Rick Tyler: Attacking Mitt Romney From David Axelrod’s Playbook?
by Charles C. JohnsonJoel Pollak, our editor-in-chief, asked Rick Tyler of Winning Our Future– Newt Gingrich’s Super PAC–about why Newt Gingrich and he are attacking Mitt Romney from the Left on his Bain Capital record. Tyler encouraged Romney to hold a press conference and explain some of the lingering questions surrounding his involvement at Bain Capital. Pollak then asked Tyler if Gingrich’s Super PAC would be returning the monies that Bain and its associates had contributed to Gingrich and the PAC.
The anti-Romney film they are discussing was made by Jason Killian Meath, a former associate of Romney’s top strategists, Stuart Stevens and Russ Schriefer and former contributor to Big Government. Adding a twist tot the project, Meath once worked for Mitt Romney during his 2008 bid for the presidency. Jon Hunstman and Rick Perry piled on, while Rick Santorum declined on Sean Hannity.
The New York Times quickly noted Newt Gingrich’s own ties to the leveraged buy out industry whose model Gingrich has attacked. Gingrich once served on the advisory board of Forstmann Little, whose business model was effectively identical to Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital.
Gingrich might want to be wary about casting stones. In his 1994 bid for the U.S. Senate, Romney refused to make an issue of Ted Kennedy’s personal life. His Super PAC, which is officially unaffiliated with his campaign, might feel no such compulsion.
Romney has weathered a campaign that went after his personal life quite easily. In 1994, Ted Kennedy hired a sleazy opposition research firm to look into Mitt Romney’s personal life and found nothing scandalous. Could Newt Gingrich run a similar gauntlet if he were the nominee?
As for political positions that will prove a liability, perhaps Rick Tyler ought to consider his own campaign to increase domestic drilling, “Drill Here, Drill Now, and Pay Less,” which he launched in 2008. ”With any energy there’s risk,” Tyler told the St. Petersburg Times in 2008. “We haven’t had a major spill since 1980.”
We did have a major spill in 2010. The cleanup costs for the Gulf oil spill was over $3 billion and it decimated tourism in the Gulf and would certainly be a political issue in Florida, which is a swing state.
These sorts of games–predicting what the left will or will not attack us on–can be played all day. Why not hit Romney from the right? After, all Bain Capital once received a government bail out. Have a look at this, from the October 25, 1994 edition of The Boston Globe.
Republican Senate nominee Mitt Romney’s rescue of a business consulting firm was achieved in part by convincing the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to forgive roughly $ 10 million of the company’s debts, according to sources close to the deal and federal records obtained by The Boston Globe.
Romney, whose business acumen has been the cornerstone of his campaign, has said saving the Bain & Co. consulting firm from the brink of bankruptcy in 1991 was the accomplishment that most convinced him he had the mettle to be a US senator.
Bain & Co. and the FDIC agreed to the deal after months of intense negotiations. Moreover, bankers say debt forgiveness is relatively routine when a company is at risk of collapse.
But the $ 10 million cost to the FDIC raises the question of whether Romney’s success, as well as the resurrection of Bain & Co., came partially at the expense of the federal agency that protects US bank deposits.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
9 Comments
Makes me wonder about Newt……………………….
I'm no Romney partisan. But these Bain Capital attacks are dumb and counter-productive.
Gingrich took $1.6 million from Freddie Mac. And now the Feds are bailing out Freddie.
And Newt won't give back the Bain contributions to his PAC? I guess hypocrisy is the tribute that vice pays to virtue.
I'll still support either Romney or Gingrich if one of them is the GOP nominee. But this is just a dumb line of attack.
How would Pollak establish that Bain gave to Newt's super-PAC? Maybe they said so, but where's the link? Is this fact, or allegation?
It's actually an incredibly important line of attack because it undermines the only supposed positive about Romney, his ability to garner the elusive "independent and moderate" vote.
"Independents and moderates" are extremely skeptical of Wall Street in today's climate, and Romney's days as a venture capitalist exemplify what many people see as the dark side of Wall Street.
There's nothing illegal or even unethical about what Bain did. But shipping good-paying manufacturing jobs overseas is not exactly a "selling point."
David Axelrod Playbook = Saul Alinsky Playbook
Private equity (PE) is an industry that owes its robust size and strength to the Federal Reserve.
If you look at the deals made by Bain, and pretty much every big PE firm, you'll notice that deals are generally made at one phase of the business cycle (the boom) and tend to collapse during the other phase (the bust). This is because during the boom, thanks to the Federal Reserve, the amount of available credit is far too high. As a result there's a lot of "funny money" floating about. This actually creates two problems. One: there's too much money chasing PE investment (and all investment for that matter; think housing) and as a result companies are targeted for LBOs that really aren't good LBO candidates. But number two is this: because the economy is in a Fed enhanced boom and there's so much available credit, PE firms can take out additional loans to pay for original loans and refinance as needed. That is, until the boom is over. That's when the targeted LBO company collapses under the weight of debt, and the PE firm walks away having already racked up millions in management fees and dividends paid to itself. Oh, and don't forget that if the PE firm gets in a little trouble they can always turn to the government to forgive some debt, as pointed out in the article.
What is it that an investment firm supposed to do? Support workers and business models that are not providing consumers what they are asking for? Would Newt know how to deploy billions of dollars of capital to achieve a profit for investors?
Whether you think Romney is a Big Government Republican or not (and I DO), this tactic of tarring a man for outsources or shutting down unproductive factories is dredging up the old protectionist/mercantilist crap that was refuted by Smith and Recardo 200+ years ago.
"Would Newt know how to deploy billions of dollars of capital to achieve a profit for investors? "
The answer to that is a resounding NO. This is why this hilarious, "captain disingenuous" strikes again!
Folks living in glass houses should not cast stones, for those very stones may come back to shatter one's own residence. BTW, if a 10 million debt had to be negotiated with the FDIC to save Bain & Co, it doesn't speak well of Romney's business sense. Whoops, forgot someone else was stuck with the bill.
There is some truth to the adage that to make money, ensure that it's other peoples' money at risk, not your own. Kinda reminds me of the spendthrift dims when they controlled congress and who still control the senate and administration.
You must be logged in to post a comment.