John Gault) represents, the sign holder is searching for a person who embodies the qualtities of John Gault.
You either don't understand what I wrote or you did understand it and chose to obfuscate to advance your liberal agenda. You are either too stupid or dishonest to be trusted.
If Ayn Rand was a hack writer you have a very long way to go before you are even a hack commenter.
Yes, speaking of morons Galt's Gulch is a plot of landed owned by John GALT where people unlike yourself are permitted to stay and work not for the government but for their own survival and happiness. And the person holding the sign is implying that John Galt exists and it is merely a question of where he is. I'm afraid reading the back of the book doesn't qualify you to comment intelligently on the book let alone take a firm stance and criticize. Also, the original quote is "Who is John Galt?" not "Who is John Gulch," I hope you don't normal end questions with commas instead of question marks. It seems inside of your head there is a collective brain. Since you clearly can't be bothered to read Ayn Rand's work I'll simply end with the quote.
"The mind is an attribute of the individual. There is no such thing as a collective brain."
For one, there usually are a few men who are better than most. But, more importantly, the point is that "we" should "give" these great innovators and creators the freedom to do what they please with their own creations. In fact, this is something which every man should have: a right to his own life and work.
And the "Where is John Galt [G-A-L-T]" signs are intended to make a point, hence the underlined "Where". The point being, "We all know who John Galt is, but he sure isn't anwhere to be found."
"Most of us who love Ayn Rand also recognize that she was not a gifted writer. "
Funny how the one person who would disagree with you most about Ayn Rand's writing is Ayn Rand herself.
She was a titan of literature, just as much as she was a titan of philosophy. Educate yourself about literature before ranting about something based off of your "instincts."
The whole "I'll pass on rethinking the criteria." statement makes me think you're just trolling though. If not, you're a pretty big hyopcrite to say you love Ayn Rand, and then follow it up with absolutely no thought or rational evaluation regarding what was most important to her.
You reveal yourself as a fool, with no comity, no ability for the give and take of discussion.
She was no titan of literature. She was a titan of political thought, a strong, well-founded body of political thought to which I subscribe. I love the woman. There are vignettes from her life that any truth-seeker would find endearing and humbling.
That said, her writing was less than strong. She was best at soliloquy, but some of her dialogue was as unforced and artifice-free (not a good thing, though it might seem that way to you) as you might find in a Soviet-inspired novel about a man, a woman and their tractor, all employed for the good of the state.
It is universally recognized that Ayn Rand was not a great writer. Why do you attack and call me a troll? You wouldn't say that to my face. No, let me rephrase. You would only say that once to my face.
People, remember all of this in November when we get our chance to clean up this mess. Do everything you can to work against the looters' agenda and encourage others to do the same. God forbid we don't overturn their majority come November. The minds in Atlas Shrugged went off and started their own community but we don't have that fantastical option. We've instead got to work for the America we believe in and raise the bar. No more community activists, no more amateurs or closeted commies. No more tax and spend, gov't bailouts or takeovers! Stand up with the rest of us and keep the pressure up against this Left, then run them out of office in Nov.
I think such an approach only plays into the hands of the looters. I bet a strike such as Galt's would be most effective. Take away the most brilliant industrial leaders and watch the rest go up in smoke… paving the way for a brighter future.
And your time is running out.
You have to boil the hippies and add lots of salt….everyone else should be roasted over an open flame {with extra brimstone}…
What makes Atlas Shrugged the most important polemical novel ever written, and the most timely thing people in the era of the Obama administration could possibly read, is the fact that Ayn Rand raises the most fundamental of socioeconomic questions: What is the nature of human responisiblity? How shall the means of life be apportioned– through work and industry and honest effort, or through governmental looting and parasitism that signals an attitude that rewards indolence and stupidity more readily than it rewards intelligence and ambition? What kind of world are we going to have? What is the nature of real wealth? Hank Rearden’s succinct answer: wealth has to be created, and created by functioning human minds.
The reason why Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged is the most important polemical novel ever written– one that desperately needs to be widely read in an era of the insane excesses and wrong-headedness of the Obama administration– is that it raises the most fundamental of socioeconomic questions: What is the nature of human responsiibility? How shall the means of life be had, by work and intelligence and industry, or by indolence and stupidity and laziness? What sort of world do we want to have– a community of honest and industrious and productive people, or a system of hosts and parasites? It's good to see how the sales of Atlas Shrugged have spiked since the 2008 elections. People are figuring it out!
If you think there is any difference in the goals of the democrats or the republicans, you miss the point of Atlas Shrugged. Both parties want to tell us what to do and to spend our money on their projects. The dems want collectivism, sacrifice, and charity and the repubs want facism, war, and autocratic rule. The repubs spent a trillion dollars on a war against a country that had done nothing to the US and the dems want to spend a trillion on health care for people out of charity. No difference in result, just a different rationale to get you there. Watch out for articles like this that use works like this to support their "party". Perfect double speak.
Simple truths that the Left Wing refuses to Accept!
You cannot legislate the poor into riches by legislating the wealthy into poverty. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anyone anything that the government does not first take from someone else.
When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend is about the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it."
Politicians of either party really understands what is happening in American!
For years we have watched our jobs being outsourced & in-sourced, aided and abide by the ruling Political elite!
On the low end Politicians have allowed the largest invasion of any Nation, at any time, by any means, as millions of Uneducated, Illegal Aliens pour across our borders in direct volition of our Constitution Article IV Section IV against invasion, the Rule of Law & their Oath of office.
The Democrat support the massive invasion because a large Uneducated, Prolific breeding, dependent welfare class translates into Democrat votes!
The Republicans because their paymaster in the Chamber of Commerce & Business love slave labor with the benefits like Medical, Schooling, Welfare & Incarceration, Section 8 housing etc. are passed on to the tax payers!
On the high end H1b program to take the engineering, software jobs etc. at low wages to increase business profits & the insane salaries & bonuses of the CEO,s & their cronies etc.
After years of seeing their jobs disappear & standard of living deteriorate people are frustrated & angry that no one in Washington really cares about middle class tax paying , law abiding Americans or the future of this Nation!
Obama promised Hope & Change so the voters kicked out a Elitist, Arrogant, Spendthrift Republican party that was wading in the swamp of corruption!
Now after one year of Democrat rule and total control most are realizing Obama sold them a bill of goods and the Democrats are even more Elitist, Arrogant, Big spending and the swamp of corruption & debt has now turned into a sea of debt & corruption with Acorn , Unions, Seiu, Wall street , Big banks & the tax funded Racist hate organization La Raza!
Both parties when they get total control & power get more corrupt, arrogant & worse than the British & King George that resulted in the American revolution and the shot heard around the world!
Now the good people of Mass. have fired another shot. If the Politicians of both parties still refuse to change and keep thinking they are Kings & we are their Serfs & they & the special interest they serve, know what is best, the next shots they hear may not be as peaceful.
It is way pass time the Politicians realize they are the servants & not our rulers and they exist to serve the American citizens & this Nation, not the special interest, not Mexico, not Latin American and every country in the world while ignoring and punishing Citizens by taxes, jobs and debt to support the rest of the world!
[...] [...]
[...] [...]
[...] [...]
[...] [...]
5 star article brilliant. I am not used to blogging and you used a langauge I could comprehend
As far as going Galt, I'd like to explain how I've done it. I was a chef. Worked hard but became sick and tired of watching my earnings being pumped into third world countries (looters). All the while, we're cutting funding for our police (just laid off 155), schools are loosing funding. We can't even light up I-44 at night!
I decided to be self employed. I became a door-to-door salesman. I work with products that seven out of ten people want in my state. In the year or so I've done it, my earnings literally quadrupled. I now enjoy the lifestyle I deserve while keeping my earnings in my own pockets. Objectivist thinking literally pulled me out of the ghetto and dumped me lakeside. That was the first year. Can't wait to see what's coming.
As far as who can lead us, who is willing to risk being shot trying to free the producing members of this country?