Stop Playing Politics, Start Focusing on the Economy
by David BossieOn July 27, 2010 the Senate failed to advance the Democracy is Strengthened by Casting Light on Spending in Elections Act (“DISCLOSE Act”). The leaders of the Democratic Party including Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senator Chuck Schumer, and President Barack Obama crafted the legislation to silence speakers whose rights were restored by the Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. FEC.
While Congressional leaders spent six months reacting to the Citizens United decision our economy continued to teeter on the brink. The liberal elites focused their energies on the DISCLOSE Act rather than focusing on meaningful fiscal policy to help strengthen our economy.
Reid and Schumer had planned to pass the DISCLOSE Act by the Fourth of July so that they could regulate and silence political speakers in the November elections. Once this was no longer a viable option, I assumed they would return to the business of promoting economic growth, saving jobs, and preventing massive tax increases from stifling our economy.
Unfortunately they haven’t gotten the message. Instead of addressing the issues most concerning the American public Senator Schumer has vowed to “go back at this bill again and again and again until we pass it.” Senator Schumer isn’t the only one still fixated on Citizens United.
Having chastised the Supreme Court during the State of the Union for their decision, as well as praising Elena Kagan for her work arguing Citizens United, President Obama has committed himself to the fight against free speech. Just this week, President Obama again sought to demagogue the issue during a fundraising event:
“And part of what’s happened in this landscape is the Supreme Court — those of you who don’t think the Supreme Court matters, their ruling in Citizens United, which said that corporations, including potentially foreign corporations, can go ahead and spend unlimited amounts without disclosing who they are during election season — means that you’re going to have a whole bunch of organizations like Americans for Prosperity — (laughter) — spending millions of dollars trying to roll back reforms that we’ve initiated. And you won’t even know who they are, because right now the law says they don’t have to disclose who they are.”
President Obama’s recent rhetoric is more calculated than that used in the State of the Union address. His allegations that “the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests – including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections” have in large part been refuted as evidenced by his own remarks.
In reality the DISCLOSE Act will silence political speech by imposing a burdensome new reporting regime as well as raising the costs of political speech through expanded disclaimer requirements. Though it will chill speech President Obama continues to defend the legislation as “the least we can do is, on behalf of our democracy.”
Instead of trying to silence political speech Congress and the President should focus on the economy. This is a message that should resonate with Harry Reid. After all, since Harry Reid became Senate Majority Leader unemployment in Nevada has more than tripled, going from 4.4% to 14.2%. Rather than fret over how the American public may exercise their right to political speech during this election cycle, it’s time our elected representatives focus on the real issues.
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
76 Comments
See with the left free speech is only free if they agree with it…The left whines and cries and throws fits like a bunch of little kids..But when they don't agree with something then free speech,riots,burning cars…anything goes
I disagree David! We don’t need these Keynesian nitwits focusing on the economy, and destroy what’s left of it.
How to understand what a Liberal-sponsored 2000 page bill does, without consulting lawyers:
1). Read the name of the bill
2). Whatever the name of the bill says it does – the opposite is true.
Let's send them all on a 10 year vacation to france.
The bill would be cheaper, and besides……..they like it over there……
This disclose Act like the Employee free choice act are mis-named bills and actually do the opposite. Under the disclose act the UNIONS will continue to have free reign to BUY our representatives without DISCLOSING. The fact that PUBLIC EMPLOYEE UNIONS can contribute to political campaigns is perhaps the greatest travesty to the whole concept of "FAIR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING". There can be no good faith negotiations when the employees own management. We the tax payers are the ones who should be approving all pay and benefits fo federal employees, since it is we who have to pay them.
I'm afraid these guys have "focused" on the economy too much, albeit the wrong kind of focus. Main Street businesses should be allowed to conduct business without political-class empowering regulations. Our leaders should provide incentives for growth with a clear and concise policy free of over-taxation coupled with a laissez-faire approach for small business (the real engine of growth for jobs in America). It's really so simple even a Keynesian could do it.
"….Though it will chill speech President Obama continues to defend the legislation as “the least we can do is, on behalf of our democracy.” "
Our own PRESIDENT doesn't even know we're a republic.
What mail order service did he get his 'constitutional law' degree from………….?
It wasn't a mail order service, it was a gumball machine.
It was some outfit in Kenya.
great point there SH,….
at this point the less they address economic issues,……
the less we will have have to repeal.
Obama an his crew has offended also everyone in the US, i cant understand how is ratings aren't even lower!
While it would be nice, playing politics will never start. Its been going on since FDR. For one, the left is loaded with economic illiterates-who seriuosly considers Paul Krugman an economist? Second of all, they than cant buy votes-no black "preachers" to buy off every 4 years. No homosexual groups to give money to to promote there agenda. No LaRAza or CAIR to suck up to. So, while its a great thought, it will not happen as long as the party of Marx and Lenin occupies the seats of power.
Great thinking! Maybe even permanent vacation (banishment), as they board the plane, remove their passports, and remind them not to let the door bump them on the ass on the way out.
What do you mean….. this is obama's plan
1) get elected through deception and saying absolutely NOTHING
2) take over large portions of our free market (auto, banking, student loans, health)
3) ruin the economy, so more people become dependent upon government
4) ??????
Amen Ralph!
This legislative attempt makes perfect sense from the Obamaist point of view,…….
Maintain the transformation of the United States,………
by minimizing and eliminating the ability to refute it.
Sorta like Jesse the jackass SR-his website says he "attended" Chicago Theological Seminary-it says nothing about whether he graduated. Jackass "degree" is an honorary one from Hahvard Theo Seminary in 1977(figures) , but yet the media clowns were calling him "rev" long before that occured. The parallels are similair.
Bathroom wall at the bus station!
This is an important building block to further their goals of centralizing govt. Of course they don't want to let it go..
Yeh.,..
41% my ass. 41% of who? The UN? No WAY he's got almost half the country in the bag.
I want to see that poll, the democraphics of WHO WAS ASKED, THE QUESTION THEY WERE ASKED, AND THE CHOICES THEY WERE GIVEN AS ANSWERS.
The ability to control the message is 'Priority One' for liberal progressives. If you can control the message that everyone hears then nothing else matters and you can do whatever it is you want. Hence the Fairness Doctrin, the Disclose Act, and even Political Correctness -all geared to limiting, manipulating, twisting and contorting the message.
Hell with the economy – if you control the mesage you can tell everyone the economy is great and nobody can argue with you.
Recent polls state only 21% of Americans are liberal, of that ony 5-6% consider themselves very liberal – Bill Ayres, Anita Dunn… you know…the far wacked out left. Unfortunatly this tiny percentage also controls a vast portion of the MSM You're not arguing with a lot of people here, you're just arguing with a small amount of people that control a disproportionate amount of the message so it 'FEELS' like you're in the minority – that's the power of controling the message
Never forget the difference between a conservative and a progressive – a conservative will argue with you a progressive just wants to shut you up.
From last nights Obama mosque thread:
"President Barack Obama on Friday forcefully endorsed building a mosque near ground zero, saying the country’s founding principles demanded no less."
Here is my point.
If he wants to wrap himself in the Constitution, and talk about "founding principles" (you'll notice he didn't mention "Founding Fathers"), then why doesn't Obama follow the Constitution ALL THE TIME?
Obama is a threat to America.
YES………matter of fact. That's EXACTLY the plan.
AND IT HAS THE FULL COMPLICITY OF THE DEM CONTROLLED CONGRESS THAT HAS ALL BUT ABDICATED IT'S ROLE IN GOV'T IN FAVOR OF GOVERNANCE BY EO AND FED AGENCY REGULATION.
Obama doesn't want the conservatives and Republicans to be able to use money from corporations… hmmm… Yet he got the biggest contribution from a foreign corporation "BP" which is also the evil oil company he is preaching about. Can anyone still take this administration even halfway serious?
I guess I fall into the 'GRIDLOCK' crowd. All this legislation the Congress has passed will be a night-
mare in the repealing phase. I look for them to fight hard and fight dirty to hold the ground they have
gained thus far.
As far as I can tell, like a virus they have gone dormant several times over the last hundred years,
but when conditions are ripe, like spores they roar back to life and begin their destruction again.
FoP
.
Barry’s a Constitutionalist when it behooves him, other wise it’s rough toilet paper.
They want full disclosure of contribution sources, but they are funded by a web of George Soros and Tides Foundation bogus organizations.
.
We do not have statesmen in government. We don't even really have a government anymore.
What we do have is a protection racket, from top to bottom. Throw 'em ALL out.
.
Exactly. They always say the opposite.
A few major Liberal keywords to watch for in the titles are "fairness" which means "unfair", "tax cut" which means "ratchet up the taxes" and the current favorite "stimulus" which means "hog heaven spending spree".
Except for Scott Rasmussen and Frank Luntz, I don't know of any other firms that are doing truly 'random' polling. Most of the polling firms operate with solicited 'sign up lists' and they tend to poll the same people over and over again. Rasmussen's polls consistently show varying views because his polling method is automated and the questions asked never vary. Most polling firms use 'live' questioners and therefore the questions can be skewed by the individuals conducting the poll. Frank Luntz uses 'dynamic response' methods that get at the 'feelings of the moment' in reaction to questions or happenings and therefore an actual sample of the emotional state of the person being polled. It seems that most of the polling firms have a definite agenda designed to skew numbers and manipulate the outcomes through manipulation of the the emotions of individual participants.
As Frank Luntz always says, "pollsters are word doctors and they know that even a minor inflection or verbiage variance in a question can completely skew a polling sample"…
I fully expect polling shenanigans to get going in earnest in the next couple of weeks.
Great observation, CL, on obama's choice words. He really tells us what he's truly thinking. Everything is calculated.
WoW Stomp, I've been wondering who and where those folks in the 41% are also.
We need to interview them. Where the HELL is Frank Luntz when we need him?
Hook those suckers up to the 'dial-o-meter' ask some probing questions. We need
to find that 'demographic' and examine them like laboratory monkeys.
FoP
.
Led by the government unions. They all get what they want from the politician's they keep voting in. Let's start by
Dissolving the unions and their collective bargaining policies–local, state and federal.
Yep, they all have to go!
History shows us that liberal-progressives have to focus on subjective issues in order to sustain power – that's why politics is always the preferred venue of competition as their so-called "economic policies" really aren't policies.
An "economic policy" is a program of means and methods by which a unit of government intends to undertake the management of the private-sector economy for the benefit of the individuals, households and businesses that depend upon it.
Here's a shocker: there is no underlying set of means and methods by which liberal-progressives seek to meet this mandate of governance.
The reality of the liberal-progressive economic approach is to use the color of government to confiscate as much wealth from the private-sector economy as the people will let them get away with because this is how they create wealth for their own use. The action is to appropriate funds for some supposed "helpful" purpose (like welfare or housing or health care) and to allow a portion of the funds to actually trickle through to the people being helped, but to funnel the majority of the funds through to their fellow liberal-progressives in government. In this way, they very much believe in trickle-down economics. They count upon this being sustainable policy but it is grossly inefficient and it fails because it does not allow the private-sector economy to work in accordance with the critical free-market principle of Rational Choice Theory. This is why every single liberal government always fails.
Rational Choice Theory is known by many names and everyone should be well acquainted with it. In nature it is known as "survival of the fittest" or "dog eat dog". We call it "The Pleasure Principle" and apply to mean all human-beings move towards that which produces pleasure for them and away from that which is painful. Rational Choice Theory means that you will always look after your own self-interests first – your own survival. When we apply Rational Choice Theory to economics it means that all market participants can be expected to act in a consistent (rational) manner to further their own future economic fortunes. This applies to individuals, businesses and units of government.
The proven failure of the liberal-progressive corruption is that wise men of government and policy (liberals) can better allocate the resources of the economy than can be achieved by all the participants in the economy acting in their own self-interest to allocate capital where it will earn the greatest return for the least risk and providing their labor where the greatest near-term and long-term wages would be realized. This cannot work and it injects a "bias" into the plans of the liberal-progressive that always results in failure.
This is why liberals have to play politics and don't want to discuss economics. When they discuss economics they are inevitably forced to have their programs measured using objective measurements of jobs created, increases in GDP and per capita personal income – these are all measurements they must avoid because their programs do not add to our wealth; their programs only result in a twisted "Robin Hood" scenario where liberal-progressives steal from everyone else until everyone else is poor. This is what happened in Germany with Hitler, Russia with the communists, China, North Korea, Cuba, Angola and Vietnam. It never works and that's why we are not likely to have this discussion.
Our Founding Fathers said this: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."…
Obama, as president has NO RIGHT to endorse ANY religion! What he is doing is giving Islam a foothold in our government and making false statements about " Islam has been in the American society for a very long time"…until they attacked the United States, nothing was mentioned about them! They have NO RIGHT to expect America to go along with this trophy monster they want to build…hopefully it will come down before it's built!
India, for thousands of years, has been a Hindu nation…until the muslims conquered them and FORCED Islam on them…ask any person from India, here in the U.S. why they are here…We cannot allow them to force this horrific cult on the American people! We just may have to fight them here in America, before it's over!
I believe they are trying to force our hand, by building this mosque, so they can say "see we tried to do it peacefully" before we have to fight them in the streets!
Joan, I'm just now beginning to agree with the "Throw 'em ALL out" mantra being chanted here and
elsewhere for some months. I was worried we would flounder without the advice and counsel of
a few sage Senators and Representatives. Slowly that 'fear' has dissolved and has been replaced
with another fear. The fear that IF we keep any small vestige of the current Regime, including our
current Congress, we will not be able to achieve the desired level of sanitation. We will need copious
quantities of bleach and sunlight to make a dent on this endemic corruption.
.
Excuse me sir….
HE IS FOCUSED on the Economy… You forgot his goal is to destroy it…
He seems to be doing a pretty fine job of it thus far…
Supposedly Harvard or another Marxist public high school that has been grossly mislabeled as an institution of higher learning.
I love arguing this point with retards who continually say OUR country is a democracy. We can only hope and pray that in the 2012 election, we will have a conservative person step forward and call this dip$h!t out on his lack of knowledge concerning our form of government. It would be a sight to see in a fully televised debate. The LS media would probably have a conniption as the dip$h!t in chief stutters and stammers over his words.
Shhhh, I cant say it here, they are watching and listening.
Coming soon to a neighborhood near you if we do not stop them now.
"reforms we have initiated", reforms, or roadblocks? there is no reform in healthcare, no reform in banking, no reform anywhere to be found. but lots more jobs are being crafted for government workers, union government workers. the only economy this guy is helping, it the office supply business, with all the cubicles, desks, chairs, computers, and staplers we will need to outfit all of these new workers.
If your representatives aren't too cowardly to hold public Q&A sessions, keep dogging them on the economy and jobs!
They are trying to shift the debate back to 'evil republicans' and George Bush, the left owns this economy, every business failure and every lost job since January of 2007.
Don't allow them to change the topic!
They are going to start 'screening participants' in Q&As and they will likely start demanding voter registration cards to get into their events to keep conservatives out of the debate.
If your congressman, senator or dog catcher candidates attempt to control the debate by excluding their detractors, make a mockery of their cowardice and force them to address THEIR failure!
Get active now, get in their face and most of all keep up the pressure!
This is why they are not excited about our current economic predicament, the wealth is here,
it is merely owned by the individual, rather than the Fed Gov't.
As we see the Left already has a template in action for the transition away from private owner-
ship of anything, to Gov't control or ownership of everything that produces one thin dime here in
the USA.
Will we wait patiently to see when and how this Regime comes for our most basic need, our food?
Are we so overfed we cannot imagine shortage or rationing? We stood by, mouths agape while
the Fish and Wildlife Service recommended the decimation of a huge percentage of our vegetable
fruit and nut production area in the US.
When will we become sufficiently alarmed to fight back? Do we need to see food-lines to become
alarmed?
WAKE UP AMERICA, WAKE UP !
That's quite easy to answer…. Ever heard of Detroit, LA, NYC, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Houston ? The list of parasitic populations is endless. And lest we forget nearly every college and university campus with their left wing professorial nutcases and the students with mush for brains. THERE ! You have 41% !
No Bama has to mention the Constitution when he can use it to his benefit so he can look like a centrist. That way he can fool the dumb asses again.
Yep. No one is "playing" politics. They are all playing for keeps, however.
So am I.
"Obama, as president has NO RIGHT to endorse ANY religion! "
That is profound.
You understand it; I understand it, as does everyone else here. Everyone but Obama.
you don't get it, the economy is EXACTLY where obama wants it, ready to collapse. like the communist and the nazi's he knows that there can be no revolution until the nation explodes. we are going to wake up and go from the weimar republic to the 3rd reich.
A BBC production of 1984….old and B&W…it is still fun to watch.
It is scary to think that is where we are headed.
http://www.archive.org/details/Meatpies_1984
Obama is an outright bastard. All he and his ilk are concerned with is maintaining power over the people with their ill gotten majority in congress. Every one of them hates the united states and what it stands for and will stop at nothing to bring her down. I cannot believe the democrat voters are so oblivious to what these leftists are doing to our great country. It seems they are too busy with their real lives to stop and look at the bigger picture. They are all too happy drinking the Koolade and mindlessly parroting the talking points to one another with no concern for what the truth is.
You know they won't be setting themselves up for the difficult questions. They learned at least that much from Obama. And when they do have a "public Q & A" such as town hall events they will make sure to have scripted it or to bring their own hecklers to shout down those who would dare ask a question that is relevant.
I expect that we may have to move to the "man on the street method" of getting them to respond, all of them are in their districts now and it's time to storm their ivory tower offices and DEMAND ANSWERS!
The loopy leftists have gotten away with this tactic for 50 years, it's time that we start to employ it.
and Geo Bush came mighty close to "endorsing Islam" in his nervous attempts to dissuade
the American populace from committing mass genocide after 9/11/01. The fact that the
RULING ELITE CLASS thought there was a danger of such a thing happening shows me
just how completely out of touch they actually are with the average Joe. Who convinced
Bush to make those uncomfortable clumsy speeches and statements regarding the 'religion
of pieces', after 9/11, they certainly didn't seem to sprout from his nomal line of reasoning?
Perhaps Rove will sit in for Rush again and I will call in with that question. Karen Hughes
would also be an appropriate person to question on that subject.
.
You have to remember, they used Racial Profiling to qualify him for Harvard.
G. Bush DID do that! And he also sent this muslim Imam to the middle east on our dime!! We NEED a president with the balls to stand up to these terrorists!!!
I always refer to it as the Employee Choice-Free Act. I already have no choice – I have to pay union dues so the union can get their guys elected. When we get a Republican Congress in November, that is one of the first things I want changed. Give employees real choice, real hope, real change.
Obama is THE threat to America. Ruskies, terrorists, and the end of the world in 2012 all pale in comparison to the damage he is causing.
"It's the economy, Stupid!" — James Carville (circa 1992)
"It's the uncertainty, Stupid!" — American business (2010)
He is an empty suit and no more. Mr.President, actions speak louder than words off of a TelePrompTer. History holds all of the answers, if you were truly looking out for US. Why did the 20's roar? Why did the economy of 1965 boom? Why did the 1980's rock? They all have a few things in common. That is because government let the private sector get to work and prosper with less government, and lower taxes. Hmm. As they say on blue collar comedy,"Heres your sign". The left use to refer too Reaganomics as voodoo economics as we are witnessing, we should refer to Obamanomics as doodoo economics. http://www.roadmap.republicans.budget.house.gov/P....
Americans are in denial.
like what is happening will all turn around one of these days,
as if he really does have our country's best interests in mind,
he's trying so hard, maybe he's just misguided…
people need to wise up to the fact that this stuff isn't an accident..
it isn't because obama is inexperienced or confused.
he is following orders. and each one is intentionally destructive.
Americans are so trusting many still attribute his actions to ignorance.
please be honest with yourselves and see this for what it is.
then we can take appropriate action.
The Coward Piven strategy. Going as planned.
If they even bother to put a name on it of course…………
Would you blieve this?
In the early 1970's there was a documentary televised by PBS (Yes, PBS) on the state of the economy in India.
The conclusion was that the Indian economy was over regulated and the redtape and layers of bureaucracy proved to be stifling to any business versus the USA's economy which at the time was more favorable.
Did I say this was on PBS?
I wonder if they'll do a documentary on the USA's oppressive government versus the now vibrant Indian economy.
All these so-called leaders seem to know how to do is make laws on laws to attempt to cover up their flaws…
So they think the country will not break up into at least five parts and they will be left with governing Wash DC only??!
Yeah, I'm waiting for Obama to return the 200+ million he took from BP!
Just wait until you see the stats from the "big lie" called the census!
"An "economic policy" is a program of means and methods by which a unit of government intends to undertake the management of the private-sector economy for the benefit of the individuals, households and businesses that depend upon it. "
What you describe is more like the "government/business cooperation" that is preached by liberals and conservatives afraid to call fascism by its real name. This corporatism is only slightly less destructive than full fledged socialism.
The government should not be in the business of making private economic decisions much less be "managing" the private sector. The strength of the private sector is in the spontaneous order that emerges from individuals pursuing their own aims. Attempts to "manage" that order invariably results in economic decline by crippling individual initiative, the driving force behind economic development.
By accepting the progressives' premise that the government must engage in an "economic policy" you are surrendering to them. There is no instance where an individual decision cannot be "shown" to be harmful to both himself and others given that the criteria is essentially some form of "collective benefit".
If you find a way to produce more goods with fewer employees you contribute to unemployment. If you get fat you harm society by depriving it of food better used to alleviate poverty. If you are ill you harm society by draining resources better employed by the healthy. All of these can be remedied by forcing less productive manufacturing, food rationing and forced "healthy" lifestyles.
The implicit premise of collective benefit denies individualism at its root and will always result in the sacrificing of the few for the benefit of the many. The few that get sacrificed are usually the most productive.
Attempts to justify liberty on other than individualist grounds have always resulted in tyranny. John Stuart Mill attempted to justify liberty on the basis of "the greatest good for the greatest number" and ended his life as a "qualified socialist".
The power of liberty can be seen where government "help" is least present. These areas are dynamic and ever improving like computers, cell phones and PDAs. Organization is spontaneous and remarkably flexible.
By contrast look at any area where the government "helps". That includes everything from public education to the post office to the department of motor vehicles. Everywhere there are imperious employees devoid of ambition and creativity who treat their "customers" like necessary evils.
Look at the most regulated industries like airlines, banks and insurance. The degree of regulation is the degree of dissatisfaction shown by their customers. This is not an accident. State management deprives these businesses of the creativity that other fields have.
The real problem with the progressives is not that "there is no underlying set of means and methods by which liberal-progressives seek to meet this mandate of governance." It is that they, and apparently you also, think that there actually is a mandate of governance and that government can manage things successfully by the use of the law which means the use of force.
The solution to problems is less regulation and that will not occur until people stop thinking in terms of some magic government economic policy and more in terms of individual initiative and spontaneous order.
I couldn't possibly agree more and yet the path involves creating markets, institutions and business organizational principles and systems that are self-regulating and self-sustaining in nature. By their very outcome those we have today require us to ignore this tenet of liberty and I would not have it if it were mine to order. On that level you misunderstand me and my vision.
My vision, my work and my proposals are to end the tyranny of the liberal-progressive movement forever and end the threat of corruption and abuse and fraud with a transparent system that continually forces the government to shrink in size – not by the concurrence of men of good purpose – but by the very design of the system and the operation of its institutions.
In short, you jumped the gun in order to pick a fight only to find you are on the same foxhole with me and facing the same enemy. I would fight this war and you would fight a battle. Perhaps we will go in the same direction for a while.
By the time 2012 gets here, I believe the "end of the world" might be looking pretty good, in comparison to where the world could be by then !
Wow, dumbguy, you are one scary dude, like some horror film. I am peeking through my fingers now. But you are so right. I spent some time in Riyadh, Morocco and Egypt (AF not my choice) I wish more Americans had personal time in other societies. Not "tourism" but living. I was around for a "chop-chop square day." Didn't go. But some crew did, came back vomiting. Mind you these were military. It is so close. I am so scared.
Anybody that thinks the President is going to do the right thing for America evidently hasn't been paying attention to all he has done on purpose to do all the wrong things… Why would he turn around now and start doing things any differently? His plan is not complete yet and who knows how it will end? Too bad we can't depend on the main stream news to do a sufficient job and challenge all that he does…
Cl: Obama is a threat to America.
He actually is and we could get to that "Imp**ch word from his actions but ………
He took an oath of office, swore on a bible (ya for all that's worth to this pres) to uphold the constitution of the U.S. Yet he will not secure the borders risking american lives, I believe he is behind the DOJ discrimination scandal. Surrounding himself with known radicals and lawbreakers, the billion or so lies "all this talk about socialism is simply false" and the deception of his agenda, this to just name a few (because I can't sit here all night and type his socialistic agenda). Any person with a functioning mind could get to "imp**ch". The problem as I see it is because the progressives are on the left AND right and you couldn't get to the 2/3 needed for removal, then we get Biden……………oh dear god. Then Pelosi.
Sad all we have is a vote in November.
What's this about conservatives whining about freedom of religion?
Wouldn't you like to know who the George Soros' shell corporations are funding?
Easy, there dallen. Don't plan on shooting up the Tides Foundation like that other guy.
Lets see the Constitution (something you know little about) guarantees freedom of religion…..Where does it say that health care is a right…
You must be logged in to post a comment.